Baltimore bridge collapse
Posted: Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:04 am
Seems the ship lost power.
Apparently there were workmen on the bridge too.Sandstorm wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:51 am Damn, there's cars whizzing over the bridge at the moment of impact.![]()
Are you suggesting Trump is to blame, given his well-documented and proven ties with Russia?Ymx wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:50 pm The conspiracy loons will be out blaming the Russians, who blame the CIA for the Russia attack.
"We do believe at least seven," Chief James Wallace of the Baltimore Fire Department said in response to a reporter's question about how many people are unaccounted for after the incident at Francis Scott Key Bridge.
Wallace, at an early morning news conference, said two people were rescued from the water, one who didn't require medical attention, and another person who was transported to a local hospital.
Wallace said divers, as well as sonar and infrared technologies are being utilized in the search. Sonar has detected the presence of vehicles below the water's surface, he said.
Maryland Transportation Secretary Paul Wiedefeld confirmed reports of workers being on the bridge at the time of the collapse, but did not have specifics on the number of people that entailed.
Hell, why nottroglodiet wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:49 pmAre you suggesting Trump is to blame, given his well-documented and proven ties with Russia?Ymx wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:50 pm The conspiracy loons will be out blaming the Russians, who blame the CIA for the Russia attack.
Plenty of engineers going "yeah most bridges are going to collapse if they get hit like that" tbfHal Jordan wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:57 pm Chap on the radio this morning was saying they don't build bridges like this any more because a similar thing happened a good while ago to the same type of bridge. However, this bridge was built before that accident happened.
JM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 6:29 pmPlenty of engineers going "yeah most bridges are going to collapse if they get hit like that" tbfHal Jordan wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:57 pm Chap on the radio this morning was saying they don't build bridges like this any more because a similar thing happened a good while ago to the same type of bridge. However, this bridge was built before that accident happened.
Being a regular viewer of disaster/accident investigation videos, I've seen a few bridge collapse ones, & a few of them in the US highlight the issues with piers being inadequate, either because they didn't protect the pier for collision, or tidal/flow scrub.inactionman wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 6:52 pmJM2K6 wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 6:29 pmPlenty of engineers going "yeah most bridges are going to collapse if they get hit like that" tbfHal Jordan wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 4:57 pm Chap on the radio this morning was saying they don't build bridges like this any more because a similar thing happened a good while ago to the same type of bridge. However, this bridge was built before that accident happened.
A truss bridge is prone to collapsing across the entire length if any section is lost, and newer bridges would have more protection of the piers - although you're right to say that not many would fare that well with 100k+ tons bumping into them.
Cable-stayed bridges, just as an example, would have the piers quite a bit further apart - maybe even clearing the navigation channel - and they're less likely to progressively collapse.
not seen anyone blaming Trump but the MAGA cultist are blaming Biden, and Ukraine.Ymx wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 2:44 pmHell, why nottroglodiet wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 1:49 pmAre you suggesting Trump is to blame, given his well-documented and proven ties with Russia?Ymx wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:50 pm The conspiracy loons will be out blaming the Russians, who blame the CIA for the Russia attack.
You calling my brother a loon?Ymx wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 12:50 pm The conspiracy loons will be out blaming the Russians, who blame the CIA for the Russia attack.
I bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
Jesus wept.Kiwias wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:07 am It was a cyber attack signaling the start of WWIII, according to two fine upstanding members of the Internet
Pretty safe bet when this little incident has shut down one of the biggest ports in the world.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pmI bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
Kind of depends whether or not that bridge was included in the list of stuff that's been in national surveys of infrastructure in the US, where they've said stuff is failing, in need of urgent repair or replacement etc. There's a shit ton of infrastructure in the US that's on the point of collapse.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pmI bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
fishfoodie wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:06 pmPretty safe bet when this little incident has shut down one of the biggest ports in the world.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pmI bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
What's the betting that 1st hole in this classic Swiss cheese disaster model isn't a part, or a piece of work that costs less that say $1,000 ?
It's significant in a couple of sectors - vehicles and coal I believe.TB63 wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 8:11 pmfishfoodie wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:06 pmPretty safe bet when this little incident has shut down one of the biggest ports in the world.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pm
I bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.
What's the betting that 1st hole in this classic Swiss cheese disaster model isn't a part, or a piece of work that costs less that say $1,000 ?
Look on AIS, it's not a busy port...
and natural gasBiffer wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 8:45 pmIt's significant in a couple of sectors - vehicles and coal I believe.TB63 wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 8:11 pmfishfoodie wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 6:06 pm
Pretty safe bet when this little incident has shut down one of the biggest ports in the world.
What's the betting that 1st hole in this classic Swiss cheese disaster model isn't a part, or a piece of work that costs less that say $1,000 ?
Look on AIS, it's not a busy port...
Oil & Gas companies tend to self-insure, shipping companies carry liability insurance. Outcome will be very different unless there is a criminal activity or gross negligence found as the cause.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pmI bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
unless it's the now rather widespread black fleet carrying O&G who don't worry overly about insurance, or seaworthy vessels even. though somehow I don't think they'd be sailing into Baltimore, at least I hope notshaggy wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:21 amOil & Gas companies tend to self-insure, shipping companies carry liability insurance. Outcome will be very different unless there is a criminal activity or gross negligence found as the cause.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pmI bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.TedMaul wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 3:19 pm Preliminary loss reserves by insurers are in excess of $3bn…![]()
These two should not be included in the political landscape. They are nothing more than conspiracy theorists and belongs to the same group as David Icke does.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 2:06 pmJesus wept.Kiwias wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 7:07 am It was a cyber attack signaling the start of WWIII, according to two fine upstanding members of the Internet
Pre internet, these fuckwit cancers on society would have been confined to pamphlets, shouting through a megaphone and maybe a brief but horribly damaging run in the style of Senator McCarthy. People would have had to seek them out to find out what horseshit they were peddling. Now, thanks to social media, they can post to millions with zero effort and grift like kings.
Especially with a container ship.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:06 amunless it's the now rather widespread black fleet carrying O&G who don't worry overly about insurance, or seaworthy vessels even. though somehow I don't think they'd be sailing into Baltimore, at least I hope notshaggy wrote: Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:21 amOil & Gas companies tend to self-insure, shipping companies carry liability insurance. Outcome will be very different unless there is a criminal activity or gross negligence found as the cause.Blackmac wrote: Wed Mar 27, 2024 1:14 pm
I bet it hits many more times that once the yank courts bend Maersk over BP style. Every resident of Baltimore and the surrounding area will claim compensation for loss and inconvenience.
Absolutely disgusting that they are having to endure that because of visa restrictions.Uncle fester wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:19 pm Crew are in an awful position.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-69011124
Yep, we'd be hearing about it on day 2 and they'd be off the ship that evening.Uncle fester wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:26 pm Can you imagine the uproar if it was westerners being cooped up in an Indian harbour?
One of the reasons I have all the time in the world for the Seamans Union is the way they support people in situations like this, which happen way too often.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:29 pmYep, we'd be hearing about it on day 2 and they'd be off the ship that evening.Uncle fester wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:26 pm Can you imagine the uproar if it was westerners being cooped up in an Indian harbour?
Unbelievable that they are still stuck there like non people.
I would be wary of believing the stories are telling the whole truth. I have been detained for weeks in non-UK ports and I know of Brits who have been detained for months in different parts of the World.Margin__Walker wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:29 pmYep, we'd be hearing about it on day 2 and they'd be off the ship that evening.Uncle fester wrote: Wed May 15, 2024 5:26 pm Can you imagine the uproar if it was westerners being cooped up in an Indian harbour?
Unbelievable that they are still stuck there like non people.