Page 7 of 7

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:24 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Compare backlines
Sharks – 15 Aphelele Fassi, 14 Werner Kok, 13 Lukhanyo Am (c), 12 Francois Venter, 11 Makazole Mapimpi, 10 Curwin Bosch, 9 Jaden Hendrikse

Stormers – 15 Warrick Gelant (Hoerskool Outeniqua), 14 Ben Loader (Reading School), 13 Suleiman Hartzenberg (Bishops), 12 Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu (Bishops), 11 Leolin Zas (Hermanus High), 10 Jurie Matthee (Paarl Gim), 9 Paul de Wet (Paarl Boys)

Dis n rou agterlyn van die Stormers teen hardebaard Sharks.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:55 pm
by Chilli2
OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:24 pm Compare backlines
Sharks – 15 Aphelele Fassi, 14 Werner Kok, 13 Lukhanyo Am (c), 12 Francois Venter, 11 Makazole Mapimpi, 10 Curwin Bosch, 9 Jaden Hendrikse

Stormers – 15 Warrick Gelant (Hoerskool Outeniqua), 14 Ben Loader (Reading School), 13 Suleiman Hartzenberg (Bishops), 12 Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu (Bishops), 11 Leolin Zas (Hermanus High), 10 Jurie Matthee (Paarl Gim), 9 Paul de Wet (Paarl Boys)

Dis n rou agterlyn van die Stormers teen hardebaard Sharks.
$harks have 5 Springboks
Stormers have 1

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:23 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Chilli2 wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:55 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:24 pm Compare backlines
Sharks – 15 Aphelele Fassi, 14 Werner Kok, 13 Lukhanyo Am (c), 12 Francois Venter, 11 Makazole Mapimpi, 10 Curwin Bosch, 9 Jaden Hendrikse

Stormers – 15 Warrick Gelant (Hoerskool Outeniqua), 14 Ben Loader (Reading School), 13 Suleiman Hartzenberg (Bishops), 12 Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu (Bishops), 11 Leolin Zas (Hermanus High), 10 Jurie Matthee (Paarl Gim), 9 Paul de Wet (Paarl Boys)

Dis n rou agterlyn van die Stormers teen hardebaard Sharks.
$harks have 5 Springboks
Stormers have 1
Stormers 10,12,13 is young laaities playing against 100 + experience players.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 4:06 am
by Chilli2
OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:23 pm
Chilli2 wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 4:55 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:24 pm Compare backlines
Sharks – 15 Aphelele Fassi, 14 Werner Kok, 13 Lukhanyo Am (c), 12 Francois Venter, 11 Makazole Mapimpi, 10 Curwin Bosch, 9 Jaden Hendrikse

Stormers – 15 Warrick Gelant (Hoerskool Outeniqua), 14 Ben Loader (Reading School), 13 Suleiman Hartzenberg (Bishops), 12 Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu (Bishops), 11 Leolin Zas (Hermanus High), 10 Jurie Matthee (Paarl Gim), 9 Paul de Wet (Paarl Boys)

Dis n rou agterlyn van die Stormers teen hardebaard Sharks.
$harks have 5 Springboks
Stormers have 1
Stormers 10,12,13 is young laaities playing against 100 + experience players.
GatVlieg will post something grump about this

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 4:25 am
by OomStruisbaai
You can expect the return of all our Sharks loyal posters after this afternoon. I am missing them.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:23 am
by Sandstorm
Dwebe. Sharks by 10

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:38 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Gelant se tik skoppie het reg geland

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:56 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Loader is playing well for the Stormers

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:59 pm
by _Os_
Roos = Always offside and a weakling. A giant cheating pussy. Physically beaten one on one by Fassi. :lol:

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 4:52 pm
by _Os_
Dyantyi isn't even half as good as Kok and has now lost us the match. Abandon the thread we've lost again! That doos Assfly will be pleased! :cry:

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 5:16 pm
by OomStruisbaai
Very tight finish. The Stormers look like a much better coached team. Fouche Neethling deserved MOTM. Must be the only TH in world rugby to have Ox on the backfoot. The Cheetah 10 is a massive improvement on Bosch.

The Stormers have real depth. Massive game next weekend

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 5:28 pm
by OomStruisbaai
_Os_ wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:59 pm Roos = Always offside and a weakling. A giant cheating pussy. Physically beaten one on one by Fassi. :lol:
Roos was good today, putting in the hard stuff. Much better then anything your loosies could offer.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:04 pm
by Sandstorm
Really good performance by Stomps, kept the Sharks on the backfoot for about 68 mins total. Fouche scrummed like a champ and managed the ref like a veteran. :clap:

Also....just a single TMO check for a high tackle (rejected) and another for a grounding (try awarded)...? Great game by the ref & assistants today.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:39 pm
by Chilli2
The true cycle of South African rugby is almost complete.
The Freestate's Neethling Fouche was the Stormers best player and the Freestate 's Masuka has hopefully put an end to Curwin Bosch as the $harks starting 10.

You can thank me later.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:13 am
by OomStruisbaai
Both Masuka and Mathee are the newest Maties flyhalf products. Following in the footsteps of George Lourens, Reinhardt, Chris Smith, Jordan Hendrikse, Jorden Chiat, ext

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2024 1:19 am
by OomStruisbaai
Sandstorm wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 8:04 pm Really good performance by Stomps, kept the Sharks on the backfoot for about 68 mins total. Fouche scrummed like a champ and managed the ref like a veteran. :clap:

Also....just a single TMO check for a high tackle (rejected) and another for a grounding (try awarded)...? Great game by the ref & assistants today.
Wanted to see the scratch between Mapimpi and Andre Hugo Venter.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:31 pm
by Sards
Well done Stomps. I will try watch the game

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:33 am
by LoveOfTheGame
Sards wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:31 pm Well done Stomps. I will try watch the game
Why are you such a fair-weather supporter lately Sards?

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:46 pm
by OomStruisbaai
OomStruisbaai wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:38 pm Gelant se tik skoppie het reg geland
The Sharks owner throwing a tantrum, claiming de Wet was off side, what a idiot.
https://x.com/MarcoMasotti_/status/1759 ... 36437?s=20

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:40 pm
by assfly
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:46 pm The Sharks owner throwing a tantrum, claiming de Wet was off side, what a idiot.
https://x.com/MarcoMasotti_/status/1759 ... 36437?s=20
"tantrum" :crazy:

Was de Wet offside?

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:44 pm
by OomStruisbaai
assfly wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:40 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:46 pm The Sharks owner throwing a tantrum, claiming de Wet was off side, what a idiot.
https://x.com/MarcoMasotti_/status/1759 ... 36437?s=20
"tantrum" :crazy:

Was de Wet offside?
No, it's not soccer , it's rugby. Gelant put him on side otherwise his pass would be forward.

Hey no need to role your vokken eyes, obvious he is an American.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2024 6:33 pm
by Sards
LoveOfTheGame wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 7:33 am
Sards wrote: Mon Feb 19, 2024 3:31 pm Well done Stomps. I will try watch the game
Why are you such a fair-weather supporter lately Sards?
Too much happening. Really struggling to cope.
Winter will be better.

Hoping to watch the game. I don't even know who is playing anymore. Saw the result on fb

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:41 am
by assfly
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:44 pm No, it's not soccer , it's rugby. Gelant put him on side otherwise his pass would be forward.

Hey no need to role your vokken eyes, obvious he is an American.
de Wet was in front and advancing long before Gelant put him onside. https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/law/10, rule 10.4(c)

All he did was ask the question, I'd hardly call it a tantrum. Not sure why his nationality is an issue either.

To be honest, I don't have a problem with it because that happens in virtually every game because of the tracking line that 9s run. The better team won.

But enjoy the win and be humble bro :thumbup:

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 7:11 am
by Blake
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:44 pm
assfly wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:40 pm
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 12:46 pm The Sharks owner throwing a tantrum, claiming de Wet was off side, what a idiot.
https://x.com/MarcoMasotti_/status/1759 ... 36437?s=20
"tantrum" :crazy:

Was de Wet offside?
No, it's not soccer , it's rugby. Gelant put him on side otherwise his pass would be forward.

Hey no need to role your vokken eyes, obvious he is an American.
Technically, De Wet was offside. He was in front of Galant when the kick was made, and advanced forward towards the ball before Galant put him onside.

But, all the officials were watching Galant so nobody saw that. I think if De Wet was the player that recovered the kick instead of Galant, then the try might have been referred, but as it played out I don't think any of the referees or the Sharks players thought to challenge it in the moment. You kind of have to be looking for it to see it.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2024 10:51 am
by OomStruisbaai
assfly wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2024 5:41 am
OomStruisbaai wrote: Tue Feb 20, 2024 1:44 pm No, it's not soccer , it's rugby. Gelant put him on side otherwise his pass would be forward.

Hey no need to role your vokken eyes, obvious he is an American.
de Wet was in front and advancing long before Gelant put him onside. https://www.world.rugby/the-game/laws/law/10, rule 10.4(c)

All he did was ask the question, I'd hardly call it a tantrum. Not sure why his nationality is an issue either.

To be honest, I don't have a problem with it because that happens in virtually every game because of the tracking line that 9s run. The better team won.

But enjoy the win and be humble bro :thumbup:
I am a humble man. Very humble. If you are not humble, you end up on the flounce like Sards. Stil bek is n heel bek. Paarl taught me this.

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:50 am
by OomStruisbaai
OomStruisbaai wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 5:28 pm
_Os_ wrote: Sat Feb 17, 2024 3:59 pm Roos = Always offside and a weakling. A giant cheating pussy. Physically beaten one on one by Fassi. :lol:
Roos was good today, putting in the hard stuff. Much better then anything your loosies could offer.
Image

Re: Stormers vs $hark$ no excuses thread

Posted: Thu Feb 22, 2024 7:57 am
by OomStruisbaai
Hollywoodbets Sharks v DHL Stormers

Ben Loader made a total of five clean breaks at the weekend – as many as any other player.
Ruben van Heerden made more successful tackles in Round 10 than any other player, a total of 25. This was only two shy of the record so far this season and van Heerden has now made the most successful tackles in URC 3 (135).
Jaden Hendrikse made more contestable kicks than any other player in Round 10 (six), two of which were retained. Teammate Aphelele Fassi also made three contestable kicks.
Warrick Gelant was one of two players at the weekend to assist two tries; no player assisted more.
Hollywoodbets Sharks beat 24 defenders in Round 10 – the second-highest total of the weekend.