Page 5 of 8

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:54 pm
by Sandstorm
Nortje is lethal

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:55 pm
by Rinkals
It's hard to believe that the selectors feel that Bueren Hendricks is a better bowler than Nortje.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:01 pm
by Longshanks
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:55 pm It's hard to believe that the selectors feel that Bueren Hendricks is a better bowler than Nortje.
Isn't it mostly about economy rate with t20?
How do they compare?

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:09 pm
by Rinkals
Butler's determination to show shamzi how shit he is is his undoing.

That ball spun a mile.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:13 pm
by Rinkals
Bairstowe perishes trying to dominate shamzi.

Stokes to the crease.

Does he play sensibly? or does he allow his natural confidence in his own ability dictate?

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:17 pm
by Paddington Bear
Fan of Shamsi’s work, useful player

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:19 pm
by Rinkals
Malan batting well.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:20 pm
by Rinkals
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:17 pm Fan of Shamsi’s work, useful player
He got severely dismantled on Friday.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm
by Rinkals
Stokes and Malan obviously deciding to get after the bowling.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:25 pm
by Bimbowomxn
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm Stokes and Malan obviously deciding to get after the bowling.


Unusual, normally a conservative approach is seen in 20/20.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:27 pm
by JM2K6
Go on, say the a-word Rinkals. You know you want to.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:30 pm
by Rinkals
Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:25 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm Stokes and Malan obviously deciding to get after the bowling.


Unusual, normally a conservative approach is seen in 20/20.
Because it's a high scoring game?

You can knock it around for five or six an over and get the occasional boundary without taking risks when you are chasing a low total.

I think most people who understand the game understood the context.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:31 pm
by Paddington Bear
Stokes batting is just so special to watch

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:32 pm
by Paddington Bear
Sorry, my fault

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:32 pm
by Rinkals
And, as if to make my point, Stokes departs.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:32 pm
by JM2K6
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:30 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:25 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:21 pm Stokes and Malan obviously deciding to get after the bowling.


Unusual, normally a conservative approach is seen in 20/20.
Because it's a high scoring game?

You can knock it around for five or six an over and get the occasional boundary without taking risks when you are chasing a low total.

I think most people who understand the game understood the context.
Stokes out - chasing a run-rate that's approaching ten an over.

Going at 5 or 6 an over and praying for a boundary means losing this game at a canter.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:34 pm
by Paddington Bear
At this rate we won’t get close

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:37 pm
by JM2K6
WhY dOnT eNgLaNd JuSt KnOcK iT aRoUnD, tHe ArRoGaNt ArSeHoLes

Image

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:41 pm
by Rinkals
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:32 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:30 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:25 pm



Unusual, normally a conservative approach is seen in 20/20.
Because it's a high scoring game?

You can knock it around for five or six an over and get the occasional boundary without taking risks when you are chasing a low total.

I think most people who understand the game understood the context.
Stokes out - chasing a run-rate that's approaching ten an over.

Going at 5 or 6 an over and praying for a boundary means losing this game at a canter.
Yes, but a more conservative approach early on with the asking rate at seven an over would probably be a safer option.

They'll probably still get them, but they are giving the staffers an opening with their hubris.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:42 pm
by JM2K6
The more conservative rate of... miles less than South Africa at any point beyond the first 2 overs?

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:49 pm
by Paddington Bear
‘Hubris’ as opposed to how England have approached all white ball cricket since 2015?

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:51 pm
by Rinkals
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:42 pm The more conservative rate of... miles less than South Africa at any point beyond the first 2 overs?
If you are telling me that knocking the ball around for singles interspersed with the odd boundary is difficult when you are chasing seven-odd an over, then I bow to your superior knowledge.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:56 pm
by JM2K6
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:51 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:42 pm The more conservative rate of... miles less than South Africa at any point beyond the first 2 overs?
If you are telling me that knocking the ball around for singles interspersed with the odd boundary is difficult when you are chasing seven-odd an over, then I bow to your superior knowledge.
I'm saying we were miles behind the rate from almost the very start of the game, and we had to hit lots of boundaries to catch up. T20 isn't about excising risk, it's about gambling at the right time. England started to accelerate, Stokes got out, and they carried on hitting boundaries and as a result the worm looks like this:

Malan is out, having done his job and ensured England don't need to rely on big runs in the final over:

Image

T20 is not ODI cricket.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:58 pm
by Paddington Bear
I’ll never not be fascinated by the way that the presence of England in any sports match can cause people to start foaming at the mouth.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:59 pm
by JM2K6
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:58 pm I’ll never not be fascinated by the way that the presence of England in any sports match can cause people to start foaming at the mouth.
Rinkals is special, he genuinely believes England are the devil and are just insanely arrogant. So whatever our approach, he considers it a sign of our moral failings.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:00 pm
by Longshanks
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:59 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:58 pm I’ll never not be fascinated by the way that the presence of England in any sports match can cause people to start foaming at the mouth.
Rinkals is special, he genuinely believes England are the devil and are just insanely arrogant. So whatever our approach, he considers it a sign of our moral failings.
Sounds a bit like Cammy

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:07 pm
by Rinkals
Mark Nicholas: the South Africans feel that the game is already lost.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:08 pm
by Paddington Bear
Good game that. Smart and well timed chase, as it turns out

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:09 pm
by Rinkals
Well done England.

South Africa don't have the self belief to win, despite the potency of their bowling.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:10 pm
by JM2K6
Brilliant. Well done, England. Hit their way out of trouble perfectly in the end :thumbup:

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:11 pm
by Rinkals
I think that England probably made it closer than it should have been.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 5:14 pm
by JM2K6
Rinkals wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:11 pm I think that England probably made it closer than it should have been.
Yep, they did scratch around for too long and their top order isn't in great form.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2020 5:16 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 2:46 pm This backdrop has convinced me - my first post lockdown holiday will be to SA. Lovely content on a foggy Sunday
Paarl is a beautiful town. Dawid Malan home.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:41 pm
by handyman
Back at Newlands for the last T20, starting at 18:00.

Tough choice for me between Klaassen and Smuts, Smuts just shading it by being able to bowl. Possibly give Sipamla a chance by dropping Ngidi?

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:58 pm
by Rinkals
handyman wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:41 pm Back at Newlands for the last T20, starting at 18:00.

Tough choice for me between Klaassen and Smuts, Smuts just shading it by being able to bowl. Possibly give Sipamla a chance by dropping Ngidi?
I suspect another hiding coming up.

I know we have the bowling to compete, but our batsmen are stuck in the belief that England are a much stronger team.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:35 pm
by OomStruisbaai
We need David Miller.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:41 pm
by Longshanks
Rinkals wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:58 pm
handyman wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:41 pm Back at Newlands for the last T20, starting at 18:00.

Tough choice for me between Klaassen and Smuts, Smuts just shading it by being able to bowl. Possibly give Sipamla a chance by dropping Ngidi?
I suspect another hiding coming up.

I know we have the bowling to compete, but our batsmen are stuck in the belief that England are a much stronger team.
Perhaps they are.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:57 pm
by Rinkals
Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:41 pm
Rinkals wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:58 pm
handyman wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:41 pm Back at Newlands for the last T20, starting at 18:00.

Tough choice for me between Klaassen and Smuts, Smuts just shading it by being able to bowl. Possibly give Sipamla a chance by dropping Ngidi?
I suspect another hiding coming up.

I know we have the bowling to compete, but our batsmen are stuck in the belief that England are a much stronger team.
Perhaps they are.
Whether they are or not, if you approach the game believing that you are not good enough, you won't be.

England probably weren't expecting South Africa to be quite so supine.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:05 pm
by Longshanks
Rinkals wrote: England probably weren't expecting South Africa to be quite so supine.
I'm surprised you said that, considering how arrogant we are.

Re: Cricket: SA vs England

Posted: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:19 pm
by handyman
Rinkals wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:58 pm
handyman wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:41 pm Back at Newlands for the last T20, starting at 18:00.

Tough choice for me between Klaassen and Smuts, Smuts just shading it by being able to bowl. Possibly give Sipamla a chance by dropping Ngidi?
I suspect another hiding coming up.

I know we have the bowling to compete, but our batsmen are stuck in the belief that England are a much stronger team.
At the moment, we don't have the cattle.