why? seriously, either of you, please explain
F**ked up Facts
Full backHappyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsNiegs wrote: Tue Apr 13, 2021 5:16 pm This man is only 49 and once was an international fly half / full back!![]()
![]()

-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
that's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull backHappyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsNiegs wrote: Tue Apr 13, 2021 5:16 pm This man is only 49 and once was an international fly half / full back!![]()
![]()
Sorry That's a pastis ...
Cornish pastis?Happyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:40 pmthat's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull backHappyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pm
you'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsSorry That's a pastis ...
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
now i'm even more confusedGogLais wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:46 pmCornish pastis?
Ha, ha... I was looking for a good pic of him, too, when I threw the above up. I suspect he's sucking in his cut something fierce here.Happyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsNiegs wrote: Tue Apr 13, 2021 5:16 pm This man is only 49 and once was an international fly half / full back!![]()
![]()
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.Niegs wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:12 pmHa, ha... I was looking for a good pic of him, too, when I threw the above up. I suspect he's sucking in his cut something fierce here.Happyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsNiegs wrote: Tue Apr 13, 2021 5:16 pm This man is only 49 and once was an international fly half / full back!![]()
![]()
![]()
this was in the late 80s
Saying he was a “fat cunt” or “fat” and a “cunt”?Happyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.
this was in the late 80s
Don’t click if this is that disturbing to you, but many people in the Victorian era had family photos taken with a deceased family member, often a child.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36389581

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36389581
Yes, Bill McLaren used to say "the whistle blows for no side". Or similar.
51 0 in WembleyHappyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:40 pmthat's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull backHappyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pm
you'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backsSorry That's a pastis ...
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Nah, a bit up himself but a decent enough blokeNiegs wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:48 pmSaying he was a “fat cunt” or “fat” and a “cunt”?Happyhooker wrote: Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.
this was in the late 80s
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Never heard it used in Glasgow either.
Thanks for reminding me about that smirking little git Castaignede running rings around us.laurent wrote: Thu Apr 15, 2021 5:42 am51 0 in Wembley
Aha!
I’ve seen it used a few times. The first time, I’m sure, was in a newspaper (?The Scotsman, as we took it at home back then) in a report on Scotland’s GS win back in 1990.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Well I had to check that one. Reminds me of the four colour theorem - in any map, however complicated, no more than four colours are required to ensure that no two adjacent regions have the same colour.PornDog wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:01 pm Arkansas borders six states - you can travel from Arkansas into all six of them by travelling due south.
What’s with the travel into all by heading due south thing? I’m often slow on riddles but I see LA to the south...
Edit: okay, I see it... can access each state by traveling south from a portion of it. For Oklahoma that must be a very small opportunity?
Edit: okay, I see it... can access each state by traveling south from a portion of it. For Oklahoma that must be a very small opportunity?
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
1 (and 2) Austerity in the UK is to blame for 135 thousand deaths, before Covid even hit and during Covid, tens of thousands of infected people were forced to go into work as there was zero support for them if they didn.t..spreading the disease wildly..
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ppr-report
3) Boris desperately wanted a "Brexit" ventilator (a ventilator provided by Dyson and Caterpillar and Brexit entrepreneurs) and completely ignored other established ventilator suppliers, many of which not just went to the wall, the ventilators they supplied had to be taken from the front line for lack of parts and servicing.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ppr-report
3) Boris desperately wanted a "Brexit" ventilator (a ventilator provided by Dyson and Caterpillar and Brexit entrepreneurs) and completely ignored other established ventilator suppliers, many of which not just went to the wall, the ventilators they supplied had to be taken from the front line for lack of parts and servicing.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
Less likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
So why less likely?Biffer wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will esentialky create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.
From the BBC today -

Neutron stars are dead stars that are incredibly dense. A teaspoonful of material from a neutron star is estimated to weigh around four billion tonnes.



Chris Jack, 67 test All Black - "I was voted most useless and laziest cunt in the English Premiership two years on the trot"
Is that heaped or flat?notfatcat wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 12:47 pm From the BBC today -
Neutron stars are dead stars that are incredibly dense. A teaspoonful of material from a neutron star is estimated to weigh around four billion tonnes.![]()
![]()
![]()
I tried, very hard, to disprove this. Failure. It's truly amazing.GogLais wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 8:48 amWell I had to check that one. Reminds me of the four colour theorem - in any map, however complicated, no more than four colours are required to ensure that no two adjacent regions have the same colour.PornDog wrote: Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:01 pm Arkansas borders six states - you can travel from Arkansas into all six of them by travelling due south.
I read an interesting sci fi novel that postulated our universe was created as a by product of another universes exotic power/propulsion system their ships used to explore the 'real universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:21 amSo why less likely?Biffer wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will esentialky create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.
Simulation theory is a pretty robust explanation for our universe though - would not surprise me at all.
When you say 140,000 years do you mean 14 billion?Line6 HXFX wrote: Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:21 amSo why less likely?Biffer wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will essentially create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.
The Boötes void, sometimes called the Great Void, is a huge, spherical region of space that contains very few galaxies. It's approximately 700 million light years from Earth and located near the constellation Boötes, which is how it got its name. The supervoid measures 250 million light-years in diameter, representing approximately 0.27% of the diameter of the observable universe, which itself is a daunting 93 billion light-years across. Its volume is estimated at 236,000 Mcp3 , making it the largest known void in the Universe.
At first, astronomers were only able to find eight galaxies across the expanse, but further observations revealed a total of 60 galaxies. Now, while that might still seem like a lot, it would be like stumbling upon ONLY 60 objects across a region larger than the continental United States (and that's just in two dimensions). According to astronomer Greg Aldering, the scale of the void is such that, "If the Milky Way had been in the center of the Boötes void, we wouldn't have known there were other galaxies until the 1960s." Looking at the volume of the Boötes void, it should contain about 10,000 galaxies, when considering that the average distance between galaxies elsewhere in the universe is a few million light-years.
But the question is....why and how this void came to be. There hasn't been enough time since the universe began for mere gravitational forces to clear out a space of that size. There's a theory which suggests that supervoids are caused by the intermingling of smaller mini voids, like soapbubbles coming together.
But a more...maybe creepier...explanation is that the Boötes void could be the result of an expanding Kardashev III scale civilization. As the colonization bubble expands outward from its home system, the civilization dims each star (and subsequently each galaxy) it encounters by blanketing it in a Dyson shell. This might also explain why the void has such a nice, spherical shape.
Oh and we're seeing a snapshot of The Void 700million years ago. A lot could have happened in 700 million years that we just cannot see/know due to the inherant speed of light.
Sleep well.
At first, astronomers were only able to find eight galaxies across the expanse, but further observations revealed a total of 60 galaxies. Now, while that might still seem like a lot, it would be like stumbling upon ONLY 60 objects across a region larger than the continental United States (and that's just in two dimensions). According to astronomer Greg Aldering, the scale of the void is such that, "If the Milky Way had been in the center of the Boötes void, we wouldn't have known there were other galaxies until the 1960s." Looking at the volume of the Boötes void, it should contain about 10,000 galaxies, when considering that the average distance between galaxies elsewhere in the universe is a few million light-years.
But the question is....why and how this void came to be. There hasn't been enough time since the universe began for mere gravitational forces to clear out a space of that size. There's a theory which suggests that supervoids are caused by the intermingling of smaller mini voids, like soapbubbles coming together.
But a more...maybe creepier...explanation is that the Boötes void could be the result of an expanding Kardashev III scale civilization. As the colonization bubble expands outward from its home system, the civilization dims each star (and subsequently each galaxy) it encounters by blanketing it in a Dyson shell. This might also explain why the void has such a nice, spherical shape.
Oh and we're seeing a snapshot of The Void 700million years ago. A lot could have happened in 700 million years that we just cannot see/know due to the inherant speed of light.
Sleep well.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I love that story... as a kid, I wish my dad had told me that story instead of the one about Little Red Riding Hood!Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 2:59 pm The Boötes void, sometimes called the Great Void, is a huge, spherical region of space that contains very few galaxies. It's approximately 700 million light years from Earth and located near the constellation Boötes, which is how it got its name. The supervoid measures 250 million light-years in diameter, representing approximately 0.27% of the diameter of the observable universe, which itself is a daunting 93 billion light-years across. Its volume is estimated at 236,000 Mcp3 , making it the largest known void in the Universe.
At first, astronomers were only able to find eight galaxies across the expanse, but further observations revealed a total of 60 galaxies. Now, while that might still seem like a lot, it would be like stumbling upon ONLY 60 objects across a region larger than the continental United States (and that's just in two dimensions). According to astronomer Greg Aldering, the scale of the void is such that, "If the Milky Way had been in the center of the Boötes void, we wouldn't have known there were other galaxies until the 1960s." Looking at the volume of the Boötes void, it should contain about 10,000 galaxies, when considering that the average distance between galaxies elsewhere in the universe is a few million light-years.
But the question is....why and how this void came to be. There hasn't been enough time since the universe began for mere gravitational forces to clear out a space of that size. There's a theory which suggests that supervoids are caused by the intermingling of smaller mini voids, like soapbubbles coming together.
But a more...maybe creepier...explanation is that the Boötes void could be the result of an expanding Kardashev III scale civilization. As the colonization bubble expands outward from its home system, the civilization dims each star (and subsequently each galaxy) it encounters by blanketing it in a Dyson shell. This might also explain why the void has such a nice, spherical shape.
Oh and we're seeing a snapshot of The Void 700million years ago. A lot could have happened in 700 million years that we just cannot see/know due to the inherant speed of light.
Sleep well.
Space and time... doesn't it screw with your mind...