Brian Moore was certainly the catalyst on this occasion. The BT bobble heads have referenced it a few times and Bayfield came out with the URC is shit innit trope - which in fairness hasn't really been brought up too often in more recent times.
As I said in my first post, it's not that there isn't a valid topic of conversation there in terms of tournament structure etc. - I think we can all agree it has many many issues. It's just that this particular issue wasn't a problem when it was to Exeters advantage, it wasn't a problem when it was to Toulouse or La Rochelle's advantage, but now that it is (potentially) to Leinster's advantage, well now its a problem that needs to be addressed.
There's a very underhanded vibe to it all.
Martin Samuel in The Times -
Leinster are favourites to become champions of Europe for a fifth time next month, powered by a very fine team and a completely avoidable competitive advantage. If Leinster reach the final on May 20, they will have played eight games, and all but two will have been at home. January 14 at Gloucester will be the last time Leinster played outside the Aviva Stadium, Dublin, in their European run, having previously visited Le Havre to face Racing 92. The rest will be home encounters.
The Heineken Champions Cup plays its knockout rounds over a single leg and home advantage is bestowed on the higher-ranked team. Leinster dominated pool A, so got their rewards. Yet the semi-finals and final are played at neutral venues. It just so happens that European Rugby decided Dublin in 2023 would be neutral.
So Leinster play Toulouse at home this weekend, and then the winners of La Rochelle and Exeter Chiefs there in May. It’s wrong. There has to be a way to organise a competition from a year out so that the deciding venues are guaranteed neutral. Next year, Tottenham Hotspur’s stadium has been chosen for the final. That’s sensible, but this was always likely to bestow an unfair advantage. Leinster were last season’s finalists and their team is the core of Ireland, ranked first in the world.
And, yes, Bayern Munich got to play football’s 2012 Champions League final at home and didn’t win. Yet if Leinster do, it will always be thought they were given a leg-up. It’s not fair on them; but it’s certainly not fair on the others, either.
"It's Wrong", when Leinster only play two away games*, but it's not wrong when La Rochelle won the tournament last year having only played once outside of France (they were awarded a draw for a COVID game, ironically enough when in similar circumstances Leinster were handed a 28-0 forfeit - and played Bordauex in the 2 leg last 16). It wasn't wrong when Leinster had to play La Rochelle in a semi final the year before in their actual home ground, but it is unfair that Toulouse has to play in a ground Leinster sometimes move high profile games to - same as Harlequins, Saracens, Stade Francais and Edinburgh do (and the Welsh do with Judgement Day).
It's the hypocrisy of it all that really grates. A hypocrisy that only seems to show its ugly head when an Irish team is doing well (and they still haven't won anything yet)
* I think it's wrong too, but that's the structure the shitheads in power dreamt up!