Re: Another 737 down
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:21 am
Capt Steeeve seems like a tool, and his theory of the pilots causing the crash by mistakenly raising the flaps instead of the landing gear seems really fucking stupid
Oh. I'm not agreeing with him: jury is out for me and everyone at the airfield. But that clear footage he had was something new for me whichSandstorm wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:08 amCareful Torque, a lot of actual 787 pilots are debunking everything Capn Steeeve is saying.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:07 am This is an interesting one:
Here is a snip I've taken from another Dreamliner take off
and comparing with the (now improved) video in the video link above, for me it's inconclusive whether Air India had flaps deployed.
Re the flaps, if you watch YouTube of a Dreamliner doing a sharp take off and climb as a demonstration (so presumably lightly loaded, good pilot on board , everything triple checked ) you can see the flaps clearly down on the steep climb, very different from the crash video where if they are down it’s at first setting only.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:07 am This is an interesting one:
Here is a snip I've taken from another Dreamliner take off
and comparing with the (now improved) video in the video link above, for me it's inconclusive whether Air India had flaps deployed.
Slats would increase the critical AOA so I suppose might have been (re)deployed to try and lower the risk of stall?Yeeb wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:47 am Re the flaps, if you watch YouTube of a Dreamliner doing a sharp take off and climb as a demonstration (so presumably lightly loaded, good pilot on board , everything triple checked ) you can see the flaps clearly down on the steep climb, very different from the crash video where if they are down it’s at first setting only.
Crashed wing shows leading edge slats deployed at least , unsure how much these help if power and flap settings don’t match.
Can see the clear zig zag between where flaps end and ailerons are on trailing edge - no zig zag on crash vid
The 787 doesn't use separate FDR & CDR. It uses an EAFR which combines both aspects and there are two of them.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 10:14 am Both the FDR & CVR have now been recovered, so hopefully they're both in good shape & the investigators will start to get some answers.
Crashed video shows the flaps deployed and even if they weren't the plane managed to take off and climb to around 600ft when there was a massive loss of thrust - and only then went downYeeb wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:47 amRe the flaps, if you watch YouTube of a Dreamliner doing a sharp take off and climb as a demonstration (so presumably lightly loaded, good pilot on board , everything triple checked ) you can see the flaps clearly down on the steep climb, very different from the crash video where if they are down it’s at first setting only.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 6:07 am This is an interesting one:
Here is a snip I've taken from another Dreamliner take off
and comparing with the (now improved) video in the video link above, for me it's inconclusive whether Air India had flaps deployed.
Crashed wing shows leading edge slats deployed at least , unsure how much these help if power and flap settings don’t match.
Can see the clear zig zag between where flaps end and ailerons are on trailing edge - no zig zag on crash vid
See earlier ( I think). It almost certainly could not have got off the ground, fully loaded, without flaps deployed.Calculon wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:15 pm Crashed video shows the flaps deployed and even if they weren't the plane managed to take off and climb to around 600ft when there was a massive loss of thrust - and only then went down
![]()
Obligatory Fr Ted referenceCalculon wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:22 pm Don't know. Guy I linked speculates most likely due to fuel valves closing but doesn't say why they shut. Hopefully will find out sooner rather than later.
GE, although it's highly impobable the engines themselves were the problem. But then, this whole incident is highly unlilely in the first place.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:12 pmSee earlier ( I think). It almost certainly could not have got off the ground, fully loaded, without flaps deployed.Calculon wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 1:15 pm Crashed video shows the flaps deployed and even if they weren't the plane managed to take off and climb to around 600ft when there was a massive loss of thrust - and only then went down
![]()
I can't wait for the reason for a catastrophic loss of power to 2 engines (assuming cause), simultaneously. Do we know if this one was GE or Trents?
Why you think it's the pilots fault? At this stage the only pretty clear cause is the loss of thrust, nobody knows why this loss, which he makes clear.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:05 pmObligatory Fr Ted referenceCalculon wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 5:22 pm Don't know. Guy I linked speculates most likely due to fuel valves closing but doesn't say why they shut. Hopefully will find out sooner rather than later.
Why on earth would either Pilot be going anywhere near fuel controls during takeoff ????
He sounds like he's like most of the Youtube experts, just flinging shit at the wall and seeing what sticks !
Very. Rarely are these events down to a single cause but more usually, a combo. of smaller issues that combine to create catastrophe.Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:37 pm GE, although it's highly impobable the engines themselves were the problem. But then, this whole incident is highly unlilely in the first place.![]()