The best new and returning TV series thread
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4601
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Finished Blue Eye Samurai and finally got to watch the voice artist credits.
I'd spotted George Takei's presence but was genuinely gobsmacked at seeing Sir Kenneth Branagh's name come up.
I'd spotted George Takei's presence but was genuinely gobsmacked at seeing Sir Kenneth Branagh's name come up.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Very wary of that due to who is making it.yermum wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:56 pm Enjoying the first few episodes of the three body problem on Netflix
I'm wary of it due to severely disliking the book.Uncle fester wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:00 pmVery wary of that due to who is making it.yermum wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:56 pm Enjoying the first few episodes of the three body problem on Netflix
Turns out one of the Blue Eye Samurai creators wrote Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.Hal Jordan wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:18 pm Finished Blue Eye Samurai and finally got to watch the voice artist credits.
I'd spotted George Takei's presence but was genuinely gobsmacked at seeing Sir Kenneth Branagh's name come up.
Seems like I missed out then by watching this in the Turkish dub (which had a decent voice cast to be fair). I enjoyed it overall but wasn't so keen on the final twist.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Haven't read it. What didn't you like about the book?robmatic wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:35 amI'm wary of it due to severely disliking the book.Uncle fester wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:00 pmVery wary of that due to who is making it.yermum wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:56 pm Enjoying the first few episodes of the three body problem on Netflix
I will watch it at some point. I read the first two books as I'm a bit of a sci fi guy, but the issue I had with them is, well a bit science nerdy. Normally for Big space opera type sci fi you can legit push the boundaries of physics and what we know, and then hypothesise stuff that might happen on top of it. But in the Three Body problem it seemed to me there was some stuff that was just flat wrong, contrary to known stuff. For example, warp speed, wormhole travel etc all are bullshit but hypothesise on known aspects of space time, that it can curve, that if we could create negative energy we'd be able to create highly curved bubbles of space time etc. It stretches the boundaries of known science without just saying 'fuck'em' and throwing it all out for something excessively handwavy. And yes I'm sure there are other examples of stuff that breaks physics completely, but this one jarred with me for some reason.Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
The characters and some of the science being nonsense. I can't remember the details because it was a while ago when I read it, but there were bits that just made me go 'nope' on both issues.Uncle fester wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 10:52 amHaven't read it. What didn't you like about the book?
Looks like we're coming from the same placerobmatic wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:28 pmThe characters and some of the science being nonsense. I can't remember the details because it was a while ago when I read it, but there were bits that just made me go 'nope' on both issues.
Edit - just checked back and one of the things that I thought etf about was using the sun as a giant amplifier for radio signals. That's just got no basis in science. Higher dimensional folding and such, yeah I can live with that.
Last edited by Biffer on Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4601
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Misu and Teigen so badly needed to hate fuck it out of their systems.robmatic wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 8:42 amTurns out one of the Blue Eye Samurai creators wrote Branagh's Murder on the Orient Express.Hal Jordan wrote: Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:18 pm Finished Blue Eye Samurai and finally got to watch the voice artist credits.
I'd spotted George Takei's presence but was genuinely gobsmacked at seeing Sir Kenneth Branagh's name come up.
Seems like I missed out then by watching this in the Turkish dub (which had a decent voice cast to be fair). I enjoyed it overall but wasn't so keen on the final twist.
Like I say, some of it is reasonably legit, but other parts of it aren't. The quantum entanglement comms thing is one that I believe there is some debate about as it breaks a fundamental law of physics. That article talks about the stuff that's well planned out, but doesn't talk about some of the other stuff that's not.Marylandolorian wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:51 pmWe liked it too, my wife wants to buy the books seriesBiffer wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:14 pmI will watch it at some point. I read the first two books as I'm a bit of a sci fi guy, but the issue I had with them is, well a bit science nerdy. Normally for Big space opera type sci fi you can legit push the boundaries of physics and what we know,Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.and then hypothesise stuff that might happen on top of it. But in the Three Body problem it seemed to me there was some stuff that was just flat wrong, contrary to known stuff. For example, warp speed, wormhole travel etc all are bullshit but hypothesise on known aspects of space time, that it can curve, that if we could create negative energy we'd be able to create highly curved bubbles of space time etc. It stretches the boundaries of known science without just saying 'fuck'em' and throwing it all out for something excessively handwavy. And yes I'm sure there are other examples of stuff that breaks physics completely, but this one jarred with me for some reason.
, Interesting article, it shows that the writer understood physic and astronomy
https://www.vox.com/culture/24108638/3- ... real-is-it
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
It's pretty awful right. Doesn't really get to the funny awful level either.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Shame, I like Jake Gyllenhaal and Daniela Melchior (for different reasons...). Was hoping it might be watchable at least.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
A couple of episodes...Biffer wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 2:27 pm Like I say, some of it is reasonably legit, but other parts of it aren't. The quantum entanglement comms thing is one that I believe there is some debate about as it breaks a fundamental law of physics. That article talks about the stuff that's well planned out, but doesn't talk about some of the other stuff that's not.
Pointing a radio telescope directly at the middle of the sun to amplify the signal

And using binoculars to point a state-of-the-art radio telescope and then look directly at the sun with them... Trump level stupid.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
I don’t normally watch reality TV, but I liked the idea of The Underdog: Josh Must Win. Contestants think they’re competing to win a show called The Favourite, basically a popularity contest, but there’s no public vote. Instead they’re being manipulated by a celeb panel to try and make the slightly dorky, nerdy guy the most popular in the house. It’s a wee bit twisted and has been good so far.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Marylandolorian wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:51 pmWe liked it too, my wife wants to buy the books seriesBiffer wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:14 pmI will watch it at some point. I read the first two books as I'm a bit of a sci fi guy, but the issue I had with them is, well a bit science nerdy. Normally for Big space opera type sci fi you can legit push the boundaries of physics and what we know,Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.and then hypothesise stuff that might happen on top of it. But in the Three Body problem it seemed to me there was some stuff that was just flat wrong, contrary to known stuff. For example, warp speed, wormhole travel etc all are bullshit but hypothesise on known aspects of space time, that it can curve, that if we could create negative energy we'd be able to create highly curved bubbles of space time etc. It stretches the boundaries of known science without just saying 'fuck'em' and throwing it all out for something excessively handwavy. And yes I'm sure there are other examples of stuff that breaks physics completely, but this one jarred with me for some reason.
, Interesting article, it shows that the writer understood physic and astronomy
https://www.vox.com/culture/24108638/3- ... real-is-it
Adam West did it, so I don't see why notIf I dehydrate myself, can I rehydrate myself later and be fine?
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Fallout coming on Amazon prime.
Looks like it might be decent.
Looks like it might be decent.
Having watched the first couple of episodes I’ve remembered what annoyed me so much - the idea that if all the particle accelerators in the world started giving results that are contrary to theory, physicists all over the world would start crying into their porridge that their theories were broken and commit suicide. That’s diametrically opposite from what would actually happen. They’d be sick with excitement, and throwing all sorts of new theories out about why their new bs is better than someone else’s. They dream of everything going wrong, that’s what they want!Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 3:16 amHaving watched the first couple of episodes I’ve remembered what annoyed me so much - the idea that if all the particle accelerators in the world started giving results that are contrary to theory, physicists all over the world would start crying into their porridge that their theories were broken and commit suicide. That’s diametrically opposite from what would actually happen. They’d be sick with excitement, and throwing all sorts of new theories out about why their new bs is better than someone else’s. They dream of everything going wrong, that’s what they want!Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.
I thought the scientists were forced into suicide by the aliens? I thought the idea was that because it was going to take four hundred years to get to earth they realised humanity would have developed technology beyond their own by that time and took preemptive action.
Tbh I didn’t give it too much thought.
Nah, this is right at the start before they know about themTichtheid wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:40 amBiffer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 3:16 amHaving watched the first couple of episodes I’ve remembered what annoyed me so much - the idea that if all the particle accelerators in the world started giving results that are contrary to theory, physicists all over the world would start crying into their porridge that their theories were broken and commit suicide. That’s diametrically opposite from what would actually happen. They’d be sick with excitement, and throwing all sorts of new theories out about why their new bs is better than someone else’s. They dream of everything going wrong, that’s what they want!Tichtheid wrote: Mon Mar 25, 2024 11:57 am We've enjoyed 3 Body Problem so far, and it's not the sort of thing my wife would go for at all. It's nonsense of course, but fun I think.
I thought the scientists were forced into suicide by the aliens? I thought the idea was that because it was going to take four hundred years to get to earth they realised humanity would have developed technology beyond their own by that time and took preemptive action.
Tbh I didn’t give it too much thought.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:22 amNah, this is right at the start before they know about themTichtheid wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:40 amBiffer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 3:16 am
Having watched the first couple of episodes I’ve remembered what annoyed me so much - the idea that if all the particle accelerators in the world started giving results that are contrary to theory, physicists all over the world would start crying into their porridge that their theories were broken and commit suicide. That’s diametrically opposite from what would actually happen. They’d be sick with excitement, and throwing all sorts of new theories out about why their new bs is better than someone else’s. They dream of everything going wrong, that’s what they want!
I thought the scientists were forced into suicide by the aliens? I thought the idea was that because it was going to take four hundred years to get to earth they realised humanity would have developed technology beyond their own by that time and took preemptive action.
Tbh I didn’t give it too much thought.
It's right at the start when the main character Doc, the one who is developing the super strong nano thread, sees the countdown to her life ending, it goes away when she pulls the plug on the programme. Others have already topped themselves.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5506
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Really enjoying Shogun, 5 episodes in
Sugar first episode intriguing so far
3 Bodies was a bit meh.
Sugar first episode intriguing so far
3 Bodies was a bit meh.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
But there's also this idea knocking around the theoretical physics community that physics is broken because all the particle accelerators across the planet have started giving odd results and they're all depressed about it. They wouldn't be, they'd be incredibly excited.Tichtheid wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:44 amBiffer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:22 amNah, this is right at the start before they know about themTichtheid wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:40 am
I thought the scientists were forced into suicide by the aliens? I thought the idea was that because it was going to take four hundred years to get to earth they realised humanity would have developed technology beyond their own by that time and took preemptive action.
Tbh I didn’t give it too much thought.
It's right at the start when the main character Doc, the one who is developing the super strong nano thread, sees the countdown to her life ending, it goes away when she pulls the plug on the programme. Others have already topped themselves.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I quite liked the latest moody noir monochrome remake of Ripley, but by god it's sloooow.
Only got about an hour into Fallout before bailing.
The Last of Us did nothing for me, either. About the only thing I remember was the pretty good gay couple episode, but didn't get much further than that. Guess these computer game adaptations just ain't my thang.
Only got about an hour into Fallout before bailing.
The Last of Us did nothing for me, either. About the only thing I remember was the pretty good gay couple episode, but didn't get much further than that. Guess these computer game adaptations just ain't my thang.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Shogun looks great so far. Helps that I'm a history dork re that period.Insane_Homer wrote: Sun Apr 07, 2024 10:48 am Really enjoying Shogun, 5 episodes in
Sugar first episode intriguing so far
3 Bodies was a bit meh.
- mat the expat
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm
Fallout was excellent!
Started the Gentlemen. It's good but not the same intensity as I'd expect
Started the Gentlemen. It's good but not the same intensity as I'd expect
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8759
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
The thing that bothers me is that you have to ask yourself if things that are entirely foreseeable, & preventable, are allowed to happen because they're "good for ratings" !Sandstorm wrote: Sat May 04, 2024 2:18 pm Clarkson’s Farm 3. If episode 4 doesn’t break your heart, you’re probably dead.
It's what makes reality TV such a disgusting genre; TV execs stuff reality programs with people with mental health issues, & stoke up conflict, because if everyone gets along, the ratings are shit, so they put their thumbs on the scale.
Now watch that episode again & ask yourself if things happened because that's exactly what some people wanted !!