And if you have any allergies (penicillin for me)
So, coronavirus...
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Got my letter this morning, went to book and the nearest centre to me with appointments is a lot further away than I'd like. Will try again on Tuesday, see if either of the much closer centres have opened up a bit.
-
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Yes was mildly surprised given the backlog in London, can only guess it's presumed better to plough ahead without them for now. Hopefully they come sooner than later.Sandstorm wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 5:39 pmLondon is full of cunts and idiots.Biffer wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 5:34 pmHow your age group takes it up. Vaccination rates are very significantly lower in London.TheNatalShark wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 12:21 pm Just got the text and booked my first appointment for the 15th Jun.
28 in SW London so things ticking along
See the anti lockdown/passport & proplaguer lot have had another trundle today.
-
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
London has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.TheNatalShark wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 6:44 pmYes was mildly surprised given the backlog in London, can only guess it's presumed better to plough ahead without them for now. Hopefully they come sooner than later.
See the anti lockdown/passport & proplaguer lot have had another trundle today.
Really? That accounts for London being 14% behind the rest of the country?Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:07 pmLondon has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.TheNatalShark wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 6:44 pmYes was mildly surprised given the backlog in London, can only guess it's presumed better to plough ahead without them for now. Hopefully they come sooner than later.
See the anti lockdown/passport & proplaguer lot have had another trundle today.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Pretty much.Biffer wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 8:41 pmReally? That accounts for London being 14% behind the rest of the country?Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:07 pmLondon has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.TheNatalShark wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 6:44 pm
Yes was mildly surprised given the backlog in London, can only guess it's presumed better to plough ahead without them for now. Hopefully they come sooner than later.
See the anti lockdown/passport & proplaguer lot have had another trundle today.
Most of the areas with the lowest vaccine takeup rates are in London - the reasons are diverse but 'religious-socio-economic' mostly covers it. That is probably about 10% and the average age in London being 5 years younger than nationally accounts for the rest.
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”
“Religious-socio-economic”
Are we not allowed to say Muslim?
The people I saw marching though Brighton last week, intimidating people and shouting through loud hailers at bystanders in masks, were not Muslims.
You're going to ask me how I know they were not Muslims, the marchers were 100% white English from what I could see, the demographic looked very similar to the EDL marches I've seen coming through here in recent years, and before that NF.
BuT iT’s ThE mUsLiMs InNiTDinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:19 pmPretty much.Biffer wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 8:41 pmReally? That accounts for London being 14% behind the rest of the country?Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:07 pm
London has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.
Most of the areas with the lowest vaccine takeup rates are in London - the reasons are diverse but 'religious-socio-economic' mostly covers it. That is probably about 10% and the average age in London being 5 years younger than nationally accounts for the rest.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
The conversation is about London.Tichtheid wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:02 pmSlick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”
“Religious-socio-economic”
Are we not allowed to say Muslim?
The people I saw marching though Brighton last week, intimidating people and shouting through loud hailers at bystanders in masks, were not Muslims.
You're going to ask me how I know they were not Muslims, the marchers were 100% white English from what I could see, the demographic looked very similar to the EDL marches I've seen coming through here in recent years, and before that NF.
I also saw an anti vax march in Edinburgh where 100% were white. But again, that’s not London
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 796
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".Rinkals wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 9:21 pmIt really depends on your definition of 'affordable'.Happyhooker wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 10:52 amThat's not "making it unaffordable "Rinkals wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 8:05 am
Good on them.
However, 'at cost' in the UK is probably significantly more expensive than it is in India or South Africa.
The minimum wage in South Africa is R21 an hour, which is about a quid.
I'd like to see the average Brit live on that.
They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd
-
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.
You all know this
You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.
Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
-
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Between direct cash contributions, discounts from the manufacturers and above all contribution of excess orders by Western countries I'm confident in saying that African countries will by and large not pay anything towards vaccine procurement this year.Happyhooker wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 11:02 pm The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".
They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd
Those countries that are left out of pocket will probably be those that took initiative to order Sinovac/Sinopharm.
Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:40 amBetween direct cash contributions, discounts from the manufacturers and above all contribution of excess orders by Western countries I'm confident in saying that African countries will by and large not pay anything towards vaccine procurement this year.Happyhooker wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 11:02 pm The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".
They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd
Those countries that are left out of pocket will probably be those that took initiative to order Sinovac/Sinopharm.
The reason south africa has only managed to administer 1.18 dose of vaccine per hundred people in the total population is largely down to its utterly incompetent vaccine rollout strategy. Morocco has managed nearly 40 doses, even zimbabwe has managed 6.57
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
He's right. It's grotesque. The USA is offering lotteries of $1m to have actual children vaccinated, meanwhile the rest of the world suffers.
Having said that, any excuse will be used to cover for ANC incompetence
Having said that, any excuse will be used to cover for ANC incompetence
Well a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 amBut you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.
You all know this
You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.
Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it
The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Those that ordered and paid for them that won't receive effective reimbursement from donations that are tapered to not include them. Eg some funds and instruments (eg Covax) are restricted to vaccines approved by WHO, and only Sinopharm has been added in May, with Sinovac due.Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:27 am Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?
So if they ordered and paid for out with these funding pools and instruments, like Morocco, they will be out of pocket Vs doses they wait for and get materially for free. Once the vaccines are eligible for the pools and instruments, as Sinopharm is now, they'll likely fall into the same bucket - albeit the Sinopharm and Sinovac jabs are significantly more expensive (where data is available) than the 'western' vaccines, so I won't attribute a comment of 'likely materially free' to them.
So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:39 amThose that ordered and paid for them that won't receive effective reimbursement from donations that are tapered to not include them. Eg some funds and instruments (eg Covax) are restricted to vaccines approved by WHO, and only Sinopharm has been added in May, with Sinovac due.Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:27 am Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?
So if they ordered and paid for out with these funding pools and instruments, like Morocco, they will be out of pocket Vs doses they wait for and get materially for free. Once the vaccines are eligible for the pools and instruments, as Sinopharm is now, they'll likely fall into the same bucket - albeit the Sinopharm and Sinovac jabs are significantly more expensive (where data is available) than the 'western' vaccines, so I won't attribute a comment of 'likely materially free' to them.
-
- Posts: 1298
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
By the time South Africa has jabbed most of its pop, assuming done so with J&J, Pfizer and excess from Europe+NA (Novavax/Moderna/CureVac/Valneva/Sanofi&GSK/etc...) then yes I would say Morocco will be out of pocket for non-funded deliveries (given the prevalence in wide rollout already) whilst South Africa will be materially reliant on funded and donated deliveries. SA's 'buying' element will at the end of the day be effectively (re)funded by Western countries. I reasonably expect that to apply to any other African country that hasn't yet procured material amounts outside of the funded resources.Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:26 am So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?
I don't think I can type it any clearer than that. 'Wait' for free stuff, means you get free stuff. Pay for stuff you won't get refunded for and you will have paid for stuff.
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Nor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Financial penalties are availablesockwithaticket wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 amNor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Shirley after a point respective governments can also make social penalties a thing. Passing legislation to allow companies to refuse hire, to allow transport to refuse carriage, to allow sports groups to refuse participation, without vaccination proof? Plenty of ways to put the squeeze on after playing nice first and giving everyone every opportunity.Sandstorm wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:50 amFinancial penalties are availablesockwithaticket wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 amNor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Just seems strange how the South african government was making such a big deal about how they couldn't afford the vaccine, how they negotiated lower prices on the vaccine they bought, and how they managed to get their money back when reselling the AZ vaccine - if the money is all going to be refunded anyway. My understanding is also that South africa, as a middle income country, ended up paying COVAX more for the vaccine than they would have if they bought it directly from the manufacturers. At least this was widely reported in the media here.TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:42 amBy the time South Africa has jabbed most of its pop, assuming done so with J&J, Pfizer and excess from Europe+NA (Novavax/Moderna/CureVac/Valneva/Sanofi&GSK/etc...) then yes I would say Morocco will be out of pocket for non-funded deliveries (given the prevalence in wide rollout already) whilst South Africa will be materially reliant on funded and donated deliveries. SA's 'buying' element will at the end of the day be effectively (re)funded by Western countries. I reasonably expect that to apply to any other African country that hasn't yet procured material amounts outside of the funded resources.Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:26 am So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?
I don't think I can type it any clearer than that. 'Wait' for free stuff, means you get free stuff. Pay for stuff you won't get refunded for and you will have paid for stuff.
Of course they do but can't pass up the opportunity to polish their virtue signalling skills.Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.
You all know this
Is vaccine hesitancy related to their religion? Genuine questions as I've heard some of the less enlightened imams saying not to take the vaccine but there doesn't appear to be much reluctance amongst SA Muslims to take the vaccine. In fact, I think the greatest reluctance is amongst AfrikanersSlick wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:24 amWell a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 amBut you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.
You all know this
You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.
Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it
The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.

Over here they are Female WASPs generallySlick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.
You all know this
I drink and I forget things.
Are South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
You think SA President had any knowledge over what his Health Minister did with their last batch of vaccines. Or any control over that circus they call the ANC?ohno wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:44 pmAre South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326 ... 105180-050ohno wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:44 pmAre South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
From his address to the Nation last night, he suggested that the Pfizer vaccine was being administered, but that the J&J vaccine was the preferred option being a single dose and being less volatile in rural areas without capable refrigeration facilities.
However, he mentioned that the J&J vaccine was being held up by certification issues in the United States. I'm not sure what these are, though.
There is some debate among pious Muslims about whether it is acceptable to be vaccinated during the month of Ramadan (which was April-May this year) because it might break the daytime fasting rules due to liquid entering the body.Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 4:28 pmIs vaccine hesitancy related to their religion? Genuine questions as I've heard some of the less enlightened imams saying not to take the vaccine but there doesn't appear to be much reluctance amongst SA Muslims to take the vaccine. In fact, I think the greatest reluctance is amongst AfrikanersSlick wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:24 amWell a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 am
But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.
You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.
Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it
The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.![]()
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Local vaccination centre open today despite the Bank Holiday
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Covid-19: UK in early stages of third wave - scientist
There are signs the UK is in the early stages of a third wave of coronavirus infections, a scientist advising the government has said.
Prof Ravi Gupta, from the University of Cambridge, said although new cases were "relatively low" the Indian variant had fuelled "exponential growth". He said ending Covid restrictions in England on 21 June should be postponed.
Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government could not rule out a delay to the planned lockdown easing.
On Sunday, the UK reported more than 3,000 new Covid infections for a fifth day in a row.
Prior to this, the UK had not surpassed that number since 12 April.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57304515
They have known this was a possibility for some weeks now. Modelling has been done and some of the scenarios show a worrying 3rd wave - I posted on this about a week or two ago. It looks like the scientists are now getting worried they will not be listened to hence going public with their concerns. The UK Gov has been trailing the need to extend lock down but obviously don't want to do it given the Blonde Bumblecunt's promises. They also don't want to have to try and explain why they delayed on India travel restrictions and why their late call on the border has allowed the new more transmissible variant being imported. I see France is restricting travel from the UK because of Indian variant. All entirely predictable and avoidable!tabascoboy wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 11:51 amCovid-19: UK in early stages of third wave - scientist
There are signs the UK is in the early stages of a third wave of coronavirus infections, a scientist advising the government has said.
Prof Ravi Gupta, from the University of Cambridge, said although new cases were "relatively low" the Indian variant had fuelled "exponential growth". He said ending Covid restrictions in England on 21 June should be postponed.
Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government could not rule out a delay to the planned lockdown easing.
On Sunday, the UK reported more than 3,000 new Covid infections for a fifth day in a row.
Prior to this, the UK had not surpassed that number since 12 April.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57304515