What's going on in Ukraine?
Edge. No nuance comrades, those keyboards won't type themselves.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... dy/629850/
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archi ... dy/629850/
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6804
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Certainly seems that Ukraine forces are concentrating on other objectives at the moment and whether they are just trying to slow down this attack and withdraw in good order to a better defensive position here I have no idea, but there is potential for Russian forces to make a gain here. Have to hope for now that their supplies and logistics can be disrupted enough to make any advances temporary.
- Hellraiser
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am
Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
It was so far away, I didn't think about it much. But then I read Neville Shute's book - On the Beach??Enzedder wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 10:59 pm
Much the same.here, born 1949. Aware of nuclear war as a theoretical possibility but it never seemed that likely.
[/quote]
Enz, as a young lad I watched the original movie of that book, it made a huge impression on me at that time.
Edit For the great theme music.
Last edited by The Druid on Sun May 15, 2022 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8729
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
One of the things I think this war has, ironically, made much more likely, is more Nuclear Disarmament.
Whoever replaces Putin will be well aware, that the ICBM stockpile they have is starving the rest of the army of money, & if they ever wanted to use them, they'd be lucky if 1 in 10 made it out of the launcher, & didn't go a couple of hundred meters up, & blow up scattering plutonium all over the country.
The Chinese seem to be capping their ICBMs at ~300, which with MIRVs still gives you 3,000 deliverable warheads, which is a lot better that 20,000 undeliverable warheads.
The US Would be happy (well except the USAF, & Navy), to cap the number of deliverable warheads.
Whoever replaces Putin will be well aware, that the ICBM stockpile they have is starving the rest of the army of money, & if they ever wanted to use them, they'd be lucky if 1 in 10 made it out of the launcher, & didn't go a couple of hundred meters up, & blow up scattering plutonium all over the country.
The Chinese seem to be capping their ICBMs at ~300, which with MIRVs still gives you 3,000 deliverable warheads, which is a lot better that 20,000 undeliverable warheads.
The US Would be happy (well except the USAF, & Navy), to cap the number of deliverable warheads.
- Hellraiser
- Posts: 2272
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am
If commercially viable thorium salt reactor technology become a reality that will probably spell the end of nuclear weapons or at least proliferation.fishfoodie wrote: Sun May 15, 2022 1:58 pm One of the things I think this war has, ironically, made much more likely, is more Nuclear Disarmament.
Whoever replaces Putin will be well aware, that the ICBM stockpile they have is starving the rest of the army of money, & if they ever wanted to use them, they'd be lucky if 1 in 10 made it out of the launcher, & didn't go a couple of hundred meters up, & blow up scattering plutonium all over the country.
The Chinese seem to be capping their ICBMs at ~300, which with MIRVs still gives you 3,000 deliverable warheads, which is a lot better that 20,000 undeliverable warheads.
The US Would be happy (well except the USAF, & Navy), to cap the number of deliverable warheads.
Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6804
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Another one of those translated intercepts
Prembore wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 11:39 pmDitto. It was there but so were girls, and they were infinitely more terrifyingOpenside wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 9:18 pmWTF? Seriously? I didn’t give nuclear war a second thought!!Biffer wrote: Thu May 12, 2022 3:24 pm Interesting Long Read in the Guardian about the memory of nuclear war
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... -dangerous
I'm very conscious of this. I'm 51, so was 18 when the cold war ended. My childhood and teenage years had an existential terror hanging over them. Anyone who's more than a few years younger than me doesn't remember that, and doesn't really realise what the overarching fear of nuclear war was during the cold war. I remember having regular nightmares about nuclear war when I was a kid, and I know many of my friends did as well. This worries me very much.
Pah I was at Reading Uni and in 1982 we turned up en masse and changed the policy to pro Nuclear weapons!! The students Union were livid!!Gumboot wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 11:48 pmI was a card carrying, badge wearing CND member in the UK mid-80s. The nuclear threat felt very real and very close.Plim wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 11:16 pmPart of it is age. I’m a bit(ish) younger than Openside and GogLais. I grew up through the years when the BBC were keen on screening Ken Loach-type dramas about nuclear apocalypse. And CND were very vocal. That fell away by the late ‘80s.
I still have this, which I bought at the time.
![]()
Obviously he believed in his noddy suit.Guy Smiley wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 10:03 pmParas eh... too dumb to know they were part of a Cold War.Openside wrote: Sat May 14, 2022 9:18 pm
WTF? Seriously? I didn’t give nuclear war a second thought!!
Do Americans do this sort of public place religious recruitment thing the most? Always reminds me of this Curbed episode where the Jewish side call out the Christians on their constant attempts to recruit:

- redderneck
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:45 pm
Remember wandering downstairs in my hotel in Krasnoyarsk many moons ago, thrilled at hearing the sound of American voices after putting down around 3 months solid of working through interpreters as I slowly built up my Russian from scratch, only to find it was a platoon of Mormons plotting their Siberian campaign. Safe to say they were about as thrilled to encounter a jaundiced Jesuit-educated cynical Irish bastard like myself as I was to encounter them.
An atmosphere of thinly-veiled, yet strangely civil animosity prevailed for 2-3 days until they fecked off to do God's work.
I spent most of the w/end in the bar, which must have impressed them. Not as much as my repeatedly charging my booze to their rooms.
An atmosphere of thinly-veiled, yet strangely civil animosity prevailed for 2-3 days until they fecked off to do God's work.
I spent most of the w/end in the bar, which must have impressed them. Not as much as my repeatedly charging my booze to their rooms.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6804
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Hmm, hope this is a false alarm, there is supposed to be an agreement on evacuation of wounded from Azovstal during this time
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2801
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Looks like a surrender is close at Azovstal
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4920
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Bit risky to talk about taking Crimea, isn't it?

laurent wrote: Mon May 16, 2022 9:05 pm Looks like the azovstal wounded were evacuated and reached the hospital (in Russian occupied area).
Not sure about the rest of the garrison (Azov + Marines + border guards )
Still not sure what is happening after today
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-05-17/ ... /101070084
A local article asking what comes next.