Stop voting for fucking Tories

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Ovals wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:39 am
ASMO wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:30 am Looks like Kwarteng has been given the Spanish Archer, wont be enough to save that useless shitwitch in number 10, but its a step.
Her authority has been totally shot to pieces - she was 1st choice (as PM) by quite a small number of Tory MPs and now the backbenchers know they can tell her what to do and when. Just a matter of time until she is ditched.
Sunak had more support from MPs than Dizzy, from the 1st to the final round of ballots; it was only in the membership she won the Leadership
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1875
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Ovals wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:39 am
ASMO wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:30 am Looks like Kwarteng has been given the Spanish Archer, wont be enough to save that useless shitwitch in number 10, but its a step.
Her authority has been totally shot to pieces - she was 1st choice (as PM) by quite a small number of Tory MPs and now the backbenchers know they can tell her what to do and when. Just a matter of time until she is ditched.
Do you think she gave him a consolation shag before sacking him?

As they are essentially of one (very small) mind, and he was implementing the plans she announced in her campaign, there is no way she can distance herself from her own budget. She's toast.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6827
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Ovals wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:39 am
ASMO wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:30 am Looks like Kwarteng has been given the Spanish Archer, wont be enough to save that useless shitwitch in number 10, but its a step.
Her authority has been totally shot to pieces - she was 1st choice (as PM) by quite a small number of Tory MPs and now the backbenchers know they can tell her what to do and when. Just a matter of time until she is ditched.

She has, in fact, confounded some expectations and lasted longer than a lettuce. So, in terms of how long she'll last, what are we talking here, mushrooms, aubergine?
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6827
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

It's mental, he has clearly been deeply unqualified and out of his depth but this is equally down to Truss, and she surely can't be allowed to continue as PM as a part of this whole shitcart.
Kwarteng second shortest-serving UK chancellor

It means Kwarteng is the second shortest-serving UK chancellor on record.

The shortest serving chancellor, Iain Macleod, died of a heart attack 30 days after taking the job in 1970.

Since 2019, the UK has had four chancellors, including Nadhim Zahawi who served the third shortest tenure with 63 days during a short-lived reshuffle under Boris Johnson, and Sajid Javid who served 204 days - the fourth shortest tenure since the Second World War.
Fucking hell...
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:53 am It's mental, he has clearly been deeply unqualified and out of his depth but this is equally down to Truss, and she surely can't be allowed to continue as PM as a part of this whole shitcart.
She's going thru the standard playbook of responses; they tried blaming external influences, & then blaming the market. Those didn't work, & her MPs are demanding blood, so she has to sack the Minister; this was suggested after the dire reception at the 1922 Committee.

She still has to convince her MPs that she won't do any more stupid shit, & she will have to start by appointing a decent replacement, rolling back the idiocy, & presenting a new Budget, with the OBR report, & then we'll see how the markets react, to see if she retains any credibility.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:53 am It's mental, he has clearly been deeply unqualified and out of his depth but this is equally down to Truss, and she surely can't be allowed to continue as PM as a part of this whole shitcart.
Kwarteng second shortest-serving UK chancellor

It means Kwarteng is the second shortest-serving UK chancellor on record.

The shortest serving chancellor, Iain Macleod, died of a heart attack 30 days after taking the job in 1970.

Since 2019, the UK has had four chancellors, including Nadhim Zahawi who served the third shortest tenure with 63 days during a short-lived reshuffle under Boris Johnson, and Sajid Javid who served 204 days - the fourth shortest tenure since the Second World War.
Fucking hell...

If the UK was one of businesses these arseholes are so in thrall to, and they'd caused this much of a fuck up to their business after a few days in office, the CEO, the chair and whole board would resign.
Slick
Posts: 13324
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

I've seen that the new idea from MP's is a Sunak - Mordaunt team in some combination of PM- Deputy PM - Chancellor

Sunak PM - Mordaunt Deputy

Mordaunt PM - Sunak Chancellor.

It shows how bad shit has got in the last few weeks that this now looks like a possible way forward...
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:04 pm
tabascoboy wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:53 am It's mental, he has clearly been deeply unqualified and out of his depth but this is equally down to Truss, and she surely can't be allowed to continue as PM as a part of this whole shitcart.
Kwarteng second shortest-serving UK chancellor

It means Kwarteng is the second shortest-serving UK chancellor on record.

The shortest serving chancellor, Iain Macleod, died of a heart attack 30 days after taking the job in 1970.

Since 2019, the UK has had four chancellors, including Nadhim Zahawi who served the third shortest tenure with 63 days during a short-lived reshuffle under Boris Johnson, and Sajid Javid who served 204 days - the fourth shortest tenure since the Second World War.
Fucking hell...

If the UK was one of businesses these arseholes are so in thrall to, and they'd caused this much of a fuck up to their business after a few days in office, the CEO, the chair and whole board would resign.
Comes back to brexit being a steaming turd. Until the extremists will accept some compromises being Chancellor is impossible.
_Os_
Posts: 2865
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

_Os_ wrote: Tue Sep 27, 2022 8:31 am Some are saying the UK is turning into an emerging market. It's obviously not (it's not high growth with favourable demographics), but is it even behaving like an emerging market?

During the Jacob Zuma era, a place man called Des van Rooyen was made finance minister, the market reaction was extremely negative, and the Rand immediately dropped 5% against the $. He was in on Friday and fitted up in concrete boots and gone by Monday, earning him the nickname "weekend special". In his place Zuma selected someone the markets had more faith in but wasn't a Zuma ally.

If the UK was actually behaving like an emerging market, Truss would now dismiss KamiKwazi, and beg Sunak to come back because that is the surest way to regain market confidence. Jacob Zuma and the ANC understood this.

But that's not going to happen, and the BoE has limited room to do anything without sending ordinary middle class families into poverty. So instead the markets are going to hammer the £, on and off for two months, then KamiKwazi will report back at the end of November. He's also doubled down and made clear he's committed to further tax cuts (funded by debt?). It's total madness, could end up the most damaging speech in UK political history. The £ is definitely going below the $ and Euro if this holds, but what does a currency crisis look like in a reserve currency? Possible doom loop where the volatility itself creates more volatility? Can't see it helping the City's position.
It's taken Truss and the Tories weeks to work out what Zuma and the ANC took hours/days to work out. Fucking hell.

It really looked like they weren't going to work it out at all for awhile, and just didn't understand the certain doom they were heading into.

Spoilers on the next stage of the process: Truss herself is removed, and by taking this long to climb down and sacrifice Kamikwazi she's risking that happening sooner than would've otherwise been the case.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Meantime
I like neeps
Posts: 3800
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:29 am
I like neeps wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:11 am
Biffer wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 10:45 am Does anyone know for certain the limits of the monarchy's constitutional power in this regard? How many attempts to form a working government does he have to put up with before saying 'I do not believe the current parliament can form a stable government so we will have a general election?'
Infinate. King Charles isn't stupid, the monarchy erodes in power when they start trying this nonsense. It's not up to them.
The most King Charles could do would be to suggest to the PM during their weekly briefing that they ought to consider their position and question the extent to which they are able to form a Government, but he couldn't take any action in public and certainly couldn't exercise any constitutional powers, even if he has them.
King Charles laughing at Truss in their last meeting was fairly radical for a monarch which didn't get much pop.

Anyway, chancellors will continue to go after a year or so until brexit is reversed.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6670
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

PornDog wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:29 am
Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:11 am
Slick wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 8:18 am

Well I think this hits the nail on the head actually.

Brexit, Boris and now this mess were all meant to move the dial on Indy, but haven't really. It's just a personal view but I can see the Indy bubble beginning to deflate and this nonsense of the next GE being a defacto referendum and the very real probability of the next UK government being Labour has the capacity to put it on the back foot for at least the next decade.

It seems to me that those pro Indy are made up a majority of folk that just don't care about the impact or haven't the capacity to realise it and a minority who do get it but think it is worth it in the short to medium term to look after ourselves, which is fair enough. I think the only way to move that dial and get towards the 65%-70% in favour, which I think should be the minimum, is to start being honest about the future. At one end you have the "independence is the answer to everything and we will be rich beyond our wildest dreams" to " we will end up on the scrapheap", when of course the answer is somewhere between, but more on the hurt and pain end.

I just don't understand how the SNP expect people who are against at the moment to vote for it when we know, and they know, there is absolutely no credible plan in place after 12 years, none at all. Even basic questions are not being addressed in favour of protecting what they have. How ever bad things are for the UK at the moment, the option of going it alone without and real idea of what that means just seems crazy. There is also the issue that by just about every metric Scotland has been going backwards with this government and the glaring reality that below Sturgeon (way out in front) and Forbes there is absolutely no talent, little intelligence and close to zero statesmanship or statecraft - much as I admire Sturgeon in some ways, I can't see her leading an independent country.

Being a small independent country in Europe actually excites me but I need honesty, I need answers about our new relationship with our biggest, by far, trading partner, what we can realistically expect our lives to look like for the next 10 years after. I'd also like some kind of admission that the current SG would be massively out of their depth, and they would look to form a coalition of politicians and experienced civil servants to take us on that journey.
The most pertinent lesson from Brexit for Scottish independence is surely that leaving a political and economic union is incredibly complicated and difficult, and will have all sorts of unintended consequences. If the UK leaving the EU after just over 40 years (of a not always particularly close union) is such a clusterfuck, Scotland leaving the UK after about 300 years of (a much closer) union is going to be several times more complex and difficult, especially if the SNP refuses to prepare a realistic plan for exit (and we have all seen how well that has gone for Brexiteers).

Realistically, even if Scotland votes to leave, it will likely take decades to sort out before Scotland can contemplate joining the EU.
I don't think you can use the Brexit clusterfuck as a yardstick for Scotland, after all the Tories wont be in charge of it. No matter what reservations Scots may have about the quality and experience of their politicians on the international stage, they could not possibly be anywhere near as remotely deluded and incompetent as the Tories.

But you are dead right, it wont be plain sailing and viable plans have to be in place long before any action is taken.
Brexit is the yardstick - Britain has a large civil service and diplomatic corps that got completely overwhelmed by leaving a 40 year union, leaving a 300 year old one (that is much deeper) without most of that will sink the Scottish Government for at least a decade.
Not to mention that the SNP are perfectly capable of spinning fantasies up there with any Redwood or Baker - see the constant hedging on currency and the laughable suggestion that the rUK government will pay pensions.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Lobby
Posts: 1875
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Chris Philp also sacked.

It’s rumoured that ‘senior Tories’ are planning to visit Dizzy Lizzie next week to tell her to resign. 1922 Committee are also going to set aside rules protecting PM from confidence vote for a year, after a deluge of letters from Tory MPs.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 6670
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

I like neeps wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:21 pm
Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:29 am
I like neeps wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:11 am

Infinate. King Charles isn't stupid, the monarchy erodes in power when they start trying this nonsense. It's not up to them.
The most King Charles could do would be to suggest to the PM during their weekly briefing that they ought to consider their position and question the extent to which they are able to form a Government, but he couldn't take any action in public and certainly couldn't exercise any constitutional powers, even if he has them.
King Charles laughing at Truss in their last meeting was fairly radical for a monarch which didn't get much pop.

Anyway, chancellors will continue to go after a year or so until brexit is reversed.
Can't see how this stands up to Sunak resigning over Boris' behaviour, particularly given the government is about to revert to his economic plans
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4606
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:20 pm Meantime
This sort of stupid cuntery doesn't even get me cross anymore. It's priced into the general despair and anger at everything this sorry collection of zealots, whores and thieves do.
Last edited by Hal Jordan on Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:22 pm Chris Philp also sacked.

It’s rumoured that ‘senior Tories’ are planning to visit Dizzy Lizzie next week to tell her to resign. 1922 Committee are also going to set aside rules protecting PM from confidence vote for a year, after a deluge of letters from Tory MPs.
Fabulous. That c**t Philp is a particular bugbear of mine.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:25 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:20 pm Meantime
This sort of stupid cuntery doesn't even get me cross anymore. It's priced into the general despair and anger at everything this sorry collection of zealots, whores and thieves do.
It's almost fascinating to see how delusionally arrogant they continue to be that such utter tripe is spouted. I'm waiting for one to officially declare that the Earth is flat and black is white.

PS It's okay to be criss too :wink:
petej
Posts: 2506
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:25 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:20 pm Meantime
This sort of stupid cuntery doesn't even get me cross anymore. It's priced into the general despair and anger at everything this sorry collection of zealots, whores and thieves do.
Umm. It is potentially correct. Oil and gas extraction in the North sea is heavily regulated and controlled so far less likely to leak methane also if the extraction is less energy intense then yes it could be less environmentally damaging than extraction somewhere less regulated. I wouldn't be bothered if this was coupled with green policies elsewhere in things like buildings, insulation, renewables and nuclear but generally the government is flailing about.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10497
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:22 pm and the laughable suggestion that the rUK government will pay pensions.

Just on this one item, I was under the impression (from reading the government website a few years ago) that the UK paid pensions for those people who had worked here but had emigrated on their retirement.

Why would an Indy Scotland be different from that scenario?


edit, in fact

Claim State Pension abroad
You can claim State Pension abroad if you’ve paid enough UK National Insurance contributions to qualify.

https://www.gov.uk/state-pension-if-you ... 0may%20get.
Last edited by Tichtheid on Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
_Os_
Posts: 2865
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:22 pm Chris Philp also sacked.

It’s rumoured that ‘senior Tories’ are planning to visit Dizzy Lizzie next week to tell her to resign. 1922 Committee are also going to set aside rules protecting PM from confidence vote for a year, after a deluge of letters from Tory MPs.
She's fucked. Her only option was immediate climb down and get Kamikwazi into concrete boots asap. Which she didn't do. The problem for her, is she now has no credibility and has tanked Tory polling, no one respects her and the general view is she's a moron or insane. She has made herself into a threat to the Tory party's existence.

Mordaunt looked like their best candidate during the campaign to me, posted as much on the thread, I think her and Sunak would be capable of holding the massive Tory core vote of 30%-35%. She's from an ordinary background so could cause Labour some problems, her politics are far closer to most people in the UK than the Truss/IEA plan too. She has no big vision and is a bit rubbish, but will give them more of a chance than other candidates.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:44 am
Will there be a State funeral?
I like neeps
Posts: 3800
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:23 pm
I like neeps wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:21 pm
Lobby wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 11:29 am

The most King Charles could do would be to suggest to the PM during their weekly briefing that they ought to consider their position and question the extent to which they are able to form a Government, but he couldn't take any action in public and certainly couldn't exercise any constitutional powers, even if he has them.
King Charles laughing at Truss in their last meeting was fairly radical for a monarch which didn't get much pop.

Anyway, chancellors will continue to go after a year or so until brexit is reversed.
Can't see how this stands up to Sunak resigning over Boris' behaviour, particularly given the government is about to revert to his economic plans
Johnson would never have been PM without Brexit, Sunak would never have to resign over his behaviour which was obviously going to happen to anyone who knew anything about Boris. Ipso facto...
User avatar
Camroc2
Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:27 pm
Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:25 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:20 pm Meantime
This sort of stupid cuntery doesn't even get me cross anymore. It's priced into the general despair and anger at everything this sorry collection of zealots, whores and thieves do.
It's almost fascinating to see how delusionally arrogant they continue to be that such utter tripe is spouted. I'm waiting for one to officially declare that the Earth is flat and black is white.

PS It's okay to be criss too :wink:
Don't worry, a fair few of their DUP allies are 'Young Earthers', who want 'Creationism' included in the Science syllabus in NI schools.

:lol: :lol:
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Jeremy Hunt as Chancellor; I'm not sure that's what the markets will want to see. They want to see a pragmatist, with some experience, not just another zealot.
Nobody in their right mind would sack the bomb disposal guy. Right?

When it comes to getting the politically dirty and dangerous jobs done, U.K. Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt is the man to turn to.

In the more than four years since he took the brief, Hunt has pushed through hugely unpopular health care reforms and shielded his prime ministers from the toxic fallout.

He deftly avoided the ax over months of unprecedented doctors’ strikes and survived a media maelstrom after the U.K. National Health Service's outdated systems were paralyzed by a global cyber attack.

...

“He’s the great survivor … the bomb disposal expert,” said Liberal Democrat former Health Minister Norman Lamb. “He’s taken a lot of flak for the government and there’s a case from the Tory perspective to let him continue to be the shock absorber,” he said.

...
https://www.politico.eu/article/nhs-uk- ... -absorber/

Pick the guy who'll happily push thru the most disastrous of policies, because you can rely on him to pay no attention to experts, but he'll be loyal.

He's mostly responsible for the shocking decline in the NHS, but what the hell, give him a promotion, & put him in charge of the Economy
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6827
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

EDIT - tweets not available now
Last edited by tabascoboy on Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6827
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Duplicated post
Last edited by tabascoboy on Fri Oct 14, 2022 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2804
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

*snigger

User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4606
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Being manager of Watford looks like a lifetime gig compared to the Chancellor's job at the moment.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

I don't know how much of this you can see behind FT's paywall:
https://www.ft.com/content/7b90ec2e-d57 ... 437f8659ff

but the short of it is the water cos were privatised with zero debt and fed another £1.5bn of tax payer money to make improvements. Since then, they have borrowed at least £53bn and paid in excess of £72bn in dividends. Significant amount of our billing money is now simply being used to service the debt.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 1:22 pm Being manager of Watford looks like a lifetime gig compared to the Chancellor's job at the moment.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5507
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
_Os_
Posts: 2865
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

One Truss ally suggested that scrapping the corporation tax plan, if agreed, might be presented as “a readjustment given global market conditions”. The government has been keen to blame the market turmoil since the “mini” Budget on global factors rather than accept it stems from UK specific issues.
There was no consensus in Truss’s team about what precise elements of Kwarteng’s fiscal statement should be dropped and how soon. “The U-turn has been briefed out before the policy was decided,” said one official.
Some government insiders blamed the chaos on a lack of senior officials in Number 10, with several of Truss’s aides on holiday and Kwarteng in Washington. One civil servant described the mood in Number 10 on Thursday as “grim”.
The lack of experience among Truss’s team was highlighted by MPs who claimed it was not equipped for a crisis. “She has no good advisers,” said one Whitehall official.
One civil servant said there was “a lack of decision-making in Number 10” and paralysis across Whitehall. “There’s inexperience and naivety in [Truss’s] team not realising what a mess they’ve created.”
Another official added: “They simply don’t know how to govern”.
https://www.ft.com/content/062bb647-14f ... 7edada5dc2

My suspicion they just don't know what the fuck they're doing, and this is why it's taken weeks for the obvious move to happen (incurring huge political damage on Truss/the Tories, as well as economic damage to the UK, almost all of it avoidable with immediate action) looks to be correct. They just didn't comprehend what they had done or what to do next. :shock:
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Well that was catastrophically bad :shock: :shock: :shock:

She's fucking digging in.
User avatar
salanya
Posts: 747
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

No surprise Kwarteng is gone - funny how he's saying he's been sacked, whereas she's saying he made the honourable decision :problem:

Though I'm surprised Hunt is that dense that he's involving himself with this government, and is happy to work under Truss.
I didn't have that high of an opinion of his intelligence, but this is a stupidly bad call.
Over the hills and far away........
User avatar
PornDog
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:39 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 12:22 pm Brexit is the yardstick - Britain has a large civil service and diplomatic corps that got completely overwhelmed by leaving a 40 year union, leaving a 300 year old one (that is much deeper) without most of that will sink the Scottish Government for at least a decade.
Not to mention that the SNP are perfectly capable of spinning fantasies up there with any Redwood or Baker - see the constant hedging on currency and the laughable suggestion that the rUK government will pay pensions.
Not to diminish the size of the tasks (both real and potential), but you seem to be absolving the Tories of their role in the clusterfuck and blaming it instead on the task just being too big a one to achieve/ the civil service. They've had no clear direction from incompetent leadership - the most competent and best served civil servants in the world would fail at organising a piss up in a brewery under those conditions.

While the SNP are no doubt capable of their own incompetencies, I refuse to believe they could come anywhere close to the scale of this generation of Tories (plenty of rational Tories in the past, and I'm sure present, they have just lost control of the party)!

As for pensions, while it will no doubt be another political football, I really don't see it as being the major obstacle that others do. My mother hasn't worked in the UK since the late 60's and yet still receives a very small portion of a UK pension every month. You get paid out of the pot you paid into, inevitably many people will end up being paid from two different pension pots, though not a full share from either, but so be it.
Biffer
Posts: 10069
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 1:23 pm I don't know how much of this you can see behind FT's paywall:
https://www.ft.com/content/7b90ec2e-d57 ... 437f8659ff

but the short of it is the water cos were privatised with zero debt and fed another £1.5bn of tax payer money to make improvements. Since then, they have borrowed at least £53bn and paid in excess of £72bn in dividends. Significant amount of our billing money is now simply being used to service the debt.
I am very glad Scottish Water is still in public ownership. The water companies are both a literal and metaphorical shitshow.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Slick
Posts: 13324
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 1:56 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Oct 14, 2022 1:23 pm I don't know how much of this you can see behind FT's paywall:
https://www.ft.com/content/7b90ec2e-d57 ... 437f8659ff

but the short of it is the water cos were privatised with zero debt and fed another £1.5bn of tax payer money to make improvements. Since then, they have borrowed at least £53bn and paid in excess of £72bn in dividends. Significant amount of our billing money is now simply being used to service the debt.
I am very glad Scottish Water is still in public ownership. The water companies are both a literal and metaphorical shitshow.
They still dumped 48 million cubic metres of raw sewage into our seas and rivers last year, so they can also get fucked.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
salanya
Posts: 747
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

I love Truss' definition of 'decisive' action:
'I waited 3 weeks for the economy to collapse before throwing my great 'friend' under the bus.'
Over the hills and far away........
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8766
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Post Reply