Is that a real bit of research? Genuinely very interestedBiffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 12:24 pmNo lead in petrol -> less violence in society.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:35 amLargely anecdotal but the amount of anti-social behaviour from kids I see in England has radically reduced over the last 15 years, at the same time as a lot of the funding you've mentioned has been cut.fishfoodie wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:38 am
Despite decades of research,; right wing politicians still don't get that if they spend a fraction of the money, they spend on policing, on clubs like these, that give teenagers accessible, enjoyable activities; they wouldn't need those extra coppers, to chase joy riders !
I remember the shite objections that people had, when people suggested adding bmx & skateboard facilities to parks![]()
My cricket club used to have constant vandalism, up to and including the clubhouse being burned down. We've had nothing for five years or more now.
Pet theory is that the kids who used to do this spend their time gaming now.
2021 Tokyo Olympics thread
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Full time in Swedish. Which took some googling and careful browser history management.Niegs wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 1:37 pm Caught the last 20 of the replay of Canada's victory over the Yank lasses in the football.
:clap:
Also, what's a "slutsignal"? :lol:
![]()
Yeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.Slick wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:55 pmIs that a real bit of research? Genuinely very interestedBiffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 12:24 pmNo lead in petrol -> less violence in society.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:35 am
Largely anecdotal but the amount of anti-social behaviour from kids I see in England has radically reduced over the last 15 years, at the same time as a lot of the funding you've mentioned has been cut.
My cricket club used to have constant vandalism, up to and including the clubhouse being burned down. We've had nothing for five years or more now.
Pet theory is that the kids who used to do this spend their time gaming now.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
That’s amazingly brilliant, I willBiffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:36 pmYeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4919
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Interesting. Had assumed you were being funny.Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:36 pmYeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
So where does pikeys stealing the lead from church roofs fit in?Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:36 pm
Yeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.

Are their kids licking the lead after they’ve nicked it?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:37 pmSo where does pikeys stealing the lead from church roofs fit in?Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:36 pm
Yeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.![]()
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
They’ve all overdosedTorquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:37 pmSo where does pikeys stealing the lead from church roofs fit in?Biffer wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 7:36 pm
Yeah, there's loads of stuff about it. It's not absolutely proven, but there's an astonishing correlation; in every country, the decrease in violent crime has happened about twenty years after lead was removed from petrol. If you stick lead petrol crime into Google you'll find loads of academic papers on it.![]()
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm

Certainly makes it more exciting.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Seen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
It is pursuit race, not a catch and destroy race. Dane was at fault here, he should be looking and probably should have been DSQ but that would not look good.inactionman wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:06 pmSeen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
UCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.inactionman wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:06 pmSeen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
I’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pmUCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.inactionman wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:06 pmSeen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
He wasn't the 4th rider dropping off first, but the third rider who had simply lost the wheels of the front two, so we was still in the active team. Re the catch, the rules appear ambiguous as to whether the first or the third chasing rider completes the catch (which is strange given that it must happen often and need checking for time details) but as a Brit I'm happy that the Danes deserve to go through. [Other than for potential cheaty equipment in early rounds, which I've only just read about.]ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:57 pmI’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pmUCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.inactionman wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:06 pm
Seen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
CBC just showed a snippet of our sport climbing guy being slow up the rock wall and falling off the bouldering wall.
Guessing these are timed events, so have no issue with them compared to more judged ones. But is it the gateway into having a full set of Gladiators events / Ninja Warrior / Takeshi's Castle? (... imagine the latter as an Olympic sport!
)
Guessing these are timed events, so have no issue with them compared to more judged ones. But is it the gateway into having a full set of Gladiators events / Ninja Warrior / Takeshi's Castle? (... imagine the latter as an Olympic sport!

Nope. The pursuing team needs to overtake them safely, the rider being caught has no obligation to get out of their way. Total cop out by the officials.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:57 pmI’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pmUCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.inactionman wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:06 pm
Seen reports that Danish bloke ran into British bloke - assume, given that Danes progress, British bloke at fault?
Weird statement that Danish bloke didn't see British bloke, how on earth do you miss them?
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Ahhh. I thought he was the fourth rider. Didn’t realise he was a lagging third.Woddy wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 3:03 pmHe wasn't the 4th rider dropping off first, but the third rider who had simply lost the wheels of the front two, so we was still in the active team. Re the catch, the rules appear ambiguous as to whether the first or the third chasing rider completes the catch (which is strange given that it must happen often and need checking for time details) but as a Brit I'm happy that the Danes deserve to go through. [Other than for potential cheaty equipment in early rounds, which I've only just read about.]ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:57 pmI’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pm
UCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
Yeah. It's more or less impossible for the rider being caught to see the pursuer and know when to get out of the way.shaggy wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 3:33 pmNope. The pursuing team needs to overtake them safely, the rider being caught has no obligation to get out of their way. Total cop out by the officials.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:57 pmI’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pm
UCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
I would hope that the Dane who stood over Tanfield swearing at him, having knocked him down, at least has a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. Especially if that's the second thing for which his team should have been, but wasn't, disqualified.
They are clearly excellent cyclists, the Danish pursuit team, but also cvnts on today's evidence.
Hilarious for me was when the BBC apologised for the Danish expletive... even though it was in Danish!
They are clearly excellent cyclists, the Danish pursuit team, but also cvnts on today's evidence.
Hilarious for me was when the BBC apologised for the Danish expletive... even though it was in Danish!
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2806
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
I wonder if he thought he was the fourth man and went off on one.
Doesn't really matter. He's mesnt to be am adult. What an example to set.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 4:10 pm I wonder if he thought he was the fourth man and went off on one.
shaggy wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 9:24 pmSailing isn’t posh, well the dinghy sailing anyway.Ovals wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 7:51 pmI don't really enjoy the BMX competitions - but it's really good to see sports like that in the Olympics - they are very much working class sports - medals that every kid could aspire to - Much as I like the Rowing, it is very much a posh people sport - like sailing and equestrian.Certain Navigator wrote: Sun Aug 01, 2021 8:44 am
Lol. Unfortunately, that's the Olympics — not all medals are created equal.
Best moment of the Olympics for me, so far, was when Barshim and Tamberi were both awarded Gold in the High Jump - The Italian's reaction was just fantastic - a truly fantastic sporting moment.



Actually they don't need to overtake them at all as soon as they are within 1m of the wheel the contest is over...shaggy wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 3:33 pmNope. The pursuing team needs to overtake them safely, the rider being caught has no obligation to get out of their way. Total cop out by the officials.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:57 pmI’d have thought that the onus was on the British rider to get out of the way seeing as he was the rider who had dropped off? He can’t just piddle about on the racing line making the Danes lose time riding around him?Saint wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 2:50 pm
UCI effectively decided that as the Denmark team had caught GB (the catch wasn't actually complete under the rules), then the race was over before the crash actually happened. The general feeling at the track was the the GB guy had held his line as he's supposed to in order for the Danish team to pick the line to safely overtake.
Lots of controversy with the Denmark team in general, using equipment in the early rounds that was subsequently banned - the rules state that they should have been DQ'd for using unsanctioned equipment in the first place.
Yes, they seem to be very courteous towards each other but I expect the judges come down on them hard if they are not.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
They are very aware who has right of way and if they transgress they have to sail a 720 degree turn so there is big incentive to play fair.Slick wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:24 amYes, they seem to be very courteous towards each other but I expect the judges come down on them hard if they are not.
Ahh! yes, that would do it.Openside wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:26 amThey are very aware who has right of way and if they transgress they have to sail a 720 degree turn so there is big incentive to play fair.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Well done the Italians for beating them in the final.charltom wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 3:55 pm I would hope that the Dane who stood over Tanfield swearing at him, having knocked him down, at least has a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. Especially if that's the second thing for which his team should have been, but wasn't, disqualified.
They are clearly excellent cyclists, the Danish pursuit team, but also cvnts on today's evidence.
Hilarious for me was when the BBC apologised for the Danish expletive... even though it was in Danish!
Some weird decisions from the judges in the velodrome. Denmark let off for two much more serious infringements that should really have seen them DQd, then Katy Marchant DQd after winning her heat this morning for coming down on the wheel a fraction early.
The Danish shouldn't have been DQ'd as as soon as they were 1M away the contest was over however the shitty way the Dane behaved post crash makes me very happy that they lostLobby wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:34 amWell done the Italians for beating them in the final.charltom wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 3:55 pm I would hope that the Dane who stood over Tanfield swearing at him, having knocked him down, at least has a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct. Especially if that's the second thing for which his team should have been, but wasn't, disqualified.
They are clearly excellent cyclists, the Danish pursuit team, but also cvnts on today's evidence.
Hilarious for me was when the BBC apologised for the Danish expletive... even though it was in Danish!
Some weird decisions from the judges in the velodrome. Denmark let off for two much more serious infringements that should really have seen them DQd, then Katy Marchant DQd after winning her heat this morning for coming down on the wheel a fraction early.
-
- Posts: 3398
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Exploiting their position to force their opponent to manoeuvre is a key part of racing - there are general sailing rules about who is the stand-on (the vessel who doesn't need to shift) and the give way. These are mostly to do with upwind/downwind and who is on port or starboard tack, some a bit arbitrary. Getting your opponent to have to make an undesirable manoeuvre is a pretty handy way to steal a march.Slick wrote: Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:24 amYes, they seem to be very courteous towards each other but I expect the judges come down on them hard if they are not.
In the London Olympics Ben Ainslie just spent his last race blocking off his gold medal contender, forcing them to continually give way.
I've had a go at a few regattas and it's a further complication I really struggled with, I just tended to get the hell out of everyone else's way.
Last edited by inactionman on Wed Aug 04, 2021 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.