NPR

Enzedder wrote: Fri Nov 15, 2024 12:06 am Not sure if this can be debated as people decide on emotions rather than facts (my opinion).

I am just so bloody glad we have it in case we need it.

Even NSW has come to the party without the deluge of deaths the opposition claimed would happen. Actually don't know anyone who has gone down this road, but the day care I visit weekly has pamphlets available on request.

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:19 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:33 am

None of you are prepared to make the statement that the awful suffering some people go through is more important to you than preventing and protecting people from being coerced into early deaths.

I would happily make that statement, sing it from the rafters even.

me too, haven't read this legislation but maybe try it and if there are too many people killing of gramps and gran it can be amended or scrapped

Calculon wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:47 am

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:19 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 5:33 am

None of you are prepared to make the statement that the awful suffering some people go through is more important to you than preventing and protecting people from being coerced into early deaths.

I would happily make that statement, sing it from the rafters even.

me too, haven't read this legislation but maybe try it and if there are too many people killing of gramps and gran it can be amended or scrapped

How many is too many?

Tilly Orifice wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:54 am

Calculon wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:47 am

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 9:19 pm

I would happily make that statement, sing it from the rafters even.

me too, haven't read this legislation but maybe try it and if there are too many people killing of gramps and gran it can be amended or scrapped

How many is too many?

more than 100 per year

Calculon wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 5:02 am

Tilly Orifice wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 2:54 am

Calculon wrote: Sat Nov 23, 2024 8:47 am

me too, haven't read this legislation but maybe try it and if there are too many people killing of gramps and gran it can be amended or scrapped

How many is too many?

more than 100 per year

Good strong confident answer.

So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

Calculator is a loon and a troll.

Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

well don't be coy, what's your number?

Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

Some very emotive language and straw manning. Part of the reason you're not being debated seriously.

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:33 pm

Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

Calculator is a loon and a troll.

Lol, see Fester's response. It's an silly question that deserves a silly answer

Calculon wrote: Mon Nov 25, 2024 12:31 am

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 1:33 pm

Biffer wrote: Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:44 am So Calculon is ok with 100 people being murdered each year to enable assisted dying. Is that number true for everyone else, or is it higher / lower?

Calculator is a loon and a troll.

Lol, see Fester's response. It's an silly question that deserves a silly answer

First vote in HoC passed by 330 to 275 - have to say I'm surprised it go through.

Quite a bit of process to go through yet though, so maybe some of the issues will be ironed out.