Sam Burgess Convicted
Posted: Fri Feb 05, 2021 11:53 am
or we'd all end up with similar convictions.had yelled a threat in Mitchell Hooke's face at Hooke's property in Sydney
Plenty more to it, yeah. Threatened him, was barely in control, etc. All verbal but he only has to make the guy fear for his safety to be guilty, and, well...Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:45 pm Okay, he's a mungo so I want to laugh. However, I do hope there was a bit more to it thanor we'd all end up with similar convictions.had yelled a threat in Mitchell Hooke's face at Hooke's property in Sydney
There must be a dozen such incidents in every High St on a Saturday night in normal, none lockdown conditions. This reads as there being much more to it but that he could only be pinned on a relatively minor misdemeanour for which he's received the maximum possible punishment for to compensate. Not a fan of that kind of application of the law.JM2K6 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:14 pmPlenty more to it, yeah. Threatened him, was barely in control, etc. All verbal but he only has to make the guy fear for his safety to be guilty, and, well...Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:45 pm Okay, he's a mungo so I want to laugh. However, I do hope there was a bit more to it thanor we'd all end up with similar convictions.had yelled a threat in Mitchell Hooke's face at Hooke's property in Sydney
There's quite a difference between two drunk blokes yelling at each other on the high street, and a gigantic professional rugby player threatening the life of his estranged wife's elderly father. The personal connection, the absurd physical disparity, the understanding that Burgess is a psycho who hurts people for a living, the repeated incidents of 'out of control' behaviour, and the difference in UK and Aussie law makes this one a no-brainer.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 9:37 amThere must be a dozen such incidents in every High St on a Saturday night in normal, none lockdown conditions. This reads as there being much more to it but that he could only be pinned on a relatively minor misdemeanour for which he's received the maximum possible punishment for to compensate. Not a fan of that kind of application of the law.JM2K6 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:14 pmPlenty more to it, yeah. Threatened him, was barely in control, etc. All verbal but he only has to make the guy fear for his safety to be guilty, and, well...Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Feb 23, 2021 2:45 pm Okay, he's a mungo so I want to laugh. However, I do hope there was a bit more to it than
or we'd all end up with similar convictions.
That's probably the explanation.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Feb 24, 2021 10:31 am There's quite a difference between two drunk blokes yelling at each other on the high street, and a gigantic professional rugby player threatening the life of his estranged wife's elderly father. The personal connection, the absurd physical disparity, the understanding that Burgess is a psycho who hurts people for a living, the repeated incidents of 'out of control' behaviour, and the difference in UK and Aussie law makes this one a no-brainer.