Even then it's odd. The Tory party now will spaff billions up the wall on vanity projects, on nepotism, even billions just to make the economy smaller, and that costs all but a tiny %. Okay if you're earning over £500k a year, or certainly a million and more per annum it'd be worth it just on the money frontSlick wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:21 pmThis is probably fairBiffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:12 pmNo alternative to a bunch of incompetents who are fucking over the taxpayer for the benefit of corporations?
Really?
Tell the truth OS, you just don't want to pay any more tax anf fuck anyone who suffers because of it.
Stop voting for fucking Tories
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
- not_english
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 6:51 pm
It seems obvious to me, putting the moral argument aside for a minute that it is just going to be ludicrously expensive to transport and pay for asylum seekers all the way to Rwanda while their applications are being processed.
Apparently 600 arrived by boat yesterday, just one day.
Surely this is going to end up costing billions (if they can get it through the courts, which seems unlikely).
Apparently 600 arrived by boat yesterday, just one day.
Surely this is going to end up costing billions (if they can get it through the courts, which seems unlikely).
You need to read the small print. They are not getting processed, they are getting dumpednot_english wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:33 pm It seems obvious to me, putting the moral argument aside for a minute that it is just going to be ludicrously expensive to transport and pay for asylum seekers all the way to Rwanda while their applications are being processed.
Apparently 600 arrived by boat yesterday, just one day.
Surely this is going to end up costing billions (if they can get it through the courts, which seems unlikely).
Edit: I thought it was bullshit at first as well. We wouldn’t do that. But, we are. Flying them to Rwanda and leaving them there. I don’t think I could actually come up with that plan in my imagination
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Yeah, he’s convinced himself it’s about competence or something, but it’s purely self interest on his part and fuck anyone less fortunate. Typical Tory boomer.Slick wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:21 pmThis is probably fairBiffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:12 pmNo alternative to a bunch of incompetents who are fucking over the taxpayer for the benefit of corporations?
Really?
Tell the truth OS, you just don't want to pay any more tax anf fuck anyone who suffers because of it.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 7:06 pmYeah, he’s convinced himself it’s about competence or something, but it’s purely self interest on his part and fuck anyone less fortunate. Typical Tory boomer.Slick wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:21 pmThis is probably fairBiffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:12 pm
No alternative to a bunch of incompetents who are fucking over the taxpayer for the benefit of corporations?
Really?
Tell the truth OS, you just don't want to pay any more tax anf fuck anyone who suffers because of it.
I'd like to see a full breakdown of tax and economic competence between the two major parties in the last 50 years.
You'd have to look at outcomes too.
It only takes one prime ministerial term to run down public services massively but a lot longer to build them back up again, it's like stamping on a violin compared to making one.
My eldest had problems with her ears, she had to have grommets fitted. She was born in 1996. When we started the ENT department was a dank drab place with exhausted staff, the waiting room was rammed with families with screaming kids and you'd have to wait for hours before being seen, everyone was at the end of their tether.
By the time she was discharged several years later the ENT was a nicely lit, newly decorated quiet place where you'd go in and sit for ten minutes tops before being seen. This was the same room.
The same daughter later attended an outreach programme at the new medical school which had just opened here. The idea was to get more state school kids into medicine. This outreach program ran from the first year of secondary school up to A level and through the application process. I could go into great detail as to why state school kids were not getting into medical school, these would not be my views, but the views of the head of admissions at the medical school who ran the outreach programme, but the very short version is that private school kids are prepared from day one to go on to these degrees, state school kids are at a huge disadvantage in the application process.
The traditional application process was set up to ignore huge numbers of talented young people, just because of where they went to school.
The idea of the outreach programmes came from Gordon Brown and it mandated that the new medical schools Labour were providing must run these initiatives.
What happened to Rory Stewart?petej wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:12 amThere are over 300 Tory mps but it is always the same 50-60 or so morons who get on the newsTorquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 7:57 am These people.![]()
The UK moves beyond dumping its toxic waste onto 3rd world countries to dumping its "waste" human beings in a similar manner. This has shades of when the UK decided it was going to create a homeland for the Jews............ in Uganda.
And then you have this c**t
https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-crit ... s-12589153
He seemed okay.
He quit at the last election and left the Conservative partyRinkals wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 8:48 pmWhat happened to Rory Stewart?petej wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:12 amThere are over 300 Tory mps but it is always the same 50-60 or so morons who get on the newsTorquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 7:57 am These people.![]()
The UK moves beyond dumping its toxic waste onto 3rd world countries to dumping its "waste" human beings in a similar manner. This has shades of when the UK decided it was going to create a homeland for the Jews............ in Uganda.
And then you have this c**t
https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-crit ... s-12589153
He seemed okay.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Forced out by Johnson.Rinkals wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 8:48 pmWhat happened to Rory Stewart?petej wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 9:12 amThere are over 300 Tory mps but it is always the same 50-60 or so morons who get on the newsTorquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 7:57 am These people.![]()
The UK moves beyond dumping its toxic waste onto 3rd world countries to dumping its "waste" human beings in a similar manner. This has shades of when the UK decided it was going to create a homeland for the Jews............ in Uganda.
And then you have this c**t
https://news.sky.com/story/tory-mp-crit ... s-12589153
He seemed okay.
Outline the alternative…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman isHappyhooker wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:16 pmYou've lost it sonOpenside wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 4:54 pmThere is quite simply no alternative!!Slick wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 6:42 am
Although I’ve never voted Tory and usually either spoil my vote or give it to one of the smaller parties, I’d usually have that thought in my mind.
But don’t you think that’s a bit difficult to back up now given Brexit, the constant lying, partygate, offshore, refugees, and on and on and on. It’s just a bit of a lazy statement now, this feels a bit unprecedented in terms of a really shit government taking us in a very wrong direction
You either have to tell usOpenside wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:00 pmOutline the alternative…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is![]()
1. The Tories are more competent than labour
2. They’re equally incompetent but I prefer Tory policies that shit all over people
3. You don’t give a shit so long as your tax is low
Which one is it?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Sir is not too bothered, either.Openside wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:00 pmOutline the alternative…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is![]()
/OS Butler
…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
OS is in the top 1% of UK earners and so you can hardly expect him to vote for anything that is detrimental to him: although the Tories hate small businesses almost as much as Labour hates enterprise full stop. FWIW, I don't want to pay more taxes either. I want Govts and the public sector to stop p*ssing mine up the wall in corruption, ineptitude and wars. I'd also like big businesses to start paying taxes and no party is signing up to that.Biffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 5:12 pm Really?
Tell the truth OS, you just don't want to pay any more tax anf fuck anyone who suffers because of it.
On a wider note, opposition parties have done a terrible job through COVID & Brexit. The fish were there in the barrel for shooting and instead they've done a pretty decent job of shooting themselves in the foot.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
He has become a parody a bimbo liteTichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:46 am…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
It’s currently 1)Biffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:10 pmYou either have to tell usOpenside wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:00 pmOutline the alternative…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is![]()
1. The Tories are more competent than labour
2. They’re equally incompetent but I prefer Tory policies that shit all over people
3. You don’t give a shit so long as your tax is low
Which one is it?
We all get one vote how we use it is up to us!
C69 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 7:41 amHe has become a parody a bimbo liteTichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:46 am…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
Except that fella had already been kicked out of labour by the last election.
I'm sure labour would have had more than enough of their own fuck ups, but it's hard to see how they could have deliberately fucked over the british public to quite the same degree. The Tories haven't just got it wrong through incompetence (though they aren't competent either), they've actively been giving away public funds to their mates, helping themselves to line their own pockets, and not giving a shit about anything else. Actively hurting the country, that we can see, rather than us hypothesising that maybe Labour would have done it too.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
It's missing the point in worrying fashion to label it a so-called culture war, on both sides there are those who feel the position of those against them is simply to deny they even exist, that's not a vague concern for either side of the debate. That it gets glossed over as a so-called even speaks to the misogyny many will citeTichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:46 am…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... dApp_Other
Jesus. What was Crispin Blunt thinking defending him!
Also, Rwanda? I thought it was a late April fools when I heard it first.
Jesus. What was Crispin Blunt thinking defending him!
Also, Rwanda? I thought it was a late April fools when I heard it first.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I'm a little surprised that the latest Tory sexual predator has decided to resign, & force the by-election.
HQ won't be happy; they'd have happily sat out a drawn out appeals process, & avoided a vote for as long as possible. Now we'll get the voters opinion of how well the Government is performing, & whether or not a war in Ukraine is reason enough to stick with the Tories, regardless of how badly they've fucked up domestic issues
HQ won't be happy; they'd have happily sat out a drawn out appeals process, & avoided a vote for as long as possible. Now we'll get the voters opinion of how well the Government is performing, & whether or not a war in Ukraine is reason enough to stick with the Tories, regardless of how badly they've fucked up domestic issues
The start of the demolition of the Red Wall hopefullyfishfoodie wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:06 am I'm a little surprised that the latest Tory sexual predator has decided to resign, & force the by-election.
HQ won't be happy; they'd have happily sat out a drawn out appeals process, & avoided a vote for as long as possible. Now we'll get the voters opinion of how well the Government is performing, & whether or not a war in Ukraine is reason enough to stick with the Tories, regardless of how badly they've fucked up domestic issues
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:23 amIt's missing the point in worrying fashion to label it a so-called culture war, on both sides there are those who feel the position of those against them is simply to deny they even exist, that's not a vague concern for either side of the debate. That it gets glossed over as a so-called even speaks to the misogyny many will citeTichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:46 am…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
I say "so-called culture wars" because the issues directly affect only a relatively small percentage of the population yet it gets exploited for political gain by the Right, so becoming a seeming deluge of "wokeism", "political correctness" and lefty liberal lawyers and judges, or "traitors" if you prefer.
The trans issues are very complicated and especially when it comes to the rights feminists have won over the last four or five decades, the rights conservatives resisted, in the main.
The sharp end of the issues such as the use of changing rooms become the be all and end all of the discussion, the splash headline, but it's only part of the topic, but it's far easier to use lazy tropes and facile statements than engage in the debate.
Tories know this, Johnson in particular is good at spotting a dividing line, it's easy, it gets people's backs up and it means they don't have to deal with lying to parliament or billions of pounds pissed away during a pandemic or why they got rid of protective equipment before the outbreak, or why did the PM take so long to attend the COBRA meetings, questions about Test and Trace, I could go on.
Trans issues are probably at the same place gay issues were 40/50 or so years ago, I don't pretend to have answers but I'm aware of some of the questions from many viewpoints.
At the start of this I said the culture wars only affect a relatively small percentage of the population, I'll go back on that and say we all benefit when another group wins its right to become treated as equals.
Perhaps it was because this hit the headlines this morningfishfoodie wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:06 am I'm a little surprised that the latest Tory sexual predator has decided to resign, & force the by-election.
HQ won't be happy; they'd have happily sat out a drawn out appeals process, & avoided a vote for as long as possible. Now we'll get the voters opinion of how well the Government is performing, & whether or not a war in Ukraine is reason enough to stick with the Tories, regardless of how badly they've fucked up domestic issues
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/20 ... e-was-16A man has accused Imran Ahmad Khan, the disgraced former Conservative MP, of propositioning him when he was 16.
The man, who the Guardian is calling Andrew (not his real name), says he met Khan at a birthday party in Suffolk in August 2015. He claims Khan, then in his early 40s, offered to give him oral sex and to take him to a hotel room to take cocaine and hire a sex worker.
Can you give me an example of incompetence as bad as writing off four billion pounds of fraud because the scheme you've set up has no way of identifying who did it?Openside wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 7:53 amIt’s currently 1)Biffer wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:10 pmYou either have to tell usOpenside wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 11:00 pm
Outline the alternative…Labour? They can’t even decide what a woman is![]()
1. The Tories are more competent than labour
2. They’re equally incompetent but I prefer Tory policies that shit all over people
3. You don’t give a shit so long as your tax is low
Which one is it?
We all get one vote how we use it is up to us!
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
So to be clear, your response to the idea that Labour isn't an alternative because of some bullshit about trans rights is... that the previous Labour lot who've since been marginalised or removed from the party are a bunch of wankers?
That's quality good faith argument right there
It's absolute horseshite. A circle jerk of indignation and sneering. But I see both "sides" using the exact same tactic. If you consider yourself a member of the right team in the "culture war", then keep an eye on the guardian until you find some over-the-top "left" opinion say something like admiring Marxism then express your indignation. The left side are no better - find a quote by Trump or some wing-nut alt-right racist and get highly indignant about it. Then get indignant about the indignation, smearing all "leftists" or "rightists" as being sympathetic to lunatic fringe views.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:32 am I say "so-called culture wars" because the issues directly affect only a relatively small percentage of the population yet it gets exploited for political gain by the Right, so becoming a seeming deluge of "wokeism", "political correctness" and lefty liberal lawyers and judges, or "traitors" if you prefer.
Actually, it's laughable what is referred to "far left" now - campaigns for gender neutral pronouns and the like? Who gives a fuck? Back in the 70s and 80s, the far left were blowing people up, kidnapping, hijacking airplanes and often acting as agents for an enemy of the state (the USSR). The amount of times you hear that back in the good old days, the far left were more reasonable compared to these days - it's mind boggling.
Precisely. Trans people have been around for a very long time and they're only a hot topic now because the populist government and some allies in the press, plus some high profile individuals, have made it a big deal. The British public is still hugely supportive of trans rights - including women, in fact a great percentage of women than men agree that trans women are women - but you wouldn't know it given the shit-stirring by a small number of people and the output of our media, who make it seem like there's overwhelming opposition.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:32 amRhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:23 amIt's missing the point in worrying fashion to label it a so-called culture war, on both sides there are those who feel the position of those against them is simply to deny they even exist, that's not a vague concern for either side of the debate. That it gets glossed over as a so-called even speaks to the misogyny many will citeTichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:46 am
The Tory game plan, when you've been caught with your pants down, ie your leader and chancellor have broken the law and also the ministerial code by lying to parliament, go straight to the so-called "Culture Wars"
I say "so-called culture wars" because the issues directly affect only a relatively small percentage of the population yet it gets exploited for political gain by the Right, so becoming a seeming deluge of "wokeism", "political correctness" and lefty liberal lawyers and judges, or "traitors" if you prefer.
The trans issues are very complicated and especially when it comes to the rights feminists have won over the last four or five decades, the rights conservatives resisted, in the main.
The sharp end of the issues such as the use of changing rooms become the be all and end all of the discussion, the splash headline, but it's only part of the topic, but it's far easier to use lazy tropes and facile statements than engage in the debate.
Tories know this, Johnson in particular is good at spotting a dividing line, it's easy, it gets people's backs up and it means they don't have to deal with lying to parliament or billions of pounds pissed away during a pandemic or why they got rid of protective equipment before the outbreak, or why did the PM take so long to attend the COBRA meetings, questions about Test and Trace, I could go on.
Trans issues are probably at the same place gay issues were 40/50 or so years ago, I don't pretend to have answers but I'm aware of some of the questions from many viewpoints.
At the start of this I said the culture wars only affect a relatively small percentage of the population, I'll go back on that and say we all benefit when another group wins its right to become treated as equals.
It's a niche issue that has been exploited to the hilt for political gain.
It's yet another thing we've imported from the USA. Centrist / centre-right politicians are immediately labelled far-left regardless of their beliefs.derriz wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:50 amIt's absolute horseshite. A circle jerk of indignation and sneering. But I see both "sides" using the exact same tactic. If you consider yourself a member of the right team in the "culture war", then keep an eye on the guardian until you find some over-the-top "left" opinion say something like admiring Marxism then express your indignation. The left side are no better - find a quote by Trump or some wing-nut alt-right racist and get highly indignant about it. Then get indignant about the indignation, smearing all "leftists" or "rightists" as being sympathetic to lunatic fringe views.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:32 am I say "so-called culture wars" because the issues directly affect only a relatively small percentage of the population yet it gets exploited for political gain by the Right, so becoming a seeming deluge of "wokeism", "political correctness" and lefty liberal lawyers and judges, or "traitors" if you prefer.
Actually, it's laughable what is referred to "far left" now - campaigns for gender neutral pronouns and the like? Who gives a fuck? Back in the 70s and 80s, the far left were blowing people up, kidnapping, hijacking airplanes and often acting as agents for an enemy of the state (the USSR). The amount of times you hear that back in the good old days, the far left were more reasonable compared to these days - it's mind boggling.
Mind you, I don't think it's quite fair to compare whichever loon has been given the opportunity to write an opinion piece on Comment Is Free with Donald Trump, former US President, most important figure for the current Republican Party, and likely favourite to win the next election...
He doesn't realise he's fooled himself into these arguments.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:47 amSo to be clear, your response to the idea that Labour isn't an alternative because of some bullshit about trans rights is... that the previous Labour lot who've since been marginalised or removed from the party are a bunch of wankers?
That's quality good faith argument right there
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I did a lot of work in previous life in medical education and had close links with post grad deans etc who ran post grad medical education across Scotland. There was a clear understanding that the traditional recruitment (males with good Highers/A levels from private education sector) had to change primarily because the output of private schools and the kids with 'good' qualifications did not guarantee good doctors of the future. In fact it meant recruiting many who were neither equipped to be doctors or didn't even want to be doctors but were 'railroaded' into it by expectations of parents and schools systems. Many had neither the social skills nor emotional intelligence to succeed and struggled very badly once they hit the real world of medicine in hospitals. Alternatively many of those with less good qualifications and from less privileged backgrounds succeeded very well, not least because they had to have had the determination and will to make it. It is of course too easy to over generalise but, there is strong data to back this up, there is now better balance in recruitment and the NHS is all the better for it.Tichtheid wrote: Thu Apr 14, 2022 8:10 pm
I'd like to see a full breakdown of tax and economic competence between the two major parties in the last 50 years.
You'd have to look at outcomes too.
It only takes one prime ministerial term to run down public services massively but a lot longer to build them back up again, it's like stamping on a violin compared to making one.
My eldest had problems with her ears, she had to have grommets fitted. She was born in 1996. When we started the ENT department was a dank drab place with exhausted staff, the waiting room was rammed with families with screaming kids and you'd have to wait for hours before being seen, everyone was at the end of their tether.
By the time she was discharged several years later the ENT was a nicely lit, newly decorated quiet place where you'd go in and sit for ten minutes tops before being seen. This was the same room.
The same daughter later attended an outreach programme at the new medical school which had just opened here. The idea was to get more state school kids into medicine. This outreach program ran from the first year of secondary school up to A level and through the application process. I could go into great detail as to why state school kids were not getting into medical school, these would not be my views, but the views of the head of admissions at the medical school who ran the outreach programme, but the very short version is that private school kids are prepared from day one to go on to these degrees, state school kids are at a huge disadvantage in the application process.
The traditional application process was set up to ignore huge numbers of talented young people, just because of where they went to school.
The idea of the outreach programmes came from Gordon Brown and it mandated that the new medical schools Labour were providing must run these initiatives.
It’s funny really. The old Conservative line used to be that they wanted to increase the size of the national cake whereas Labour was more bothered about changing the size of the slices. Seems to be the other way round now with the intent that whoever has the biggest slice gets an even bigger one.
Yes, it still remains a mystery why the current Tory government, who are objectively terrible on a broad array of measures, won the last two elections.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:47 amSo to be clear, your response to the idea that Labour isn't an alternative because of some bullshit about trans rights is... that the previous Labour lot who've since been marginalised or removed from the party are a bunch of wankers?
That's quality good faith argument right there
It's not a mystery at all. However, the previous elections aren't what we're talking about, are they.robmatic wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 11:45 amYes, it still remains a mystery why the current Tory government, who are objectively terrible on a broad array of measures, won the last two elections.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:47 amSo to be clear, your response to the idea that Labour isn't an alternative because of some bullshit about trans rights is... that the previous Labour lot who've since been marginalised or removed from the party are a bunch of wankers?robmatic wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 7:47 am
Come on now, Corbyn and his pals were a great alternative...
That's quality good faith argument right there