Official FIFA atrocity World Cup thread
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Hmmm. The lass at 1/2 time saying "they (Korea) should have seen how Serbia set up"....
Yeah. All well and good playing 11 men behind the ball but they created no threat at all and Brazil were always going to get one at which point it was game over.
Keane is right about the celebrations. I thought this was all bookable for time wasting.
Yeah. All well and good playing 11 men behind the ball but they created no threat at all and Brazil were always going to get one at which point it was game over.
Keane is right about the celebrations. I thought this was all bookable for time wasting.
I didn’t say anything like that! It was great to watch, just think they are dicksTorquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:36 pmHow TF can you not enjoy watching this?Slick wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 7:22 pm I do find the Brazilian footballers and arrogant unsavoury bunch. Hopefully the usual will happy, they get over cocky, beaten, cry a bit, go home![]()
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
LMAO. I skipped the 2nd half.
When I wrote earlier about Brazil maybe finding a cutting edge too.........
Incredibly wasteful/poor finishers and that could be their undoing. Some games, you only get 1 or 2 chances and then you have to take them all.
When I wrote earlier about Brazil maybe finding a cutting edge too.........
Incredibly wasteful/poor finishers and that could be their undoing. Some games, you only get 1 or 2 chances and then you have to take them all.
It's the age old conundrum of do you want the best teams ar the world cup or a "fair" split.Biffer wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:20 am
In comparison to Europe. As per my other post, my main problem is actually South America, and the allocation from the next World Cup going forward. If it's done on number of member countries, South America should have fewer slots. If it's done by on pitch success, Asia and Africa should have fewer. Whatever measure you use, Europe (at 16 out of 48 places) will be under represented.
Making the tournament bigger will dilute the quality as it has done with the euros.
meh - i didn't mean to start a german bashing thread - i like/liked a lot of them. admittedly the bad ones are very annoying or worse. and i'd had no more right to expect a great summer of wine/women/song/partying than someone coming to ireland for a few months and staying in a house say 3 miles from a cross-roads post-office in the middle of leitrim.Uncle fester wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 9:33 am They are a dull people. Even in city centers, you go into a bar midweek and it's empty.
and i wouldn't be so quick generalise regarding their dullness - i was at a stag in hamburg a few years back - actually reminds me it was around world cup time - england losing to italy - 2014? - and we were hanging around the reeperbahn area and i have never seen or experienced such a display of public debauchery, drunkenness and outright filthiness over the course of the evening. it made paddy's night in temple bar look like a teddy bears picnic. it was very german in a surreal bertold brecht sort of way. admittedly there were as many tourists as germans.
fair point about the lots of empty bars in cities but you see that right across europe - i've found in a lot such cities the party/drinking areas are somewhat hidden/out-of-the-way - and a causal visitor could easily miss it - which is not the case in irish cities generally - where the action won't be far from the main street or centre.
It is. But the answer to it is not applied fairly wrt Europe and S America.Big D wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:45 pmIt's the age old conundrum of do you want the best teams ar the world cup or a "fair" split.Biffer wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 10:20 am
In comparison to Europe. As per my other post, my main problem is actually South America, and the allocation from the next World Cup going forward. If it's done on number of member countries, South America should have fewer slots. If it's done by on pitch success, Asia and Africa should have fewer. Whatever measure you use, Europe (at 16 out of 48 places) will be under represented.
Making the tournament bigger will dilute the quality as it has done with the euros.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Once again, surprised at how Spain, the great technicians, are so poor at penalties.
That result guarantees the winner of Eng/Fra a spot in the final.
That result guarantees the winner of Eng/Fra a spot in the final.
To me that’s all on coaching. Both of the kick takers and the keepers.
Goalkeepers - Moroccan keeper didn’t guess and go early for any of the kicks. The Spanish keeper picked a side and went each time. If he’d stood still two of them as taken would have hit him. He made it easy for the Moroccan kick takers to pick where he wasn’t going.
Kick takers - the Spanish kick takers were desperately waiting for the Moroccan keeper to go. Several of them dawdled up to the spot, and when he effectively said ‘I’m not going, you have to beat me’ they were left with one stride and a kick to beat him. So low power kicks without great placement (first kicker didn’t do it, but the other two who missed did). In particular, Busquets watched three penalties where the keeper didn’t go, and instead reacted to the kick as taken, and Busquets just wanders up to the ball waiting for him to dive. Monumentally fucking stupid.
So many coaches don’t seem to approach shootouts differently from penalty kicks in open play. As a keeper, facing five consecutive kicks under pressure, you’re probably going to have a decent chance of saving at least one. So don’t guess, react to the shot as taken, make them beat you. As a kick taker, realise that the keeper is doing that, and run up, smack it in the corner of your choice and walk away.
Goalkeepers - Moroccan keeper didn’t guess and go early for any of the kicks. The Spanish keeper picked a side and went each time. If he’d stood still two of them as taken would have hit him. He made it easy for the Moroccan kick takers to pick where he wasn’t going.
Kick takers - the Spanish kick takers were desperately waiting for the Moroccan keeper to go. Several of them dawdled up to the spot, and when he effectively said ‘I’m not going, you have to beat me’ they were left with one stride and a kick to beat him. So low power kicks without great placement (first kicker didn’t do it, but the other two who missed did). In particular, Busquets watched three penalties where the keeper didn’t go, and instead reacted to the kick as taken, and Busquets just wanders up to the ball waiting for him to dive. Monumentally fucking stupid.
So many coaches don’t seem to approach shootouts differently from penalty kicks in open play. As a keeper, facing five consecutive kicks under pressure, you’re probably going to have a decent chance of saving at least one. So don’t guess, react to the shot as taken, make them beat you. As a kick taker, realise that the keeper is doing that, and run up, smack it in the corner of your choice and walk away.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Famous last words. It's not like Morocco weren't worthy of their draw.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 5:54 pm Once again, surprised at how Spain, the great technicians, are so poor at penalties.
That result guarantees the winner of Eng/Fra a spot in the final.
Agree, they are a good teamFlockwitt wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:06 pmFamous last words. It's not like Morocco weren't worthy of their draw.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 5:54 pm Once again, surprised at how Spain, the great technicians, are so poor at penalties.
That result guarantees the winner of Eng/Fra a spot in the final.
The penalties last night and tonight have been pretty awful, very strange
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Just awful. 2 golden rules on penalties unless you are godSlick wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:14 pmAgree, they are a good teamFlockwitt wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 6:06 pmFamous last words. It's not like Morocco weren't worthy of their draw.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Dec 06, 2022 5:54 pm Once again, surprised at how Spain, the great technicians, are so poor at penalties.
That result guarantees the winner of Eng/Fra a spot in the final.
The penalties last night and tonight have been pretty awful, very strange
1) Strike it hard. Speed is the friend of the taker. Slow is the friend of the keeper.
2) Get it on target. Even if you blast it down the middle. Guess what, you can't score if you aren't on target. Hitting the post or bar is not bad luck.
Most of them seemed determined to ignore Rule 1..... with inevitable consequences.
Pfffft to your Mockers. Eng or Fra in the final already.
People fuck up rule 1 because they're waiting for the goalkeeper to commit. When he doesn't, which he shouldn't in a penalty shoot out, they're fucked.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 11:55 amJust awful. 2 golden rules on penalties unless you are god
1) Strike it hard. Speed is the friend of the taker. Slow is the friend of the keeper.
2) Get it on target. Even if you blast it down the middle. Guess what, you can't score if you aren't on target. Hitting the post or bar is not bad luck.
Most of them seemed determined to ignore Rule 1..... with inevitable consequences.
Pfffft to your Mockers. Eng or Fra in the final already.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
It's funny because when the rule was applied that goal keepers were not allowed to move, we used to see them premeditate all the time which I thought was crazy because so many pen takers did blast it down the middle.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:15 pm
People fuck up rule 1 because they're waiting for the goalkeeper to commit. When he doesn't, which he shouldn't in a penalty shoot out, they're fucked.
Statistically a decade ago, I reckoned if a keeper stood tall in the middle, he'd save 2/5 by doing nothing else: force the taker to take a good pen in the corner. And that should still apply but, as you say, there are so many
powder puff pens now.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
I thought they'd made the penalty-taker stuttering or stopping in the penalty run-up an offence. Apparently not, given what I've seen so far - Lewandowski's stereo penalty being a case in point.
On the topic of ridiculous run-ups, worth admiring Zaza's from 2016.
https://gfycat.com/femaleadventurousaurochs
(Can't seem to embed gifs, sorry)
Of course, showing a typical commitment to slapstick, West Ham then signed him.
On the topic of ridiculous run-ups, worth admiring Zaza's from 2016.
https://gfycat.com/femaleadventurousaurochs
(Can't seem to embed gifs, sorry)
Of course, showing a typical commitment to slapstick, West Ham then signed him.
They’re allowed to move but must keep feet (foot?) on the goal line.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 3:23 pmIt's funny because when the rule was applied that goal keepers were not allowed to move, we used to see them premeditate all the time which I thought was crazy because so many pen takers did blast it down the middle.Biffer wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 12:15 pm
People fuck up rule 1 because they're waiting for the goalkeeper to commit. When he doesn't, which he shouldn't in a penalty shoot out, they're fucked.
Statistically a decade ago, I reckoned if a keeper stood tall in the middle, he'd save 2/5 by doing nothing else: force the taker to take a good pen in the corner. And that should still apply but, as you say, there are so many
powder puff pens now.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
- boere wors
- Posts: 1467
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:03 am
I always remember that one. Was watching that game with an italian friend. As soon as he started his run, we knew he was going to miss. What a Clowninactionman wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 3:33 pm I thought they'd made the penalty-taker stuttering or stopping in the penalty run-up an offence. Apparently not, given what I've seen so far - Lewandowski's stereo penalty being a case in point.
On the topic of ridiculous run-ups, worth admiring Zaza's from 2016.
https://gfycat.com/femaleadventurousaurochs
(Can't seem to embed gifs, sorry)
Of course, showing a typical commitment to slapstick, West Ham then signed him.

It always has been, but they’ve never enforced it.inactionman wrote: Wed Dec 07, 2022 3:33 pm I thought they'd made the penalty-taker stuttering or stopping in the penalty run-up an offence. Apparently not, given what I've seen so far - Lewandowski's stereo penalty being a case in point.
On the topic of ridiculous run-ups, worth admiring Zaza's from 2016.
https://gfycat.com/femaleadventurousaurochs
(Can't seem to embed gifs, sorry)
Of course, showing a typical commitment to slapstick, West Ham then signed him.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
He might be a twat, but that is a very good goal.
Neymar puts Brazl 1-0 up in extra time.
Neymar puts Brazl 1-0 up in extra time.
er Croatia not too bad on the totty …..Jim Lahey wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:12 pm![]()
![]()
What a result. Love the Croatian football team. They are just ice-cold hard bastards that punch way above their weight.
The big downside will be all the pretty Brazilian girls in the crowd going home![]()
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
Not that long, it was 2018! France Belgium England CroatiaGogLais wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:28 pm Can’t be bothered checking but it must be a long time since neither Germany, Brazil, Spain nor Italy were in the semis. Surely?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Boom! First time since at least the 1960s.
Although their only shot on goal in 120 minutes was the deflection which went in. Otherwise it was straight at the keeper.PCPhil wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:55 pm Croatia are seriously good. I thought they would be too old for this one but they just keep going.
Must try harder I reckon
I drink and I forget things.
One shot on goal and one goal. A pretty decent return.Enzedder wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 6:49 amAlthough their only shot on goal in 120 minutes was the deflection which went in. Otherwise it was straight at the keeper.PCPhil wrote: Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:55 pm Croatia are seriously good. I thought they would be too old for this one but they just keep going.
Must try harder I reckon
It’s their technical ability and teamwork+energy that is outstanding. That was a good Brazilian defence as proved over a number of years and Croatia never gave up on their game of crisp, tight passing. Not a betting man but a few bob on them at start of tournament to win it would have been good (watch them crash out in semi now).
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12046
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Dec 05, 2022 8:58 pm LMAO. I skipped the 2nd half.
When I wrote earlier about Brazil maybe finding a cutting edge too.........
Incredibly wasteful/poor finishers and that could be their undoing. Some games, you only get 1 or 2 chances and then you have to take them all.

You don’t need to bother about Spain or Italy btw. 2018 was the first time since World War II without either Germany or Brazil in the semis.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
morocco so close to a 2nd goal. Portugal would be better if they put more effort in playing than whinging at the ref.
Ronaldo coming on. Think Leao would have been a better option (invoking the mockers and guaranteeing Ronaldo scoring).
Ronaldo coming on. Think Leao would have been a better option (invoking the mockers and guaranteeing Ronaldo scoring).