Re: England in Australia
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:58 am
Nice!
Hooper says “Hold my beer”Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:54 am 3 mins of reset coming up to kill off this game. How do refs allow this every week?
Needs more Sarries.
Correction. 13 men.
Problem has been having Smith and Farrell on the pitch at the same time. I would let Smith play 10 and give him a proper 12 outside. Too many cooks ...I like neeps wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:57 am Yet again Marcus Smith fails to live up the hype. Farrell should play 10.
England never really got on the front foot, not to any degree of dominance, no fly half is going to shine under those circumstances. I get the feeling people want Smith to faildpedin wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:03 pmProblem has been having Smith and Farrell on the pitch at the same time. I would let Smith play 10 and give him a proper 12 outside. Too many cooks ...I like neeps wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:57 am Yet again Marcus Smith fails to live up the hype. Farrell should play 10.
England defence has been awful coupled with complete lack of imagination in their back play. Going back to the Vunipolas is a big mistake, they are both pretty one dimensional now, they might be the big bully boys in the league but they're not good enough now at international level.
Some people legitimately think Farrell should be 10Tichtheid wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:04 pmEngland never really got on the front foot, not to any degree of dominance, no fly half is going to shine under those circumstances. I get the feeling people want Smith to faildpedin wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:03 pmProblem has been having Smith and Farrell on the pitch at the same time. I would let Smith play 10 and give him a proper 12 outside. Too many cooks ...I like neeps wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:57 am Yet again Marcus Smith fails to live up the hype. Farrell should play 10.
England defence has been awful coupled with complete lack of imagination in their back play. Going back to the Vunipolas is a big mistake, they are both pretty one dimensional now, they might be the big bully boys in the league but they're not good enough now at international level.
Made a mockery of being left on the bench so long, great to see.Lobby wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pm Arundell touched the ball twice in his 5 minutes on the field, scored once and had a major hand in another.
Even after how many years of proof that it doesn't work.sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pm Some people legitimately think Farrell should be 10![]()
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pmSome people legitimately think Farrell should be 10Tichtheid wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:04 pmEngland never really got on the front foot, not to any degree of dominance, no fly half is going to shine under those circumstances. I get the feeling people want Smith to faildpedin wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:03 pm
Problem has been having Smith and Farrell on the pitch at the same time. I would let Smith play 10 and give him a proper 12 outside. Too many cooks ...
England defence has been awful coupled with complete lack of imagination in their back play. Going back to the Vunipolas is a big mistake, they are both pretty one dimensional now, they might be the big bully boys in the league but they're not good enough now at international level.![]()
We don't have a proper 12. I think we should either play Smith with a 12 who's actually a 12, or play Ford and Farrell. I think the latter is preferable.dpedin wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:03 pmProblem has been having Smith and Farrell on the pitch at the same time. I would let Smith play 10 and give him a proper 12 outside. Too many cooks ...I like neeps wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 11:57 am Yet again Marcus Smith fails to live up the hype. Farrell should play 10.
England defence has been awful coupled with complete lack of imagination in their back play. Going back to the Vunipolas is a big mistake, they are both pretty one dimensional now, they might be the big bully boys in the league but they're not good enough now at international level.
Are you genuinely that blinkered? It may be his best position but he's so far from being an intl FH, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he should not even be in the Eng squad.Kawazaki wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:09 pmsockwithaticket wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pm Some people legitimately think Farrell should be 10![]()
Why not? It's his best position.
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:11 pmAre you genuinely that blinkered? It may be his best position but he's so far from being an intl FH, the only conclusion that can be drawn is that he should not even be in the Eng squad.Kawazaki wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:09 pmsockwithaticket wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pm Some people legitimately think Farrell should be 10![]()
Why not? It's his best position.
The win rate with him at 10 and Ford at 10 is starkly different, it's statistical confirmation of what's seemed apparent when watching him down the years - can't get us firing. Now, some of that is England generally being crap all too often, but I don't think sticking him at 10 solves any of the problems we have, so why do it?Kawazaki wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:09 pmsockwithaticket wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:06 pmSome people legitimately think Farrell should be 10Tichtheid wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:04 pm
England never really got on the front foot, not to any degree of dominance, no fly half is going to shine under those circumstances. I get the feeling people want Smith to fail![]()
Why not? It's his best position.
ASMO wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:12 pm The main issue is in the midfield in that we don't have one, there is zero threat, zero penetration, zero creativity. If Farrell is not playing at 10, he should not be in the team. If England are looking to play a fast wide game, Smith is the answer Farrell on the bench at best.
All of that and you can throw in zero pace in the absence of May.ASMO wrote: Sat Jul 02, 2022 12:12 pm The main issue is in the midfield in that we don't have one, there is zero threat, zero penetration, zero creativity.