Page 201 of 375
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:19 pm
by Ted.
Raggs wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 6:23 pm
FFS, really still peddling that shit? It's been shown many times that it stops you from giving it to others, not so much catching it yourself.
All viruses get through? Feck off, any virus contained in a droplet won't get through, because the droplet it's contained in doesn't get through.
Are we really still having to explain this bollocks?
Apparently, yes.
If we accept that there are both a number of easily led and in some instances extremely dim-witted people out and about along with some very deceitful people, I think these sort of explanations will never cease being useful.

Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:30 pm
by Saint
Ted. wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:19 pm
Raggs wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 6:23 pm
FFS, really still peddling that shit? It's been shown many times that it stops you from giving it to others, not so much catching it yourself.
All viruses get through? Feck off, any virus contained in a droplet won't get through, because the droplet it's contained in doesn't get through.
Are we really still having to explain this bollocks?
Apparently, yes.
If we accept that there are both a number of easily led and in some instances extremely dim-witted people out and about along with some very deceitful people, I think these sort of explanations will never cease being useful.
If it weren't for the fact that the antivax brigade negatively impact the whole population I would be quite happy to write the lot of them off to Darwin
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:07 pm
by Enzedder
Sandstorm wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 8:12 am
Enzedder wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:37 am
Sandstorm wrote: Sun Jan 31, 2021 6:20 pm
My 46 year old brother had his second AZ jab on Friday. All day and night of Saturday he felt really achy with a migraine. Feels 100% again today.
What sort of political push does he have to have had 2 jabs when aged just 46?
He’s on Maui. Teacher. Frontline worker. There’s only 130k on the island and the Hawaiian governor is on the ball.
Bugger - good for him but my mate in Birmingham is going to have to just stay home.
Thanks
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:38 am
by Ted.
Saint wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:30 pm
Ted. wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:19 pm
Raggs wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 6:23 pm
FFS, really still peddling that shit? It's been shown many times that it stops you from giving it to others, not so much catching it yourself.
All viruses get through? Feck off, any virus contained in a droplet won't get through, because the droplet it's contained in doesn't get through.
Are we really still having to explain this bollocks?
Apparently, yes.
If we accept that there are both a number of easily led and in some instances extremely dim-witted people out and about along with some very deceitful people, I think these sort of explanations will never cease being useful.
If it weren't for the fact that the antivax brigade negatively impact the whole population I would be quite happy to write the lot of them off to Darwin
It makes you wonder how many deaths these people are responsible for.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:52 am
by fishfoodie
Ted. wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:38 am
Saint wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:30 pm
Ted. wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:19 pm
Apparently, yes.
If we accept that there are both a number of easily led and in some instances extremely dim-witted people out and about along with some very deceitful people, I think these sort of explanations will never cease being useful.
If it weren't for the fact that the antivax brigade negatively impact the whole population I would be quite happy to write the lot of them off to Darwin
It makes you wonder how many deaths these people are responsible for.
Well just look at how many lives the despicable cunt Wakefield destroyed; & extrapolate, the difference between illnesses with relatively small mortality rates; & a global pandemic .....
If there was one individual I would cheerfully cut their throat; it would be Wakefield.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:47 am
by Gumboot
fishfoodie wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:52 am
Ted. wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 12:38 am
Saint wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 9:30 pm
If it weren't for the fact that the antivax brigade negatively impact the whole population I would be quite happy to write the lot of them off to Darwin
It makes you wonder how many deaths these people are responsible for.
Well just look at how many lives the despicable cunt Wakefield destroyed; & extrapolate, the difference between illnesses with relatively small mortality rates; & a global pandemic .....
If there was one individual I would cheerfully cut their throat; it would be Wakefield.
I've just been reading about Wakefield - he sounds like a proper cunt all right.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:26 am
by robmatic
Biffer wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:15 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:35 pm
Saint wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:38 pm
In the meantime we appear to have almost oversupplied overseas territories. A school friend of mine (so early 40s), no pre-existing etc. lives out in the Cayman Islands. Got his dose over the weekend after they'd cleared through all the at risk categories
Reminds me of an event I organised years ago for the Overseas Territories at the FCO. An hour before the audience arrived the couriers delivered the investment guides. We were all cooing over what a great job the designer had done - Cayman Islands illustrated with nice beaches and palm trees, Tristan da Cunha with their prized lobsters etc - when a scream came from the Falklands group... the designer had used a fucking fighter jet to promote them.
What did he want, a penguin on a barren rock?
Could have been a particularly glamorous sheep.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:27 am
by Openside
Opensides Butler wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 1:08 pm
tc27 wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 12:07 pm
The SA variant found in Surrey with people who have not travelled or knowingly met people who have.
A massive door to door testing effort is going to be started in the affected areas. T&T is supposed to be working reasonably well now - I guess we will see.
Juan, the poolboy, has gone into hiding.
He better get back to work or a hiding is exactly what he’ll get!!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:10 am
by Sandstorm
Enzedder wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 10:07 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 8:12 am
Enzedder wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 2:37 am
What sort of political push does he have to have had 2 jabs when aged just 46?
He’s on Maui. Teacher. Frontline worker. There’s only 130k on the island and the Hawaiian governor is on the ball.
Bugger - good for him but my mate in Birmingham is going to have to just stay home.
Thanks
Same for me, mate. No use moaning about being young.

Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:28 am
by Sards
robmatic wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:26 am
Biffer wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:15 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:35 pm
Reminds me of an event I organised years ago for the Overseas Territories at the FCO. An hour before the audience arrived the couriers delivered the investment guides. We were all cooing over what a great job the designer had done - Cayman Islands illustrated with nice beaches and palm trees, Tristan da Cunha with their prized lobsters etc - when a scream came from the Falklands group... the designer had used a fucking fighter jet to promote them.
What did he want, a penguin on a barren rock?
Could have been a particularly glamorous sheep.

Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:47 am
by fishfoodie
robmatic wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:26 am
Biffer wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:15 pm
Slick wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 3:35 pm
Reminds me of an event I organised years ago for the Overseas Territories at the FCO. An hour before the audience arrived the couriers delivered the investment guides. We were all cooing over what a great job the designer had done - Cayman Islands illustrated with nice beaches and palm trees, Tristan da Cunha with their prized lobsters etc - when a scream came from the Falklands group... the designer had used a fucking fighter jet to promote them.
What did he want, a penguin on a barren rock?
Could have been a particularly glamorous sheep.
Miss Falklands 2020

Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:36 pm
by Saint
So, the Russians finally have some trial data to report on Sputnik V - 92% effective. Just as well given that they've already given it to a lot of people.....
It also speaks well to the expected results of mixing different vaccines for the 2nd dose, as Sputnik V is effectively 2 different vaccines........
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:53 pm
by Saint
And in other news Ursula has moved on from trying to take UK vaccine stocks to trying to strengthen the UK anti-vax brigade
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:57 pm
by Raggs
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:53 pm
And in other news Ursula has moved on from trying to take UK vaccine stocks to trying to strengthen the UK anti-vax brigade
?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:03 pm
by Lobby
Raggs wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:57 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:53 pm
And in other news Ursula has moved on from trying to take UK vaccine stocks to trying to strengthen the UK anti-vax brigade
?
The vaccination programme in the UK has enjoyed a head start through compromising on “safety and efficacy” safeguards, the European commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has claimed.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ine-safety
She’s not alone, and there now seems to be a concerted effort by EU ministers to claim the UK vaccination programme is unsafe. As well as earlier comments from Macron and Mark Rutte, we now have this from France's Europe minister, Clément Beaune:
The UK has taken 'a lot of risks' in its vaccine programme, Beaune told reporters:
'The British are in an extremely difficult health situation. They are taking many risks in this vaccination campaign. And I can understand it, but they are taking many risks. They have spaced – and the scientists have told us not to – they have massively spaced the two injections apart…They mainly depend on one vaccine, AstraZeneca.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:04 pm
by Biffer
35,000 vaccinations recorded in Scotland yesterday. Not sure if some of that is a lag in reporting, or how much it’s the opening of mass centres in Edinburgh and Aberdeen.
Edinburgh NHS also saying that their numbers have been under reported for some reason, by about 25,000.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:09 pm
by Raggs
Lobby wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:03 pm
Raggs wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:57 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:53 pm
And in other news Ursula has moved on from trying to take UK vaccine stocks to trying to strengthen the UK anti-vax brigade
?
The vaccination programme in the UK has enjoyed a head start through compromising on “safety and efficacy” safeguards, the European commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has claimed.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ine-safety
Same swipe as the US took at us, before walking back if I recall.
Have to say, as they then go on to approve it, with the same trial data, it surely just makes them look slow? However, I do get your point in terms of trying to erode trust.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:19 pm
by GogLais
NHS doesn't do IT does it. We received letters today telling us we could book the vaccine on-line. Yippeeee!. Well no. You select a time, go through the rest of the process asap and get told that that slot is no longer available. I had to do this three times before I succeeded, I suppose you're effectively in a booking race with other punters.
It then tells me again that my attempt has failed but it doesn't say whether it's the first or second booking that's been unsuccessful so you start again from scratch even though the first booking might be ok. I eventually ended up with a screen telling me my second jab is in Chester and an email telling me it's in Liverpool. It's so much easier to book a holiday.
In fairness the person I spoke to on 119 sorted it out quickly. However, he asked Ms GL whether she identified as female or male but not me. Funny that.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:20 pm
by GogLais
fishfoodie wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 11:47 am
robmatic wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:26 am
Biffer wrote: Mon Feb 01, 2021 4:15 pm
What did he want, a penguin on a barren rock?
Could have been a particularly glamorous sheep.
Miss Falklands 2020
Too young.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:22 pm
by Saint
Lobby wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:03 pm
Raggs wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:57 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 1:53 pm
And in other news Ursula has moved on from trying to take UK vaccine stocks to trying to strengthen the UK anti-vax brigade
?
The vaccination programme in the UK has enjoyed a head start through compromising on “safety and efficacy” safeguards, the European commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, has claimed.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/ ... ine-safety
She’s not alone, and there now seems to be a concerted effort by EU ministers to claim the UK vaccination programme is unsafe. As well as earlier comments from Macron and Mark Rutte, we now have this from France's Europe minister, Clément Beaune:
The UK has taken 'a lot of risks' in its vaccine programme, Beaune told reporters:
'The British are in an extremely difficult health situation. They are taking many risks in this vaccination campaign. And I can understand it, but they are taking many risks. They have spaced – and the scientists have told us not to – they have massively spaced the two injections apart…They mainly depend on one vaccine, AstraZeneca.
Hadn't seen the second quote. You have to laugh at "They mainly depend on one vaccine", as if there were a multitude of options open to us right now. We're actively jabbing 2 out of the 3 UK (and EU) approved vaccines - the only reason it's not 3 is that Moderna won't arrive in the UK till April. We'll likely have Novovax approved and be jabbing that by then, while the EU don;t even have an order for that.
I know that the French in particular have a problem with getting take-up rates up - but doing it by actively denigrating the UK is a pretty poor strategy, especially as they've actually now approved exactly the same set of vaccines
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:24 pm
by Saint
GogLais wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:19 pm
NHS doesn't do IT does it. We received letters today telling us we could book the vaccine on-line. Yippeeee!. Well no. You select a time, go through the rest of the process asap and get told that that slot is no longer available. I had to do this three times before I succeeded, I suppose you're effectively in a booking race with other punters.
It then tells me again that my attempt has failed but it doesn't say whether it's the first or second booking that's been unsuccessful so you start again from scratch even though the first booking might be ok. I eventually ended up with a screen telling me my second jab is in Chester and an email telling me it's in Liverpool. It's so much easier to book a holiday.
In fairness the person I spoke to on 119 sorted it out quickly. However, he asked Ms GL whether she identified as female or male but not me. Funny that.
It;s a platform that's been thrown together at short notice to support a nationwide programme when the NHS simply isn't built like that. I'm slightly surprised that they got the DNS correctly registered tbh
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:31 pm
by GogLais
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:24 pm
GogLais wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:19 pm
NHS doesn't do IT does it. We received letters today telling us we could book the vaccine on-line. Yippeeee!. Well no. You select a time, go through the rest of the process asap and get told that that slot is no longer available. I had to do this three times before I succeeded, I suppose you're effectively in a booking race with other punters.
It then tells me again that my attempt has failed but it doesn't say whether it's the first or second booking that's been unsuccessful so you start again from scratch even though the first booking might be ok. I eventually ended up with a screen telling me my second jab is in Chester and an email telling me it's in Liverpool. It's so much easier to book a holiday.
In fairness the person I spoke to on 119 sorted it out quickly. However, he asked Ms GL whether she identified as female or male but not me. Funny that.
It;s a platform that's been thrown together at short notice to support a nationwide programme when the NHS simply isn't built like that. I'm slightly surprised that they got the DNS correctly registered tbh
Well yes but. I know people are under pressure but we’ve known since last March that a mass vaccination programme was almost certainly going to be needed. Some might say that we should have had a national plan for mass vaccination in place all along. Perhaps we did, I don’t know.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:34 pm
by tc27
Biffer wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:04 pm
35,000 vaccinations recorded in Scotland yesterday. Not sure if some of that is a lag in reporting, or how much it’s the opening of mass centres in Edinburgh and Aberdeen.
Edinburgh NHS also saying that their numbers have been under reported for some reason, by about 25,000.
Looking at Scotland's numbers I am sure some reporting lag is happening but its good to get a big number - my rough estimation is that Scotland needs an average daily rate of about 30k to hit the mid February target.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:44 pm
by Sandstorm
GogLais wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:31 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:24 pm
GogLais wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 2:19 pm
NHS doesn't do IT does it. We received letters today telling us we could book the vaccine on-line. Yippeeee!. Well no. You select a time, go through the rest of the process asap and get told that that slot is no longer available. I had to do this three times before I succeeded, I suppose you're effectively in a booking race with other punters.
It then tells me again that my attempt has failed but it doesn't say whether it's the first or second booking that's been unsuccessful so you start again from scratch even though the first booking might be ok. I eventually ended up with a screen telling me my second jab is in Chester and an email telling me it's in Liverpool. It's so much easier to book a holiday.
In fairness the person I spoke to on 119 sorted it out quickly. However, he asked Ms GL whether she identified as female or male but not me. Funny that.
It;s a platform that's been thrown together at short notice to support a nationwide programme when the NHS simply isn't built like that. I'm slightly surprised that they got the DNS correctly registered tbh
Well yes but. I know people are under pressure but we’ve known since last March that a mass vaccination programme was almost certainly going to be needed. Some might say that we should have had a national plan for mass vaccination in place all along. Perhaps we did, I don’t know.
Easyjet holidays are basically dead, should have asked Stelios to manage the jab schedule instead.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:13 pm
by Saint
So, 353K doses delivered yesterday, up from 282K the week before.
7 day average is 402K per day - 2.8 million per week
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:16 pm
by tc27
Good news:
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:18 pm
by SaintK
tc27 wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:16 pm
Good news:
Is this in general or a specific one?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:27 pm
by tc27
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:13 pm
So, 353K doses delivered yesterday, up from 282K the week before.
7 day average is 402K per day - 2.8 million per week
Contrasted with a real slowdown in EU wide deliveries anticipated over the next few weeks - I wonder what the anti UK rhetoric is going to be then.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 5:43 pm
by tc27
More info from the Oxford study.
https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2021-02-02-ox ... h-interval
Its really good news
Analyses reveal single standard dose efficacy from day 22 to day 90 post vaccination of 76% with protection not falling in this three-month period
After the second dose vaccine efficacy from two standard doses is 82.4% with the 3-month interval being used in the UK. (82.4% effective, with a 95% confidence interval of 62.7% - 91.7% at 12+ weeks)
Data supports the 4-12 week prime-boost dosing interval recommended by many global regulators
Analyses of PCR positive swabs in UK population suggests vaccine may have substantial effect on transmission of the virus with 67% reduction in positive swabs among those vaccinated
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 6:17 pm
by Marylandolorian
Also, from this article
The exploratory analyses presented in this preprint suggest that it is the dosing interval and not the dosing level which has a great impact on the efficacy of the vaccine. This is in line with previous research supporting greater efficacy with longer prime-boost intervals done with other vaccines such as influenza, Ebola and malaria.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:05 pm
by Saint
Lots of good news today. Really wasn't expecting the reduction in transmissibility - I was more or less resigned to this becoming background. It suggest that 2-3 years of booster vaccines (adjusted for strains) could really bring this under control
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:22 pm
by Dinsdale Piranha
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:05 pm
Lots of good news today. Really wasn't expecting the reduction in transmissibility - I was more or less resigned to this becoming background. It suggest that 2-3 years of booster vaccines (adjusted for strains) could really bring this under control
The confirmed effect on transmissiblity is a massive boost. It gets the R number of the newer variants back to something manageable
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:27 pm
by Biffer
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:30 pm
by Saint
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:22 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:05 pm
Lots of good news today. Really wasn't expecting the reduction in transmissibility - I was more or less resigned to this becoming background. It suggest that 2-3 years of booster vaccines (adjusted for strains) could really bring this under control
The confirmed effect on transmissiblity is a massive boost. It gets the R number of the newer variants back to something manageable
Yeah. The route out of this looks much more viable now. Another 6-7 months to get the adult population fully vaccinated, at 70% vaccination rate and 60%+ reduced transmission we could get the r below 1 long term.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:31 pm
by Raggs
76% against symptomatic, means only 1 in 6 (if my maths is correct) will get any symptoms.
What really interested me though is the effect on long covid.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:32 pm
by Biffer
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:35 pm
by Lobby
Biffer wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:27 pm
And yet in Europe, Germany, France and Sweden won’t use it for anyone over 65; Poland won’t use it for anyone over 60; and Italy won’t use it for anyone over 55. At their current rate of vaccination, I’m not sure they’ll actually need any AZ doses until the Autumn.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:44 pm
by Saint
Lobby wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:35 pm
Biffer wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:27 pm
And yet in Europe, Germany, France and Sweden won’t use it for anyone over 65; Poland won’t use it for anyone over 60; and Italy won’t use it for anyone over 55. At their current rate of vaccination, I’m not sure they’ll actually need any AZ doses until the Autumn.
Which then leave you wondering what all the fuss was about - unless it was to divert attention from something else?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:50 pm
by Slick
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:44 pm
Lobby wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:35 pm
Biffer wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 7:27 pm
And yet in Europe, Germany, France and Sweden won’t use it for anyone over 65; Poland won’t use it for anyone over 60; and Italy won’t use it for anyone over 55. At their current rate of vaccination, I’m not sure they’ll actually need any AZ doses until the Autumn.
Which then leave you wondering what all the fuss was about - unless it was to divert attention from something else?
Don’t understand this
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2021 10:11 pm
by Saint
Slick wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:50 pm
Saint wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 9:44 pm
Lobby wrote: Tue Feb 02, 2021 8:35 pm
And yet in Europe, Germany, France and Sweden won’t use it for anyone over 65; Poland won’t use it for anyone over 60; and Italy won’t use it for anyone over 55. At their current rate of vaccination, I’m not sure they’ll actually need any AZ doses until the Autumn.
Which then leave you wondering what all the fuss was about - unless it was to divert attention from something else?
Don’t understand this
Which bit?