Priti Patel.
Oh and Ian Blackford.
Things that annoy you
-
Line6 HXFX
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
So the Camera thing, found out there are actually laws and regukations that govern static CCTV, that the person who erects and uses them must obey.
Things like
Clear Signage "cctv operating in this area".you can get heavily prosecuted if you don't do this.
If you film outside your property (like these people appear to be), onto a public footpath or communal carpark etc, you are subject to a whole raft of data protection laws, that would make it extremely miserable for anyone who wasn't a paid professional, to do it.
You are subject to disclose the fact you have stored someone's image, every time you do.
You have to agree to constant deletion requests.
Requests to stop or justify what you are doing etc.
Probably have to go through footage for sometimes hours a day..to abide by Data Protection.
Fact is Static Cameras can , and certainly are used as harassment devices, and people have even left their homes and sold up because of them.
I mean there is nothing on anyones tenancy agreement they signed, that says they agreed to be monitored, everytime they come and go into their property, by any old dipshit who has bought 12 quid camera from Amazon, that tracks your and everyone elses movements walking by, and which can be accessed by any other dipsit with an Internet connection.
And they spread like wildfire. I now have two neighbours with cameras pointing out their flats, so cannot go left or right without being filmed, when leaving the building.
If you object, to being illegally monitored by these people, and even explain your rights, giving themfull information, calmly and pleasantly..and explain rationally how they are violating your civil and legal rights...that's right, they insist you are the creep, and you must have something to hide, as "why wouldo't want your comings and goings to be filmed?
Well for one I don't want to be burgled!!!
It is like a robber, asking a shopeeper why he doesn't want to be robbed.
The classic bit at the end of this conversation (not making this up) was the sentence "right I am going to get more cameras and operate them 24 hours a day, legally " (just because I object to people running illegal, covert CCTV), as it pisses me off, and to harass me personally.
What the laws regarding Cctv, are there specifically to prevent.
People are fucking nuts, and if they want to put a camera in the window,nothing is going to stop them. Because they can film in the Street and take footage with their mobile phones, they think they can run covert, static, illegal CCTV into any public area..and will even justify it by pretending they are threatened.
Think if I stayed longer, trying to reason with them, he would actually have accused me of threatening them.
This new camera is there not just because his neighbour is doing it , and so he thinks he can too, but because one night someone was shining a lazer pen into his flat.
Most people just draw the curtains.
Anyway here are your rights regarding CCTV.
Use them or lose them.
https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/do ... ng-filmed/
Things like
Clear Signage "cctv operating in this area".you can get heavily prosecuted if you don't do this.
If you film outside your property (like these people appear to be), onto a public footpath or communal carpark etc, you are subject to a whole raft of data protection laws, that would make it extremely miserable for anyone who wasn't a paid professional, to do it.
You are subject to disclose the fact you have stored someone's image, every time you do.
You have to agree to constant deletion requests.
Requests to stop or justify what you are doing etc.
Probably have to go through footage for sometimes hours a day..to abide by Data Protection.
Fact is Static Cameras can , and certainly are used as harassment devices, and people have even left their homes and sold up because of them.
I mean there is nothing on anyones tenancy agreement they signed, that says they agreed to be monitored, everytime they come and go into their property, by any old dipshit who has bought 12 quid camera from Amazon, that tracks your and everyone elses movements walking by, and which can be accessed by any other dipsit with an Internet connection.
And they spread like wildfire. I now have two neighbours with cameras pointing out their flats, so cannot go left or right without being filmed, when leaving the building.
If you object, to being illegally monitored by these people, and even explain your rights, giving themfull information, calmly and pleasantly..and explain rationally how they are violating your civil and legal rights...that's right, they insist you are the creep, and you must have something to hide, as "why wouldo't want your comings and goings to be filmed?
Well for one I don't want to be burgled!!!
It is like a robber, asking a shopeeper why he doesn't want to be robbed.
The classic bit at the end of this conversation (not making this up) was the sentence "right I am going to get more cameras and operate them 24 hours a day, legally " (just because I object to people running illegal, covert CCTV), as it pisses me off, and to harass me personally.
What the laws regarding Cctv, are there specifically to prevent.
People are fucking nuts, and if they want to put a camera in the window,nothing is going to stop them. Because they can film in the Street and take footage with their mobile phones, they think they can run covert, static, illegal CCTV into any public area..and will even justify it by pretending they are threatened.
Think if I stayed longer, trying to reason with them, he would actually have accused me of threatening them.
This new camera is there not just because his neighbour is doing it , and so he thinks he can too, but because one night someone was shining a lazer pen into his flat.
Most people just draw the curtains.
Anyway here are your rights regarding CCTV.
Use them or lose them.
https://ico.org.uk/your-data-matters/do ... ng-filmed/
-
mat the expat
- Posts: 1561
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
Online banks that have no storefronts, insisting on signed paper copies of forms.....
Piers Morgan is an appalling human being, but age and success appear to have at least directed his cūntiness towards standing up against even bigger cünts and using his platform to call them out. So he’s still a cünt but he’s slowly becoming our cünt.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Wed Sep 22, 2021 12:00 pmMike Hosking? Megacunt.
At least Piers Morgan has the journalistic chops when he actually tries.
Interviewers who ask a question and answer it at the same time ie 'That looked a hard game in the wind and the rain and being shown the red card after 30 mins must have made it even harder but you defended resolutely right to the final whistle for the win. Was it a hard game?'
-
Uncle fester
- Posts: 4963
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Young lad demanded that we start putting stuff up yesterday.Oxbow wrote: Wed Nov 08, 2023 2:36 pm Saw my first Christmas tree in somebody's window today. November 8th, new record for me.
-
Tilly Orifice
- Posts: 535
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am
This just absolutely demands a flat no and a blank expressionless stare.dpedin wrote: Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:08 am Interviewers who ask a question and answer it at the same time ie 'That looked a hard game in the wind and the rain and being shown the red card after 30 mins must have made it even harder but you defended resolutely right to the final whistle for the win. Was it a hard game?'
I don't know why they pulled them down from youtube, but Crowd Goes Wild in NZ had a whole segment dedicated to this, admitting sports journos are terrible at asking open-ended questions... called... "Yeah, definitely."Tilly Orifice wrote: Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:58 amThis just absolutely demands a flat no and a blank expressionless stare.dpedin wrote: Fri Nov 10, 2023 9:08 am Interviewers who ask a question and answer it at the same time ie 'That looked a hard game in the wind and the rain and being shown the red card after 30 mins must have made it even harder but you defended resolutely right to the final whistle for the win. Was it a hard game?'
