True, but front-rowers are more likely to get injured at training. 9s just run about on Tuesday yapping and box-kicking.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:41 pm Marx shows it's hardly just about playing. And the thing about being a rugby player anyway is it involves playing.
Dupont gone
I called it at HT too, I also wanted Danty hooked, so what?Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:18 pmTorq had called this before it happened and they were already 50 points up. Had it happened at the same point in the Uruguay game I’d agree with you. The only thing he was doing on the pitch, bar entertaining the crowd. Was offering himself up to be injured. Not sure I’d have played him at all in their position but he’d have certainly been hooked at half time once it became clear Namibia weren’t causing problems.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:27 amPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:14 am France have paid the price for showboating.
A real pity for the tournament
Err, bit harsh, it was the 45th minute, he wouldn't have been on for much longer and he paid the price for a fucking horrible "tackle"/headbutt.
20/20 hindsight is great.
The term showboating is bollocks, Dupont runs the whole show, France’s second string were poor in the last game but they were purring last night, mainly down to their captain.
That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
Like I say 20/20 hindsight is easy/lazy
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Sad but true. The Kriel incident could so easily have been the same outcome.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:33 amWe'll get to see if a long term injury to the World Cup poster boy prompts use of aggravating factors. All too little for Dupont, and in this the IRB may care to reflect on the laxity they've shown around high tackles for the past few weeks, they've set the cultural standards, just very bad onesTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:09 am I've just had a look at the tackle again, it wasn't remotely legal, leading with the head, slightly bent at the hips, far too high at all times. It's exactly the sort of collision the game is trying to get rid of.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 1:10 pmNo argument there. Hence we will all applaud Farrell's return.


- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
That's too strong. We've all moaned about the poor, defensive rugby being played and so I have no issue with France playing some high "risk" stuff (we had two potential, Russell-esque interception tries as a result). The issue is over the personnel to do that with and, as has been pointed out, hindsight is wonderful............ and yet I'd already got the yips (and posted such) about keeping the key players on beyond half time. Specifically because of the injury risk (to both sides).Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:14 am France have paid the price for showboating.
A real pity for the tournament
Galthie now looks like a friggin' idiot and, IMHO, rightly so.
France has a history of self-inflicted injuries to key players at RWCs: both Marconnet and de Villiers missed comps due to cycling accidents IIRC.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
It might have done so. But it was more likely to happen as Namibia's players got tired and, who knows, frustrated even. I am with you: I had no problem with Dupont et al starting but I had a massive problem with them staying onTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:53 pm That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
when the game was well and truly dusted.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
It’s not lazy at all - when you’re 50 points up you hook your best players and wrap them in cotton wool. Sure they were purring but it’s Namibia ffs, half their players are amateur or play in lower tiers. With all respect to them they’re barely offering a contested training run to the best player in the world. I can get him starting to ensure they didn’t have any jitters but his job was done, he was only still on to entertain a raucous crowd.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:53 pmI called it at HT too, I also wanted Danty hooked, so what?Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:18 pmTorq had called this before it happened and they were already 50 points up. Had it happened at the same point in the Uruguay game I’d agree with you. The only thing he was doing on the pitch, bar entertaining the crowd. Was offering himself up to be injured. Not sure I’d have played him at all in their position but he’d have certainly been hooked at half time once it became clear Namibia weren’t causing problems.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 11:27 am
Err, bit harsh, it was the 45th minute, he wouldn't have been on for much longer and he paid the price for a fucking horrible "tackle"/headbutt.
20/20 hindsight is great.
The term showboating is bollocks, Dupont runs the whole show, France’s second string were poor in the last game but they were purring last night, mainly down to their captain.
That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
Like I say 20/20 hindsight is easy/lazy
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 9348
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Yeah, I wouldn't have risked him at all tbh. If anyone could stand to sit out ;til the knockouts it's Dupont given the way he's been flogged for club and country the last few years.Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:23 pmIt’s not lazy at all - when you’re 50 points up you hook your best players and wrap them in cotton wool. Sure they were purring but it’s Namibia ffs, half their players are amateur or play in lower tiers. With all respect to them they’re barely offering a contested training run to the best player in the world. I can get him starting to ensure they didn’t have any jitters but his job was done, he was only still on to entertain a raucous crowd.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:53 pmI called it at HT too, I also wanted Danty hooked, so what?Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:18 pm
Torq had called this before it happened and they were already 50 points up. Had it happened at the same point in the Uruguay game I’d agree with you. The only thing he was doing on the pitch, bar entertaining the crowd. Was offering himself up to be injured. Not sure I’d have played him at all in their position but he’d have certainly been hooked at half time once it became clear Namibia weren’t causing problems.
The term showboating is bollocks, Dupont runs the whole show, France’s second string were poor in the last game but they were purring last night, mainly down to their captain.
That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
Like I say 20/20 hindsight is easy/lazy
With the cushion they had by half time there was really no point in sending him back out. Given how poor the second string were previously it was time to give one of the other 9s a solid half to try and prove that was a blip
people like DupontEnergiseR2 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:45 amAh come on. I remember the joking when POC and SOB were ruled out. Dupont hasn't died

Someone tweeted that Brad Barritt had similar and was back in a week or so?
This incident: https://www.rugbypass.com/news/barritt- ... -leinster/
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8850
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
He's only 26; this injury hardly destines him to the knackers yard. He has at least one more RWC in him, albeit not at home.Ymx wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:27 amIt was a horrible collision. You could even see Du Pont grimace as he knew it was about to happen in slow-mo.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:09 am I've just had a look at the tackle again, it wasn't remotely legal, leading with the head, slightly bent at the hips, far too high at all times. It's exactly the sort of collision the game is trying to get rid of.
Such a shame to ruin a player in his peaks’ RWC. Chance in lifetime gone !
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:23 pmIt’s not lazy at all - when you’re 50 points up you hook your best players and wrap them in cotton wool. Sure they were purring but it’s Namibia ffs, half their players are amateur or play in lower tiers. With all respect to them they’re barely offering a contested training run to the best player in the world. I can get him starting to ensure they didn’t have any jitters but his job was done, he was only still on to entertain a raucous crowd.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:53 pmI called it at HT too, I also wanted Danty hooked, so what?Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:18 pm
Torq had called this before it happened and they were already 50 points up. Had it happened at the same point in the Uruguay game I’d agree with you. The only thing he was doing on the pitch, bar entertaining the crowd. Was offering himself up to be injured. Not sure I’d have played him at all in their position but he’d have certainly been hooked at half time once it became clear Namibia weren’t causing problems.
The term showboating is bollocks, Dupont runs the whole show, France’s second string were poor in the last game but they were purring last night, mainly down to their captain.
That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
Like I say 20/20 hindsight is easy/lazy
Your ire is completely misplaced, it wasn't French arrogance, playing to the crowd or showboating that caused the injury, it was a ridiculously poor attempt at a tackle, the very kind of collision that WR say they are trying to prevent, the kind that tier one players have been banned for in recent months and weeks, so I'm not buying the idea from others that it was "poor old tiring tier two players, what do you expect?".
Players don’t tend to retain peak superpower form for that long.fishfoodie wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:51 pmHe's only 26; this injury hardly destines him to the knackers yard. He has at least one more RWC in him, albeit not at home.Ymx wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:27 amIt was a horrible collision. You could even see Du Pont grimace as he knew it was about to happen in slow-mo.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:09 am I've just had a look at the tackle again, it wasn't remotely legal, leading with the head, slightly bent at the hips, far too high at all times. It's exactly the sort of collision the game is trying to get rid of.
Such a shame to ruin a player in his peaks’ RWC. Chance in lifetime gone !
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Yes, the only thing that was going to happen in terms of the tournament from Dupont being on that pitch past half time was him getting hurt. There was no rugby reason for him to be there, as I keep trying to explain.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:21 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:23 pmIt’s not lazy at all - when you’re 50 points up you hook your best players and wrap them in cotton wool. Sure they were purring but it’s Namibia ffs, half their players are amateur or play in lower tiers. With all respect to them they’re barely offering a contested training run to the best player in the world. I can get him starting to ensure they didn’t have any jitters but his job was done, he was only still on to entertain a raucous crowd.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:53 pm
I called it at HT too, I also wanted Danty hooked, so what?
The term showboating is bollocks, Dupont runs the whole show, France’s second string were poor in the last game but they were purring last night, mainly down to their captain.
That shite excuse for a tackle could have happened in the fifth minute, the thirty fifth or the forty fifth, should they just not play him at all?
Like I say 20/20 hindsight is easy/lazy
Your ire is completely misplaced, it wasn't French arrogance, playing to the crowd or showboating that caused the injury, it was a ridiculously poor attempt at a tackle, the very kind of collision that WR say they are trying to prevent, the kind that tier one players have been banned for in recent months and weeks, so I'm not buying the idea from others that it was "poor old tiring tier two players, what do you expect?".
Say what you like about Sir Clive but Jonny didn’t get hurt trying to make a world record number of conversions when we put 100 past Uruguay. This is tournament management and France have just failed at it
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Marylandolorian wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:58 pm I agree with PB, it was stupid to put not only Dupont but also Jalibert, Penaud and Olivon ( the last three are above average prone to injuries).
Like I said earlier, I was calling for Danty to be hooked at HT, he is particularly prone to injury and absolutely vital to France's chances.
The issue I have is with the term "showboating", it was wrong.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
What else would you call keeping the world’s best player on the pitch after half time in a game where you’re leading 50-0, when you have potentially four huge games coming up?Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:05 pmMarylandolorian wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:58 pm I agree with PB, it was stupid to put not only Dupont but also Jalibert, Penaud and Olivon ( the last three are above average prone to injuries).
Like I said earlier, I was calling for Danty to be hooked at HT, he is particularly prone to injury and absolutely vital to France's chances.
The issue I have is with the term "showboating", it was wrong.
He was entertaining the crowd, hell he was entertaining me, but his loss could be fatal and was totally avoidable if they hadn’t got carried away in the occasion. There was no reason, none, for him being on the pitch
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:16 pmWhat else would you call keeping the world’s best player on the pitch after half time in a game where you’re leading 50-0, when you have potentially four huge games coming up?Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:05 pmMarylandolorian wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:58 pm I agree with PB, it was stupid to put not only Dupont but also Jalibert, Penaud and Olivon ( the last three are above average prone to injuries).
Like I said earlier, I was calling for Danty to be hooked at HT, he is particularly prone to injury and absolutely vital to France's chances.
The issue I have is with the term "showboating", it was wrong.
He was entertaining the crowd, hell he was entertaining me, but his loss could be fatal and was totally avoidable if they hadn’t got carried away in the occasion. There was no reason, none, for him being on the pitch
I'd call it a misjudgement from the coaches, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight
I have no idea of Galthié's motivation, neither do you. My guess would be based around how poor the second string were in the previous game and that suggests to me that the coaches wanted France to absolutely lay down a very big marker before getting the main spirit of the team off the park - if he'd come off two minutes later without being victim of a jaw-breaking head butt this exchange would not be happening.
But here we are.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
It’s not 20/20 hindsight if it was blindingly obvious at the time and other coaches in similar positions avoid similar situations!Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:22 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:16 pmWhat else would you call keeping the world’s best player on the pitch after half time in a game where you’re leading 50-0, when you have potentially four huge games coming up?Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:05 pm
Like I said earlier, I was calling for Danty to be hooked at HT, he is particularly prone to injury and absolutely vital to France's chances.
The issue I have is with the term "showboating", it was wrong.
He was entertaining the crowd, hell he was entertaining me, but his loss could be fatal and was totally avoidable if they hadn’t got carried away in the occasion. There was no reason, none, for him being on the pitch
I'd call it a misjudgement from the coaches, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight
I have no idea of Galthié's motivation, neither do you. My guess would be based around how poor the second string were in the previous game and that suggests to me that the coaches wanted France to absolutely lay down a very big marker before getting the main spirit of the team off the park - if he'd come off two minutes later without being victim of a jaw-breaking head butt this exchange would not be happening.
But here we are.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:26 pmIt’s not 20/20 hindsight if it was blindingly obvious at the time and other coaches in similar positions avoid similar situations!Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:22 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:16 pm
What else would you call keeping the world’s best player on the pitch after half time in a game where you’re leading 50-0, when you have potentially four huge games coming up?
He was entertaining the crowd, hell he was entertaining me, but his loss could be fatal and was totally avoidable if they hadn’t got carried away in the occasion. There was no reason, none, for him being on the pitch
I'd call it a misjudgement from the coaches, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight
I have no idea of Galthié's motivation, neither do you. My guess would be based around how poor the second string were in the previous game and that suggests to me that the coaches wanted France to absolutely lay down a very big marker before getting the main spirit of the team off the park - if he'd come off two minutes later without being victim of a jaw-breaking head butt this exchange would not be happening.
But here we are.
This place is hilarious.
You said Galthié was showing off.
I don't think he was, it has proved to be a misjudgment, but who is to say Dupont wouldn't have been head butted in the tenth minute?
Would you be roaring and greeting about the decision to play him then?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I’ve been really clear about what I think was particularly dumb about their decision making and I’m not sure how I can get you to grasp it if you haven’t alreadyTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:31 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:26 pmIt’s not 20/20 hindsight if it was blindingly obvious at the time and other coaches in similar positions avoid similar situations!Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:22 pm
I'd call it a misjudgement from the coaches, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight
I have no idea of Galthié's motivation, neither do you. My guess would be based around how poor the second string were in the previous game and that suggests to me that the coaches wanted France to absolutely lay down a very big marker before getting the main spirit of the team off the park - if he'd come off two minutes later without being victim of a jaw-breaking head butt this exchange would not be happening.
But here we are.
This place is hilarious.
You said Galthié was showing off.
I don't think he was, it has proved to be a misjudgment, but who is to say Dupont wouldn't have been head butted in the tenth minute?
Would you be roaring and greeting about the decision to play him then?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
This.Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:26 pmIt’s not 20/20 hindsight if it was blindingly obvious at the time and other coaches in similar positions avoid similar situations!Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:22 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:16 pm
What else would you call keeping the world’s best player on the pitch after half time in a game where you’re leading 50-0, when you have potentially four huge games coming up?
He was entertaining the crowd, hell he was entertaining me, but his loss could be fatal and was totally avoidable if they hadn’t got carried away in the occasion. There was no reason, none, for him being on the pitch
I'd call it a misjudgement from the coaches, with the advantage of 20/20 hindsight
I have no idea of Galthié's motivation, neither do you. My guess would be based around how poor the second string were in the previous game and that suggests to me that the coaches wanted France to absolutely lay down a very big marker before getting the main spirit of the team off the park - if he'd come off two minutes later without being victim of a jaw-breaking head butt this exchange would not be happening.
But here we are.
IMO though it was stupid from the second the lineup was posted, especially with another pool game in the offing that would have accomplished what playing him against Namibia was theoretically supposed to have done.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6734
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
You turned it up to 60 from the start and have kept doing so throughout whilst switching your arguments around, don’t complain about manners because you’re not making ground. I answered your point repeatedlyTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:38 pm Yet again I'm wondering why people can't just reply with manners here
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:50 pmYou turned it up to 60 from the start and have kept doing so throughout whilst switching your arguments around, don’t complain about manners because you’re not making ground. I answered your point repeatedlyTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:38 pm Yet again I'm wondering why people can't just reply with manners here
My complaint has always been about the wrong term, "showboating", I've been consistent in that.
There was no showing off.
I'm really going to have to sit this out now, it's not funny any more.
-
- Posts: 2442
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
I've got no issue with France keeping players on the park. Perhaps if they were playing next weekend you'd have been more inclined to give some players the hook, perhaps, but with 2 weeks until the next game then meh. It's just very unlucky, but accidents happen. As a mis management call it doesn't even rise to the level of POM and Earls riding a bike not wearing helmets but wearing crocs
Yes some people are right to identify in advance some players will get injured, but you'd hope even a moron could make that call given in training and in games rugby reliably injures people
Yes some people are right to identify in advance some players will get injured, but you'd hope even a moron could make that call given in training and in games rugby reliably injures people
I must say, I hadn’t considered this angle. We’re they also chomping on onions shouting aw he haw he haw?EnergiseR2 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:04 pmRhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:37 pm I've got no issue with France keeping players on the park. Perhaps if they were playing next weekend you'd have been more inclined to give some players the hook, perhaps, but with 2 weeks until the next game then meh. It's just very unlucky, but accidents happen. As a mis management call it doesn't even rise to the level of POM and Earls riding a bike not wearing helmets but wearing crocs
Yes some people are right to identify in advance some players will get injured, but you'd hope even a moron could make that call given in training and in games rugby reliably injures people![]()
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
That will have been the last reason Galthie would have kept him on.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:37 pm As a mis management call it doesn't even rise to the level of POM and Earls riding a bike not wearing helmets but wearing crocs

Marconnet and de Villiers in bike accidents too. Maybe it's a rugby player thing?
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Rubbish, he'll be fine. Aaron Smith is well into his 30s and has actually improved his form over the last few years after slumping for a while.Ymx wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:22 pmPlayers don’t tend to retain peak superpower form for that long.fishfoodie wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 4:51 pmHe's only 26; this injury hardly destines him to the knackers yard. He has at least one more RWC in him, albeit not at home.Ymx wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:27 am
It was a horrible collision. You could even see Du Pont grimace as he knew it was about to happen in slow-mo.
Such a shame to ruin a player in his peaks’ RWC. Chance in lifetime gone !
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6815
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Tictheid's spot on.Tichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:53 pmPaddington Bear wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:50 pmYou turned it up to 60 from the start and have kept doing so throughout whilst switching your arguments around, don’t complain about manners because you’re not making ground. I answered your point repeatedlyTichtheid wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 6:38 pm Yet again I'm wondering why people can't just reply with manners here
My complaint has always been about the wrong term, "showboating", I've been consistent in that.
There was no showing off.
I'm really going to have to sit this out now, it's not funny any more.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Not sure where you got that from. Before I left work this evening, the update I had was no decision had been taken.
As Yr Alban posted earlier, surely they'll have to wait for the swelling to go down?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:51 pmNot sure where you got that from. Before I left work this evening, the update I had was no decision had been taken.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8850
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Yeah I don't thing any surgeon is going to go in until they have a very clear idea of what needs to happen during the surgery, & that won't be possible until the swelling goes down. The last thing they want to do is have to go back in again in a weeks time because they rushed the job.Gumboot wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:55 pmAs Yr Alban posted earlier, surely they'll have to wait for the swelling to go down?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:51 pmNot sure where you got that from. Before I left work this evening, the update I had was no decision had been taken.
ThisSandstorm wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 10:11 amCheers DocYr Alban wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 9:51 am Waiting until the end of the game would have made no difference at all. Also, they probably won’t operate for a week or so, because there will be a load of swelling and they need that to settle to avoid wound breakdown. Zero chance of him taking any further part in the tournament, I’d say. Unfortunately.
BCUHB?
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 12016
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
It seems it was misreported on Bernol:Gumboot wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:55 pmAs Yr Alban posted earlier, surely they'll have to wait for the swelling to go down?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Sep 22, 2023 8:51 pmNot sure where you got that from. Before I left work this evening, the update I had was no decision had been taken.
https://www.rugbyrama.fr/2023/09/22/cou ... 472111.php