Plane over Colorado...

Where goats go to escape
Post Reply
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 2992
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

... made it back safely despite people finding pieces of the engine covering in their yards and this! :shock:




https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/colorado- ... -1.5921973

https://abcnews.go.com/US/plane-debris- ... d=76020616

Image

Image
User avatar
Trapper
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:03 am

User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 9500
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Needs more brown tape.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5054
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

very Donnie Darko
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Biffer
Posts: 7873
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 5942
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

"Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit scrap metal recycling"
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 7379
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
Biffer
Posts: 7873
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
Obviously. I'm not saying it's all fine don't worry about it!
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 9500
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 7379
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....
User avatar
Un Pilier
Posts: 700
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 9:22 am

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm

But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.

26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....
If it moves and it shouldn’t = duct tape
If it doesn’t move and it should = WD40 :geek:
User avatar
Akkerman
Posts: 110
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

Similar incident yesterday in Netherlands, another Boeing

https://www.aviation24.be/airlines/long ... e-injured/
A Boeing 747-400BCF freighter registered VQ-BWT (MSN 24975) flying for Bermuda-based Longtail Aviation took off from runway 21 at Maastricht Aachen Airport this Saturday afternoon at 16:11 (UTC+1). The aeroplane operating flight LGT5504 to New York JFK experienced heavy damage on an engine shortly after take-off. Engine parts (turbine blades) fell in the nearby village of Meerssen resulting in 2 people slightly injured and damage to cars.

According to a spokesman for the South Limburg Safety Region, an explosion has probably occurred in engine number one of the aircraft. Metal parts such as turbine blades have come down around the Limburg town of Meerssen.

Debris hit an elderly woman, who was slightly injured as a result. A child also burned his fingers on a piece of metal.

In Meerssen several houses and cars got damaged by falling debris.

The thirty-year-old plane immediately diverted on three engines to Liège airport, where it landed safely after making a number of laps over the Ardennes to burn fuel and lose weight.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 3830
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 9:24 am Needs more brown tape.
Presumably to disguise the brown trousers?
User avatar
Dan54
Posts: 676
Joined: Sat Sep 05, 2020 3:11 am

Un Pilier wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 5:50 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm

26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....
If it moves and it shouldn’t = duct tape
If it doesn’t move and it should = WD40 :geek:
:lol: Geez mate I obviously need to empty my toolbox and just have to 2 things in.
Biffer
Posts: 7873
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:17 am On the bright side, it shows that these planes can land safely despite a catastrophic engine failure.
But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.
The 26-year-old 777 was powered by two Pratt & Whitney PW4000 engines. Investigators will focus on what caused the accident and will look at whether a fan blade failed.
26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
This is something I'm genuinely concerned about wrt sir travel. Planes are designed to fly constantly, not sit on the ground.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 10463
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

We really should add this to the 737 thread and rename it Official Boeing F**k Up Thread.

At this rate, it'll be longer than the swarm thread on PR.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Biffer wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:39 am
Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm

But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.

26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
This is something I'm genuinely concerned about wrt sir travel. Planes are designed to fly constantly, not sit on the ground.
Other than a brief hiatus this one has been flying pretty much every day through the pandemic
tc27
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Sounds like its more a P&W problem than a Boeing one.

Interestingly today just found out that ETOPs regulations require different technicians to service each engine on twin engine aircraft (for obvious reasons).
tc27
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Holy shit - could have being much much worse.

Image
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2411
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:24 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 1:57 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 12:34 pm

But on the downside; in the event of a disc burst; the cowling, HAS TO CONTAIN THE SHRAPNEL !

If it doesn't; there's a good chance the wing, & fuel tanks can be ruptured.

In this case the engine manufacturer, & not Boeing, has some serious questions to answer.

26 year old plane, parked for a year, maintenance rushed to get it flying again, etc
... and a mechanic who can't find his 3/4" socket .....
It’s buried in the bonnet of an F350 pickup truck 57 miles from the airport.
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

tabascoboy wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 10:19 am "Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit scrap metal recycling"
:clap: :clap:
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 10463
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

tc27 wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:01 pm Sounds like its more a P&W problem than a Boeing one.

Interestingly today just found out that ETOPs regulations require different technicians to service each engine on twin engine aircraft (for obvious reasons).
That's correct. To avoid user error. it's fine in theory but useless mostly in practice because
a) The technicians are likely to have had the same background training and so that lends itself to the same potential deficiencies.
b) Once shortcuts become known in a group (or encouraged/enforced by employers), the best you can expect is for some techies not to compromise their personal standards but
whistle blowing is down towards non existent.

Don't think ETOP applies to military?
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2269
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:22 pm

Don't think ETOP applies to military?
I don;t think it applies to ANY government owned aircraft, military or otherwise
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 7379
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Yikes ! :shock:

Image

a chunk of titanium moving at terminal velocity; I'm surprised it didn't go straight thru the roof
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

fishfoodie wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:53 pm Yikes ! :shock:

Image

a chunk of titanium moving at terminal velocity; I'm surprised it didn't go straight thru the roof
That’ll be a hell of a claim form to fill in.
User avatar
Chrysoprase
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:59 am

GogLais wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:55 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Mon Feb 22, 2021 6:53 pm Yikes ! :shock:

Image

a chunk of titanium moving at terminal velocity; I'm surprised it didn't go straight thru the roof
That’ll be a hell of a claim form to fill in.
They're used to odd claims in the Netherlands. A mate managed to accidentally chuck a snowball through a window that was only open about 6 inches straight into the PC monitor of the householder who was working inside.

All while cycling past with a serious hangover.

We often amused ourselves speculating how the insurance claim was worded.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 2879
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Boeing = bits of engine in neighbour's garden
I drink and I forget things.
Post Reply