Re: The Official Scottish Rugby Thread
Posted: Thu Oct 08, 2020 5:33 pm
That team won’t be far off and can’t disagree with much. Although no idea why Jaco would deserve a spot
A place where escape goats go to play
https://www.notplanetrugby.com/
Admittedly Jaco had a shocker in his last game against Ospreys, but it would be odd for Scotland not to find a place in the squad for last season's Pro14 Dream Team fly half given the strength in depth for that position in the Scottish game.Slick wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 5:33 pm That team won’t be far off and can’t disagree with much. Although no idea why Jaco would deserve a spot
Was he really? Must admit I didn't know that. I do tend to be hyper critical of stand offs, having almost been world class myself... but I can honestly only remember one game when I've thought he was decent, most of the rest just bang average.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:18 amAdmittedly Jaco had a shocker in his last game against Ospreys, but it would be odd for Scotland not to find a place in the squad for last season's Pro14 Dream Team fly half given the strength in depth for that position in the Scottish game.Slick wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 5:33 pm That team won’t be far off and can’t disagree with much. Although no idea why Jaco would deserve a spot
He was, but I don't know what criteria it was judged on, to be fair.Slick wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:50 amWas he really? Must admit I didn't know that. I do tend to be hyper critical of stand offs, having almost been world class myself... but I can honestly only remember one game when I've thought he was decent, most of the rest just bang average.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:18 amAdmittedly Jaco had a shocker in his last game against Ospreys, but it would be odd for Scotland not to find a place in the squad for last season's Pro14 Dream Team fly half given the strength in depth for that position in the Scottish game.Slick wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 5:33 pm That team won’t be far off and can’t disagree with much. Although no idea why Jaco would deserve a spot
It's absolutely a depth selection. We need a 3rd choice FH we can trust. It appears Weir isn't that, Chamberlain isn't ready and other possibles (Lang, Heathcote etc.) have largely dropped off the radar.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 8:41 amHe was, but I don't know what criteria it was judged on, to be fair.Slick wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:50 amWas he really? Must admit I didn't know that. I do tend to be hyper critical of stand offs, having almost been world class myself... but I can honestly only remember one game when I've thought he was decent, most of the rest just bang average.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 7:18 am
Admittedly Jaco had a shocker in his last game against Ospreys, but it would be odd for Scotland not to find a place in the squad for last season's Pro14 Dream Team fly half given the strength in depth for that position in the Scottish game.
I think he does have weaknesses in his game, but he is the regular starter for one of the better performing teams in the league. He's obviously not in the same class as Finn but after that is Hastings who I think is good behind a dominant pack but not always consistent.
We are still working through fly half but should have it to you soon.
For me it's odd that Townsend doesn't even consider Weir when he's seemingly playing well down at Worcester. I get that he has a certain style of play that he's aiming for, but surely Weir could slot in well enough.KingBlairhorn wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:35 pm I like Weir but Townsend knows exactly what he is about and clearly, for whatever reason, doesn't fancy him. For me that leaves VdW as the next cab off the rank. Add in the fact that he is currently not tied to us and I think that there is a more compelling case for him than Weir.
Lightweight.
I dont really think VDW fits that style eitherrobmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 1:45 pmFor me it's odd that Townsend doesn't even consider Weir when he's seemingly playing well down at Worcester. I get that he has a certain style of play that he's aiming for, but surely Weir could slot in well enough.KingBlairhorn wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:35 pm I like Weir but Townsend knows exactly what he is about and clearly, for whatever reason, doesn't fancy him. For me that leaves VdW as the next cab off the rank. Add in the fact that he is currently not tied to us and I think that there is a more compelling case for him than Weir.
Biffer wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 2:25 pm The 150th anniversary of the 1872 cup is approaching, and I was thinking what can we influence the SRU to do for it.
My idea is to do throwback shirts for the games. Assuming we have three of them, First game is in the original colours from 1872, second game the strips from the first year of professionalism, third game either the current kit at the time or a kit of choice e.g. Edinburgh's multicolour vomit New Year strip.
Any thoughts?
Weir has never let Scotland down, and he’s a kicking stand-off in a way that Finn and Hastings aren’t. I can’t understand why Toony doesn’t pick him as a bench option. I think it must be that there’s one way Toony wants to play, and he doesn’t want to have to change style if there’s an injury.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 1:45 pmFor me it's odd that Townsend doesn't even consider Weir when he's seemingly playing well down at Worcester. I get that he has a certain style of play that he's aiming for, but surely Weir could slot in well enough.KingBlairhorn wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:35 pm I like Weir but Townsend knows exactly what he is about and clearly, for whatever reason, doesn't fancy him. For me that leaves VdW as the next cab off the rank. Add in the fact that he is currently not tied to us and I think that there is a more compelling case for him than Weir.
You'd think it would be nice to have a plan B though.Yr Alban wrote: Sat Oct 10, 2020 11:42 amWeir has never let Scotland down, and he’s a kicking stand-off in a way that Finn and Hastings aren’t. I can’t understand why Toony doesn’t pick him as a bench option. I think it must be that there’s one way Toony wants to play, and he doesn’t want to have to change style if there’s an injury.robmatic wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 1:45 pmFor me it's odd that Townsend doesn't even consider Weir when he's seemingly playing well down at Worcester. I get that he has a certain style of play that he's aiming for, but surely Weir could slot in well enough.KingBlairhorn wrote: Fri Oct 09, 2020 12:35 pm I like Weir but Townsend knows exactly what he is about and clearly, for whatever reason, doesn't fancy him. For me that leaves VdW as the next cab off the rank. Add in the fact that he is currently not tied to us and I think that there is a more compelling case for him than Weir.
Yeah, he added a bit of "zip".
Yup, you just knew it was coming
And there has been for years. How many big games have our teams thrown away at the death? Even 38-38 was us bottling it - should have been our first win at Twickenham since I was 10.
I realise he may be injured but if he's fit for one game Tagive is 100% getting a cap.KingBlairhorn wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:11 pm My (38 man, 21/17 split) squad would be (assuming all are fit):
Forwards:
Fagerson, Nel, Berghan
Sutherland, Kebble, Bhatti/Rae
Brown, McInally, Turner
Gray (J), Cummings, Gilchrist, Toolis, Hunter-Hill
Crosbie, Ritchie, Watson, Fagerson, Bradbury, Skinner (lock/back-row), Thomson
Backs:
Price, Horne, Sam H-C
Russell, Hastings, Jaco VdW
Harris, Johnson, Taylor, Hutchinson, Jones, Matt Scott
Graham, Duhan, Maitland, Kinghorn
Hogg
Just to be clear, is the consecus that Tagive is good? I've only seen him a couple of times and he was hilariously crap in one game but looked OK in the other. Not a troll, I really don't know.I like neeps wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 7:58 amI realise he may be injured but if he's fit for one game Tagive is 100% getting a cap.KingBlairhorn wrote: Thu Oct 08, 2020 3:11 pm My (38 man, 21/17 split) squad would be (assuming all are fit):
Forwards:
Fagerson, Nel, Berghan
Sutherland, Kebble, Bhatti/Rae
Brown, McInally, Turner
Gray (J), Cummings, Gilchrist, Toolis, Hunter-Hill
Crosbie, Ritchie, Watson, Fagerson, Bradbury, Skinner (lock/back-row), Thomson
Backs:
Price, Horne, Sam H-C
Russell, Hastings, Jaco VdW
Harris, Johnson, Taylor, Hutchinson, Jones, Matt Scott
Graham, Duhan, Maitland, Kinghorn
Hogg
Blade Thomson was good yesterday but got injured. And he's pushing 30 and not a "test animal" as Eddie Jones would say.
Slick wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 8:50 am
Just to be clear, is the consecus that Tagive is good? I've only seen him a couple of times and he was hilariously crap in one game but looked OK in the other. Not a troll, I really don't know.
Attacked well yesterday and finished his try well Vs Edinburgh.clydecloggie wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:26 am Defensively a solid, dependable winger, very good under the high ball which at times can be an issue for the Scottish back-3. In attack - I haven't seen much yet. He doesn't seem to have the dancing feet of a Darcy Graham, he's more of a hold-your-position, finish-the-move type player from what I've seen.
Fair point on Tagive, I thought he was excellent before being KO'd yesterday. In particular, he was genuinely excellent in the air. I wonder if he played Aussie Rules at any point? I'm not sure who's place he takes though? Darcy and Duhan are match winners, Maitland is Mr Dependable and Kinghorn gives versatility with his ability to play wing and fullback to test standard. It will probably come down to injury.I like neeps wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:55 amAttacked well yesterday and finished his try well Vs Edinburgh.clydecloggie wrote: Mon Oct 12, 2020 9:26 am Defensively a solid, dependable winger, very good under the high ball which at times can be an issue for the Scottish back-3. In attack - I haven't seen much yet. He doesn't seem to have the dancing feet of a Darcy Graham, he's more of a hold-your-position, finish-the-move type player from what I've seen.
I don't think he's great but we'll cap him as break glass in case if emergency. See also Van Der Walt, Jaco.