I wonder who this is...................

Where goats go to escape
Post Reply
I like neeps
Posts: 3820
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

C69 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 11:14 am
TB63 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:41 am
C69 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:05 am American news sites are now openly naming the man and South Wales police confirmed they are aware of the man.

I suspect given a history of severe and prolonged depression the individual will not want to be interviewed at present.
Got a link for that? A certain persons mother lives up the road from me in llangenith, but that person resides in Dulwich as far as I'm aware..
https://www.itv.com/news/2023-07-11/sou ... e-of-adult
A welfare check on an individual is a knock on the door to check nobody is taking drastic actions rather than checking the case.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4343
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

:shock:
I love watching little children running and screaming, playing hide and seek in the playground.
They don't know I'm using blanks..
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11863
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

BBC announce its Huw Edwards. I’m shocked.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4343
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

I love watching little children running and screaming, playing hide and seek in the playground.
They don't know I'm using blanks..
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

The wife of news reader Huw Edwards has named him as the BBC presenter facing allegations over payments for sexually explicit images

In a statement issued on his behalf, Vicky Flind says her husband is "suffering mental health issues" and is now receiving in-patient hospital care

Detectives from the Met Police have ended their inquiry into a BBC presenter and determined there is no evidence a criminal offence has been committed
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7411
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:19 pm
The wife of news reader Huw Edwards has named him as the BBC presenter facing allegations over payments for sexually explicit images

In a statement issued on his behalf, Vicky Flind says her husband is "suffering mental health issues" and is now receiving in-patient hospital care

Detectives from the Met Police have ended their inquiry into a BBC presenter and determined there is no evidence a criminal offence has been committed
Hope recovers his health, can’t see him working in the media again
Lots of questions unanswered not least why The Sun didn’t think it was in the public interest to print his name initially
dpedin
Posts: 3389
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

All I feel about this whole issue is that I hate the Sun, News Corp and Murdoch even more viscerally than I did before. They are a bunch of cunts and will do untold harm to individuals in their quest to down the BBC. Anyone who buys this rag of a paper must be brain dead.
User avatar
Jim Lahey
Posts: 1024
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:26 am

Awkward dinner table conversation tonight.
Ian Madigan for Ireland.
I like neeps
Posts: 3820
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

SaintK wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:25 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:19 pm
The wife of news reader Huw Edwards has named him as the BBC presenter facing allegations over payments for sexually explicit images

In a statement issued on his behalf, Vicky Flind says her husband is "suffering mental health issues" and is now receiving in-patient hospital care

Detectives from the Met Police have ended their inquiry into a BBC presenter and determined there is no evidence a criminal offence has been committed
Hope recovers his health, can’t see him working in the media again
Lots of questions unanswered not least why The Sun didn’t think it was in the public interest to print his name initially
Because all they wanted to do was discredit the BBC and avoid as many repercussions as is possible whilst doing so. They knew there was nothing illegal and they knew their is legitimate no public interest in Huw Edwards being gay or paying for nudes.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4121
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Thank God the guessing game is over and all the know-nothings can stop posting their daft guesses.
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8846
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

SaintK wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:25 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:19 pm
The wife of news reader Huw Edwards has named him as the BBC presenter facing allegations over payments for sexually explicit images

In a statement issued on his behalf, Vicky Flind says her husband is "suffering mental health issues" and is now receiving in-patient hospital care

Detectives from the Met Police have ended their inquiry into a BBC presenter and determined there is no evidence a criminal offence has been committed
Hope recovers his health, can’t see him working in the media again
Lots of questions unanswered not least why The Sun didn’t think it was in the public interest to print his name initially
I hope he sues the disgusting ozzie scrote & this rag into oblivion. There's precedence for slandering a small group to the point where everyone can guess the individual being slandered.
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

I assume the next drip fed Sun revelation is incoming in tomorrow's paper.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11863
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Margin__Walker wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:59 pm I assume the next drip fed Sun revelation is incoming in tomorrow's paper.
They need to start posting the pics on Page 3
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Jim Lahey wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:26 pm Awkward dinner table conversation tonight.
:lol: :lol:
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6882
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

I like neeps wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:28 pm
SaintK wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:25 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:19 pm
Hope recovers his health, can’t see him working in the media again
Lots of questions unanswered not least why The Sun didn’t think it was in the public interest to print his name initially
Because all they wanted to do was discredit the BBC and avoid as many repercussions as is possible whilst doing so. They knew there was nothing illegal and they knew their is legitimate no public interest in Huw Edwards being gay or paying for nudes.
Not only that but they've also managed to drag the BBC and other media attention completely away from the failure to comply with the Court Order for BB's WhatsApp amongst other things into the bargain
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4343
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

Hearing reports the press descended to his mum's house like a pack of hyaenas..

Locals didn't take to kindly to the invasion..No press visible tonight....
I love watching little children running and screaming, playing hide and seek in the playground.
They don't know I'm using blanks..
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8846
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

TB63 wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:24 pm Hearing reports the press descended to his mum's house like a pack of hyaenas..

Locals didn't take to kindly to the invasion..No press visible tonight....
Local tyre specialist doing a roaring trade ?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9347
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

tabascoboy wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 7:46 pm
I like neeps wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:28 pm
SaintK wrote: Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:25 pm
Hope recovers his health, can’t see him working in the media again
Lots of questions unanswered not least why The Sun didn’t think it was in the public interest to print his name initially
Because all they wanted to do was discredit the BBC and avoid as many repercussions as is possible whilst doing so. They knew there was nothing illegal and they knew their is legitimate no public interest in Huw Edwards being gay or paying for nudes.
Not only that but they've also managed to drag the BBC and other media attention completely away from the failure to comply with the Court Order for BB's WhatsApp amongst other things into the bargain
Exactly.

Very much a look over there exercise.
tc27
Posts: 2567
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3417
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

tc27 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:24 am Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
I would suggest you read about his history of mental illness
This may possibly frame your viewpoint differently.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7411
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

C69 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:38 am
tc27 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:24 am Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
I would suggest you read about his history of mental illness
This may possibly frame your viewpoint differently.
Quite!!
dpedin
Posts: 3389
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

SaintK wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:46 am
C69 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:38 am
tc27 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:24 am Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
I would suggest you read about his history of mental illness
This may possibly frame your viewpoint differently.
Quite!!
There is a good interview/piece by him and Alistair Campbell from a few years ago about mental health and depression - I will se if I can find it and post the link. The more odious thing here is that the Currant Bun knew all about his mental health issues yet decided to go ahead the way they did in order to target the BBC as per instructions from Murdoch.

By the way what is the problem with the Blonde Bumblecunts old mobile phone which has prevented him handing it over to the Covid Enquiry?
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 11863
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

dpedin wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:50 am
By the way what is the problem with the Blonde Bumblecunts old mobile phone which has prevented him handing it over to the Covid Enquiry?
Pics of the birth of his 130 kids on there and he doesn't want to lose them?
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6882
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:51 am
dpedin wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:50 am
By the way what is the problem with the Blonde Bumblecunts old mobile phone which has prevented him handing it over to the Covid Enquiry?
Pics of the birth of his 130 kids on there and he doesn't want to lose them?
:smile:
The stated issue is that the Cabinet Office ( in this case in Sunak's interests too) claim that they can't open the phone for examination and ensure the integrity of interests of national security - which sounds like bollocks, as forensic IT experts will have a way to take the data off on an isolated network if necessary, and pass it on to those who need to see it. Seems more like BB and the Cabinet Office are trying to delay and obfuscate while they try to wheedle themselves out of it. You wouldn't put it past BB to have destroyed or attempted to destroy the phone himself.
according to the PA news agency, Mr Johnson's old phone - which contains the messages - is still in his possession while government officials help him try to securely retrieve information from the device.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 10656
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:10 am
Sandstorm wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:51 am
dpedin wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:50 am
By the way what is the problem with the Blonde Bumblecunts old mobile phone which has prevented him handing it over to the Covid Enquiry?
Pics of the birth of his 130 kids on there and he doesn't want to lose them?
:smile:
The stated issue is that the Cabinet Office ( in this case in Sunak's interests too) claim that they can't open the phone for examination and ensure the integrity of interests of national security - which sounds like bollocks, as forensic IT experts will have a way to take the data off on an isolated network if necessary, and pass it on to those who need to see it. Seems more like BB and the Cabinet Office are trying to delay and obfuscate while they try to wheedle themselves out of it. You wouldn't put it past BB to have destroyed or attempted to destroy the phone himself.
according to the PA news agency, Mr Johnson's old phone - which contains the messages - is still in his possession while government officials help him try to securely retrieve information from the device.


In pervious roles my wife has had, confidentiality was taken as read and she wasn't any where near state secrets level of work. If she'd broken confidentiality she'd have lost her job and would have had great difficulty in finding another.

There is no way there is a risk from the people who will be tasked with retrieving information from that phone, I simply don't believe it. For one it would be completely unprofessional for them to leak any information and two it would probably involve prison time.
shaggy
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2021 11:11 am

Tichtheid wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:31 am
tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:10 am
Sandstorm wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:51 am

Pics of the birth of his 130 kids on there and he doesn't want to lose them?
:smile:
The stated issue is that the Cabinet Office ( in this case in Sunak's interests too) claim that they can't open the phone for examination and ensure the integrity of interests of national security - which sounds like bollocks, as forensic IT experts will have a way to take the data off on an isolated network if necessary, and pass it on to those who need to see it. Seems more like BB and the Cabinet Office are trying to delay and obfuscate while they try to wheedle themselves out of it. You wouldn't put it past BB to have destroyed or attempted to destroy the phone himself.
according to the PA news agency, Mr Johnson's old phone - which contains the messages - is still in his possession while government officials help him try to securely retrieve information from the device.


In pervious roles my wife has had, confidentiality was taken as read and she wasn't any where near state secrets level of work. If she'd broken confidentiality she'd have lost her job and would have had great difficulty in finding another.

There is no way there is a risk from the people who will be tasked with retrieving information from that phone, I simply don't believe it. For one it would be completely unprofessional for them to leak any information and two it would probably involve prison time.
I think you might have discounted parliamentary privilege and political gain in your conclusions, as it is not just about the retrieval it is also who it is then shared with.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5529
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

it's the WhatsApp messages to his Russian mate Lord Leb that will be of keen, incidental, interest.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

C69 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:38 am
tc27 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:24 am Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
I would suggest you read about his history of mental illness
This may possibly frame your viewpoint differently.
I suspect I might well have a mental health episode if I had just been exposed as a sleazy perv to the entire world. I am sorry is he has a history of mental health issues but treated as an inpatient does follow a well worn path and excuses any comment. Also putting his poor wife in front of the media as the one to announce it :thumbdown: poor wife and kids haven't they suffered enough??
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 11:42 am
C69 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:38 am
tc27 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 9:24 am Anyone else got the pics via WhatsApp? :???:

Anyway in claiming mental illness he's got half the management strategy in place - he has lost the chance to bravely come out as gay/bisexual ahead of the scandal.
I would suggest you read about his history of mental illness
This may possibly frame your viewpoint differently.
I suspect I might well have a mental health episode if I had just been exposed as a sleazy perv to the entire world. I am sorry is he has a history of mental health issues but treated as an inpatient does follow a well worn path and excuses any comment. Also putting his poor wife in front of the media as the one to announce it :thumbdown: poor wife and kids haven't they suffered enough??
There’s been great pressure on him to make a statement and it doesn’t sound as though he was capable of doing so. As far as I’m aware his wife released a statement to the PA, I don’t think she did it live in front of the media. Haven’t seen it on anything anyway.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12015
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
A lot of it must be because of who he is, nobody would think anything of it if he were a professional footballer for example. Of course that’s if he has actually done what he’s alleged to have done - paid for some images.
Yeeb
Posts: 1540
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:06 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
This. No crime, no schofield like abuse of power, just a man’s career ended my media jackals and clickbait.
He’s a churchgoer with 5 kids , so that’s some damn big closet he has to climb out of.
Whoever buys the Sun now really needs to give themself a punch in the balls
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Yeeb wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:04 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
This. No crime, no schofield like abuse of power, just a man’s career ended my media jackals and clickbait.
He’s a churchgoer with 5 kids , so that’s some damn big closet he has to climb out of.
Whoever buys the Sun now really needs to give themself a punch in the balls
I think the No abuse of power thing might need to hang tasty as more people are coming forward.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12015
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:11 pm
Yeeb wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:04 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
This. No crime, no schofield like abuse of power, just a man’s career ended my media jackals and clickbait.
He’s a churchgoer with 5 kids , so that’s some damn big closet he has to climb out of.
Whoever buys the Sun now really needs to give themself a punch in the balls
I think the No abuse of power thing might need to hang tasty as more people are coming forward.
I'm always sceptical of all this. Band waggoners, wannabe media celebs, Munchausens, money seekers etc often seem to make up a lot of these after claimants in these sorts of cases (Savile etc was children and so a bit different). All I've seen is vague accusations along the lines of "An employee at the corporation told BBC News they received "suggestive" messages from Edwards." Well, if you were concerned about them, why didn't you do something back then?
_Os_
Posts: 2887
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
It's looks very similar to the Farage bank account story, which ran for a week and started dominating all media, even MPs in parliament spoke about it. I think even Sunak said no one should be denied a bank account. All without any evidence of what really happened and if anything happened at all, and without Farage taking anyone to court.

If you're a media owner and your mission is to support the Tories and help them win elections to further your own financial interests, then it's quite a tough time at the moment. They're inventing stories to avoid reporting on reality. It makes a change from 24/7 immigrant bashing.

Tabloids still have massive power despite their readership declining. The rest of the media often just follow Sun and Daily Mail frontpages like zombies. Doesn't make any sense, but that's how it works.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12015
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

_Os_ wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:29 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 12:53 pm I really don't appear to be getting this. The police have stated there is no evidence of criminality. The "victim's" own lawyer has said the accusations are rubbish.

And so the sum of this appears to be a full scale witch-hunt and trial by sowshulll meeeejuuhh generated by possibly the UK's worst rag paying the "victim's" parents?
It's looks very similar to the Farage bank account story, which ran for a week and started dominating all media, even MPs in parliament spoke about it. I think even Sunak said no one should be denied a bank account. All without any evidence of what really happened and if anything happened at all, and without Farage taking anyone to court.

If you're a media owner and your mission is to support the Tories and help them win elections to further your own financial interests, then it's quite a tough time at the moment. They're inventing stories to avoid reporting on reality. It makes a change from 24/7 immigrant bashing.

Tabloids still have massive power despite their readership declining. The rest of the media often just follow Sun and Daily Mail frontpages like zombies. Doesn't make any sense, but that's how it works.
I don't know how circulations are measured but Audit Bureau of Circulations has the Wail down to under 800k (The Sun no longer reports its circulation) which seems a tiny number for how much influence they appear to have.
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1718
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:28 pm
Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:11 pm
Yeeb wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:04 pm

This. No crime, no schofield like abuse of power, just a man’s career ended my media jackals and clickbait.
He’s a churchgoer with 5 kids , so that’s some damn big closet he has to climb out of.
Whoever buys the Sun now really needs to give themself a punch in the balls
I think the No abuse of power thing might need to hang tasty as more people are coming forward.
I'm always sceptical of all this. Band waggoners, wannabe media celebs, Munchausens, money seekers etc often seem to make up a lot of these after claimants in these sorts of cases (Savile etc was children and so a bit different). All I've seen is vague accusations along the lines of "An employee at the corporation told BBC News they received "suggestive" messages from Edwards." Well, if you were concerned about them, why didn't you do something back then?
Worried about their or career/being believed. As it is it looks like the head shed circled the wagons. Inspite of knowing of these allegations they handed HE the largest pay rise of all the ‘top stars’ 🤔
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 12015
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:39 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:28 pm
Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:11 pm

I think the No abuse of power thing might need to hang tasty as more people are coming forward.
I'm always sceptical of all this. Band waggoners, wannabe media celebs, Munchausens, money seekers etc often seem to make up a lot of these after claimants in these sorts of cases (Savile etc was children and so a bit different). All I've seen is vague accusations along the lines of "An employee at the corporation told BBC News they received "suggestive" messages from Edwards." Well, if you were concerned about them, why didn't you do something back then?
Worried about their or career/being believed. As it is it looks like the head shed circled the wagons. Inspite of knowing of these allegations they handed HE the largest pay rise of all the ‘top stars’ 🤔
It does worry me that somehow the Beeb is in the firing line ahead of The Sun and the likes of Twatter in all of this.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 7411
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:39 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:28 pm
Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:11 pm

I think the No abuse of power thing might need to hang tasty as more people are coming forward.
I'm always sceptical of all this. Band waggoners, wannabe media celebs, Munchausens, money seekers etc often seem to make up a lot of these after claimants in these sorts of cases (Savile etc was children and so a bit different). All I've seen is vague accusations along the lines of "An employee at the corporation told BBC News they received "suggestive" messages from Edwards." Well, if you were concerned about them, why didn't you do something back then?
Worried about their or career/being believed. As it is it looks like the head shed circled the wagons. Inspite of knowing of these allegations they handed HE the largest pay rise of all the ‘top stars’ 🤔
WTF are you wibbling on about?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 9347
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:42 pm
Openside wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:39 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Jul 13, 2023 1:28 pm
I'm always sceptical of all this. Band waggoners, wannabe media celebs, Munchausens, money seekers etc often seem to make up a lot of these after claimants in these sorts of cases (Savile etc was children and so a bit different). All I've seen is vague accusations along the lines of "An employee at the corporation told BBC News they received "suggestive" messages from Edwards." Well, if you were concerned about them, why didn't you do something back then?
Worried about their or career/being believed. As it is it looks like the head shed circled the wagons. Inspite of knowing of these allegations they handed HE the largest pay rise of all the ‘top stars’ 🤔
It does worry me that somehow the Beeb is in the firing line ahead of The Sun and the likes of Twatter in all of this.
I hope the Edwards family sue the filthy rag into non-existence.

They're trying to pretend they never alleged criminality, yet a string of quotes from their web coverage read out on PoliticsJOE demonstrates that they quite clearly claimed solicitation of pictures from someone unerage.
Post Reply