NPR

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:31 am Byline times

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:42 am

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:31 am Byline times

It was originally in the Northern Echo and has been picked up by the Metro, Independent, The Herald and several others in the last couple of hours. I expect others to follow.

If reports are correct, the two houses that the unpaid bills apply to were built without planning permission

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:42 am

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:31 am Byline times

It was originally in the Northern Echo and has been picked up by the Metro, Independent, The Herald and several others in the last couple of hours. I expect others to follow.

If reports are correct, the two houses that the unpaid bills apply to were built without planning permission

Mr Timmiss said the investigation concluded the main house had not been subdivided, and that the residential use of an outbuilding for family accommodation did not require planning permission.

A COUNCIL investigation has concluded there were historic breaches of planning and building control regulations at Dominic Cummings’ lockdown family farm.

Durham County Council has said no further action will be taken, but it will pass the findings on to the Valuation Office Agency to see if the family’s extra building is liable for council tax.

The Prime Minister’s special aide stayed at the property, North Lodge Farm, on the A167 Darlington Road, near Durham, after he and his wife developed coronavirus symptoms in March.


After the furore surrounding the allegations Mr Cummings had breached lockdown law, the council launched an investigation following complaints the property itself did not meet the regulations.

Stuart Timmiss, head of development and housing at Durham County Council, said: “We have now investigated the complaints regarding planning permission.

“While there have been historic breaches of planning and building control regulations, current legislation places a time limit on any enforcement measures and as a result no further action will be taken.”

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 14, 2020 9:31 am Byline times

Fallacious and reasonable ad hominem arguments

In everyday language, the term ‘ad hominem argument’ is primarily used to refer to a fallacious personal attack against the source of an argument, that is unsound from a logical perspective.

This type of argument can be fallacious for a number of reasons, including, most notably, the following:

The ad hominem attack is irrelevant to the discussion.
The ad hominem attack is used as primarily as a diversion tactic, either to unjustifiably shift the burden of proof to someone else in the discussion or to change the topic.
The ad hominem attack involves the faulty premise that an attack against the source of an argument necessarily constitutes a successful refutation of that argument.