Was just having fun with you old boy.JM2K6 wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:24 pmWhat on earth was the purpose of your original post if not to be snide? Maybe just don't be a twat to people if you are going to get sniffy if they respond accordingly?Ymx wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2023 11:25 am JM - You honestly give the amazing impression of someone always snidey and angry.
Well played sir.
RWCR1 England vs Argentina
CoolYmx wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:32 pmWas just having fun with you old boy.JM2K6 wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2023 1:24 pmWhat on earth was the purpose of your original post if not to be snide? Maybe just don't be a twat to people if you are going to get sniffy if they respond accordingly?Ymx wrote: Sun Sep 10, 2023 11:25 am JM - You honestly give the amazing impression of someone always snidey and angry.
Well played sir.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Would you 2 just get a room?
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
2 out of 3 members of the World Rugby Disciplinary Committee for Tom Curry's hearing tomorrow evening were also on the panel that overturned Owen Farrell's sending off v Wales.
https://www.world.rugby/news/861336/ind ... -curry-eng
https://www.world.rugby/news/861336/ind ... -curry-eng
Oh Dear - they're unlikely to overturn another one after already having their card marked.topofthemoon wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:11 pm 2 out of 3 members of the World Rugby Disciplinary Committee for Tom Curry's hearing tomorrow evening were also on the panel that overturned Owen Farrell's sending off v Wales.
https://www.world.rugby/news/861336/ind ... -curry-eng
topofthemoon wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:11 pm 2 out of 3 members of the World Rugby Disciplinary Committee for Tom Curry's hearing tomorrow evening were also on the panel that overturned Owen Farrell's sending off v Wales.
https://www.world.rugby/news/861336/ind ... -curry-eng
Who’s looking at the other ones that were apparently:
a) yellow card only
b) not noticed and since considered not worthy or citing
c) not noticed and
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
When the Curry card happened I could sort of see it (had originally thought it would stay yellow and not get upgraded).Sinkers wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 2:45 amtopofthemoon wrote: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:11 pm 2 out of 3 members of the World Rugby Disciplinary Committee for Tom Curry's hearing tomorrow evening were also on the panel that overturned Owen Farrell's sending off v Wales.
https://www.world.rugby/news/861336/ind ... -curry-eng
Who’s looking at the other ones that were apparently:
a) yellow card only
b) not noticed and since considered not worthy or citing
c) not noticed and![]()
After the Segren yellow card I was thinking ok, maybe that's a lower level of danger due to head contact being indirect.
After the Kriel one supposedly being reviewed by the TMO and nothing given (therefore not even meeting the threshold for a penalty let alone a card) and then head on heads in the Wales v Fiji game not even meriting a discussion amongst the officials, I think Richard Smith KC is going to have a field day at this disciplinary tonight!
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Probably fair enough in isolation, albeit a really unfortunate one.
Set against Kriel though, its just weird.
Hopefully they are a little more consistent come the business end of the tournament
Set against Kriel though, its just weird.
Hopefully they are a little more consistent come the business end of the tournament
Quite!Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Sep 12, 2023 4:03 pm Probably fair enough in isolation, albeit a really unfortunate one.
Set against Kriel though, its just weird.
Hopefully they are a little more consistent come the business end of the tournament
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
He accepted the red card which I found interesting given the other decisions over the weekend.
England may have decided Curry missing 2 easy games was less disruptive than challenging and ending up WR appealing if the card was overturned.
England may have decided Curry missing 2 easy games was less disruptive than challenging and ending up WR appealing if the card was overturned.