NPR

Please be a grown up, attack the post if you want to but not the poster.

Eh?

Bimbo, you’ve been banned repeatedly for being a twat and now you are begging posters to stop being mean to you?

You can’t have it both ways, outside of romantic sexy time adventures.

Oh?

You’re going to Barbados?

Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 2:56 pm Please be a grown up, attack the post if you want to but not the poster.

But what if you like the post, but don’t like the poster?

I never liked that poster of the bird scratching her arse while playing tennis.

Ali Cadoo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:29 pm I never liked that poster of the bird scratching her arse while playing tennis.

Ooh I don’t know. Seems a touch harsh.

Fuck tennis.

Does Bill Posters have a persecution complex yet?

Ali Cadoo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:18 pm Bimbo, you’ve been banned repeatedly for being a twat and now you are begging posters to stop being mean to you?

You can’t have it both ways, outside of romantic sexy time adventures.

I’ve not been “repeatedly “ anything.

No, I’m not giving a fuck if posters are mean, I’m referring to the rules and a directed gif for the bored which breaks those rules.

You know I still don’t know who you are btw.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:50 pm

Ali Cadoo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 3:18 pm Bimbo, you’ve been banned repeatedly for being a twat and now you are begging posters to stop being mean to you?

You can’t have it both ways, outside of romantic sexy time adventures.

I’ve not been “repeatedly “ anything.

No, I’m not giving a fuck if posters are mean, I’m referring to the rules and a directed gif for the bored which breaks those rules.

Since when did you ever give a fuck about the rules?

Mocked, Bimbo, you have obviously been mocked repeatedly. I’d wager there were plenty more things you’ve been ‘repeatedly’d’, too.

How does that gif break the rules? I had thought it referred to ‘flogging a dead horse’, rather than attacking a poster?

Aww, has bimbo turned into Toby Young?

Ali Cadoo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:58 pm Mocked, Bimbo, you have obviously been mocked repeatedly. I’d wager there were plenty more things you’ve been ‘repeatedly’d’, too.

How does that gif break the rules? I had thought it referred to ‘flogging a dead horse’, rather than attacking a poster?

The gifs name is “bimbo” that’s a direct attack.

Sorry you claimed I’d been repeatedly banned for something. Mocked .....

I’m always happy with that as I turn out to be right most of the time.

Oh, I hadn’t clocked the name of the gif. Yes, that definitely seems like a valid reason to start a thread crying about it. Especially for attention-seeking purposes, seeing as a private message to ASMO would have also done the trick.

I love the stinky, dead horse called Bimbo. If ASMO takes it away, I’m starting my own crybaby thread!

Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:03 pm The gifs name is “bimbo” that’s a direct attack.

Sandstorm wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:11 pm I love the stinky, dead horse called Bimbo. If ASMO takes it away, I’m starting my own crybaby thread!

Grow a fücking spine is the appropriate response here I think.

Uncle fester wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:19 pm Grow a fücking spine is the appropriate response here I think.

they don't censor fucking here :P

Sucks to be you.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 5:03 pm

Ali Cadoo wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 4:58 pm Mocked, Bimbo, you have obviously been mocked repeatedly. I’d wager there were plenty more things you’ve been ‘repeatedly’d’, too.

How does that gif break the rules? I had thought it referred to ‘flogging a dead horse’, rather than attacking a poster?

The gifs name is “bimbo” that’s a direct attack.

Sorry you claimed I’d been repeatedly banned for something. Mocked .....

I’m always happy with that as I turn out to be right most of the time.

Don’t let the door etc etc

Look at all you adult bullies.





And a mod again.

I wouldn't call it an attack. I would call it an acknowledgement of your posting style.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 2:56 pm Please be a grown up, attack the post if you want to but not the poster.

That's just a little rich coming from you.

Enzedder wrote: Sun Sep 20, 2020 8:26 pm I wouldn't call it an attack. I would call it an acknowledgement of your posting style.

Evening stalker.

Just asking on behalf of a friend, but let's put a little scenario out there. What if the poster in question is, all together and variously a despicable, spamming, know nothing, bare-faced lying, disingenuous, swivel eyed cunt of the highest order. In which case, surely there is no other option, nay duty for humanity's sake, but to attack such a vile abomination?

Also, attempting to argue rationally with such a surely, foul, loathsome arsewipe would only result in oneself having to stoop to their sewer level of discourse and therefore the proposition should be avoided at all cost by attacking with everything and anything at your disposal?

Ted. wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 am Just asking on behalf of a friend, but let's put a little scenario out there. What if the poster in question is, all together and variously a despicable, spamming, know nothing, bare-faced lying, disingenuous, swivel eyed cunt of the highest order. In which case, surely there is no other option, nay duty for humanity's sake, but to attack such a vile abomination?

Also, attempting to argue rationally with such a surely, foul, loathsome arsewipe would only result in oneself having to stoop to their sewer level of discourse and therefore the proposition should be avoided at all cost by attacking with everything and anything at your disposal?

Nice work.


The others see your signalling and approve.

Your post does how ever break the forum rules.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 6:15 am

Ted. wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 5:35 am Just asking on behalf of a friend, but let's put a little scenario out there. What if the poster in question is, all together and variously a despicable, spamming, know nothing, bare-faced lying, disingenuous, swivel eyed cunt of the highest order. In which case, surely there is no other option, nay duty for humanity's sake, but to attack such a vile abomination?

Also, attempting to argue rationally with such a surely, foul, loathsome arsewipe would only result in oneself having to stoop to their sewer level of discourse and therefore the proposition should be avoided at all cost by attacking with everything and anything at your disposal?

Nice work.


The others see your signalling and approve.

Your post does how ever break the forum rules.

In what way, Bimbo?

Try making a valid point worth commenting on and I'm sure people will manage to comment on it - your dishonest posting 'style' however is worthy of personal derision.

How to "attack the post if you want to but not the poster", by Bimbo

For all the bed wetters

Look at all you adult bullies

I suspect the lunatics have covered that with the emergency law

I was referring to the articles author. He’s a Marxist.

Says a Marxist.

Wrong again AC, I’m laughing at you, you’re confused premises and you’re absolute odd view of the world. We won’t even get to the child like understanding your have of an economy.

I’m laughing at a clown who cheers on every closure

Wow, you’re an odd chap aren’t you.

Good evening liar

You’re a clown

You’ve been loathsome for Ages to be fair.

to selectively read a dictionary entry takes a “special” kind of stupid

however that just makes you ignorant

Says a rather obsessed poster

Jeez you’re a weirdo

Don’t worry we’re led to believe you’re a comedian......

Which is still more believable than your claims to be a scientist

I’m sure ASMO the gutless will pull the trigger here

I didn’t use it as an “insult” , I used it as a description

The autism and linear thinking of some posters is hilarious.

Crikey, as mince

Crikey you’re dim

The bed wetters identified

For the bet wetters

It’s amusing watching who’s a twat or not though

and finally

The hypocrisy is astounding

If someone posts continually in a style which is ill informed, confrontational and intellectually vacant, it should be no surprise that they are consistently told they are ill informed, confrontational and intellectually vacant. And given this is a rugby board, it shouldn't be surprising to see that expressed as 'fucking stupid', 'wankstain' and 'cunt'.

And here, I am talking about the subject of the thread. So I'm not attacking a poster.

and from the last week on PR...

you realise you’d asked the worlds stupidest question

Skippy peanut butter you dafty

You cannot be this thick right?

You’re question about supermarket food in the UK is about as dumb a thing that’s ever been asked

The same way Canada will. Thicko

Must be something from what ever mess employs you

no such thing a a currency denomination for a clearing house you idiot

You’re a slow reader I guess

god you’re stupid

God you’re stupid

You’re an idiot

Moron

How to "attack the post if you want to but not the poster", by Bimbo

Most of those are post me discovering the rules have changed.

and from the last week on PR...

A completely different set of rules and forum .

Skippy peanut butter you dafty

Again the bar is set pretty low here by Carol ....

Says a Marxist.

So Marxist is now an insult ? And I was describing a news report not a poster.

Why are you so dishonest carol .?

Obviously I love to pile on bimbo as much as anyone, but the rules are garbage. Why bother pretending they're real?


"Whilst we encourage banter, as a general rule, if you cant say it to to someones face or in public in real life then don't say it here."
- Clearly not enforced, and never will be.

Adult content. No pornography is allowed, items deemed NSFW must be spoilered
- Not enforced, plenty of NSFW stuff not spoilered

Illegal content. No re-posting of copyrighted materials or other illegal content is allowed. Any posts containing illegal content or copyrighted materials will be deleted.
- We constantly repost paywalled articles

Please be a grown up, attack the post if you want to but not the poster.
- Half of us attack the poster. It's fun, and more importantly it's impossible (and stupid) to divorce the post from the poster - a history of what someone has posted and their logic / illogic has a huge role to play when dealing with people

ohh and all virtue signalers will be shot on sight!!
- this is super lame


Have rules you're willing to actually enforce and be consistent.

I’d say pretty much everything impost here to people in person.

Happily.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:30 am I’d say pretty much everything impost here to people in person.

Happily.

At last something we can all agree on.

Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:30 am I’d say pretty much everything impost here to people in person.

Happily.

Sure bud, does that apply to PR too?

this prick is a Saffa no less absolute tosser

Insane_Homer wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 11:29 am

Bimbowomxn wrote: Mon Sep 21, 2020 10:30 am I’d say pretty much everything impost here to people in person.

Happily.

Sure bud, does that apply to PR too?

this prick is a Saffa no less absolute tosser

You sure that’s a quite of mine ?