Stop voting for fucking Tories

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10426
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:08 am

A competent labour opposition based on the values of fairness and transparency would nail them on changing the rules of an independent watchdog because they found an MP guilty of getting 3x their MPs salary to break lobbying rules to award Randox multi million pound contracts. But Keir Starmer is absolutely useless. And so they won't.

Whilst I tend to agree on the current opposition, it's a numbers game, if the Speaker selects this as a topic to vote on it will pass because it is whipped, and there is nothing that even the most competent leader of the opposition could do about it.
dpedin
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Calculon wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:34 am
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:15 pm
dpedin wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 11:26 am https://thefishingdaily.com/uk-fishing- ... g-vessels/

So despite the claims that the UK has 'won the war' and Macron has 'stepped back/backed down' from the fishing dispute it appears that Jersey has quietly issued the licences the French claimed were being delayed. On the back of this Macron has therefore agreed to avoid the promised retaliation and Frost has to go to Paris, tail between his legs, to continue negotiations. Hardly the victory portrayed in the right wing press.

The jingoistic, xenophobic rhetoric has become embarrassing in the last couple of weeks with the racist language and deliberate mistranslation of the French PMs letter creating peak 'Little Englander' pant wetting amongst our 'glorious' MPs. The irony of accusing the French of not adhering to the spirit of the Withdrawal Agreement by a country who agreed to break International law in a limited and specific way or who now claim to have signed an International treaty whilst being 'pressure' and wanting to renegotiate it 12 months later has been completely lost. Unfortunately we are now exhibiting all the traits of a tin pot dictatorship and the rest of the world will either not want to touch us with a barge pole or else will use the opportunity of our now desperation to have a FTA, any FTA on offer, to get the best deal they can whilst we are on our knees. Australia managed to get their way in ripping out the Paris Agreement clauses they didn't like. Feck knows where this shitshow is going to go now!
Jersey has extended yet again temporary licences to fishing boats that have no proof of fishing their waters, likely because they turned off their transponders to fish illegally, under threat of having their power cut off and their port blockaded again.

The thought process that seems to result in every French/EU action being some rational, inevitable vulcan style event and every British one being emotional, unreasonable and insulting is silly and I'm staggered it still has such sway given the repeated actions of the French government this year.
According to French boats the CFP didn't oblige them to have transponders.


Good article on the dispute
https://www.rte.ie/news/analysis-and-co ... -fish-war/
Cheers - good article explains current position.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7315
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 8:01 am

Today in the world's flagship democracy.
What a bunch of utter cunts. Paterson was a serial "house flipper" in the expenses scandal and had to pay back £1,000's
Downing St are also supporting Leadsom's amendment.so let's just hope that the Speaker has the balls not to call it for a vote.
Allies of a Tory MP who broke standards rules are trying to prevent him from being suspended from Parliament.

Owen Paterson was found to have used his position as an MP to benefit two firms that paid him as a consultant.

He said the probe into his conduct was unfair - and Tory MPs will try later to have his 30-day suspension put on hold while the rules are rewritten.

Labour say it is a "shocking" attempt to scrap the independent anti-sleaze system designed to keep MPs in check.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-59143727
I like neeps
Posts: 3796
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:24 am
I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:08 am

A competent labour opposition based on the values of fairness and transparency would nail them on changing the rules of an independent watchdog because they found an MP guilty of getting 3x their MPs salary to break lobbying rules to award Randox multi million pound contracts. But Keir Starmer is absolutely useless. And so they won't.

Whilst I tend to agree on the current opposition, it's a numbers game, if the Speaker selects this as a topic to vote on it will pass because it is whipped, and there is nothing that even the most competent leader of the opposition could do about it.
Make a song and a dance so it's picked up by the press and hopefully the wider public.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Sunak drawing the crowds in :lolno:
Image
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2806
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

Is that his actual speech or a sound check ahead of it?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9251
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:55 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:24 am
I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:08 am

A competent labour opposition based on the values of fairness and transparency would nail them on changing the rules of an independent watchdog because they found an MP guilty of getting 3x their MPs salary to break lobbying rules to award Randox multi million pound contracts. But Keir Starmer is absolutely useless. And so they won't.

Whilst I tend to agree on the current opposition, it's a numbers game, if the Speaker selects this as a topic to vote on it will pass because it is whipped, and there is nothing that even the most competent leader of the opposition could do about it.
Make a song and a dance so it's picked up by the press and hopefully the wider public.
The wider public have the collective memories of goldfish or straight up don't give a shit when it comes to political malfeasance and the majority enjoyed by the government means they basically have impunity to do whatever the fuck they please.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10426
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 1:00 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:55 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:24 am


Whilst I tend to agree on the current opposition, it's a numbers game, if the Speaker selects this as a topic to vote on it will pass because it is whipped, and there is nothing that even the most competent leader of the opposition could do about it.
Make a song and a dance so it's picked up by the press and hopefully the wider public.
The wider public have the collective memories of goldfish or straight up don't give a shit when it comes to political malfeasance and the majority enjoyed by the government means they basically have impunity to do whatever the fuck they please.

The current government definitely seem to have changed the rules on what constitutes a resignation offence. I'm not sure what Aitken did or Hamilton did was any worse that that which Paterson has been found guilty of.
Patel would have gone under any other leadership, hell even Peter Mandelson resigned, twice in fact.

Now "one of their own" can be found guilty by due process and they will just change the process.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Paterson should be gone, precisely because they have a 80 seat majority !

If he was so stupid & arrogant as to get caught; he deserves to get kicked off the gravy train. I'm sure his constituents will just elect another grasping sack of shit with a blue rosette anyway; & the Tories can pretend they care about sleaze.

By sticking by him; they give ammo to the opposition, & if there are other by-elections; that majority may get whittled down.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

If you’re a convicted sex pest, they will protect you, refuse to amend rules for you, be a character witness for you, even pressure a judge on your behalf. If you’re corrupt & in several breaches of lobbying rules, they’ll just change the rules.

:shifty: :shh:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

I have a proposal for Mr Paterson, if he wants all the nasty to go away, simply pay back the bribes :wink:
Last edited by Insane_Homer on Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

And the UK takes another lurch towards becoming a banana republic.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2802
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

What a grubby day in the Commons. Imagine being a Conservative MP and voting for that with a straight face. No shame at all.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:05 pm What a grubby day in the Commons. Imagine being a Conservative MP and voting for that with a straight face. No shame at all.
Rees Bogg, with a straight face, said he'd still support it even if it were a Labour MP

:lolno: :lolno: :lolno: :lolno: :lolno: :lolno: :lolno:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7315
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:05 pm What a grubby day in the Commons. Imagine being a Conservative MP and voting for that with a straight face. No shame at all.
Fired off a "Mr Angry" e-mail to my MP about the Paterson thing
Just checked and the bastard had voted in the Aye lobby. Didn't even haave the bollocks to abstain
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10426
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

From the article I posted earlier
On only two occasions since the second world war have suspensions been contested in the Commons, it is thought, but never has one been downgraded or removed.

This is how far they are prepared to go to protect one of their own.
dpedin
Posts: 3338
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:48 pm From the article I posted earlier
On only two occasions since the second world war have suspensions been contested in the Commons, it is thought, but never has one been downgraded or removed.

This is how far they are prepared to go to protect one of their own.
Cunts!
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Tory scum.
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Rinkals wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:21 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:37 pm
Openside wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:00 pm

because listening to people drone on about something that may or may not happen and then not doing anything about it seems pretty dull to me.
May or may not happen eh? Not in our lifetime perhaps, but I certainly worry for my young grandchildren if we don't start doing something about it now.
This is what I genuinely don't understand.

I don't have kids and I'm 67, so it's no skin off my nose if global warming makes life on earth uninhabitable in thirty or forty years, but I would have thought that anyone who had children would want them to survive to adulthood.

Seriously. Maybe global warning is a hoax, as ex President Trump was claiming on twitter today.

But, even so, would you bet the lives of your offspring on it?

Of course not. Not unless you are a complete cunt.
:lol: :lol: hysterical much?
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 3:53 pm Image

:lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: very good
User avatar
Plim
Posts: 253
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:46 pm

Openside wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 6:34 pm
Rinkals wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:21 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:37 pm
May or may not happen eh? Not in our lifetime perhaps, but I certainly worry for my young grandchildren if we don't start doing something about it now.
This is what I genuinely don't understand.

I don't have kids and I'm 67, so it's no skin off my nose if global warming makes life on earth uninhabitable in thirty or forty years, but I would have thought that anyone who had children would want them to survive to adulthood.

Seriously. Maybe global warning is a hoax, as ex President Trump was claiming on twitter today.

But, even so, would you bet the lives of your offspring on it?

Of course not. Not unless you are a complete cunt.
:lol: :lol: hysterical much?
I love my children so much that I would help them pump out their houses inundated by sea water and fight the mobs of hungry nomads searching for Mars Bars and Pot Noodles.

Not that anyone has to worrry about this. Because the effects of global warming - which is real - will be so slow that we can adapt. :thumbup:
Biffer
Posts: 10028
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Plim wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 7:02 pm
Openside wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 6:34 pm
Rinkals wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:21 pm
This is what I genuinely don't understand.

I don't have kids and I'm 67, so it's no skin off my nose if global warming makes life on earth uninhabitable in thirty or forty years, but I would have thought that anyone who had children would want them to survive to adulthood.

Seriously. Maybe global warning is a hoax, as ex President Trump was claiming on twitter today.

But, even so, would you bet the lives of your offspring on it?

Of course not. Not unless you are a complete cunt.
:lol: :lol: hysterical much?
I love my children so much that I would help them pump out their houses inundated by sea water and fight the mobs of hungry nomads searching for Mars Bars and Pot Noodles.

Not that anyone has to worrry about this. Because the effects of global warming - which is real - will be so slow that we can adapt. :thumbup:
Will they, aye?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3796
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am



The UK, a proud democracy.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The Scots need to immediately start rebuilding Hadrian's wall; because:

i) They'll need a proper border when they join the EU; &

ii) So there's a wall long enough; South of the border; to line all the traitors up against !
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Scotland can be as happy and United as Ireland
Slick
Posts: 13245
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 11:45 pm The Scots need to immediately start rebuilding Hadrian's wall; because:

i) They'll need a proper border when they join the EU; &

ii) So there's a wall long enough; South of the border; to line all the traitors up against !
Are we off?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5506
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

The Daily Heil?

Image
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:29 pm
Rinkals wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:21 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 12:37 pm
May or may not happen eh? Not in our lifetime perhaps, but I certainly worry for my young grandchildren if we don't start doing something about it now.
This is what I genuinely don't understand.

I don't have kids and I'm 67, so it's no skin off my nose if global warming makes life on earth uninhabitable in thirty or forty years, but I would have thought that anyone who had children would want them to survive to adulthood.

Seriously. Maybe global warning is a hoax, as ex President Trump was claiming on twitter today.

But, even so, would you bet the lives of your offspring on it?

Of course not. Not unless you are a complete cunt.
A lot of people would rather be 100% sure that their kids are provided for in 25 years (good education, maybe a start on a mortgage) rather than 50% sure their plot of land will be under water.

Being able to “go without” now to “save your children” in 30 years time is a luxury of the top 5% of the planet only.
Ok, so it's not that likely that their plot will be underwater.

But if you are ok for your actions (or lack of action) to put somebody else's plot underwater, that still makes you a cunt.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Plim wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 7:02 pm
Openside wrote: Wed Nov 03, 2021 6:34 pm
Rinkals wrote: Tue Nov 02, 2021 9:21 pm
This is what I genuinely don't understand.

I don't have kids and I'm 67, so it's no skin off my nose if global warming makes life on earth uninhabitable in thirty or forty years, but I would have thought that anyone who had children would want them to survive to adulthood.

Seriously. Maybe global warning is a hoax, as ex President Trump was claiming on twitter today.

But, even so, would you bet the lives of your offspring on it?

Of course not. Not unless you are a complete cunt.
:lol: :lol: hysterical much?
I love my children so much that I would help them pump out their houses inundated by sea water and fight the mobs of hungry nomads searching for Mars Bars and Pot Noodles.

Not that anyone has to worrry about this. Because the effects of global warming - which is real - will be so slow that we can adapt. :thumbup:
The point I was making (which OS called hysterical), is that I am still willing to make any small sacrifice I can to combat Climate change even if it's unlikely to affect me.

That people who have offspring who will very likely be affected by climate change are against doing likewise is baffling.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:29 am The Daily Heil?

Image
You can see why they want the scrote, Dacre, in charge of Ofcom.

[Edit] And note how they blame the; "venal political class". The pricks can't even state the simple fact that this is a purely Tory operation.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10426
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

When me and her were talking about the latest sleaze last night, my wife said that this is not about Paterson, there are bigger fish to fry/save.

She is not the only one who thinks this https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... e-watchdog


oh and just when you think having the gall to dismantle the process when it catches you out was as bad as it gets, now they demanding that the independent commissioner should be sacked and disgraced

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... n-paterson
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2802
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Yeah, saw that. This issue pushed me past my seldom breached emailed missive to my Tory MP threshold. Not done that since Cummings' excursion.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2802
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Looks like my email may have done the trick

User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6655
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Honestly staggered they even tried on this. So brazen.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10426
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Margin__Walker wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:35 am Looks like my email may have done the trick


I like the reply to that tweet that has the guys moving the goal posts :lol:
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9251
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Margin__Walker wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:35 am Looks like my email may have done the trick

Clearly direct causality. Can you upbraid them a bit more often, Margin?

I've drafted a message of my own to send Jeremy Hunt, for all the good it'll do. Will have to amend it a bit if they do backtrack to say that even , though they might not have gone through with it, the fact they planned to do so is dangerous for our notions of fairness and democratic oversight.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8729
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:46 am
Margin__Walker wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:35 am Looks like my email may have done the trick

Clearly direct causality. Can you upbraid them a bit more often, Margin?

I've drafted a message of my own to send Jeremy Hunt, for all the good it'll do. Will have to amend it a bit if they do backtrack to say that even , though they might not have gone through with it, the fact they planned to do so is dangerous for our notions of fairness and democratic oversight.
Maybe mention that now you have seen the Tories, "vision", of Democracy, you won't be putting an X beside his name.
yermum
Posts: 560
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:15 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:12 am When me and her were talking about the latest sleaze last night, my wife said that this is not about Paterson, there are bigger fish to fry/save.

She is not the only one who thinks this https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... e-watchdog


oh and just when you think having the gall to dismantle the process when it catches you out was as bad as it gets, now they demanding that the independent commissioner should be sacked and disgraced

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... n-paterson
The builder we used for an extension on our house was also refurbing Boris's Thame family house so it could be rented this summer.

when he took on the job he was dealing direct with BJ and the spec was to do it as cheap and bodged as possible so he could rent it for some quick cash. About halfway through a design consultancy took over and the budget quadrupled and he never spoke to BJ again. All the bills were paid by the consultancy. not saying it was tory donors paying but....
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7315
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Margin__Walker wrote: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:17 am Yeah, saw that. This issue pushed me past my seldom breached emailed missive to my Tory MP threshold. Not done that since Cummings' excursion.
Yep, did the same last night. Despite voting against or abstaining on various votes previously he followed the rest of the sheep through the aye lobby!!!
Post Reply