Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 2:15 pm
That BBC article is fine. The only slightly silly section is quoting Johnson and even that is mostly him encouraging people to get booster jabs. a bit from Prof Balloux who has been a very sensible voice and Dr Clarke who states international comparisons are never very useful at the end of the article.salanya wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 9:34 pmWhereas your posts are always so insightful.Dragster wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:27 pmSuch a chronic bore.salanya wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 3:02 pm Aunty Beeb finger-pointing: 'look at all those Covid-infested Europeans, nothing to see here'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-59262701
They'd be very fair to question the increase in European cases, or report how those countries are trying to deal with it.
But to summarise by saying the UK is bucking the trend after having consistently high numbers for months, and yes, thankfully a slight dip in the last week or so, is beyond a rose-tinted glasses interpretation.
Interesting that there are no graphs on Covid casualties, because why would they want to report and investigate that?!
This country is doomed with the kind of politicians and media it has at the moment. It deserves better.
It is good that work is being done for the thankfully small proportion of children who get long covid.
Small proportion. Up to is doing a huge amount of work. Only 13% responded to the survey. When you consider this is an age group where they are much more likely to not have symptoms you are going to miss a lot of cases.
And we have a fuck-ton of cases, so that percentage is still a large number of people.petej wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:51 amSmall proportion. Up to is doing a huge amount of work. Only 13% responded to the survey. When you consider this is an age group where they are much more likely to not have symptoms you are going to miss a lot of cases.
1 in 8 of kids who have symptoms of long covid seems like a lot to me. Perhaps they all have underlying conditions so according to the Daily Mail don't count?JM2K6 wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 11:17 amAnd we have a fuck-ton of cases, so that percentage is still a large number of people.petej wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:51 amSmall proportion. Up to is doing a huge amount of work. Only 13% responded to the survey. When you consider this is an age group where they are much more likely to not have symptoms you are going to miss a lot of cases.
What exactly are you trying to achieve at the moment? You've ignored data that contradicts your "COVID is no threat to the young and the vaccine is neutral at best for them" viewpoint and nit-picked at others.
He's had the advantage of being able to hide up in Scotland; while his MPs were fuming back in their Constituencies. They've no doubt been getting in the neck for that time; & the corruption headlines show no sign of going away; & now Labour are referring cases in the Standards Czar; & it would be electoral suicide to try messing with them, with so many Tory MPs sitting on the naughty bench.salanya wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:45 pm They didn't want to focus on Covid in the early autumn, trying to avoid discussions about Plan B, and hoping for a glory moment with COP.
But now they don't want any focus on the failings of COP, or their own sleazy processes and MPs. And as numbers have been going up across Europe, it's the perfect moment to blame that for Covid issues in the UK.
Obviously ignoring that numbers have been consistently above 30k cases a day for 2-3 months now...
I dunno. Does the electorate even notice?fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:14 pmHe's had the advantage of being able to hide up in Scotland; while his MPs were fuming back in their Constituencies. They've no doubt been getting in the neck for that time; & the corruption headlines show no sign of going away; & now Labour are referring cases in the Standards Czar; & it would be electoral suicide to try messing with them, with so many Tory MPs sitting on the naughty bench.salanya wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:45 pm They didn't want to focus on Covid in the early autumn, trying to avoid discussions about Plan B, and hoping for a glory moment with COP.
But now they don't want any focus on the failings of COP, or their own sleazy processes and MPs. And as numbers have been going up across Europe, it's the perfect moment to blame that for Covid issues in the UK.
Obviously ignoring that numbers have been consistently above 30k cases a day for 2-3 months now...
It may need more than one MPs blood to make this go away.
Some of them do; because there were plenty of stories of MPs inboxes full of angry punters mails, & headlines in the Daily Heil, & Express tend to get noticed more than ones in the Guardian; by the typical Tory voterRinkals wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:22 pmI dunno. Does the electorate even notice?fishfoodie wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 8:14 pmHe's had the advantage of being able to hide up in Scotland; while his MPs were fuming back in their Constituencies. They've no doubt been getting in the neck for that time; & the corruption headlines show no sign of going away; & now Labour are referring cases in the Standards Czar; & it would be electoral suicide to try messing with them, with so many Tory MPs sitting on the naughty bench.salanya wrote: Mon Nov 15, 2021 7:45 pm They didn't want to focus on Covid in the early autumn, trying to avoid discussions about Plan B, and hoping for a glory moment with COP.
But now they don't want any focus on the failings of COP, or their own sleazy processes and MPs. And as numbers have been going up across Europe, it's the perfect moment to blame that for Covid issues in the UK.
Obviously ignoring that numbers have been consistently above 30k cases a day for 2-3 months now...
It may need more than one MPs blood to make this go away.
I still think this should lead to a criminal investigation - it is inevitable that the 'deliberate' or at best incompetent' production of false negatives has led to a number of avoidable deaths. I believe the (Not NHS) Test and Trace organisation was responsible for award and monitoring of the contract?petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 11:58 am Impact of the not immensa labs south west screw up in the react COVID prevalence study.
This sort of thing will nearly always be due to an accidental fuck up followed by various people in management positions arse covering (trying not to admit it) while desperately urging their minions to fix it in the background. It is possible someone internal deliberately sabotaged it but highly unlikely.dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:07 pmI still think this should lead to a criminal investigation - it is inevitable that the 'deliberate' or at best incompetent' production of false negatives has led to a number of avoidable deaths. I believe the (Not NHS) Test and Trace organisation was responsible for award and monitoring of the contract?petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 11:58 am Impact of the not immensa labs south west screw up in the react COVID prevalence study.
My suspicion is that they were overwhelmed with samples and behind in reporting and just decided to not test batches and just declare them as negatives to help them catch up.petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:46 pm [quote=dpedin post_id=156614 time=1637064296 user_This sort of thing will nearly always be due to an accidental fuck up followed by various people in management positions arse covering (trying not to admit it) while desperately urging their minions to fix it in the background. It is possible someone internal deliberately sabotaged it but highly unlikely.dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:07 pmI still think this should lead to a criminal investigation - it is inevitable that the 'deliberate' or at best incompetent' production of false negatives has led to a number of avoidable deaths. I believe the (Not NHS) Test and Trace organisation was responsible for award and monitoring of the contract?petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 11:58 am Impact of the not immensa labs south west screw up in the react COVID prevalence study.
I thought that people were given false positive and false negative results.dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 1:11 pmMy suspicion is that they were overwhelmed with samples and behind in reporting and just decided to not test batches and just declare them as negatives to help them catch up.petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:46 pm [quote=dpedin post_id=156614 time=1637064296 user_This sort of thing will nearly always be due to an accidental fuck up followed by various people in management positions arse covering (trying not to admit it) while desperately urging their minions to fix it in the background. It is possible someone internal deliberately sabotaged it but highly unlikely.dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:07 pm
I still think this should lead to a criminal investigation - it is inevitable that the 'deliberate' or at best incompetent' production of false negatives has led to a number of avoidable deaths. I believe the (Not NHS) Test and Trace organisation was responsible for award and monitoring of the contract?
If this was a passenger jet crashing and some died because someone fucked up and folk then tried to cover their arses then they would end up in prison. If a building site didn't provide all safety requirements and systems and someone dies in an accident and they try and cover it up those responsible end up in prison. Providing these type of healthcare lab services are no different. If the owners/managers of this lab didn't have the correct quality systems in place, knew that they couldn't operate to the standards required and knowingly failed to implement the required improvements, etc then they are at fault. Criminal negligence, corporate manslaughter, call it what you want.
Think "she" said today that under 50s that didn't fall into the currently permitted categories wouldn't have reach 6 months (24 weeks) since the 2nd jag. So the booking portal hasn't open to them yet. Sturgeon is in the same bracket so she will know I suppose.Slick wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 4:07 pm Have Scottish Government mentioned anything about under 50's getting a booster yet?
Study quoted in Times suggesting that the Immensa scandal could have led to a an additional 26k to 76k cases and up to 100 additional covid deaths based on known fatality rates. Agree that this is difficult to confirm exact numbers but it's safe to say that telling c43k people that they were negative when they were positive will have led to an increase in transmission and deaths.petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:42 pmI thought that people were given false positive and false negative results.dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 1:11 pmMy suspicion is that they were overwhelmed with samples and behind in reporting and just decided to not test batches and just declare them as negatives to help them catch up.petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 12:46 pm [quote=dpedin post_id=156614 time=1637064296 user_
This sort of thing will nearly always be due to an accidental fuck up followed by various people in management positions arse covering (trying not to admit it) while desperately urging their minions to fix it in the background. It is possible someone internal deliberately sabotaged it but highly unlikely.
If this was a passenger jet crashing and some died because someone fucked up and folk then tried to cover their arses then they would end up in prison. If a building site didn't provide all safety requirements and systems and someone dies in an accident and they try and cover it up those responsible end up in prison. Providing these type of healthcare lab services are no different. If the owners/managers of this lab didn't have the correct quality systems in place, knew that they couldn't operate to the standards required and knowingly failed to implement the required improvements, etc then they are at fault. Criminal negligence, corporate manslaughter, call it what you want.
FYI We were low on Pfizer and moderna. Devolved admins (Wales & Scotland) do publish data on vaccine stocks and deliveries and the distribution looked to be proportional to population size so could be estimated for England. Not sure England were squeezing out the extra doses as well. I think there was deliveries of pfizer early sept/late August from the 2nd order.JM2K6 wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:25 pm re: the JCVI's recommendation: https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2251
linked from this here article https://www.newstatesman.com/comment/20 ... d-disaster which is a good read (dpedin linked it earlier)
She’s 51GrahamWa wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 6:54 pmThink "she" said today that under 50s that didn't fall into the currently permitted categories wouldn't have reach 6 months (24 weeks) since the 2nd jag. So the booking portal hasn't open to them yet. Sturgeon is in the same bracket so she will know I suppose.Slick wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 4:07 pm Have Scottish Government mentioned anything about under 50's getting a booster yet?
You'll have a lot more success in proving negligence; & given what we've seen so far; that shouldn't be too difficult.petej wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 2:48 pm Aircraft crash is also an easily identifiable cause of death. Catching covid due to a lab results is pretty tenuous and won't hold up in court. They might get payments withheld and a contract cancelled for being shit. With lft's I wouldn't bother with PCR testing outside of clinical settings. Waste of money.
The good news is it’s comingDogbert wrote: Tue Nov 16, 2021 9:28 pm Google is your friend
Scotland confirms Covid boosters for over-40s
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59290426
Generally it goes Wales, Scotland, England, NI for vaccine roll out speed but Scotland leads in uptake %. NI is always significantly behind the others.Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
??? - not sure what you mean by 'speed' of roll out? Vaccine uptake as a % of pop or as % of those eligible is as Dogbert has posted. Wales aren't far behind Scotland TBF. Both Scotland and Wales have an NHS structure which has made it more efficient in managing the roll out, whilst there are the usual problems and local cock ups given the scale of the task both have done better than England. NI has different issues which I down know enough about - I am sure others will comment on why their roll out has been slower.petej wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:51 amGenerally it goes Wales, Scotland, England, NI for vaccine roll out speed but Scotland leads in uptake %. NI is always significantly behind the others.Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
Part of the problem in NI, is their NHS suffered from their Politicians playing silly buggers over flags, & the Cash-For-Ash corruption; & didn't do their jobs for a couple of years; & meanwhile the NHS was underfunded, & the Civil Service had no power to do anything but plug along.dpedin wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 11:17 am??? - not sure what you mean by 'speed' of roll out? Vaccine uptake as a % of pop or as % of those eligible is as Dogbert has posted. Wales aren't far behind Scotland TBF. Both Scotland and Wales have an NHS structure which has made it more efficient in managing the roll out, whilst there are the usual problems and local cock ups given the scale of the task both have done better than England. NI has different issues which I down know enough about - I am sure others will comment on why their roll out has been slower.petej wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:51 amGenerally it goes Wales, Scotland, England, NI for vaccine roll out speed but Scotland leads in uptake %. NI is always significantly behind the others.Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
It's very noticeable that there's been a significant drop in deaths in Scotland over the last two weeks or so. From a 7 day average of about 110-120 to a seven day average of 50-60. Got to think that's related to the booster rollout?Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
Yes. Cases in the earliest booster age groups have dropped significant (ie steeper and further than other age groups) in the last few weeks so it should be feeding through to deathsBiffer wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:07 pmIt's very noticeable that there's been a significant drop in deaths in Scotland over the last two weeks or so. From a 7 day average of about 110-120 to a seven day average of 50-60. Got to think that's related to the booster rollout?Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
However notice an uptick in cases in younger age groups in last week or so - this in turn will feed through into other age groups over the next week or two. Time lag from school returning? Mate of mine currently isolating with covid probably caught from his kids.petej wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 1:31 pmYes. Cases in the earliest booster age groups have dropped significant (ie steeper and further than other age groups) in the last few weeks so it should be feeding through to deathsBiffer wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:07 pmIt's very noticeable that there's been a significant drop in deaths in Scotland over the last two weeks or so. From a 7 day average of about 110-120 to a seven day average of 50-60. Got to think that's related to the booster rollout?Dogbert wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 10:44 am Yet Scotland is the leading nation in the UK for the highest percentage of 1st / 2nd / and Booster vaccines administered. .....
Sounds like a disaster he is overseeing
My COVID is now just an annoying cough. Nearly fully recovered. Same for my toddler. Pretty much caught it bang on 6months after my 2nd jab. If I'd properly rested up for a couple of days I would be better by now.dpedin wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 7:17 pmHowever notice an uptick in cases in younger age groups in last week or so - this in turn will feed through into other age groups over the next week or two. Time lag from school returning? Mate of mine currently isolating with covid probably caught from his kids.petej wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 1:31 pmYes. Cases in the earliest booster age groups have dropped significant (ie steeper and further than other age groups) in the last few weeks so it should be feeding through to deathsBiffer wrote: Wed Nov 17, 2021 12:07 pm
It's very noticeable that there's been a significant drop in deaths in Scotland over the last two weeks or so. From a 7 day average of about 110-120 to a seven day average of 50-60. Got to think that's related to the booster rollout?
Yep, we could take my county as a consistent evidence that masks work. Maryland one of the top 5 most vaccinated states doesn’t have mask mandate indoor, but Montgomery co does, we have constantly over half less cases than the state.dpedin wrote: Thu Nov 18, 2021 7:38 pm https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... tudy-finds
Looks like things like mask wearing, social distancing do make a difference to covid transmission!
The result:
11,219 child Covid hospitalisations [0-17]
72 child Covid deaths, to 29-Oct [ONS, 0-19]
69,000 #LongCovidKids