I didn't know which team you were referring to with the 50m in the first half, which is why I asked. 5 points isn't "lost handily", it was a close match that the Boks lost, it could happen again in the 3rd test.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 12:01 pmThe Saffers also ran only 77m in the first half, and were losing. They at least changed things up a bit in the second half. Both sides were guilty of dismal rugby for long periods, same as the first game - the one SA lost handily._Os_ wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:02 amIs that the Lions which ran less than 50m? If so it has something to do with the team they're playing as well.JM2K6 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 10:22 amI've never seen a top international team run fewer than 50m with the ball in the first half before. I'm not out there playing, so I'm just judging it as a spectator and an erstwhile fan of Lions tours: It was fucking horrific. Absolutely cancerous.
"1.24 - The Lions averaged just 1.24 metres per carry against the Springboks in the 2nd Test, the lowest by a tier one team since Opta have recorded this data; 3 of the 7 lowest single-match tallies have been recorded against South Africa since the start of RWC 2019. Nullified."
The UK media has convinced itself that Rassie and Nienaber are sort of Putin and Medvedev, and actually the evil Rassie is really still running everything. But it's more like Han and Chewy. If Nienaber's job title is coach then that's what he's doing. And Nienaber is probably the best defence coach there is.
You blamed the Lions for them not carrying and how the Lions are choosing to play. But there's two sides out there. Opta have been collecting the stats since 2010, 3 of the last 5 matches the Boks have played are in the top 7 matches for the defences which stopped the opponent running. It's not just what the Lions are choosing to do.