6 Nations Round 3 - France v Italy
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Oh shit. Genuinely gutted
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
FFS, fucking kicking tee!
Even the fucking tee is against us!
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
How on earth does the ball fall off the tee in a dome?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4597
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
That is going to haunt him for the rest of his life, the poor bastard.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Should Ridley have stopped the game when France started advancing? Can’t do that on a pen
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Oh no!!
Italy getting a nice boost before we play them against the team we should have beaten
Despite that period when he was giving France everything thought the ref had a very accomplished game in the end
Italy getting a nice boost before we play them against the team we should have beaten
Despite that period when he was giving France everything thought the ref had a very accomplished game in the end
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
You are correct. I demand a rematch.Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:56 pm Should Ridley have stopped the game when France started advancing? Can’t do that on a pen
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
He seemed to take it in good spirits…Hal Jordan wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:55 pm That is going to haunt him for the rest of his life, the poor bastard.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Yes. Should have been retaken.Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:56 pm Should Ridley have stopped the game when France started advancing? Can’t do that on a pen
As an Italian Scot, France can just go away.
Yeah, surely it's an infringement.Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:56 pm Should Ridley have stopped the game when France started advancing? Can’t do that on a pen
Law 8.27
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
I never knew that. So ref bottled it.Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:21 pm Law 8.27
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
Law 8.22Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:21 pm Law 8.27
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
If the kicker indicates to the referee the intent to kick at goal, the opposing team must stand still with their hands by their sides from the time the kicker starts to approach to kick until the ball is kicked.
The bolded bit being crucial here I think. Frenchies moved twice but both were prior to Garbisi starting his run-up.
Fuck you!Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 4:38 pm Great try. Sorry Sturg if this jinxes it, but I’m calling Italy winning this
Yeah , it seems a bit messy.topofthemoon wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:30 pmLaw 8.22Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:21 pm Law 8.27
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
If the kicker indicates to the referee the intent to kick at goal, the opposing team must stand still with their hands by their sides from the time the kicker starts to approach to kick until the ball is kicked.
The bolded bit being crucial here I think. Frenchies moved twice but both were prior to Garbisi starting his run-up.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6648
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

No Entmack to blame. I feel his sorrow.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6655
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Italy back into the top 10 in the world rankings. U20s look good as well. It’s a matter of time until they have a multi win 6N. They’ll cause Scotland some issues and should go to Cardiff as favourites
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Let's not get ahead of ourselves nowPaddington Bear wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 7:12 pm Italy back into the top 10 in the world rankings. U20s look good as well. It’s a matter of time until they have a multi win 6N. They’ll cause Scotland some issues and should go to Cardiff as favourites
So waterboys count as being part of opposing team ?Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:59 pmYeah , it seems a bit messy.topofthemoon wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:30 pmLaw 8.22Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:21 pm Law 8.27
If the opposing team infringes while the kick is being taken but the kick at goal is successful, the goal stands and a further penalty is not awarded. If the kick is unsuccessful, the non-offending team is awarded a penalty 10 metres in front of the original mark.
If the kicker indicates to the referee the intent to kick at goal, the opposing team must stand still with their hands by their sides from the time the kicker starts to approach to kick until the ball is kicked.
The bolded bit being crucial here I think. Frenchies moved twice but both were prior to Garbisi starting his run-up.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6648
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Waterboys shouldn't be on the ground during play (which includes taking a kick)... WR brought in the mandated water breaks to deal with that issue.
Have to say, I thought the players "charging" was a bit overblown and didn't really have any material impact on what happened. I have also seen very few Italians moaning about it, just seems to be everyone else.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 9251
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
And swiftly dropped it when various commentators and pundits started whinging about slowing down the game and 'why do players need waterbreaks' as if letting coaches in bibs run onto the field at every stoppage with a few bottles was any better.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2024 2:12 pmWaterboys shouldn't be on the ground during play (which includes taking a kick)... WR brought in the mandated water breaks to deal with that issue.
Yeah I don't think it made a difference, but that said I don't think France could have any complaints if the ref had called for it to be taken againSlick wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2024 2:23 pm Have to say, I thought the players "charging" was a bit overblown and didn't really have any material impact on what happened. I have also seen very few Italians moaning about it, just seems to be everyone else.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6648
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Did they? Stupid cunce.sockwithaticket wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2024 2:49 pmAnd swiftly dropped it when various commentators and pundits started whinging about slowing down the game and 'why do players need waterbreaks' as if letting coaches in bibs run onto the field at every stoppage with a few bottles was any better.Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2024 2:12 pmWaterboys shouldn't be on the ground during play (which includes taking a kick)... WR brought in the mandated water breaks to deal with that issue.
-
- Posts: 374
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:22 pm
They shouldn't have been there. The only penalty offence I can see that they could incur would be if they actually touched the ball. Other than that, the ref can caution them or send them off and they can be subject to misconduct charges.Yeeb wrote: Mon Feb 26, 2024 11:17 amSo waterboys count as being part of opposing team ?Blackmac wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:59 pmYeah , it seems a bit messy.topofthemoon wrote: Sun Feb 25, 2024 5:30 pm
Law 8.22
If the kicker indicates to the referee the intent to kick at goal, the opposing team must stand still with their hands by their sides from the time the kicker starts to approach to kick until the ball is kicked.
The bolded bit being crucial here I think. Frenchies moved twice but both were prior to Garbisi starting his run-up.
Ref could maybe have taken a pause on the shot clock and got the French players and staff sorted out appropriately. With the ball toppling with only 20 seconds left though I think everyone on the field was panicking a bit and not thinking clearly.
-
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
If you can't balance a ball on a kicking tee in a stadium with a closed roof it's a bit hard to have any sympathy.