The 5 year Brexit anniversary dead cat planned distraction, is the answer you were looking for.tabascoboy wrote: Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:12 pm
The cynic in me wonders if if was coincidental it happened on PMQs day under orders almost to provide a distraction from Boris's weekly beasting...?
War with Russia
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Erm... thanks?Lemoentjie wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 12:12 pm Lol, would love to see the Poms and their tinpot armed forces taught a lesson by the Russians.
-
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 pm
What is this about?tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:55 amAnd a BBC reporter as well.Insane_Homer wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 7:14 am
Amazing stroke of luck to have him on board during all of this and of course being allowed to freely report on it![]()
![]()
Are there a couple of journalists on every RN ship all the time? Does this sort of thing happen all the time but there's not usually journalists around to report it? Is it pure coincidence that on the rare occasion this happens there also happens to be a press pack on board?
Or maybe...just maybe not everything should be seen through the lenses of the bitter Brexit culture war you are still revealing in (and I mean what PR gain do you think the government get from this? Delivering the June 2016 vote is the entire reason for its existence so they would probably prefer to emphasise the date not distract from it).Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 4:53 amThe 5 year Brexit anniversary dead cat planned distraction, is the answer you were looking for.tabascoboy wrote: Wed Jun 23, 2021 12:12 pm
The cynic in me wonders if if was coincidental it happened on PMQs day under orders almost to provide a distraction from Boris's weekly beasting...?
Annexation of Crimea, the threats to the Baltics, South China seas...none of these things are related to Brexit and British forces are involved (rightly IMO) in the international response to all of them
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Yup, one wonders why the HUGE list of benefits were kept off of the front pages.tc27 wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:03 am Delivering the June 2016 vote is the entire reason for its existence so they would probably prefer to emphasise the date not distract from it).
It's about as obvious as who leaked the Matt Handoncock surveillance video.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
This looks like planned PR exercise by the RN.MoreOrLess wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 6:56 amWhat is this about?tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 8:55 amAnd a BBC reporter as well.Insane_Homer wrote: Thu Jun 24, 2021 7:14 am
Amazing stroke of luck to have him on board during all of this and of course being allowed to freely report on it![]()
![]()
Are there a couple of journalists on every RN ship all the time? Does this sort of thing happen all the time but there's not usually journalists around to report it? Is it pure coincidence that on the rare occasion this happens there also happens to be a press pack on board?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Wait, you’re being serious?Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:38 amYup, one wonders why the HUGE list of benefits were kept off of the front pages.tc27 wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:03 am Delivering the June 2016 vote is the entire reason for its existence so they would probably prefer to emphasise the date not distract from it).
It's about as obvious as who leaked the Matt Handoncock surveillance video.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
When it comes to Putin and BOJO, it's more likely probable than not.Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 12:45 pmWait, you’re being serious?Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:38 amYup, one wonders why the HUGE list of benefits were kept off of the front pages.tc27 wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:03 am Delivering the June 2016 vote is the entire reason for its existence so they would probably prefer to emphasise the date not distract from it).
It's about as obvious as who leaked the Matt Handoncock surveillance video.
Nothing like a bit of

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
I think Brexit has broken some peoples minds.Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 12:45 pmWait, you’re being serious?Insane_Homer wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:38 amYup, one wonders why the HUGE list of benefits were kept off of the front pages.tc27 wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 9:03 am Delivering the June 2016 vote is the entire reason for its existence so they would probably prefer to emphasise the date not distract from it).
It's about as obvious as who leaked the Matt Handoncock surveillance video.
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
The Russians are partially doing this to get ELINT off of the T45 Destroyer.
It has the most advanced (and capable) Anti-Air radar suite in the world at present.
It could swat all the planes out of the sky easily
It has the most advanced (and capable) Anti-Air radar suite in the world at present.
It could swat all the planes out of the sky easily
- FalseBayFC
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm
Interesting. Would this be to try and reverse engineer the system or figure out ways to evade it?mat the expat wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 7:10 am The Russians are partially doing this to get ELINT off of the T45 Destroyer.
It has the most advanced (and capable) Anti-Air radar suite in the world at present.
It could swat all the planes out of the sky easily
No doubt that’s true. It isn’t the first time that a 45 class has been buzzed in the Black Sea, there was a tv documentary about it a year or two ago. On a parochial note Cammell Laird just down the road from me has the billion pound contract to upgrade them.mat the expat wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 7:10 am The Russians are partially doing this to get ELINT off of the T45 Destroyer.
It has the most advanced (and capable) Anti-Air radar suite in the world at present.
It could swat all the planes out of the sky easily
Its all low grade shithousing based on the assumption no-ones going to actually start shooting for real. The Russians would not seriously try and sink a modern Air Warfare destroyer with a few Su24s and coastguard vessels - likewise a single ship however capable would not expose itself to the full weight of the Russians pretty fearsome anti surface capability a few miles from Russian controlled territory.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Appreciate the RN is the only navy in the world to have some serious live experience of naval anti-air measures since WW2 but I do have some concerns that British ships seem to comprehensively defeat all air threats in every exercise they announce.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Really? Assumed they’d be quite far behind the super powers in war tech.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 10:29 am Appreciate the RN is the only navy in the world to have some serious live experience of naval anti-air measures since WW2 but I do have some concerns that British ships seem to comprehensively defeat all air threats in every exercise they announce.
Feel safer now
What do I know? I’d guess that our tech is pretty high for things like Type 45 and Astute. The trouble is we don’t have the resources to procure them quickly enough and in sufficient numbers.Ymx wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:26 pmReally? Assumed they’d be quite far behind the super powers in war tech.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 10:29 am Appreciate the RN is the only navy in the world to have some serious live experience of naval anti-air measures since WW2 but I do have some concerns that British ships seem to comprehensively defeat all air threats in every exercise they announce.
Feel safer now![]()
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Obviously PR guff involved but our submarines are very well regarded.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
Read up on Artisan radar - it's miles ahead of the AEGIS system the Yanks use. Can track Cricket ball sized targetsGogLais wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:33 pmWhat do I know? I’d guess that our tech is pretty high for things like Type 45 and Astute. The trouble is we don’t have the resources to procure them quickly enough and in sufficient numbers.Ymx wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:26 pmReally? Assumed they’d be quite far behind the super powers in war tech.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 10:29 am Appreciate the RN is the only navy in the world to have some serious live experience of naval anti-air measures since WW2 but I do have some concerns that British ships seem to comprehensively defeat all air threats in every exercise they announce.
Feel safer now![]()
Any chance we can use it in the England slip cordon?mat the expat wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 5:44 amRead up on Artisan radar - it's miles ahead of the AEGIS system the Yanks use. Can track Cricket ball sized targetsGogLais wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:33 pmWhat do I know? I’d guess that our tech is pretty high for things like Type 45 and Astute. The trouble is we don’t have the resources to procure them quickly enough and in sufficient numbers.Ymx wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:26 pm
Really? Assumed they’d be quite far behind the super powers in war tech.
Feel safer now![]()
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
So much of tech upgrades is fighting the last war stuff - West would have been involved in ordering/procuring/maintaining air defence systems, and his ship went down due to air attacks in the Falklands. No surprise it's a higher priority for the RN than the Americans.mat the expat wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 5:44 amRead up on Artisan radar - it's miles ahead of the AEGIS system the Yanks use. Can track Cricket ball sized targetsGogLais wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:33 pmWhat do I know? I’d guess that our tech is pretty high for things like Type 45 and Astute. The trouble is we don’t have the resources to procure them quickly enough and in sufficient numbers.Ymx wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:26 pm
Really? Assumed they’d be quite far behind the super powers in war tech.
Feel safer now![]()
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
CorrectPaddington Bear wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 8:46 amSo much of tech upgrades is fighting the last war stuff - West would have been involved in ordering/procuring/maintaining air defence systems, and his ship went down due to air attacks in the Falklands. No surprise it's a higher priority for the RN than the Americans.mat the expat wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 5:44 amRead up on Artisan radar - it's miles ahead of the AEGIS system the Yanks use. Can track Cricket ball sized targetsGogLais wrote: Mon Jun 28, 2021 12:33 pm
What do I know? I’d guess that our tech is pretty high for things like Type 45 and Astute. The trouble is we don’t have the resources to procure them quickly enough and in sufficient numbers.
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
Any chance we can use it in the England slip cordon?
[/quote]
