Beast calls out Ellis Genge

Where goats go to escape
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am



Nothing would make Genge drop the tough guy act like having to scrum against Beast :lol:

Loads of delicate poms in the replies
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

The answer in regards sanction (at least from without) is nothing.

What that does signal to me is how much discipline is breaking down amongst Eng players. Not sure how TMO missed that but for me it's red. Yellow minimum.

As an aside, this is another example of why players should stay OFF social meejuh.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Genge responds:



Making as if Beast wouldn't destroy him in any physical confrontation :lol:
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
'Rubs his forearm'

He pushes his elbow into his face
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:05 pm The answer in regards sanction (at least from without) is nothing.

What that does signal to me is how much discipline is breaking down amongst Eng players. Not sure how TMO missed that but for me it's red. Yellow minimum.

As an aside, this is another example of why players should stay OFF social meejuh.
England have never really recovered from 2019 RWC final. It broke them, I guess it can be hard to get confidence back after being destroyed physically and tactically.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Lemoentjie wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:10 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
'Rubs his forearm'

He pushes his elbow into his face
Nah. He's rubbing his forearm in his face. Hence no citing.

Saffers don't get to complain about shithousery, given you guys are number one for this sort of niggly nonsense, and "Beast" looks a right twat for threatening someone on Twitter, the big jessie.

Genge is a dickhead but no one comes out of that spat smelling like roses.
tc27
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Saffers beat us comfortably in the RWC final yet we are still apparently living rent free in their heads?

Hopefully the Boks can get back to playing games so they can move on.
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 16059
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

Vok me. There is nothing in it. Look like Beast are struggling being a retired player.
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Attacking a man who can't defend himself makes you a massive kunt
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4650
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

Bit of a nothing story if you ask me.
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 16059
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

Lemoentjie wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:24 pm Attacking a man who can't defend himself makes you a massive kunt
Playing attacking rugby is great. Its part of the sport. Next time he'll be on the receiving end. Maybe Corne Krige should have a talk with Beast.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9356
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Not sure why Beast felt the need to get involved and anyone who was in a team with Bakkies Botha, but never called him out, should probably keep schtum about the cheap shots of other players.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
It's not a good gif but isn't all that contact to the neck/face? In which case that's almost always a red these days.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2814
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:36 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
It's not a good gif but isn't all that contact to the neck/face? In which case that's almost always a red these days.
I don't think there's a law in the law book that specifies that rubbing your forearm in a player's face is a red. Happy to be corrected.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:36 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
It's not a good gif but isn't all that contact to the neck/face? In which case that's almost always a red these days.
Nah, they normally talk about a strike if it's not a tackle. It's very, very, very rare to get a red for this sort of thing.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:42 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:36 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
It's not a good gif but isn't all that contact to the neck/face? In which case that's almost always a red these days.
I don't think there's a law in the law book that specifies that rubbing your forearm in a player's face is a red. Happy to be corrected.
There isn't a Law stating that sticking your finger up your opponent's arse is a red. What's your point?
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2814
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:07 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:42 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:36 pm

It's not a good gif but isn't all that contact to the neck/face? In which case that's almost always a red these days.
I don't think there's a law in the law book that specifies that rubbing your forearm in a player's face is a red. Happy to be corrected.
There isn't a Law stating that sticking your finger up your opponent's arse is a red. What's your point?
My point is that unseemly as it is. Reds for physical acts are generally handed out for offenses with a high degree of danger.

Something that's not the case here.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

assfly wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:26 pm Bit of a nothing story if you ask me.
Yep, but obviously not to your fellow countryman who wants to act like a shit stirring twat
Biffer
Posts: 10239
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:14 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:10 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:08 pm Why is it a red card? He doesn't strike the twat, just rubs his forearm on him. It'd be a yellow, though, and very poor discipline.
'Rubs his forearm'

He pushes his elbow into his face
Nah. He's rubbing his forearm in his face. Hence no citing.

Saffers don't get to complain about shithousery, given you guys are number one for this sort of niggly nonsense, and "Beast" looks a right twat for threatening someone on Twitter, the big jessie.

Genge is a dickhead but no one comes out of that spat smelling like roses.
Contact with the eye area.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Biffer wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:17 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:14 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:10 pm

'Rubs his forearm'

He pushes his elbow into his face
Nah. He's rubbing his forearm in his face. Hence no citing.

Saffers don't get to complain about shithousery, given you guys are number one for this sort of niggly nonsense, and "Beast" looks a right twat for threatening someone on Twitter, the big jessie.

Genge is a dickhead but no one comes out of that spat smelling like roses.
Contact with the eye area.
Cripes, you must have better eyesight than me then.

No hands near the eyes, though, which is what that law is about.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:11 pm My point is that unseemly as it is. Reds for physical acts are generally handed out for offenses with a high degree of danger.

Something that's not the case here.
Maybe. This is repeated (so meditated), to the face area against an opponent unable to defend himself on the floor.

My reaction, had that been Haouas, would have been "you f**king moron, you just got yourself sent off".
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:18 pm Cripes, you must have better eyesight than me then.

No hands near the eyes, though, which is what that law is about.
There is no contact with the eyes. "Contact to the eye area" is not the only law which can result in red..
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2814
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:27 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:11 pm My point is that unseemly as it is. Reds for physical acts are generally handed out for offenses with a high degree of danger.

Something that's not the case here.
Maybe. This is repeated (so meditated), to the face area against an opponent unable to defend himself on the floor.

My reaction, had that been Haouas, would have been "you f**king moron, you just got yourself sent off".
Well I think we can all agree that Genge is a moron, prone to doing something stupid whenever he's held in at the ruck. Albeit you give him too much credit on the meditated. He doesn't seem to think particularly hard about anything.

That doesn't make it a red card offence though.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:29 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:18 pm Cripes, you must have better eyesight than me then.

No hands near the eyes, though, which is what that law is about.
There is no contact with the eyes. "Contact to the eye area" is not the only law which can result in red..
Thanks but I was replying to someone who was talking about that law so hey
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:34 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:27 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:11 pm My point is that unseemly as it is. Reds for physical acts are generally handed out for offenses with a high degree of danger.

Something that's not the case here.
Maybe. This is repeated (so meditated), to the face area against an opponent unable to defend himself on the floor.

My reaction, had that been Haouas, would have been "you f**king moron, you just got yourself sent off".
Well I think we can all agree that Genge is a moron, prone to doing something stupid whenever he's held in at the ruck. Albeit you give him too much credit on the meditated. He doesn't seem to think particularly hard about anything.

That doesn't make it a red card offence though.
................not forgetting that the Citing Officer who would have seen the incident from all available angles didn't report it for disciplinary action!
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:34 pm Well I think we can all agree that Genge is a moron, prone to doing something stupid whenever he's held in at the ruck. Albeit you give him too much credit on the meditated. He doesn't seem to think particularly hard about anything.

That doesn't make it a red card offence though.
You may be right on the card. If I were the ntl coach, he'd be gone. Too many headcases in the Eng side already.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12062
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

SaintK wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 4:23 pm ................not forgetting that the Citing Officer who would have seen the incident from all available angles didn't report it for disciplinary action!
I know. I saw that in the Torygraph. But you can only cite for red level offences which means he got away with his idiocy so expect to see it again at a cinema near you.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2814
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 4:23 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:34 pm Well I think we can all agree that Genge is a moron, prone to doing something stupid whenever he's held in at the ruck. Albeit you give him too much credit on the meditated. He doesn't seem to think particularly hard about anything.

That doesn't make it a red card offence though.
You may be right on the card. If I were the ntl coach, he'd be gone. Too many headcases in the Eng side already.
Yeah agree. For the moment anyway. He's not good enough to justify carrying his aggro
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11904
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

It's Sexton. Genge should get the Key to the City.
User avatar
Chilli
Posts: 5652
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:15 pm
Location: In Die Baai in.

Beast should maybe not get involved.
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

What triggered it? There was something more than just being held in? A bite?
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2814
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

shaggy wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 5:16 pm What triggered it? There was something more than just being held in? A bite?
Nah, just being held in. It's the second time he's lost it at some minor shithousery this 6N.

He's such an easy mark for the opposition.

Must admit to smiling a bit when Sexton was complaining to the ref about it and Genge told him that 'Grandad was holding me in' or something to that effect.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6734
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

South African rugby criticising cheap shots. What a world we live in
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11904
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 5:36 pm South African rugby criticising cheap shots. What a world we live in
He’s a Zimbo. Angels.
User avatar
average joe
Posts: 1895
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 5:46 am
Location: kuvukiland

Nothing in it. The backs always came complaining to me "no8 roughed me up, the hooker grabbed my balls". My reply was always the same" don't worry boet, I'll get him for you at the next ruck"
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4650
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

SaintK wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:14 pm Yep, but obviously not to your fellow countryman who wants to act like a shit stirring twat
It's Twitter ffs. Every second person is a shit-stirring twat.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

assfly wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:35 am
SaintK wrote: Tue Mar 23, 2021 3:14 pm Yep, but obviously not to your fellow countryman who wants to act like a shit stirring twat
It's Twitter ffs. Every second person is a shit-stirring twat.
Was referring to the twat who posted it and his subsequent comments not the Beast's Twitter feed.
User avatar
assfly
Posts: 4650
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:30 am

SaintK wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:52 am Was referring to the twat who posted it and his subsequent comments not the Beast's Twitter feed.
Ah I see.

But my point on Twitter still stands. Bloody awful place.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7414
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

assfly wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:53 am
SaintK wrote: Wed Mar 24, 2021 8:52 am Was referring to the twat who posted it and his subsequent comments not the Beast's Twitter feed.
Ah I see.

But my point on Twitter still stands. Bloody awful place.
Agree completely!!
Post Reply