Page 4 of 4
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:56 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:50 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:44 pm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:24 pm
Can someone post the picture of the Saffer standing on the guys hand at the ruck please.
Thats why the dust never will settle with kants like you and Biffer. Schoeman is a In Bred per Biffo. A genuine Gauteng Inbred.
No, the dust will never settle because you lot can't help yourselves and there is ALWAYS a much worse example from a Saffer
The post above you call out the precious Irish. Get a vokken grip man.
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:23 pm
Biffer wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 12:51 pm
Seen things like this plenty of times. just a little bit of good natured niggle imo. Same as if there's an opposition boot lying on the ground you chuck it as far away as possible so they've got to go and get it (I was just getting it out of the way ref).
Just typically precious Irish reporting of how they're ever so hard done by.
If they were serious about cheating they wouldn't get themselves into man love frenzies over O'Mahony.
I hadn't read the article before, but that is glorious Irish precious.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 3:16 pm
by Slick
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:56 pm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:50 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:44 pm
Thats why the dust never will settle with kants like you and Biffer. Schoeman is a In Bred per Biffo. A genuine Gauteng Inbred.
No, the dust will never settle because you lot can't help yourselves and there is ALWAYS a much worse example from a Saffer
The post above you call out the precious Irish. Get a vokken grip man.
See above.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 3:26 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 3:16 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:56 pm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:50 pm
No, the dust will never settle because you lot can't help yourselves and there is ALWAYS a much worse example from a Saffer
The post above you call out the precious Irish. Get a vokken grip man.
See above.
I do
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:01 pm
by Biffer
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:44 pm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:24 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 1:27 pm
Yet refs penalise players (Nic White) who throw boots away. If you think this is acceptable at elite level, I can see why you have become disenfranchised by Rugby.
Can someone post the picture of the Saffer standing on the guys hand at the ruck please.
Thats why the dust never will settle with kants like you and Biffer. Schoeman is a In Bred per Biffo. A genuine Gauteng Inbred.
See, this is the thing with Oom. Happy to throw insults in Afrikaans around when he thinks people don't understand them, and then gets all touchy when someone makes a joke about South Africans.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:31 pm
by SaintK
Biffer wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:01 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:44 pm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:24 pm
Can someone post the picture of the Saffer standing on the guys hand at the ruck please.
Thats why the dust never will settle with kants like you and Biffer. Schoeman is a In Bred per Biffo. A genuine Gauteng Inbred.
See, this is the thing with Oom. Happy to throw insults in Afrikaans around when he thinks people don't understand them, and then gets all touchy when someone makes a joke about South Africans.
Skin as thin as a Rizla paper!
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:50 pm
by Sandstorm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 2:50 pm
No, the dust will never settle because you lot can't help yourselves and there is ALWAYS a much worse example from a Saffer
Shoe Man is a Saffer....oh shit.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:54 pm
by Guy Smiley
I started this as a fun thread for discussion, thinking we were a smart enough bunch to come up with a few good ideas...
so it would be good if all of you cunce that seem to feel the need to carry on like schoolchildren could fuck off. Having every thread spoiled by the bull in a china shop conversation techniques is going to get too boring, very soon.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 5:57 pm
by OomStruisbaai
OK Guy. I brought the Schoeman incident. What's your thought about players doing shite like that, I javelin seen players grap the scrum pet and throw it out the field ext.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 8:05 pm
by Line6 HXFX
We need to be able to use your own posts to kick penalties through.
It is now worth it to cheat like fuckery in the oppositions 22, as all you will get as punishment is a defensive line out 20 yards away, ...but if you don't get caught...you win biggily wiggly..
The defensive team should be able to have the option of taking the easy points, through their own posts, instead of having a lineout in a very non threatening position.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 8:55 pm
by Gumboot
Guy Smiley wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 4:54 pm
I started this as a fun thread for discussion, thinking we were a smart enough bunch to come up with a few good ideas...
so it would be good if all of you cunce that seem to feel the need to carry on like schoolchildren could fuck off. Having every thread spoiled by the bull in a china shop conversation techniques is going to get too boring, very soon.
It's beyond tedious, Guy. Not worth trying to engage with them in any meaningful way now. Leave them to wallow in their defensive self-pity...or masterful trolling...or whatever the fuck it is.
Shame, it was a good thread before being derailed.
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2023 9:47 pm
by Slick
Line6 HXFX wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 8:05 pm
We need to be able to use your own posts to kick penalties through.
It is now worth it to cheat like fuckery in the oppositions 22, as all you will get as punishment is a defensive line out 20 yards away, ...but if you don't get caught...you win biggily wiggly..
The defensive team should be able to have the option of taking the easy points, through their own posts, instead of having a lineout in a very non threatening position.
I was just going to say that
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 7:50 am
by Sandstorm
Slick wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 9:47 pm
Line6 HXFX wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 8:05 pm
We need to be able to use your own posts to kick penalties through.
It is now worth it to cheat like fuckery in the oppositions 22, as all you will get as punishment is a defensive line out 20 yards away, ...but if you don't get caught...you win biggily wiggly..
The defensive team should be able to have the option of taking the easy points, through their own posts, instead of having a lineout in a very non threatening position.
I was just going to say that
Re: Fun thread... let's rewrite the Law book
Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2023 12:53 pm
by Uncle fester
Sandstorm wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 11:41 am
Brazil wrote: Tue Nov 07, 2023 10:10 am
That does, of course, beg the question of whether the tackle height needs to be dropped if it's not making any difference in terms of concussion frequency, but as Slick says, hitting high is a relatively new phenomenon (I was only ever coached it to strip the ball at school)......
Rugby. League. Defence. Coaches.
This goes back a bit but when the laws got changed so that mauls became "use it or lose it", I changed my tackle height and started looking to wrap the ball and carrier together.