SH rugby down the drain?
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Saw this coming from long ago but this WC confirm this.
What will be the reason for this and what needs to be done to rectify it?
What will be the reason for this and what needs to be done to rectify it?
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
The URC countries doing well at the moment. Such a pitty there are three in one pool.
A bit reactionary really.
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
-
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Does losing to Derek Bevan really constitute choking?Ymx wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:17 am A bit reactionary really.
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6650
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
In 2015 all the talk was of how far ahead you all were. These things are cyclical
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6636
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Oom has been trolling for months now on the move to Europe by the SA Super teams and looking for any angle he can find to justify the crippling heartbreak he feels over what he and many other Saffas think was the rejection and expulsion of their teams by us Kiwis. In doing so, of course, he and his fellows conveniently forget that SA threatened to leave for years. Then, when Covid induced travel restrictions made holding the existing Super Rugby tournament practically impossible to hold NZ and Australia came up with a one off format holding a trans Tasman comp only.... and the manly man men children in the Republic snatched up their handbags and ran to Europe.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:47 am In 2015 all the talk was of how far ahead you all were. These things are cyclical
I feel for them, slightly. Having your private cross dressing habits and same sex preferences exposed like that publicly would have been a huge embarrassment, while discovering that throwing your hands up and shouting no no no didn't actually put people off the scent came as a huge shock.
Meanwhile, Australia have been on a downward spiral for some years and their current executive may have sparked the crisis need to finally turn that around, but it'll take years before they can return to any sort of familiar form. NZ have been corrosively coached under Foster and he has been part of the coaching line up with the ABs for 10 years... that'll end after the RWC and we should see some sort of revolutionary change and improvement under Razor. Argentina are disappointing... but there's a very promising competition growing in South America that is seeing the development of a professional league and improvement from the likes of Chile and Uruguay which will drag Argentina along and upwards with it... and Fiji are into the Finals for the first time. I'd say that rugby in the SH is actually shaping up quite well and Oom needs to learn to look past his own interests, get over his hurt feelings and actually grow a pair of balls before he gets too old to remember what to do with them.
Easy to rectify for SA. Select a fucking goalkicker!!!!OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 7:46 am Saw this coming from long ago but this WC confirm this.
What will be the reason for this and what needs to be done to rectify it?
AB's will be fine once Foster has gone.
Aus were fools to get rid of Rennie and replace him with Jones. That's easily remedied. Though the senior ARU management board may have to go as well!
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
I really dont have to justify our move to URC and Europe. That's past tense. You are probably the only one not missing SA teams in Soup.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:16 amOom has been trolling for months now on the move to Europe by the SA Super teams and looking for any angle he can find to justify the crippling heartbreak he feels over what he and many other Saffas think was the rejection and expulsion of their teams by us Kiwis. In doing so, of course, he and his fellows conveniently forget that SA threatened to leave for years. Then, when Covid induced travel restrictions made holding the existing Super Rugby tournament practically impossible to hold NZ and Australia came up with a one off format holding a trans Tasman comp only.... and the manly man men children in the Republic snatched up their handbags and ran to Europe.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:47 am In 2015 all the talk was of how far ahead you all were. These things are cyclical
I feel for them, slightly. Having your private cross dressing habits and same sex preferences exposed like that publicly would have been a huge embarrassment, while discovering that throwing your hands up and shouting no no no didn't actually put people off the scent came as a huge shock.
Meanwhile, Australia have been on a downward spiral for some years and their current executive may have sparked the crisis need to finally turn that around, but it'll take years before they can return to any sort of familiar form. NZ have been corrosively coached under Foster and he has been part of the coaching line up with the ABs for 10 years... that'll end after the RWC and we should see some sort of revolutionary change and improvement under Razor. Argentina are disappointing... but there's a very promising competition growing in South America that is seeing the development of a professional league and improvement from the likes of Chile and Uruguay which will drag Argentina along and upwards with it... and Fiji are into the Finals for the first time. I'd say that rugby in the SH is actually shaping up quite well and Oom needs to learn to look past his own interests, get over his hurt feelings and actually grow a pair of balls before he gets too old to remember what to do with them.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Nope , it cut deeper that just that. When last did NZ u20s win the JWC?SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:32 amEasy to rectify for SA. Select a fucking goalkicker!!!!OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 7:46 am Saw this coming from long ago but this WC confirm this.
What will be the reason for this and what needs to be done to rectify it?
AB's will be fine once Foster has gone.
Aus were fools to get rid of Rennie and replace him with Jones. That's easily remedied. Though the senior ARU management board may have to go as well!
That's bollocksOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:40 amNope , it cut deeper that just that. When last did NZ u20s win the JWC?SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:32 amEasy to rectify for SA. Select a fucking goalkicker!!!!OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 7:46 am Saw this coming from long ago but this WC confirm this.
What will be the reason for this and what needs to be done to rectify it?
AB's will be fine once Foster has gone.
Aus were fools to get rid of Rennie and replace him with Jones. That's easily remedied. Though the senior ARU management board may have to go as well!
When did any one but France, SA and England win the U20 JWC in the last 10 years?
-
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Any lessons on how to reject/expel South Africa would be much appreciated.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:16 amOom has been trolling for months now on the move to Europe by the SA Super teams and looking for any angle he can find to justify the crippling heartbreak he feels over what he and many other Saffas think was the rejection and expulsion of their teams by us Kiwis. In doing so, of course, he and his fellows conveniently forget that SA threatened to leave for years. Then, when Covid induced travel restrictions made holding the existing Super Rugby tournament practically impossible to hold NZ and Australia came up with a one off format holding a trans Tasman comp only.... and the manly man men children in the Republic snatched up their handbags and ran to Europe.Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:47 am In 2015 all the talk was of how far ahead you all were. These things are cyclical
I feel for them, slightly. Having your private cross dressing habits and same sex preferences exposed like that publicly would have been a huge embarrassment, while discovering that throwing your hands up and shouting no no no didn't actually put people off the scent came as a huge shock.
Meanwhile, Australia have been on a downward spiral for some years and their current executive may have sparked the crisis need to finally turn that around, but it'll take years before they can return to any sort of familiar form. NZ have been corrosively coached under Foster and he has been part of the coaching line up with the ABs for 10 years... that'll end after the RWC and we should see some sort of revolutionary change and improvement under Razor. Argentina are disappointing... but there's a very promising competition growing in South America that is seeing the development of a professional league and improvement from the likes of Chile and Uruguay which will drag Argentina along and upwards with it... and Fiji are into the Finals for the first time. I'd say that rugby in the SH is actually shaping up quite well and Oom needs to learn to look past his own interests, get over his hurt feelings and actually grow a pair of balls before he gets too old to remember what to do with them.
On Chile/Uruguay it's not perhaps that easy to push through a pro league and drive standards forwards. Romania did a decent job with their SuperLiga, they even forged links with clubs across Europe. And still you couldn't (yet) say they're getting much payoff in terms of the standard of player, maybe they've managed to attract a few players who couldn't get a pro job elsewhere in Europe and who've qualified as DNs but that's not much, and on the revenues front they've typically been unable to give the product away for free, free proving more than Romanian TV wants to pay. Maybe the SuperLiga has lit a light in a new generation that will drive things on again, hard to see it has but one can live in hope
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Hardly. You are simply looking at it in a RWC context rather than the game as a whole and its long term future which is not limited to the SH.Ymx wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:17 am A bit reactionary really.
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
I was going to start a separate thread on this to point out that rather than expanding the game globally, IRB/WR instead chose to run an old boys club to protect the interests of the greedy elite (and I count France in that) and, despite that, the game is on its knees. Ignoring the elephant in the room that is head injuries which could conceivably sink the game on its own, we have reached a position where
- Aus is on the verge of the lights going out. It's a minority sport there (behind sumoball, Aus rules and cricket....... and might even dip below football) already and so the catastrophic way they've structured the game since the advent of Soup might be the end of meaningful public interest. No public = no money. End of.
- Eng's woes are well documented. Whilst it being a toff's game in the country continues to limits its appeal, it still has enough toffs' coffers to defer a complete implosion. For now.
- Wal are in a position almost as bad economically as Aus (last night shows how f**ked Aus is) for very different reasons but the potential is the same: dwindling nos and no money.
- You read the NZ rugby board's review, right? The one that said the game was not fit for purpose and was unsustainable?
- Laurent and I were discussing Fra and participation nos do seem on the way down although the picture differs radically depending on region and ethnic demographic. An unlikely win of the RWC might alter that. Regardless, Fra is the most immune economically at present but is hardly in a picture of perfect health.
- SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
The reality is that outside of Fra and Ire, watching numbers are down at all levels where it matters i.e. not intl level.
New Zealand won it in 2015 and 2017. South Africa haven't won it since 2012.SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:54 amThat's bollocksOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:40 amNope , it cut deeper that just that. When last did NZ u20s win the JWC?SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:32 am
Easy to rectify for SA. Select a fucking goalkicker!!!!
AB's will be fine once Foster has gone.
Aus were fools to get rid of Rennie and replace him with Jones. That's easily remedied. Though the senior ARU management board may have to go as well!
When did any one but France, SA and England win the U20 JWC in the last 10 years?
Apart from that, flawless argument.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Scotland's crowds for Edinburgh and Glasgow are up over the last ten years.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 amHardly. You are simply looking at it in a RWC context rather than the game as a whole and its long term future which is not limited to the SH.Ymx wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:17 am A bit reactionary really.
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
I was going to start a separate thread on this to point out that rather than expanding the game globally, IRB/WR instead chose to run an old boys club to protect the interests of the greedy elite (and I count France in that) and, despite that, the game is on its knees. Ignoring the elephant in the room that is head injuries which could conceivably sink the game on its own, we have reached a position where
- Aus is on the verge of the lights going out. It's a minority sport there (behind sumoball, Aus rules and cricket....... and might even dip below football) already and so the catastrophic way they've structured the game since the advent of Soup might be the end of meaningful public interest. No public = no money. End of.
- Eng's woes are well documented. Whilst it being a toff's game in the country continues to limits its appeal, it still has enough toffs' coffers to defer a complete implosion. For now.
- Wal are in a position almost as bad economically as Aus (last night shows how f**ked Aus is) for very different reasons but the potential is the same: dwindling nos and no money.
- You read the NZ rugby board's review, right? The one that said the game was not fit for purpose and was unsustainable?
- Laurent and I were discussing Fra and participation nos do seem on the way down although the picture differs radically depending on region and ethnic demographic. An unlikely win of the RWC might alter that. Regardless, Fra is the most immune economically at present but is hardly in a picture of perfect health.
- SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
The reality is that outside of Fra and Ire, watching numbers are down at all levels where it matters i.e. not intl level.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Thanks for a very good post.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 am - SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
Regarding SA
Our rugby base (bottom structure) is stronger then ever. For all the bad things about Corvid, it also bring some positives in broadcasting of schoolboy sport and rugby in particular. In the past only parents usually supported but now any supporter can watch and follow schoolboy rugby from friday to saturday and from u7D to the u18A first team. This is the heart of rugby culture in South Africa. I thought this is only available for the top rugby school, no vokken way, you can watch Swartland playing Hugenote Wellington on digi platforms. The big rugby schools still draw their crowds (highest in Paarl 30,000).
The rest of the structure is CC/URC/Springboks. The CC/URC is much better to what it use to be with soup. The URC franchises has gone through testing times but the best model is the one squad and coaching staff for both competitions. There are times when both teams (CC & URC/HC) play at the same time but I am sure they working on it.
Soup rugby and Covid killed the goose that lay the golden eggs regarding attendances. However South Africa attendances do compare well with our NH opponents. Cape Town will always draw the biggest crowds maybe even world wide.
So no, Soup killed our game, URC lifted it. Add that our players play for opponent teams even make it better for our test rugby.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Thing is NZ use to dominate the JWC. SA hardly won it in the past.Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:10 pmNew Zealand won it in 2015 and 2017. South Africa haven't won it since 2012.SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:54 amThat's bollocksOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:40 am
Nope , it cut deeper that just that. When last did NZ u20s win the JWC?
When did any one but France, SA and England win the U20 JWC in the last 10 years?
Apart from that, flawless argument.
The NH 6 Nation u20 tournament is great and probably the biggest developer of their player structures.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
I didn't specifically comment on that but surely that's a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario after the winding Reivers and Reds eventually into those 2 i.e. shoehorning 4 teams into 2 would increase the gates of the 2 but in toto, still represents a reduction from the numbers when there were 4? Anyway, it was all such a mess, I can't remember what happened: Borders resurrected and then culled again and then one private team and one run by the union?Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:11 pmScotland's crowds for Edinburgh and Glasgow are up over the last ten years.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 amHardly. You are simply looking at it in a RWC context rather than the game as a whole and its long term future which is not limited to the SH.Ymx wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:17 am A bit reactionary really.
This RWC it could well be the 3N teams don’t make it to the semis.
But to put it in perspective
only one NH has ever one a World Cup.
England never made it out of group stage 2015
Ireland have never made it past the QFs
France have choked every single RWC
I was going to start a separate thread on this to point out that rather than expanding the game globally, IRB/WR instead chose to run an old boys club to protect the interests of the greedy elite (and I count France in that) and, despite that, the game is on its knees. Ignoring the elephant in the room that is head injuries which could conceivably sink the game on its own, we have reached a position where
- Aus is on the verge of the lights going out. It's a minority sport there (behind sumoball, Aus rules and cricket....... and might even dip below football) already and so the catastrophic way they've structured the game since the advent of Soup might be the end of meaningful public interest. No public = no money. End of.
- Eng's woes are well documented. Whilst it being a toff's game in the country continues to limits its appeal, it still has enough toffs' coffers to defer a complete implosion. For now.
- Wal are in a position almost as bad economically as Aus (last night shows how f**ked Aus is) for very different reasons but the potential is the same: dwindling nos and no money.
- You read the NZ rugby board's review, right? The one that said the game was not fit for purpose and was unsustainable?
- Laurent and I were discussing Fra and participation nos do seem on the way down although the picture differs radically depending on region and ethnic demographic. An unlikely win of the RWC might alter that. Regardless, Fra is the most immune economically at present but is hardly in a picture of perfect health.
- SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
The reality is that outside of Fra and Ire, watching numbers are down at all levels where it matters i.e. not intl level.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11945
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
No worries and thanks for the clarifications. Glad that the game is in good health where it matters most: grass roots. That's a lesson that too many other unions sitting in their ivory towers did not grasp or wilfully chose to ignore.OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:18 pmThanks for a very good post.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 am - SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
Regarding SA
Our rugby base (bottom structure) is stronger then ever. For all the bad things about Corvid, it also bring some positives in broadcasting of schoolboy sport and rugby in particular. In the past only parents usually supported but now any supporter can watch and follow schoolboy rugby from friday to saturday and from u7D to the u18A first team. This is the heart of rugby culture in South Africa. I thought this is only available for the top rugby school, no vokken way, you can watch Swartland playing Hugenote Wellington on digi platforms. The big rugby schools still draw their crowds (highest in Paarl 30,000).
The rest of the structure is CC/URC/Springboks. The CC/URC is much better to what it use to be with soup. The URC franchises has gone through testing times but the best model is the one squad and coaching staff for both competitions. There are times when both teams (CC & URC/HC) play at the same time but I am sure they working on it.
Soup rugby and Covid killed the goose that lay the golden eggs regarding attendances. However South Africa attendances do compare well with our NH opponents. Cape Town will always draw the biggest crowds maybe even world wide.
So no, Soup killed our game, URC lifted it. Add that our players play for opponent teams even make it better for our test rugby.
I also suspect you have another factor broadly in your advantage. The cost of living and hence players wages are much lower which means the game is more likely to be sustainable. The downside is the massed exodus you've seen of players (especially to France before the overseas limits came into force). SA rugby has done well to survive this. It has almost killed smaller nations like the PIs.
Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:10 pmNew Zealand won it in 2015 and 2017. South Africa haven't won it since 2012.SaintK wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:54 amThat's bollocksOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:40 am
Nope , it cut deeper that just that. When last did NZ u20s win the JWC?
When did any one but France, SA and England win the U20 JWC in the last 10 years?
Apart from that, flawless argument.

Nobody from the Borders is coming up to watch Edinburgh, and nobody from the North is going to watch Glasgow, believe me. In one case parochialism (people from Melrose wouldn't watch a Borders side if it played in Gala, so the idea of them coming to Edinburgh is heresy) and the other just distance. Borders and Caledonia ceased to exist more than 15 years ago, so improvement over the last ten is a realistic viewpoint.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:34 pmI didn't specifically comment on that but surely that's a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario after the winding Reivers and Reds eventually into those 2 i.e. shoehorning 4 teams into 2 would increase the gates of the 2 but in toto, still represents a reduction from the numbers when there were 4? Anyway, it was all such a mess, I can't remember what happened: Borders resurrected and then culled again and then one private team and one run by the union?Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:11 pmScotland's crowds for Edinburgh and Glasgow are up over the last ten years.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 am
Hardly. You are simply looking at it in a RWC context rather than the game as a whole and its long term future which is not limited to the SH.
I was going to start a separate thread on this to point out that rather than expanding the game globally, IRB/WR instead chose to run an old boys club to protect the interests of the greedy elite (and I count France in that) and, despite that, the game is on its knees. Ignoring the elephant in the room that is head injuries which could conceivably sink the game on its own, we have reached a position where
- Aus is on the verge of the lights going out. It's a minority sport there (behind sumoball, Aus rules and cricket....... and might even dip below football) already and so the catastrophic way they've structured the game since the advent of Soup might be the end of meaningful public interest. No public = no money. End of.
- Eng's woes are well documented. Whilst it being a toff's game in the country continues to limits its appeal, it still has enough toffs' coffers to defer a complete implosion. For now.
- Wal are in a position almost as bad economically as Aus (last night shows how f**ked Aus is) for very different reasons but the potential is the same: dwindling nos and no money.
- You read the NZ rugby board's review, right? The one that said the game was not fit for purpose and was unsustainable?
- Laurent and I were discussing Fra and participation nos do seem on the way down although the picture differs radically depending on region and ethnic demographic. An unlikely win of the RWC might alter that. Regardless, Fra is the most immune economically at present but is hardly in a picture of perfect health.
- SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
The reality is that outside of Fra and Ire, watching numbers are down at all levels where it matters i.e. not intl level.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I'm a Glasgow season ticket holder living in Aberdeen , I think I've missed less than half a dozen home games in the last ten yearsBiffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:49 pmNobody from the Borders is coming up to watch Edinburgh, and nobody from the North is going to watch Glasgow, believe me. In one case parochialism (people from Melrose wouldn't watch a Borders side if it played in Gala, so the idea of them coming to Edinburgh is heresy) and the other just distance. Borders and Caledonia ceased to exist more than 15 years ago, so improvement over the last ten is a realistic viewpoint.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:34 pmI didn't specifically comment on that but surely that's a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario after the winding Reivers and Reds eventually into those 2 i.e. shoehorning 4 teams into 2 would increase the gates of the 2 but in toto, still represents a reduction from the numbers when there were 4? Anyway, it was all such a mess, I can't remember what happened: Borders resurrected and then culled again and then one private team and one run by the union?Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:11 pm
Scotland's crowds for Edinburgh and Glasgow are up over the last ten years.
Lager & Lime - we don't do cocktails
-
- Posts: 9246
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
If we think about all the rugby that isn't the world cup, which is the vast majority of it, SH rugby already 'went down the drain' in the sense that NH results against you lot have been good for a years.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Well since we joined the URC we do experience a reverse of exodus of players. Those who go to the NH like Kolisi (France) and Kitshoff (Ulster) stay in our radar.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:41 pmNo worries and thanks for the clarifications. Glad that the game is in good health where it matters most: grass roots. That's a lesson that too many other unions sitting in their ivory towers did not grasp or wilfully chose to ignore.OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:18 pmThanks for a very good post.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:53 am - SA. With all the changes in alignments (3N, URC and the relation with CC etc), I don't have a long term view. My gut feeling is player nos are high but crowd attendances are down and the tension between URC and CC might prove equally as problematic as that between Soup and CC.
Regarding SA
Our rugby base (bottom structure) is stronger then ever. For all the bad things about Corvid, it also bring some positives in broadcasting of schoolboy sport and rugby in particular. In the past only parents usually supported but now any supporter can watch and follow schoolboy rugby from friday to saturday and from u7D to the u18A first team. This is the heart of rugby culture in South Africa. I thought this is only available for the top rugby school, no vokken way, you can watch Swartland playing Hugenote Wellington on digi platforms. The big rugby schools still draw their crowds (highest in Paarl 30,000).
The rest of the structure is CC/URC/Springboks. The CC/URC is much better to what it use to be with soup. The URC franchises has gone through testing times but the best model is the one squad and coaching staff for both competitions. There are times when both teams (CC & URC/HC) play at the same time but I am sure they working on it.
Soup rugby and Covid killed the goose that lay the golden eggs regarding attendances. However South Africa attendances do compare well with our NH opponents. Cape Town will always draw the biggest crowds maybe even world wide.
So no, Soup killed our game, URC lifted it. Add that our players play for opponent teams even make it better for our test rugby.
I also suspect you have another factor broadly in your advantage. The cost of living and hence players wages are much lower which means the game is more likely to be sustainable. The downside is the massed exodus you've seen of players (especially to France before the overseas limits came into force). SA rugby has done well to survive this. It has almost killed smaller nations like the PIs.
Players returning
Bulls
Wilco Louw, Akker van der Merwe, Marcel Coetzee, Willie le Roux
Sharks
Coenie Oosthuizen, Francois Hougaardt,
Stormers
Skosaan, Gelant. and Ben Loader from England.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Fuck I at least would have you backing me in this. What's wrong with you?
That's not very usual though. Is it? No idea I guess, but I'd be very, very surprised.Dogbert wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 1:03 pmI'm a Glasgow season ticket holder living in Aberdeen , I think I've missed less than half a dozen home games in the last ten yearsBiffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:49 pmNobody from the Borders is coming up to watch Edinburgh, and nobody from the North is going to watch Glasgow, believe me. In one case parochialism (people from Melrose wouldn't watch a Borders side if it played in Gala, so the idea of them coming to Edinburgh is heresy) and the other just distance. Borders and Caledonia ceased to exist more than 15 years ago, so improvement over the last ten is a realistic viewpoint.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:34 pm
I didn't specifically comment on that but surely that's a rob Peter to pay Paul scenario after the winding Reivers and Reds eventually into those 2 i.e. shoehorning 4 teams into 2 would increase the gates of the 2 but in toto, still represents a reduction from the numbers when there were 4? Anyway, it was all such a mess, I can't remember what happened: Borders resurrected and then culled again and then one private team and one run by the union?
More to the point, it was only 5 years ago that Edinburgh were getting 500ish to Myreside on a Friday night, it's now regularly at least 10x that.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
This is a weird take (to me anyhoo) for two reasonsOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:23 pmThing is NZ use to dominate the JWC. SA hardly won it in the past.
The NH 6 Nation u20 tournament is great and probably the biggest developer of their player structures.
NZ dominated (and really dominated) for the first few years only.
Do you really think the 6Ns U20s is driving (rather than reflecting) the development pathways? If the former, I think that’s a kinda crazy take
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
NZ played in 7 out of 10 finals until France won it in 2018.Simian wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:33 pmThis is a weird take (to me anyhoo) for two reasonsOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:23 pmThing is NZ use to dominate the JWC. SA hardly won it in the past.Biffer wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:10 pm
New Zealand won it in 2015 and 2017. South Africa haven't won it since 2012.
Apart from that, flawless argument.
The NH 6 Nation u20 tournament is great and probably the biggest developer of their player structures.
NZ dominated (and really dominated) for the first few years only.
Do you really think the 6Ns U20s is driving (rather than reflecting) the development pathways? If the former, I think that’s a kinda crazy take
Thats quite dominating.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Most Springboks kick on from u20. In fact most of them coming together from SA u16 level.Niegs wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:50 pm And how many U20s actually kick on as first-choice pros (beyond the first few years when their clubs give them a shot for all that investment), let alone become senior internationals.
Watch out for England u18s of 2023. Lots of talented English youngsters.
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15958
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
Take Scotland as an example. Where are their u20s?
Joburg
-
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
I've long held something of a loose maxim you'd not be that fussed with your results at u20s level, what you want from each cycle is 3-4 players who can really push on at the top level, and ideally over the years they spread across the XV positions. The standard of the remaining 11-12 players, the dross, can be very telling at u20s level, and irrelevant in the seniorsNiegs wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:50 pm And how many U20s actually kick on as first-choice pros (beyond the first few years when their clubs give them a shot for all that investment), let alone become senior internationals.
-
- Posts: 9246
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
England seem to do pretty well at converting our U20s into Welsh and Scottish internationals...Niegs wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:50 pm And how many U20s actually kick on as first-choice pros (beyond the first few years when their clubs give them a shot for all that investment), let alone become senior internationals.

To answer the question though, they played in the U20 World Trophy this year. In our pool, in fact. They stomped us of course, but did lose by double digits to Uruguay (take note folks), who lost a close final to Spain (also take note).
-
- Posts: 2349
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
It's not like we're losing Matfields and Conrad Smiths.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 3:19 pmEngland seem to do pretty well at converting our U20s into Welsh and Scottish internationals...Niegs wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:50 pm And how many U20s actually kick on as first-choice pros (beyond the first few years when their clubs give them a shot for all that investment), let alone become senior internationals.
The ones we're losing detract from our pool of players almost good enough to be good at test rugby
-
- Posts: 9246
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I was more trying to get a dig in about Celtic poaching than claim we're missing out tbh.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 3:33 pmIt's not like we're losing Matfields and Conrad Smiths.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 3:19 pmEngland seem to do pretty well at converting our U20s into Welsh and Scottish internationals...Niegs wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:50 pm And how many U20s actually kick on as first-choice pros (beyond the first few years when their clubs give them a shot for all that investment), let alone become senior internationals.
The ones we're losing detract from our pool of players almost good enough to be good at test rugby
You’re picking arbitrary cut offs that ‘prove your point’OomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 3:09 pmNZ played in 7 out of 10 finals until France won it in 2018.Simian wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 2:33 pmThis is a weird take (to me anyhoo) for two reasonsOomStruisbaai wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:23 pm
Thing is NZ use to dominate the JWC. SA hardly won it in the past.
The NH 6 Nation u20 tournament is great and probably the biggest developer of their player structures.
NZ dominated (and really dominated) for the first few years only.
Do you really think the 6Ns U20s is driving (rather than reflecting) the development pathways? If the former, I think that’s a kinda crazy take
Thats quite dominating.
I could equally say that since they stopped winning all the JWCs, NZ have been finalists in 3/8. At age group level, that’s a good return right?
With your age group player numbers and the emphasis on school rugby for your culture (both of which you say are peachy), why do SA go so poorly at age group level? How manybtimes have you made the finals? And, given you think this is a predictor of adult team performance, how do you reconcile Ireland doing so well when they’ve made the finals twice? (One just now)
You do talk some amount of shite.