https://www.rugbyrama.fr/rugby/info-mid ... tory.shtml
He's to be tried along with the other crook (Altrad) essentially for bribery. Some of you may recall Laporte's somehow escaping jail for his clearly corrupt involvement in the FACEM scandal of 2010/11:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/na ... cle583931/
Bastard is teflon coated.
Will Mackey (Laporte) finally get his comeuppance?
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Last edited by Torquemada 1420 on Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
https://www.lequipe.fr/Rugby/Article/Af ... re/1311247
Looks like there is a wiff of serious shit...
Looks like there is a wiff of serious shit...
Ca va, Laurent. How's she cutting ?laurent wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:23 pm https://www.lequipe.fr/Rugby/Article/Af ... re/1311247
Looks like there is a wiff of serious shit...
All goodCamroc2 wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 12:32 amCa va, Laurent. How's she cutting ?laurent wrote: Mon Jan 17, 2022 8:23 pm https://www.lequipe.fr/Rugby/Article/Af ... re/1311247
Looks like there is a wiff of serious shit...
Even better if he goes to jail
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Laporte should never had his second mandate.Marylandolorian wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:58 pm Not sure if I read it right but it means that the 4 partners (GMF etc.) had an offer of 9.9M all together ?
If this is true both Laporte and the logo should be removedDans le rapport de 76 pages, il est, entre autres, également question de l’attribution du sponsoring maillot du XV de France par la FFR au groupe Altrad, pour 6,8 millions d’euros par saison. La question de la juste valeur de ce sponsoring est soulevée : les 4 partenaires officiels des Bleus (GMF, Orange, Société Générale, BMW) s’étaient vu proposer une offre à 9,9 millions d’euros par saison.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Should never have sold the national shirt to sponsorship full stop.Marylandolorian wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:58 pm Not sure if I read it right but it means that the 4 partners (GMF etc.) had an offer of 9.9M all together ?
If this is true both Laporte and the logo should be removedDans le rapport de 76 pages, il est, entre autres, également question de l’attribution du sponsoring maillot du XV de France par la FFR au groupe Altrad, pour 6,8 millions d’euros par saison. La question de la juste valeur de ce sponsoring est soulevée : les 4 partenaires officiels des Bleus (GMF, Orange, Société Générale, BMW) s’étaient vu proposer une offre à 9,9 millions d’euros par saison.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12063
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
It should be no surprise any of the other 3 were involved. Mackey could not have got MH/Altrad's sanctions lifted without sharing some of the bribes with other senior FFR officials. What interests me is the investigation has been going on for 3 years and includes wire taps. There might actually be some hope these c**ts will finally get nailed...Marylandolorian wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:23 pmMeh, 7 to 10 M€ a year, about 1M€ a game isn’t exactly something to ignore.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:18 pm Should never have sold the national shirt to sponsorship full stop.
My frustration is more about the size of the logo/sponsor’ name and who got it and how
It’s getting better, it also includes Serge Simon, Claude Atcher et Nicolas Hourquet,
Les menaces qui pèsent sur les dirigeants du rugby tricolore sont lourdes. Les qualifications retenues par le PNF à l’encontre de Bernard Laporte sont les suivantes : « corruption par personne chargée d’une mission de service public, trafic d’influence par personne publique, abus de confiance au préjudice de la FFR, prise illégale d’intérêts, recel d’abus de biens sociaux au préjudice d’AIA (Altrad Investment Authority), abus de biens sociaux au préjudice de (sa propre entreprise) BL Communication. » Pour Mohed Altrad : « corruption active sur personne chargée d’une mission de service public, trafic d’influence actif, abus de biens sociaux au préjudice d’AlA. »
