Re: Monster explosion in Beirut

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Kiwias
Posts: 7537
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:44 am

Utterly horrific.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion.

I’m sure more info will come through.

I’m not really buying the fireworks factory.

That explosion was huge and uniform.
User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Kiwias wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 12:08 am Utterly horrific.
Just terrible. Mind-boggling level of destruction. Apparently some airport buildings were damaged about 10km away from the blast. :sad:
dkm57
Posts: 651
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:08 pm

Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6810
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Ymx wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:45 am That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion
🤔🙄
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6810
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

dkm57 wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:31 am Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
They use ANFO in mining... the place I work at fired a shot the other week that used about 30tonnes to bring down about 80 000tonnes of rock. Some of the material has been reduced to an almost sand sized particle.

Pulverised.

3 000tonnes going off?

Hellish.
Oxbow
Posts: 1514
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

Ymx wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:45 am That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion.
Um, no.
User avatar
Kiap
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:12 pm

Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:40 am
Ymx wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:45 am That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion.
Um, no.
What fraction ... 20%?
User avatar
Gumboot
Posts: 8881
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

dkm57 wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:31 am Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
I think that's the same shit Timothy McVeigh used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
Oxbow
Posts: 1514
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

Kiap wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:52 am
Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:40 am
Ymx wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:45 am That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion.
Um, no.
What fraction ... 20%?
No idea without Googling, as large as it was, it just clearly wasn't anywhere near a nuclear explosion.
robmatic
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

dkm57 wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:31 am Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
Stored next to a grain silo, which in itself is a fire risk, and next to the fireworks or whatever it was that was popping off before the big blast.

Also, six years without it getting shifted.
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6810
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

Gumboot wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:56 am
dkm57 wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:31 am Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
I think that's the same shit Timothy McVeigh used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
Yup
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:53 pm
Location: Coalfalls

Shanky’s mate wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:31 am
Gumboot wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:56 am
dkm57 wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 4:31 am Horrendous, just under 3000 tons of ammonium nitrate which was confiscated in 2014 and stored in a warehouse in a built up port.

Everything about this defies belief. Poor, poor people.
I think that's the same shit Timothy McVeigh used in the Oklahoma City bombing.
Yup
Since making ammonium nitrate depends on a cheap and plentiful supply of natural gas as a chemical input, I'm wondering if one of the gulf states was the source of the AN that had supposedly been warehoused at the Beirut port for many years. And relatedly, wondering why it was offloaded and not subsequently claimed.

Removed from a shitbox rustbucket and not claimed because neither the owner of the commodity nor the carrier considered it commercially sensible to claim it, pay whatever charges were due and move it on?
User avatar
Kiap
Posts: 229
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:12 pm

Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 am
Kiap wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:52 am
Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:40 am

Um, no.
What fraction ... 20%?
No idea without Googling, as large as it was, it just clearly wasn't anywhere near a nuclear explosion.
I'm going with a wet finger number at 20% of Hiroshima.


Nukes vary anyway. Some are small.
A6D6E6
Posts: 81
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:02 pm

Ymx wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 3:45 am That’s like a Hiroshima level of explosion.

I’m sure more info will come through.

I’m not really buying the fireworks factory.

That explosion was huge and uniform.
It was a big explosion, but let's not get hyperbolic. The Hiroshima explosion killed over 50,000 people and levelled almost an entire city. The Beirut blast, whilst big, doesn't even seem to be on the same scale as the Halifax Explosion (and for comparison, the Hiroshima explosion was equated to about 10 times the Halifax explosion)
Oxbow
Posts: 1514
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

Kiap wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:49 am
Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 am
Kiap wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 6:52 am
What fraction ... 20%?
No idea without Googling, as large as it was, it just clearly wasn't anywhere near a nuclear explosion.
I'm going with a wet finger number at 20% of Hiroshima.
My very rough calculations say you're about right with that number.
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 3840
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

Some photos emerging of what appears to be the warehouse, with the 1 ton sacks type things.

Image

Seems to be from this:

Image

2013, confiscated 2,750 tons of it, and it's been sat there waiting to be disposed of.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4118
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Well, that got rid of it.

McVeigh used 2 tons of the stuff and the devastation was massive. This was 2750 tonnes. :crazy:
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

Check out the building folding back at around 33Seconds and the car getting it's windows punched out:


User avatar
Nols
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:06 pm

Un Pilier wrote: Tue Aug 04, 2020 9:48 pm Why would anybody store anything that devastating in a populous area? No doubt there’s an answer - I just can’t imagine what it is.
Yeah, boggles the mind that you'd store it in the middle of a population centre. Also, just the sheer quantity. If you want to stockpile lots of extremely dangerous material then split the caches up, FFS.

I suppose Lebannon is not wealthy etc, so things may not always be done with the best practces.
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

Nols wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:54 am I suppose Lebannon is not wealthy etc, so things may not always be done with the best practces.
Or knowledge, sadly
Yeeb
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

mat the expat wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:00 am
Nols wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:54 am I suppose Lebannon is not wealthy etc, so things may not always be done with the best practces.
Or knowledge, sadly
Yup, probably this. If the harbour storage bloke doesn’t happen to know that under certain conditions that stuff can explode, then he’s not going to store is safely away. Could just be that an unrelated fire set off some other things , which looked like fireworks , but it all acted as a primer ignition for the amonnium nitrate.

You’d hope that this was a wake up call for the rest of the world, but sadly I think lessons won’t be learned and that certain things will continue to be stored dangerously next to other things that could set off the whole thing.

Isn’t that stuff normally quite safe to transport provided it’s airtight sealed containers and not heated ? Trying and failing to recall my GCSE chemistry here.
Last edited by Yeeb on Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1571
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

It's quite likely it was completely forgotten/lost in a paper trail.

I bet there are some nervous logistics people checking locations right now
User avatar
Nols
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:06 pm

I've done numerous chemical lab safety inductions over the years as part of my job/studies and one of the main messages is that incidents tend to happen because of a combination of factors. Human error through ignorance or taking shortcuts, compounded by various other things which results in stuff catching fire or going boom. Sheer bad luck usually plays a part in escalating something to becoming much more serious.

Presuming the details about the ammonium nitrate storage is accurate, this is like a case study where everything is dialled up to 11. Highly explosive material stored in huge quantities, terrible storage conditions, no maintenance, beside other high risk sites, beside a population centre, probably a poorly educated workforce involved with shitty work practices/standards.

Fucking hell.
Yeeb
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

There was an episode of a shit comedy programme Brittas empire, where a list of seemingly unrelated decisions made a giant bomb - was something like:
Some leftover weed killer thrown into the bin
Then some deodorant cans from leftover changing room lost and found
Then some straw
Then some kids toys with ball bearings in
Finally some bottles on the top, through which the suns rays focussed and ignited the straw etc
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

mat the expat wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:23 am Check out the building folding back at around 33Seconds and the car getting it's windows punched out:


And how far away is that footage !?!

The number of deaths surely must be higher than reported
User avatar
Nols
Posts: 341
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:06 pm

Yeeb wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:17 am Isn’t that stuff normally quite safe to transport provided it’s airtight sealed containers and not heated ? Trying and failing to recall my GCSE chemistry here.
Raggs wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:08 am Image
:???:
Yeeb
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Yup, so the stuff comes in one tonne sealed sacks - nothing inheritantly dangerous there.
But if just out of shot there are boxes of fireworks, or wax candles , and some chap is doing some welding very badly ....

The bad welding + stacks of candles burnt down a large warehouse in Durban a few years ago - will try find a pic

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.thesou ... ire-video/



https://www.ecr.co.za/news/news/2017-ye ... ned-black/
Biffer
Posts: 10202
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:02 am
Kiap wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:49 am
Oxbow wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 7:02 am

No idea without Googling, as large as it was, it just clearly wasn't anywhere near a nuclear explosion.
I'm going with a wet finger number at 20% of Hiroshima.
My very rough calculations say you're about right with that number.
My back of a fag packet says it would be less than that.

2500 tons of fertiliser. Fertiliser has about 0.4 the explosive energy of TNT, so equivalent to 1000tonnes I.e. 1 kiloton.

Hiroshima was 15 kiloton.

Additionally the explosion probably didn't take all the fertiliser, what with age and it not being set up to deliberately blow.

So about 5% is my guess.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:53 pm
Location: Coalfalls

Yeeb wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:17 am
mat the expat wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:00 am
Nols wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 8:54 am I suppose Lebannon is not wealthy etc, so things may not always be done with the best practces.
Or knowledge, sadly
Yup, probably this. If the harbour storage bloke doesn’t happen to know that under certain conditions that stuff can explode, then he’s not going to store is safely away. Could just be that an unrelated fire set off some other things , which looked like fireworks , but it all acted as a primer ignition for the amonnium nitrate.

You’d hope that this was a wake up call for the rest of the world, but sadly I think lessons won’t be learned and that certain things will continue to be stored dangerously next to other things that could set off the whole thing.

Isn’t that stuff normally quite safe to transport provided it’s airtight sealed containers and not heated ? Trying and failing to recall my GCSE chemistry here.
IIRC, ammonium nitrate is transported under the classification Dangerous Goods (oxidising agent) rather than Explosives, reason being it needs a fair bit of provocation to go bang. The latter is borne out by the simple fact that farmers etc who use an ammonium nitrate / fuel oil (diesel) mix (i.e. ANFO) to blow up stumps, rocks etc need more than a detonator and a means of initiating it to make the ANFO explode. They also need a booster since ANFO isn’t detonator-sensitive under normal circumstances.

Intense fires and / or minor explosions aren’t normal circumstances, mind you...
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8846
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The USCSB video on the fire & explosion in West Texas, if you want to see what a 30 Tonne AN explosion looks like; & it also contains a nice simple explanation of how the soot from a fire, & exposed AN, is a disastrous combination.

User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Interesting thread here explaining how the AN came to be in Beirut port

https://twitter.com/DavidVidecette/stat ... 0012167168
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 11:17 am The USCSB video on the fire & explosion in West Texas, if you want to see what a 30 Tonne AN explosion looks like; & it also contains a nice simple explanation of how the soot from a fire, & exposed AN, is a disastrous combination.

So 100 times that.

Jebus.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 5050
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

MungoMan wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:51 am
Yeeb wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:17 am
mat the expat wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 9:00 am

Or knowledge, sadly
Yup, probably this. If the harbour storage bloke doesn’t happen to know that under certain conditions that stuff can explode, then he’s not going to store is safely away. Could just be that an unrelated fire set off some other things , which looked like fireworks , but it all acted as a primer ignition for the amonnium nitrate.

You’d hope that this was a wake up call for the rest of the world, but sadly I think lessons won’t be learned and that certain things will continue to be stored dangerously next to other things that could set off the whole thing.

Isn’t that stuff normally quite safe to transport provided it’s airtight sealed containers and not heated ? Trying and failing to recall my GCSE chemistry here.
IIRC, ammonium nitrate is transported under the classification Dangerous Goods (oxidising agent) rather than Explosives, reason being it needs a fair bit of provocation to go bang. The latter is borne out by the simple fact that farmers etc who use an ammonium nitrate / fuel oil (diesel) mix (i.e. ANFO) to blow up stumps, rocks etc need more than a detonator and a means of initiating it to make the ANFO explode. They also need a booster since ANFO isn’t detonator-sensitive under normal circumstances.

Intense fires and / or minor explosions aren’t normal circumstances, mind you...
Couple of things probably went wrong here.
  • AN can absorb water from air if not well packed. This could cause it to partially liquify.
  • It can explode on it's own but would need to be exposed to a lot of heat and/or fuel mixtures. AN terrorist bombs typically mix AN with diesel or even sugar.
  • So nearly 3000 tonnes of AN stored in poor conditions and there was probably a primary explosion or fire that applied sustained heat + mix fuel in that caused the AN to go up. That's the secondary explosion.
  • Calcium Ammonium Nitrate is a safer alternative but can still be converted to AN by folks determined enough to do so.
Oxbow
Posts: 1514
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

robmatic
Posts: 2354
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I'm still confused by all the minor explosions and bangs in the fire before it all went up. Were they really storing fireworks in the same building?
User avatar
Hong Kong
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:04 am

Top photo - oaklahoma city bombing, 2.5 tonnes of the shite

Bottom photo, Beirut, with 2.7k tonnes

Image
User avatar
Hong Kong
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 1:04 am

And in a “lighter” mode

Image
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

I hope the Hiroshima comparisons aren't serious, it's evidently not even close to being the same. A nuclear explosion is a flash, then you're gone.

It will be interesting to see how the 'health and safety gone mad' groups react to this, because things like this is exactly why health and safety exists.
Jock42
Posts: 2669
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

Hong Kong wrote: Wed Aug 05, 2020 2:20 pm And in a “lighter” mode

Image
The 2 sides of social media. A little bit of entertainment but some lizard gets to air their ridiculous opinion.
Post Reply