I thought I saw a hijab in the background and thought that might be who they were trying to pick out, but no, it's just a crap haircut

Holy shit !!!fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:18 pm Sadly Dominion has settled with the Ozzie scrote & his shower of lying cunts
We'll have to see if we get any details of what the settlement entails.
Do they have to apologise on air?fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:56 pmHoly shit !!!fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:18 pm Sadly Dominion has settled with the Ozzie scrote & his shower of lying cunts
We'll have to see if we get any details of what the settlement entails.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A $787.5m payoff to a company that's valued at $30m, & a grovelling apology, & Fox admitting it lied.
Next up, they have to give a similar settlement to Smartmatic !
Edit: Oh, & let's not forget about all those innocent voting officials that were abused, who should now go after Fox too !
Afraid notsturginho wrote: Wed Apr 19, 2023 6:15 amDo they have to apologise on air?fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:56 pmHoly shit !!!fishfoodie wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 8:18 pm Sadly Dominion has settled with the Ozzie scrote & his shower of lying cunts
We'll have to see if we get any details of what the settlement entails.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A $787.5m payoff to a company that's valued at $30m, & a grovelling apology, & Fox admitting it lied.
Next up, they have to give a similar settlement to Smartmatic !
Edit: Oh, & let's not forget about all those innocent voting officials that were abused, who should now go after Fox too !
It's odd -the 1st Amendment (which also covers free speech) expressly forbids laws which mandate religion - the phraseology is 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion'
Too much of the news these days forces one to check if it is 1st of April.
The mistake is in thinking that they have any sort of ideological consistency in the first place or that they care about being seen to have it. They don't and they know that the mean, small-minded people who support their oppressive ideals don't care. They just want to win and to impose the thing hodge podge of things they believe.inactionman wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 9:10 amIt's odd -the 1st Amendment (which also covers free speech) expressly forbids laws which mandate religion - the phraseology is 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion'
I appreciate that the constitution covers the Federation and the power of federal government, not the states, but if the states opt to ignore the spirit of the constitution on this point, how does that not weaken the argument that the right to bear arms under the 2nd Amendment needs to be respected?
Please excuse the pun, but the adherence to the law and spirit of the constitution is all very scattergun.
I don't agree with it in the slightest, but can understand where they're coming from with regards to doctors.
So Doctors should get to completely ignore their Hippocratic Oath to treat all patients ???Raggs wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:36 pmI don't agree with it in the slightest, but can understand where they're coming from with regards to doctors.
Insurance companies on the other hand.... They could surely just claim to be some ultra strict religious leaning group, and deny a ton of claims to make profit?
I can’t imagine the life insurers would be very keen on it.Raggs wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:36 pmI don't agree with it in the slightest, but can understand where they're coming from with regards to doctors.
Insurance companies on the other hand.... They could surely just claim to be some ultra strict religious leaning group, and deny a ton of claims to make profit?
You missed the bit where I said I didn't agree with it then. Like the first bit.fishfoodie wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:45 pmSo Doctors should get to completely ignore their Hippocratic Oath to treat all patients ???Raggs wrote: Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:36 pmI don't agree with it in the slightest, but can understand where they're coming from with regards to doctors.
Insurance companies on the other hand.... They could surely just claim to be some ultra strict religious leaning group, and deny a ton of claims to make profit?
This is the State supporting the line of the scumbag fundamentalist companies who wanted to be able to deny health care coverage to their employees, if the particular healthcare needs of the employee didn't conform with the companies belief system.
and who are still insurable, a category that the Tuckster no longer belongs in.Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Apr 24, 2023 5:35 pm Sadly, as much as we can revel in the schadenfreude, there will be a host of other cunts who haven't built up his level baggage to step into the breach.
Guy Smiley wrote: Tue Apr 25, 2023 4:33 am Thoughts and Prayers for Seneca at this difficult time....
Without Tucker, how will my dad know who to hate?
Nope... I'm questioning your blanket assertion (which betrays a bias). As for being a donor... how does that prove your point? You're just running on assumption.Jim Lahey wrote: Tue Apr 25, 2023 6:44 am![]()
Is US politics, or at least the impression of it, so fucked that people think there not such a thing?
Given that the Crypto nerd apparently donated a ton of money to the Dems, can be exhibit A.
Not just to the Dems, it appears.Jim Lahey wrote: Tue Apr 25, 2023 6:44 am![]()
Is US politics, or at least the impression of it, so fucked that people think there not such a thing?
Given that the Crypto nerd apparently donated a ton of money to the Dems, can be exhibit A.
https://time.com/6241262/sam-bankman-fr ... donations/SBF claims he gave tens of millions in untraceable donations to Republicans
Although federal election receipts show that Bankman-Fried donated almost exclusively to Democrats, he claimed on a November phone call with YouTuber Tiffany Fong that he donated an equal amount to Republicans and Democrats.
“All my Republican donations were dark,” he said, referring to political donations that are not publicly disclosed in FEC filings. “The reason was not for regulatory reasons, it’s because reporters freak the f—k out if you donate to Republicans. They’re all super liberal, and I didn’t want to have that fight.”
As I’ve said before the Dems have getting for 300 members of Congress and state governors and Biden is the pick of the bunch?inactionman wrote: Tue Apr 25, 2023 4:14 pm Who is the next cab off the democrat rank behind Biden? Is it Harris?
Sadly, I could see her being quite a polarising candidate.
Well the GOP are now checkmated from trying to use Bidens age as any kind of attack vector.