I would've thought the message was "we've signed someone who is a lot better than you, if he can stay fit"inactionman wrote: Mon Nov 14, 2022 4:42 pmI meant that these are the ones who have emerged into the roles, although Ellis also features as a lock. None of them are exactly rookies, Bayliss is 25 and Reid is 24 so all should be solidifying their first team credentials. I appreciate Hill and Barbeary are both opportunity targets rather than anything longer-term planned, but it's a confusing message for the incumbents, to say the least. I suppose a lot will hinge on contract length.duke wrote: Mon Nov 14, 2022 4:32 pmNot sure Tom Ellis can be looked at as emerging - he's 28 and has been around since 2014. There's bound to be a clear out at the end of the season and I reckon they'll lose Ellis and Bayliss (as he's Scots qualified) and keep Reid, especially as there must be doubts about the durability of Underhill.inactionman wrote: Mon Nov 14, 2022 4:25 pm
Will make an interesting back row with Hill and Underhill. Wonder what the arrival of Barbeary and Hill will mean for the likes of Miles Reid, Tom Ellis and Josh Bayliss who are all emerging backrow at the club.
I've heard rumblings about Bayliss moving but nothing I'd hang hat on.
Has Hill signed long-term?