Chauvin/Floyd trial
Posted: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:31 pm
Jury have reached a verdict after less than a day's deliberation. Due to be read out inside the hour
Even though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
He’s as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo. Although just for the craic and the total and utter meltdown that would happen, a not guilty verdict would liven the day up.Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pmEven though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
It was never, ever going to be anything but a guilty verdictSaint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guiltyRaggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pmEven though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:49 pmMe either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guiltyRaggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pmEven though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
There's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pmI couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
Yep. It's a wierd thing
Assume the court can’t ignore other precedent cases despite everyone baying for max chargeSaint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:55 pmThere's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pmI couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:49 pm
Me either. I think it's as likely they've said not guilty on all three charges as guilty
The jury have more or less complete independence in terms of whether they feel the case is proven.Ymx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:58 pmAssume the court can’t ignore other precedent cases despite everyone baying for max chargeSaint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:55 pmThere's been a lot of cops get off in the US where we would see them as slam dunk guilty.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:52 pm
I couldn’t see on what basis they could consider a not guilty verdict to be honest. It was blatant and there’s no obvious justifiable circumstances where that length of kneeling would have been warranted.
Of which charges? All/the worst of them?Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
He’s a murderer, no doubt in my mind about thatYmx wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:01 pmOf which charges? All of them?Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Yeah, that would have been great craicScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:46 pmHe’s as guilty as a puppy next to a pile of poo. Although just for the craic and the total and utter meltdown that would happen, a not guilty verdict would liven the day up.Raggs wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:43 pmEven though it was quick, I still wouldn't want to guess as to what exactly they've decided...Saint wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 8:39 pm 10 hours to consider all 3 charges independently (he can be found guilty of any of them in any combination). Suggests they've see this as fairly clear cut.
It doesn't really matter.
Been some odd verdicts in the US over the years.
He didn’t commit a federal crime. He’ll go into protective custody in a regular prison. Medium security probably.fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 10:09 pmIt doesn't really matter.
I imagine because he's a cop, they'll put him in a Federal supermax; & he'll spend 23 hours a day in his 6x8 ft box & then he'll have 1 glorious hour of exercise .... alone
He'll rot there for decades; while his appeals go no where.
He's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
It is a unique case in some ways though. A split second before firing a gun and blowing someone's head off is much more easily explained away than choking someone out for 9 minutes. Plenty of people want to support the police, and will take the opportunity to if you can reasonably give a 'you weren't there, you don't know the stress' style defence.robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 amHe's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
Minneapolis Police initially reported this as "Man Dies After Medical Incident During Police Interaction".Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:30 amIt is a unique case in some ways though. A split second before firing a gun and blowing someone's head off is much more easily explained away than choking someone out for 9 minutes. Plenty of people want to support the police, and will take the opportunity to if you can reasonably give a 'you weren't there, you don't know the stress' style defence.robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 amHe's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
Yes, which made this one even more likely to be guilty
Didn't the district prosecutor originally decide there wasn't a case to prosecute?robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 amHe's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.
Unlikely as whilst that is the minimum tariff, the judge will consider other aggravating factors like the fact there was a child witnessing this, the position of power the cop had which was abused and a few other things, i tihnk he will get closer to 20 years.Saint wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 8:07 am Ignoring appeals, he'll only be sentenced for the most serious of the crimes, and state guidelines for sentencing mean he should get the low end of the tariff. so he gets 12.5 years, and will serve less than half of that with parole
He chose the wrong time to play his "get out of jail free card". An accumulation of offences meant someone was taking a team card in order to appease the public. He is guilty as f**k but don't think the right verdict was reached as a consequence of justice. This was political.robmatic wrote: Wed Apr 21, 2021 7:15 amHe's a cop though, they usually get away with (literal) murder so it is somewhat of a surprise.Paddington Bear wrote: Tue Apr 20, 2021 9:00 pm No way he’s anything but guilty. That video was a horrendous watch. 9 minutes of choking someone’s life out, thin blue line trigger finger in anger defence isn’t going to cut it here
Just think though, even with all the witnesses, there wouldn't have been a trial or even any sort of disciplinary procedure without the video.