https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/rugby-in-sch ... perts-say/
Clearly they were never forced to do gymnastics.
Blackmac wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:35 am According to the British Philosophy of Sport Association.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/rugby-in-sch ... perts-say/
Clearly they were never forced to do gymnastics.![]()
Yep, almost as bad. We had to run up the hills behind Dingwall. Usually 2 foot of mud. If you forgot your kit they had a good supply of dirty old used shorts and baffies for you. Being 6"4 and stiff as a brush at 12, gymnastics was definitely worse for me.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:40 amBlackmac wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 10:35 am According to the British Philosophy of Sport Association.
https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/rugby-in-sch ... perts-say/
Clearly they were never forced to do gymnastics.![]()
or cross country running in a North Sea coastal town in January.
They would have imploded about Highland schools in the 70's and 80's where shinty was on the curriculum and rugby was actually considered a soft sport played by posh kids.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:45 am It's certainly not abuse, but I don't think kids should be forced to take part in contact sports
In most state schools it's a complete non-issue anyway as they simply don't offer rugby outside of touch in regular PE lessons.
Same in South Africa. Everyone had to try rugby, until you proved you were shithouse/chickenshit enough & were allowed to play squash or join the marching band.Blackmac wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:50 amThey would have imploded about Highland schools in the 70's and 80's where shinty was on the curriculum and rugby was actually considered a soft sport played by posh kids.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:45 am It's certainly not abuse, but I don't think kids should be forced to take part in contact sports
In most state schools it's a complete non-issue anyway as they simply don't offer rugby outside of touch in regular PE lessons.
The sheer look of terror as kids, who had never played the game, faced up to the rest of us, who had been wielding camans since we were toddlers was definitely child abuse.
It does rather put other sports in the ha'penny place when it comes to the shear damage 9-10 year olds can do to each otherBlackmac wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:50 amThey would have imploded about Highland schools in the 70's and 80's where shinty was on the curriculum and rugby was actually considered a soft sport played by posh kids.sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Feb 02, 2024 11:45 am It's certainly not abuse, but I don't think kids should be forced to take part in contact sports
In most state schools it's a complete non-issue anyway as they simply don't offer rugby outside of touch in regular PE lessons.
The sheer look of terror as kids, who had never played the game, faced up to the rest of us, who had been wielding camans since we were toddlers was definitely child abuse.