Re: Ireland vs Argentina, Autumn Internationals 2024
Posted: Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:56 pm
Well for once it's not us being dense, with the unnecessary foul
A place where escape goats go to play
https://www.notplanetrugby.com/
He saw what Doris was at and decided to take matters into his own hands. Pointless.
Argie player should go down clutching their head on at least 1 of them.
Doris wasn't interfering at allBlackmac wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 9:59 pmHe saw what Doris was at and decided to take matters into his own hands. Pointless.
JM2K6 wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:00 pm Haha another bottle job on the yellow
There goes the hope that the 20 minute red would stop that shit
He was. He'd fallen off the contact onto his knees and instead of retreating back onside he stands up and either hangs around like a bad smell or slightly encroaches round the side. He does it every breakdown, just enough to sow a bit of doubt and or cut down the options for the scrum half.
Did it a couple of times in the final play.Blackmac wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:03 pmHe was. He'd fallen off the contact onto his knees and instead of retreating back onside he stands up and either hangs around like a bad smell or slightly encroaches round the side. He does it every breakdown, just enough to sow a bit of doubt and or cut down the options for the scrum half.
The instant reaction by all the Irish players suggested there was, tbh. Man, so close to another epic winTichtheid wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:05 pm Arg players didn't think there was a knock on at the end, to be fair I didn't see anything obvious at the time
It's an infuriating trademarkpetej wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:04 pmDid it a couple of times in the final play.Blackmac wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 10:03 pmHe was. He'd fallen off the contact onto his knees and instead of retreating back onside he stands up and either hangs around like a bad smell or slightly encroaches round the side. He does it every breakdown, just enough to sow a bit of doubt and or cut down the options for the scrum half.
You can't be offside when the maul hasn't formed yet.
fishfoodie wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:49 pm Stupid question, but I'm too lazy to check myself.
If a player gets two YCs, does this turn into a Full RC, or a 20min RC ?
Fuck sake, what do you lot not understand about the point. Yes we all noticed the swollen lip and yes there was obviously a head knock which was deemed sufficiently dangerous for a player to be carded, which is why he should have had an HIA. It would appear that the Irish from the management and medical team down, consistently fail to understand that.
So it’s a matter of timing? I suppose the other Irish players hold off until Lowe gets there and plays to kill the maul, winning the scrum put in.
Hate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you sayTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:21 amSo it’s a matter of timing? I suppose the other Irish players hold off until Lowe gets there and plays to kill the maul, winning the scrum put in.
It’s one of those that just looks wrong
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:11 amHate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you sayTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:21 amSo it’s a matter of timing? I suppose the other Irish players hold off until Lowe gets there and plays to kill the maul, winning the scrum put in.
It’s one of those that just looks wrong
Surely there is a player welfare issue? The guy has been knocked on the head in a dangerous manner - it should be getting checked out.Blackmac wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 8:44 amFuck sake, what do you lot not understand about the point. Yes we all noticed the swollen lip and yes there was obviously a head knock which was deemed sufficiently dangerous for a player to be carded, which is why he should have had an HIA. It would appear that the Irish from the management and medical team down, consistently fail to understand that.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:17 amYou did notice his swollen lip yeah?Blackmac wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 8:21 pm
Funny how the Irish who take these horrific head knocks never seem to need an HIA.
It's been a thing for several years tbhTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 amPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:11 amHate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you sayTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:21 am
So it’s a matter of timing? I suppose the other Irish players hold off until Lowe gets there and plays to kill the maul, winning the scrum put in.
It’s one of those that just looks wrong
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
it has, but it's not often pulled off like that.JM2K6 wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 11:26 amIt's been a thing for several years tbhTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 amPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:11 am
Hate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you say
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
Yes, the odd time Saracens/England pull off a choke tackle it provokes a positive bang on the table as opposed to my usual ‘really think this is bad for the sport’!Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 amPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:11 amHate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you sayTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 9:21 am
So it’s a matter of timing? I suppose the other Irish players hold off until Lowe gets there and plays to kill the maul, winning the scrum put in.
It’s one of those that just looks wrong
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:03 pmYes, the odd time Saracens/England pull off a choke tackle it provokes a positive bang on the table as opposed to my usual ‘really think this is bad for the sport’!Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 amPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:11 am
Hate to defend the Irish and particularly James Lowe, but that was an excellent piece of defence, well timed as you say
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
Yep I read it exactly the same as you, the brain really is a funny thing isn’t itTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:09 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:03 pmYes, the odd time Saracens/England pull off a choke tackle it provokes a positive bang on the table as opposed to my usual ‘really think this is bad for the sport’!Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 am
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
This is way off topic, but it's something that interests me - did you, or anyone else reading this, read that sentence of mine as "if Darcy Graham had done it would have been beautiful, I'm sure"
I accidentally missed out the "have", but our brains apparently insert missing words where we expect to see them.
My brain put in the missing comma and 'it' as wellTichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:09 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 12:03 pmYes, the odd time Saracens/England pull off a choke tackle it provokes a positive bang on the table as opposed to my usual ‘really think this is bad for the sport’!Tichtheid wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2024 10:25 am
I wasn't really attacking the Irish or Lowe. I thought it looked like he had come in from an offside position, given that he was round the back of the Argentinian players. As fester says, the maul obviously wasn't formed so he must have taken hold of the catcher before other Irish players made contact with the other Arg players.
To me it's a very good execution of something the coaches have come up with in accordance with the arcane laws of Rugby Union. It's also a pretty negative piece of play, an extension of the choke tackle.
However, if Darcy Graham had done it would been beautiful, I'm sure.
This is way off topic, but it's something that interests me - did you, or anyone else reading this, read that sentence of mine as "if Darcy Graham had done it would have been beautiful, I'm sure"
I accidentally missed out the "have", but our brains apparently insert missing words where we expect to see them.