Look up the Aberdonian meaing of loon (as in Loons and Quines)C69 wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:41 pm
TB63 wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 1:08 pmI know he's autistic, but that's a bit much!..Northern Lights wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 11:34 am
I am about to be banned from having a pint too as the current thinking is we are moving to tier 3 in my neck of the woods. With tier 3 being the second highest tier in a 5 tier system. You honestly couldnt make this nonsense up.
Sorry to hear about your neighbours loon TB.![]()
Thanks anyway..NL the eugenics fan
![]()
So, coronavirus...
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
Aye, loon as in young man/boy but dare i say it in more affectionate way. Clearly our local tongue hasnt made it to Wales.
It's barely made it as far as Edinburgh which is where I heard the phraseNorthern Lights wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:28 pmAye, loon as in young man/boy but dare i say it in more affectionate way. Clearly our local tongue hasnt made it to Wales.
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
duke wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:33 pmIt's barely made it as far as Edinburgh which is where I heard the phraseNorthern Lights wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 2:28 pmAye, loon as in young man/boy but dare i say it in more affectionate way. Clearly our local tongue hasnt made it to Wales.

I spotted that and thought it may be taken the wrong way.
Some major Tory names laying into the GovernmentSaint wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:09 pmIt;s not really 100% clear it will pass - but it is exposing just what a challenge this is in the Tory party and how hard BoJo is having to work to keep his MPs in line. Which is the real reason the sainted Starmer is abstaining.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:55 amI don't have much of an issue with opposition party saying we know by not opposing this it'll pass no issue which is important to see social restrictions continue to apply, but because of some issues specifically around business support we're not going to actually vote with the government.SaintK wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:57 am
Silly buggers all round really
Yesterday the government announce that we will probably need a vaccine passport in order to enter various venues
This morning Gove says exactly the opposite
Yesterday the government publish a very flimsy cost/benefit analysis of the national tiers
This morning it is leaked that the government have been running a secret economic impact analysis across all sectors which they are not going to publish
Same as it ever was with this shower!!!
Less than 2 hours into tier system debate there are signs the tory rebellion could be significantly larger than the 34 who opposed govt over the 2nd lockdown.
D Green, D Davis and A Leadsom among those voted for lockdown in Nov, but have said they won't support govt tonight
When Chris Grayling is calling into question the performance of the government and of the Health department in particular, you know that we are in serious trouble!
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
SaintK wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 3:15 pmSome major Tory names laying into the GovernmentSaint wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:09 pmIt;s not really 100% clear it will pass - but it is exposing just what a challenge this is in the Tory party and how hard BoJo is having to work to keep his MPs in line. Which is the real reason the sainted Starmer is abstaining.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:55 am
I don't have much of an issue with opposition party saying we know by not opposing this it'll pass no issue which is important to see social restrictions continue to apply, but because of some issues specifically around business support we're not going to actually vote with the government.Less than 2 hours into tier system debate there are signs the tory rebellion could be significantly larger than the 34 who opposed govt over the 2nd lockdown.
D Green, D Davis and A Leadsom among those voted for lockdown in Nov, but have said they won't support govt tonight
When Chris Grayling is calling into question the performance of the government and of the Health department in particular, you know that we are in serious trouble!






-
- Posts: 2370
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Is it 99.9% clear it'll pass? If Labour abstain the Govt. would need to suffer an enormous internal revolt and a huge number of Labour MPs would need to go against their leader too you'd think for the Noes to have it, and whilst technically possible I've not heard even slight rumours that either of those events could happen of anything like the required magnitude.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:09 pmIt;s not really 100% clear it will pass - but it is exposing just what a challenge this is in the Tory party and how hard BoJo is having to work to keep his MPs in line. Which is the real reason the sainted Starmer is abstaining.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:55 amI don't have much of an issue with opposition party saying we know by not opposing this it'll pass no issue which is important to see social restrictions continue to apply, but because of some issues specifically around business support we're not going to actually vote with the government.SaintK wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:57 am
Silly buggers all round really
Yesterday the government announce that we will probably need a vaccine passport in order to enter various venues
This morning Gove says exactly the opposite
Yesterday the government publish a very flimsy cost/benefit analysis of the national tiers
This morning it is leaked that the government have been running a secret economic impact analysis across all sectors which they are not going to publish
Same as it ever was with this shower!!!
Yes Starmer is partly doing this to encourage as many Tory MPs to rebel as possible knowing there's no threat coming from Labour that the Tory whips can use, but I still don't mind the stated reasons for the opposition to act as they've indicated. If the Govt. think it important for their to be a unified position with cross party support they should negotiate that, not just expect it because of claims of crisis
The problem with that is that everything appears to be decided within a small cabal between Downing St and the Cabinet Office. It's been reported that Sunak didn't even know about the additional funding for "wet" pubs until he was told at Cabinet this morning!Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 5:26 pmIs it 99.9% clear it'll pass? If Labour abstain the Govt. would need to suffer an enormous internal revolt and a huge number of Labour MPs would need to go against their leader too you'd think for the Noes to have it, and whilst technically possible I've not heard even slight rumours that either of those events could happen of anything like the required magnitude.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:09 pmIt;s not really 100% clear it will pass - but it is exposing just what a challenge this is in the Tory party and how hard BoJo is having to work to keep his MPs in line. Which is the real reason the sainted Starmer is abstaining.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 10:55 am
I don't have much of an issue with opposition party saying we know by not opposing this it'll pass no issue which is important to see social restrictions continue to apply, but because of some issues specifically around business support we're not going to actually vote with the government.
Yes Starmer is partly doing this to encourage as many Tory MPs to rebel as possible knowing there's no threat coming from Labour that the Tory whips can use, but I still don't mind the stated reasons for the opposition to act as they've indicated. If the Govt. think it important for their to be a unified position with cross party support they should negotiate that, not just expect it because of claims of crisis
-
- Posts: 2370
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Blimey. There's a choice for Sunak then, to resign as did Javid or to accept having a hand shoved up where the sun doesn't shine much and be part of the puppet showSaintK wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 5:50 pmThe problem with that is that everything appears to be decided within a small cabal between Downing St and the Cabinet Office. It's been reported that Sunak didn't even know about the additional funding for "wet" pubs until he was told at Cabinet this morning!Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 5:26 pmIs it 99.9% clear it'll pass? If Labour abstain the Govt. would need to suffer an enormous internal revolt and a huge number of Labour MPs would need to go against their leader too you'd think for the Noes to have it, and whilst technically possible I've not heard even slight rumours that either of those events could happen of anything like the required magnitude.Saint wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 12:09 pm
It;s not really 100% clear it will pass - but it is exposing just what a challenge this is in the Tory party and how hard BoJo is having to work to keep his MPs in line. Which is the real reason the sainted Starmer is abstaining.
Yes Starmer is partly doing this to encourage as many Tory MPs to rebel as possible knowing there's no threat coming from Labour that the Tory whips can use, but I still don't mind the stated reasons for the opposition to act as they've indicated. If the Govt. think it important for their to be a unified position with cross party support they should negotiate that, not just expect it because of claims of crisis
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
UK likely to be first western country to license a Covid vaccine
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... id-vaccine
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... id-vaccine
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
I think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 pm Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
You know what this means, don't you?Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:58 pm UK likely to be first western country to license a Covid vaccine
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... id-vaccine
A: It is the wrong thing to do and this will be a disaster. © BoJo
I drink and I forget things.
BoJo isn't an anti vaccer tbh.Enzedder wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:47 amYou know what this means, don't you?Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 8:58 pm UK likely to be first western country to license a Covid vaccine
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/ ... id-vaccine
A: It is the wrong thing to do and this will be a disaster. © BoJo
The vaccine may be started in some NHS areas next week.
I have no issue being first in queue
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
You're correct, the EU won't take short cuts. They will follow their regulatior's advice on the approval. However the UKs regulators are independent from both the EU and the UK government, and they have approved it.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:33 amI think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 pm Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
So while I'm not pro Brexit (I respect the decision) this is a positive for Brexit. Distribution should start within days, so this looks like being at least a month earlier than had we remained part of the EU.
Even the pro remain Guardian sees it that way
I just wish that the Brexiteers weren't trumpeting this as some sort of advantage of being independent of the EU. It risks harming the perception of the vaccine and provides more grist for the anti-vaxxers
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Saint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:55 am I just wish that the Brexiteers weren't trumpeting this as some sort of advantage of being independent of the EU. It risks harming the perception of the vaccine and provides more grist for the anti-vaxxers
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
If that’s a big chunk of NHS front line staff though...
Yeah, have to agree, that seems a decent startBimbowomxn wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:59 amSaint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:55 am I just wish that the Brexiteers weren't trumpeting this as some sort of advantage of being independent of the EU. It risks harming the perception of the vaccine and provides more grist for the anti-vaxxers
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
If that’s a big chunk of NHS front line staff though...
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6670
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:33 amI think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 pm Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
It's not - at least not this side of Christmas. It's care homes and staff getting it first off, and this is a drop in the oceanBimbowomxn wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:59 amSaint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:55 am I just wish that the Brexiteers weren't trumpeting this as some sort of advantage of being independent of the EU. It risks harming the perception of the vaccine and provides more grist for the anti-vaxxers
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
If that’s a big chunk of NHS front line staff though...
If AZ gets approval in the next week and can deliver a the supposed 4 million doses before Christmas that;s a whole other issue
Because people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 amI guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:33 amI think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 pm Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6670
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Well I included the SNP, for balance...Saint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:02 amBecause people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 amI guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:33 am
I think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Of course the government will use this, just the 500 quid to NHS staff from the SNP, but nonetheless the point still stands, we get it earlier and as Bimbo alluded to, hopefully many of our medical staff are protected before they would have beenPaddington Bear wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 amI guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.Rinkals wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:33 amI think we can probably have confidence that the EU won't take short cuts in approving a vaccine.Longshanks wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 9:01 pm Article also suggests that it won't be before the end of December for the EU to authorise the vaccine.
Clearly this is a Brexit plus.
Are you absolutely sure that Boris' government won't be prone to political expediency in the approval process?
Bimbot is the negative one here, thank-you!Saint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 amIt's not - at least not this side of Christmas. It's care homes and staff getting it first off, and this is a drop in the oceanBimbowomxn wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:59 amSaint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 8:55 am I just wish that the Brexiteers weren't trumpeting this as some sort of advantage of being independent of the EU. It risks harming the perception of the vaccine and provides more grist for the anti-vaxxers
As a practical matter this means very little - 800K doses before Christmas = 400K people
If that’s a big chunk of NHS front line staff though...
If AZ gets approval in the next week and can deliver a the supposed 4 million doses before Christmas that;s a whole other issue
I spoke to a couple of nurses last night and they reckon they don't want the vaccine as they as concerned they may get Mild Covid and be signed off. "We wear 18 layers of PPE anyway...."

- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Updated Vaccine Priority list just released.
1. Health Secretary Hancock
2. PM Johnson (if nothing goes wrong with 1)
3. PM Johnson's fiancee and girlfriends
4. Tory Party £1m+ donors (mostly Russian)
5. Tory Party other donors
6. Tory MPs
7. Dogs and horses belonging to the above 1-6
8. Captain Tom on TV
9. HM The Queen
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Testing to see if KarenBot's able to spot my ' not serious' posts.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:31 am If we wanted bad Facebook jokes we'd talk to Enzedder more often

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Hoping we hear about the Oxford vaccine approval soon.
Talking of Oxford, did anyone see that item on ITN the other evening about the pharmaceutical company in India? They will soon be producing 100 million doses a month for use in Asia, Incredible.
Talking of Oxford, did anyone see that item on ITN the other evening about the pharmaceutical company in India? They will soon be producing 100 million doses a month for use in Asia, Incredible.
Read an article about the Serum Institute over the summer. Amazing organisationLongshanks wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:47 am Hoping we hear about the Oxford vaccine approval soon.
Talking of Oxford, did anyone see that item on ITN the other evening about the pharmaceutical company in India? They will soon be producing 100 million doses a month for use in Asia, Incredible.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4606
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I see "Thalidomide" is trending on Twitter again in the UK. Bots and Russians work hard for their money (plus real utter idiots).
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
A serious investment too, in a vaccine they had no idea would work.Saint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:54 amRead an article about the Serum Institute over the summer. Amazing organisationLongshanks wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:47 am Hoping we hear about the Oxford vaccine approval soon.
Talking of Oxford, did anyone see that item on ITN the other evening about the pharmaceutical company in India? They will soon be producing 100 million doses a month for use in Asia, Incredible.
Social media has a lot to answer forSandstorm wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 10:10 amBimbot is the negative one here, thank-you!Saint wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 amIt's not - at least not this side of Christmas. It's care homes and staff getting it first off, and this is a drop in the ocean
If AZ gets approval in the next week and can deliver a the supposed 4 million doses before Christmas that;s a whole other issue
I spoke to a couple of nurses last night and they reckon they don't want the vaccine as they as concerned they may get Mild Covid and be signed off. "We wear 18 layers of PPE anyway...."![]()
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Matt Hancock: “Because we’ve left the EU, we’ve been able to move faster."
Dr June Raine, MHRA boss: “We’ve been able to authorise supply of this vaccine under provisions under European law which exist until January 1st.”
Dr June Raine, MHRA boss: “We’ve been able to authorise supply of this vaccine under provisions under European law which exist until January 1st.”
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
No contradiction.Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:12 am Matt Hancock: “Because we’ve left the EU, we’ve been able to move faster."
Dr June Raine, MHRA boss: “We’ve been able to authorise supply of this vaccine under provisions under European law which exist until January 1st.”
Agreed.Longshanks wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:15 amNo contradiction.Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:12 am Matt Hancock: “Because we’ve left the EU, we’ve been able to move faster."
Dr June Raine, MHRA boss: “We’ve been able to authorise supply of this vaccine under provisions under European law which exist until January 1st.”
Supply chains still in place. Good.
No more EU oversight, we can inject anything we want into Brits like they do in Russia and N Korea. Not so good.

-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Yeah, people had better be careful with that Oxford jab when it comes maybe we should ask what the Slovaks think first..Sandstorm wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:36 amAgreed.Longshanks wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:15 amNo contradiction.Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:12 am Matt Hancock: “Because we’ve left the EU, we’ve been able to move faster."
Dr June Raine, MHRA boss: “We’ve been able to authorise supply of this vaccine under provisions under European law which exist until January 1st.”
Supply chains still in place. Good.
No more EU oversight, we can inject anything we want into Brits like they do in Russia and N Korea. Not so good.
![]()
Bit of context
NHS workers - 1.4 million
Adult Social Care workers - 1.6 million
Over 85 - 1.7 million
80-84 - 1.8 million
75-79 - 2.3 million
70-74 - 3.3 million
65-69 3.4 million
Further 12.9 million over 50.
NHS workers - 1.4 million
Adult Social Care workers - 1.6 million
Over 85 - 1.7 million
80-84 - 1.8 million
75-79 - 2.3 million
70-74 - 3.3 million
65-69 3.4 million
Further 12.9 million over 50.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?