I think it's as simple as they don't really give a shit about anyone who isn't a copperLobby wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 7:14 pmYou’d think they would have noticed that these warnings were mounting up after say the fifth or sixth different time he was accused of sexual harassment, but no, they didn’t even see that there was a pattern developing after the ninth warning.EnergiseR2 wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:37 pmThis lad was definitely weird. I would have thought a lads bosses being warned he was a risk to.women would lead to his sacking but decades of itfishfoodie wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:34 pm
How much dirt to these guys collect on senior Politicians, & others; & is that why they seem to be immune ?
Stop voting for fucking Tories
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
That's it entirely !!!!JM2K6 wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 10:06 pmI think it's as simple as they don't really give a shit about anyone who isn't a copperLobby wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 7:14 pmYou’d think they would have noticed that these warnings were mounting up after say the fifth or sixth different time he was accused of sexual harassment, but no, they didn’t even see that there was a pattern developing after the ninth warning.EnergiseR2 wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 6:37 pm
This lad was definitely weird. I would have thought a lads bosses being warned he was a risk to.women would lead to his sacking but decades of it
It doesn't matter where you are; that; Thin Blue Fucking Line, means you can, Rape, Steal, or whatever, & not have to face the consequences that anyone else would.
The Met should be completely dispanded, & then a new, "London Police Service", created, & do a Fire, & Re-Hire on every single position.
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Why would a new Met be inherently better than the Met as is?
Which is to say why must the existing one be burned to the ground making 10s of thousands unemployed and reapplying for their job, many who've done nothing wrong, and you've then the vast admin task of wrapping up one entity and folding it into a new one, and that would be even bigger than the met because of the way if operates across the nation in conjunction with other forces and services .
I get wanting changes, I'm not sure spending vast sums to start from scratch is the way to go. Or at least would anyone in favour of that kindly please raise the monies themselves, and work out who'll sign off on any risk entailed in such a transfer
Which is to say why must the existing one be burned to the ground making 10s of thousands unemployed and reapplying for their job, many who've done nothing wrong, and you've then the vast admin task of wrapping up one entity and folding it into a new one, and that would be even bigger than the met because of the way if operates across the nation in conjunction with other forces and services .
I get wanting changes, I'm not sure spending vast sums to start from scratch is the way to go. Or at least would anyone in favour of that kindly please raise the monies themselves, and work out who'll sign off on any risk entailed in such a transfer
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I have to agree.. Any police force is going to attract a decent few nasty pieces of work as the job description is basically a free pass to use force against civilians if you're that way inclined. A good number of police officers just are not publically spirited good guys.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 12:22 am Why would a new Met be inherently better than the Met as is?
Which is to say why must the existing one be burned to the ground making 10s of thousands unemployed and reapplying for their job, many who've done nothing wrong, and you've then the vast admin task of wrapping up one entity and folding it into a new one, and that would be even bigger than the met because of the way if operates across the nation in conjunction with other forces and services .
I get wanting changes, I'm not sure spending vast sums to start from scratch is the way to go. Or at least would anyone in favour of that kindly please raise the monies themselves, and work out who'll sign off on any risk entailed in such a transfer
But the whole crime and justice system in this country is f*cked. We don't have enough police officers anyway so a good amount of crime is basically legal, we don't have a police force that can stop online fraud/phishing scams which have to be one of the most common crimes going, the police and courts cannot investigate and prosecute sexual offences such as rape either. And then if you get past all that and someone is imprisoned they go to a massively underfunded prison system, awash with drugs often brought in by officers looking for extra cash and come out either newly or still addicted to drugs and reoffend as they have attended crime university with little if any actual training so that they can gain meaningful employment.
It's totally broken, the only fixes include accepting we've lost the war on drugs and looking to cure addiction, social programs that intervene in offending earlier in the cycle through employment as we know that reduces reoffending. And immediately that's a good number of crime reduction. But the sensibles run in fear of the ghouls at the sun and mail who won't like that and so this dreadful state of affairs will continue.
As an aside if anyone is interested in employment for ex offenders and wants to help I recommend buying coffee from Redemption Roasters and beer from tap social from time to time. Both do great work.
Sadly the Met has been a cesspit for decades and getting worse by the year. Their recruitment and vetting has always been questionable. It was a regular occurrence for applicants roundly rejected from Scottish police forces to then walk into the Met and transfer back up after a few years with little or no additional vetting as that wasn't allowed as they were already serving. Often you would come across these pricks and think "how the fuck did this clown get in".
In my whole service in the Scottish police I can only think of a handful of cases where an officer was charged or convicted of a sexual or domestic assault, and I cannot think of one of those who didn't get sacked. When you hear that there are currently 800 Met officers currently under investigation for sexual and domestic offences, and over 1000 serving officers with convictions, it fucking defies belief and makes my blood boil.
In my whole service in the Scottish police I can only think of a handful of cases where an officer was charged or convicted of a sexual or domestic assault, and I cannot think of one of those who didn't get sacked. When you hear that there are currently 800 Met officers currently under investigation for sexual and domestic offences, and over 1000 serving officers with convictions, it fucking defies belief and makes my blood boil.
-
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Corporate culture always comes from the top. It is difficult to change but can be done.Blackmac wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 12:32 pm Sadly the Met has been a cesspit for decades and getting worse by the year. Their recruitment and vetting has always been questionable. It was a regular occurrence for applicants roundly rejected from Scottish police forces to then walk into the Met and transfer back up after a few years with little or no additional vetting as that wasn't allowed as they were already serving. Often you would come across these pricks and think "how the fuck did this clown get in".
In my whole service in the Scottish police I can only think of a handful of cases where an officer was charged or convicted of a sexual or domestic assault, and I cannot think of one of those who didn't get sacked. When you hear that there are currently 800 Met officers currently under investigation for sexual and domestic offences, and over 1000 serving officers with convictions, it fucking defies belief and makes my blood boil.
The problem is the leadership has to want to change. We've recently had Cressida Dick in charge for several years who, like her predecessors, response to problems in the Met has alway been 'there are no problems in the Met'
Braverman usually plays the man/woman instead of the ball because she is a feckin useless Cnut! It's all she has and all she will give, the lack of self awareness and false superiority is fairly typical of this current bunch of clusterfuck of a Gov.
Useless does not even begin to describe Braverman.dpedin wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 3:06 pmBraverman usually plays the man/woman instead of the ball because she is a feckin useless Cnut! It's all she has and all she will give, the lack of self awareness and false superiority is fairly typical of this current bunch of clusterfuck of a Gov.
But, on an occasion like this, a minister does have to persuade MPs that they have grasped the seriousness of the problem, and that they have the authority and grip to do something about it. And that’s where Braverman fell down today. She announced that the Wayne Couzens review will be expanded to cover the Carrick case, and she announced a review into police dismissals.
Yet neither of these announcements seemed to impress her own MPs – let alone the opposition – and what was really telling was the number of Tory backbenchers who said they agreed with Harriet Harman, the former Labour deputy leader, who called for the sacking of officers and managers who had allowed Carrick to get away with what he did.
I shouldn't laugh....EnergiseR2 wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm I don't think there are too any people who is going to defend a boss who was basically telling the lad to take the raping down a notch
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Sorry; are we still talking about the Met ? .... or we back talking about the Tory Party ?EnergiseR2 wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 4:09 pm I don't think there are too any people who is going to defend a boss who was basically telling the lad to take the raping down a notch
Stupid Tories should have raised taxes last year. We would all have grudgingly agreed that it was necessary and then they could get to an increased pay level that the NHS staff would accept.SaintK wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:03 am Can'y be arsed to negotiate so let's try emotional blackmail instead
![]()
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Well in this Government's world view all you have to do is allow employers to take on agency workers to do the jobs of those striking or sacked for striking. What could possibly go wrong?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Is this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
The UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pmIs this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Sorry, yes. I’m sure what you say is true. I saw a map showing a couple of dozen planned and existing battery plants in the EU and none in the UK. I wonder why.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pmIs this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
No one else worried about the Retained EU Law Bill going through Parliament at the moment. This would be the real target for the Brexit twats - the potential deregulation of lots of areas from employment to environmental laws. Retention or amendment of any laws to be decided purely by our current gov. This is what was wetting JRM and his Brexit Ultra twats pants, this is what Brexit was all about. Be warned the Sovereign Individual concept is about to arrive this year unless the more sensible tories, are there any left, decide to pull the reins in! It is going to be a feckin disaster and we are strolling right into it!
Yep. The cost cutting management culture from finance management and management consultants is just relentless. We have an overrated and hugely overpaid management class in this country that guts ideas. If they were as good as they think they are we wouldn't have such a small manufacturing base. The worst thing that happened on my development engineering work was management jumping on the bandwagon when stuff was going well and then relentless interference, zero help and dumb short cuts.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pmIs this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
It’s that and more than that. Venture capital in the UK is very risk averse compared to the USA. Government funding is also a bugger - we spend the lowest percentage of gdp on research and development amongst similar economies.petej wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:38 pmYep. The cost cutting management culture from finance management and management consultants is just relentless. We have an overrated and hugely overpaid management class in this country that guts ideas. If they were as good as they think they are we wouldn't have such a small manufacturing base. The worst thing that happened on my development engineering work was management jumping on the bandwagon when stuff was going well and then relentless interference, zero help and dumb short cuts.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pm
Is this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Venture capital in the US is a wild west that creates unprofitable monopolies at best and just fraud (FTX, Theranos, Nikola etc) at worst though in the free money era. Look at IPOs through the years, VC has created huge behemoths that are services that aren't needed and aren't profitable.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:26 pmIt’s that and more than that. Venture capital in the UK is very risk averse compared to the USA. Government funding is also a bugger - we spend the lowest percentage of gdp on research and development amongst similar economies.petej wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:38 pmYep. The cost cutting management culture from finance management and management consultants is just relentless. We have an overrated and hugely overpaid management class in this country that guts ideas. If they were as good as they think they are we wouldn't have such a small manufacturing base. The worst thing that happened on my development engineering work was management jumping on the bandwagon when stuff was going well and then relentless interference, zero help and dumb short cuts.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pm
The UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
R&D funding is a real issue. UK has world class universities and don't support the spin outs enough.
Last edited by I like neeps on Wed Jan 18, 2023 8:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This is not an SG bashing post but I was speaking to someone pretty senior in SDI yesterday who was telling me about the hydrogen plans. It seems the plan is focussed on being a hydrogen exporter and all the funding is going that way but there is virtually no support for the research or supply chain to actually get us there. He pretty much admitted it was completely bonkers and they have an end goal but no idea how to get thereBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pmIs this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
They are relying solely on oil majors. Costs nothing but you outsource the risk and profit.Slick wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:59 pmThis is not an SG bashing post but I was speaking to someone pretty senior in SDI yesterday who was telling me about the hydrogen plans. It seems the plan is focussed on being a hydrogen exporter and all the funding is going that way but there is virtually no support for the research or supply chain to actually get us there. He pretty much admitted it was completely bonkers and they have an end goal but no idea how to get thereBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pm
Is this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
Had thought this would quietly be extended when Truss and Mogg staggered out the exit door but the piece of shit is still here.dpedin wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:17 pm No one else worried about the Retained EU Law Bill going through Parliament at the moment. This would be the real target for the Brexit twats - the potential deregulation of lots of areas from employment to environmental laws. Retention or amendment of any laws to be decided purely by our current gov. This is what was wetting JRM and his Brexit Ultra twats pants, this is what Brexit was all about. Be warned the Sovereign Individual concept is about to arrive this year unless the more sensible tories, are there any left, decide to pull the reins in! It is going to be a feckin disaster and we are strolling right into it!
No one actually knows how much legislation is affected by everything lapsing all at once.
Exactly - current estimates are 1,000s of pieces of legislation all with associated case law, precedent, etc over many years. Much of the so called EU laws were ones that the UK asked for and supported - I think the UK voted approval with c95%+ of all EU votes? The civil service can't cope with going through all this within the timescales involved and the current Parliament hasn't the capacity to consider every law that is being repealed and needing replaced or amended. The current bill would allow the Gov and its minister to make decision via statuary instruments as to the new laws - do we really want Coffey deciding new environmental laws, Braverman deciding new immigration legislation, etc.lemonhead wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 8:35 amHad thought this would quietly be extended when Truss and Mogg staggered out the exit door but the piece of shit is still here.dpedin wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 6:17 pm No one else worried about the Retained EU Law Bill going through Parliament at the moment. This would be the real target for the Brexit twats - the potential deregulation of lots of areas from employment to environmental laws. Retention or amendment of any laws to be decided purely by our current gov. This is what was wetting JRM and his Brexit Ultra twats pants, this is what Brexit was all about. Be warned the Sovereign Individual concept is about to arrive this year unless the more sensible tories, are there any left, decide to pull the reins in! It is going to be a feckin disaster and we are strolling right into it!
No one actually knows how much legislation is affected by everything lapsing all at once.
This is exactly what the Brexit vote was all about the deregulation of the UK and the creation of new laws by the Brexit Ultras and right wing zealots funded by big business via Tufton Street, etc. This is the real battleground not the diversionary small boats in the channel/protecting our borders racist crap - that was just a means to an end, use the inherent racist little Englander mentality to drive the Brexit wedge through. It looks like JRM his Sovereign Individual supporters and the Britannia Unchained mob will get their way after all and we are sleep walking into it as a country.
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Don't think this is true, the legislation will be tied up in the lord's for a year and then next year is electioneering and not much will get done.
Could you expand on this a bit? Genuinely interestedshaggy wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:04 pmThey are relying solely on oil majors. Costs nothing but you outsource the risk and profit.Slick wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:59 pmThis is not an SG bashing post but I was speaking to someone pretty senior in SDI yesterday who was telling me about the hydrogen plans. It seems the plan is focussed on being a hydrogen exporter and all the funding is going that way but there is virtually no support for the research or supply chain to actually get us there. He pretty much admitted it was completely bonkers and they have an end goal but no idea how to get thereBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pm
The UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
It is though a next step for the lunatic fringe of the Tory Party, which one can pretty much now just call the Tory Party. A bonfire of legislation with no commitment to what comes next, some BS spouted about we'll have better standards, but we won't. And they are in this for the long haul, it took them decades to get Brexit, they'll not give up on this just because they look likely to lose one electionI like neeps wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:05 am Don't think this is true, the legislation will be tied up in the lord's for a year and then next year is electioneering and not much will get done.
-
- Posts: 2360
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
A problem made much, much worse by Brexit.Biffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pmIs this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
There is for all the US will bluster the investment could go anywhere there are some real domestic issues for them that tend to see the real money stay stateside, but they were much keener when it was but a hop, skip and a jump from the UK to Europe with the free movement they adored when it came to shuttling between academic institutions and shuttling researchers between them too.
Now they find it easier just to pay for the talent they want to fly in/out of the USA or just move to the USA
Not an SG bashing post. You need to apply this across the whole of UK manufacturing. It is all hollowed out.Slick wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:59 pmThis is not an SG bashing post but I was speaking to someone pretty senior in SDI yesterday who was telling me about the hydrogen plans. It seems the plan is focussed on being a hydrogen exporter and all the funding is going that way but there is virtually no support for the research or supply chain to actually get us there. He pretty much admitted it was completely bonkers and they have an end goal but no idea how to get thereBiffer wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmThe UK does this for every tech development. Shout about it, say we want to lead in it, do nothing to help.Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:47 pm
Is this Britishvolt?
The Government wants the uk to become world leading in battery production yet do nothing to help make it happen. There seems to be no strategic thinking and direction to guide and attract investors and investment instead it just seems to be a free for all for dubious investors to churn money for some profit not actually deliver what is supposedly wanted. Very sadly they may well find the boat has already sailed.
I know of quantum computing company with a neat bit of tech, that spun out of a university. They spent four years trying to get investment funding but couldn’t get it in the UK, so they fucked off to the US and within a year had $600million backing.
Aberdeen Hydrogen Hub JV with bp. bp have invested heavily on the role of hydrogen and are busy engaging in many countries. This allows the host country to sit back and rely on the skills and expertise of the oil major and with almost no financial risk until pre-FEED completed.Slick wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:18 amCould you expand on this a bit? Genuinely interestedshaggy wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 10:04 pmThey are relying solely on oil majors. Costs nothing but you outsource the risk and profit.Slick wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:59 pm
This is not an SG bashing post but I was speaking to someone pretty senior in SDI yesterday who was telling me about the hydrogen plans. It seems the plan is focussed on being a hydrogen exporter and all the funding is going that way but there is virtually no support for the research or supply chain to actually get us there. He pretty much admitted it was completely bonkers and they have an end goal but no idea how to get there
What I find totally gutting about this transition away from fossil fuels is how the UK isn't going to be able to benefit due to brexit and an awful government. It is absolutely gutting. I can't believe people aren't angrier and the country is so placid as the government reduces living standards and life expectancy.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
So now Rishi thinks seatbelt laws don't apply to him. Shades of Jack Straw caught speeding: "Do you know who I am?".
In the grand scheme of things I find this petty bullshit quite tiresome regardless of the politician. Likely a momentary lapse. I'm sure he'll accept his £60 conditional offer to stop the hysteria and move on.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:50 am So now Rishi thinks seatbelt laws don't apply to him. Shades of Jack Straw caught speeding: "Do you know who I am?".
Good chance for him to prove he's "not Boris", accept the fine & pay it pronto.Blackmac wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:04 amIn the grand scheme of things I find this petty bullshit quite tiresome regardless of the politician. Likely a momentary lapse. I'm sure he'll accept his £60 conditional offer to stop the hysteria and move on.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:50 am So now Rishi thinks seatbelt laws don't apply to him. Shades of Jack Straw caught speeding: "Do you know who I am?".