I do try

Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 amBimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
He is? Oh good. That means every person on the planet of all ages can stop worrying too.Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:20 amGlaston wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:17 am Another person to have Covid twice
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/54612253
Positive in Feb and positive now.
Bit worrying.completely asymptomatic".
Jesus, that is a silly post.Sandstorm wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:54 amThe average age of a Lions touring fan (fag packet calculation) is probably 60+. Any of you Euros fancy catching Covid and having to be treated in a Johannesburg hospital?Saint wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:50 amNot cancelled yet. i don;t see them cancelling this till a lot closer to teh time - if there's a vaccine (even if only partially effective) and better treatments, together with some sort of rapid testing available, then it will go ahead. If not they'll only cancel 1-2 months before
I suspect your travel insurance will cost as much as the rest of your trip.
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 amTichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
Were the measurements wrong then ?
Sandstorm wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 amHe is? Oh good. That means every person on the planet of all ages can stop worrying too.Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:20 amGlaston wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:17 am Another person to have Covid twice
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cycling/54612253
Positive in Feb and positive now.
Bit worrying.completely asymptomatic".
Toolbag.
Of course it's silly. But there's no reason to make Lions fans feel safe or comfortable. This is Serious Business.Rinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 am
Jesus, that is a silly post.
Admittedly, you probably wouldn't want to be treated at Baragwanath or Helen Josepth, but it's unlikely that any rugby fans would end up there, anyway and the private hospitals, where you would be sent are probably at least the equal of any of your NHS centres.
I never said travel insurance to SA would be more expensive than anywhere else. I said it will probably be much more expensive than 2017 Lions insurance due to Covid.Why would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
Why would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
Now see what you've done,Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:55 amWhy would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
The horrendous crime rate as a starting point.
Rinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 12:23 pmNow see what you've done,Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:55 amWhy would travel insurance be any more expensive in South Africa than anywhere else?
The horrendous crime rate as a starting point.
Bimbo is going to be convinced that 99% of all tourists to South Africa never make it back alive.![]()
Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:49 amBimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:48 amTichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
Were the measurements wrong then ?
Read the updates
When 85% of the viruses found in laboratory tests were rhinoviruses, which are about four times smaller than SARS-CoV2, no conclusion from this article can be applied to COVID-19/SARS-CoV2.
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:04 pmRinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 12:23 pmNow see what you've done,
Bimbo is going to be convinced that 99% of all tourists to South Africa never make it back alive.![]()
I think denying SA has a bit of a crime problem might be a stretch even for you.
Rinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:07 pmBimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:04 pmRinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 12:23 pm
Now see what you've done,
Bimbo is going to be convinced that 99% of all tourists to South Africa never make it back alive.![]()
I think denying SA has a bit of a crime problem might be a stretch even for you.
And where did I say that?
Christ, Bimbo, you really are desperate.
Sure, we have a crime problem, but a huge proportion of crime in this country is inflicted on blacks by fellow blacks. Tourists are unlikely to go to areas where crime is that rampant.
But, you are obviously the expert: I just live here.
Ovals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:23 pm
The devil is in the detail.......................
When 85% of the viruses found in laboratory tests were rhinoviruses, which are about four times smaller than SARS-CoV2, no conclusion from this article can be applied to COVID-19/SARS-CoV2.
There's absolutely no point in discussing anything with the Dumbot - which is why I have him on ignore over here. But, occasionally, it's fun to take the piss out of him and the stupid stuff he comes up with.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:19 pmOvals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 1:23 pm
The devil is in the detail.......................
When 85% of the viruses found in laboratory tests were rhinoviruses, which are about four times smaller than SARS-CoV2, no conclusion from this article can be applied to COVID-19/SARS-CoV2.
Yup, and that is only part of the problem with posting that five year old study which is really not relevant to the current pandemic.
However, I'm sure that won't matter a jot.
Another thing no-ones focussing on. If you read the SAGE minutes, they specifically state that the fact we continue to apply overlapping interventions makes it difficult, if not impossible, to asses which may be effective, and which aren’t.
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:07 pm
30,000 short of the predictions.....
Edit, and comparatively good news
He got this wrong tooSir Patrick Vallance said that would be expected to lead to about "200-plus deaths per day" a month after that.
Are you now supporting the Sage meeting outputs?Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:40 pmAnother thing no-ones focussing on. If you read the SAGE minutes, they specifically state that the fact we continue to apply overlapping interventions makes it difficult, if not impossible, to asses which may be effective, and which aren’t.
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:57 pmHe got this wrong tooSir Patrick Vallance said that would be expected to lead to about "200-plus deaths per day" a month after that.![]()
I have him on ignore too, but occasionally I feel the need to remind everyone that he's a cretin, just in case anyone new has wandered onto the board and doesn't know.Ovals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:26 pmThere's absolutely no point in discussing anything with the Dumbot - which is why I have him on ignore over here. But, occasionally, it's fun to take the piss out of him and the stupid stuff he comes up with.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:19 pm
Yup, and that is only part of the problem with posting that five year old study which is really not relevant to the current pandemic.
However, I'm sure that won't matter a jot.
If the Lions want a real challenge, maybe they should just tour France.Enzedder wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 7:59 pmWe can quarantine them in Australia afterwards. Mere details.
Wanna play?
Insane_Homer wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
If anyone is generating nonsense on here, it's you.Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:12 pmInsane_Homer wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
Indeed you’re a cheap agenda driven sensationalist repeating his nonsense like a government shrill.
A version of Piers Morgan without the personal charm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 4:30 amIf anyone is generating nonsense on here, it's you.Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:12 pmInsane_Homer wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:32 pm Fanatically delusion. PS I'm not your once lauded Chris Whittey.
Indeed you’re a cheap agenda driven sensationalist repeating his nonsense like a government shrill.
A version of Piers Morgan without the personal charm
Homer is using figures and data to expose the hypocrisy in Johnson's government.
If you feel that the figures are wrong, then you should demonstrate where they err.
This "you hates us" schtick is weak and unappealing.