I agree that there is no reason at all to leave TW’s creditors with anything but their dick in their hands. Nationalised water had a dismal record though!petej wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 12:19 pmThey are at least then a shitshow we own and depressingly pumped less money into. With water we could end up 60billion of debt while a bunch of cunts wander off with 60 billion. A big problem with the current gov is they are so ideologically fixed on privatisation they won't enforce the rules and the water companies are essentially playing chicken with them knowing the government are weak.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:12 amAmerica is a terrible healthcare comparator. France/Germany/Holland are much better to compare against.petej wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 8:28 am Paddington, a basic issue with privatisation at this point is a) they need to make a profit, b) the parasitic nature of our service industries and management culture and the cost of it makes them inefficient. We spend more and more on administration and less and less on the actual service and who runs it. Compared to private healthcare in America the NHS is incredibly efficient with far, far lower administrative costs. With out sourcing work the cost of the work isn't that much but the administrative cost of two sets of commercial, financial and legal people is significant.
Edit: I would add if you are dealing with a regulatory issue go direct to the regulator and avoid consultants and legal people who make things far more painful than necessary while charging lots of money.
No disputes on management culture. I dispute the idea that nationalising something = same positive outcomes as privatised services with fewer negatives. Again and again nationalised industries/utilities end up a total shitshow
Stop voting for fucking Tories
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
I would probably run them as not for profits rather then fully nationalised.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 12:45 pmI agree that there is no reason at all to leave TW’s creditors with anything but their dick in their hands. Nationalised water had a dismal record though!petej wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 12:19 pmThey are at least then a shitshow we own and depressingly pumped less money into. With water we could end up 60billion of debt while a bunch of cunts wander off with 60 billion. A big problem with the current gov is they are so ideologically fixed on privatisation they won't enforce the rules and the water companies are essentially playing chicken with them knowing the government are weak.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 10:12 am
America is a terrible healthcare comparator. France/Germany/Holland are much better to compare against.
No disputes on management culture. I dispute the idea that nationalising something = same positive outcomes as privatised services with fewer negatives. Again and again nationalised industries/utilities end up a total shitshow
That could be applied to just about everything government does at the moment
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Turn into...?I like neeps wrote: Thu Apr 11, 2024 11:28 am
Great news for British politics. Although I assume the Telegraph will just turn into written GBNews with Marshall at the helm. Not that it is hugely different now anyway I guess.
Admittedly I haven't subjected myself to watching any of GBeebies, so perhaps it is indeed worse than even the Torgraph at it's current swivel-eyed nadir.
I'm sure she'll feel right at home.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ ... ktor-orbanRishi Sunak is being urged to stop his former home secretary from attending a rightwing convention featuring figures who have been under investigation for extremism, in the latest sign of his waning control of his party.
Suella Braverman, who has been a central plotter against the prime minister since she left the cabinet, is set to be one of the keynote speakers at the National Conservatism (NatCon) conference in Brussels this week.
Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
She can be added to Gove’s list.SaintK wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 9:21 am I'm sure she'll feel right at home.https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ ... ktor-orbanRishi Sunak is being urged to stop his former home secretary from attending a rightwing convention featuring figures who have been under investigation for extremism, in the latest sign of his waning control of his party.
Suella Braverman, who has been a central plotter against the prime minister since she left the cabinet, is set to be one of the keynote speakers at the National Conservatism (NatCon) conference in Brussels this week.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4601
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Nine more months of it until the election.C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4961
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Police weren't going to charge her until tories kicked up a fuss?C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
I suspect it's going to be like this plus a culture war ad nauseum.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:50 pmPolice weren't going to charge her until tories kicked up a fuss?C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
Opening a Pandoras box with this one! I imagine there are a few Tory MPs etc sleeping slightly uneasily tonight as their Party decide to pursue this. Tory HQ must have done the sums and reckoned trying to get rid of Rayner is worth losing a few more MPs for? Problem the tories have in going this low is that they bump into all their colleagues down in the quagmire of shit they want to plumb. I. suspect this will come back and bite them on the bum.C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 4:32 pmI suspect it's going to be like this plus a culture war ad nauseum.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 3:50 pmPolice weren't going to charge her until tories kicked up a fuss?C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Yeah, if you go digging, I wonder how many Tories might also be owing tax for various things.
The contrast in how the client press are handling this and Zahawi's multi-million pound tax snafu is night and day.
HIlarious head and strap line in the Guardian today:
The contrast in how the client press are handling this and Zahawi's multi-million pound tax snafu is night and day.
HIlarious head and strap line in the Guardian today:
Sunak's been doing a grand enough job of undermining himself. Johnson and Truss don't need to do a thing.Senior Tories fear Johnson and Truss will sabotage Sunak’s election campaign
Concerns that vicious circle of party ill-discipline is undermining the PM’s ability to restore order
Truss' book out next week.
The Tories warfare and divisions will be a sight to behold
Surely the Police will resolve the Rayner thing very quickly, you would have thought Starmer knows exactly where this is going.
I suspect the die has been cast now and shit loads of crap from years onis going to resurface.
IDS on TV earlier said this really is not a path the Tories should be going down. Very different to the tone of Shaps.
If it comes to nought then Rayner will laud it like the Red Working Class queen and milk the posh Tory attacks.
It could be a very dangerous game.
The Tories warfare and divisions will be a sight to behold
Surely the Police will resolve the Rayner thing very quickly, you would have thought Starmer knows exactly where this is going.
I suspect the die has been cast now and shit loads of crap from years onis going to resurface.
IDS on TV earlier said this really is not a path the Tories should be going down. Very different to the tone of Shaps.
If it comes to nought then Rayner will laud it like the Red Working Class queen and milk the posh Tory attacks.
It could be a very dangerous game.
Leak reveals Tory plan to cut cold weather cash for disabled people
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... led-people
https://www.theguardian.com/society/202 ... led-people
He joined Angela Rayner's team as a volunteer in 2013, helping her win the Ashton-under-Lyne seat at the 2015 General Election, before subsequently joining her staff.
As her SpAd, he was responsible for all media liaison, speech writing, op-eds and providing strategic communications advice. It's no coincidence that Mrs Rayner soon became a prominent Labour front-bencher.
They parted company in August 2017 - "the worst year of my life, but mainly for personal reasons", he now recalls.
Matt left the Labour Party in 2018 in disgust at the prevalent anti-semitism within Labour's ranks - his father served with British forces who had liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and the graphic accounts of what they witnessed have had an enduring impact on Matt's values and beliefs.
I think it's the electoral issue. I did hear that if this is to be pursued then it should be done within a year.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:24 am Why is it a police matter rather than HMRC ?
Is this because they are pursuing her for electoral register fraud, rather than tax evasion? Or do the HMRC sometimes use the police to investigate?
However let's get it done and dusted, if she is guilty then she is toast and her political career is over.
If not then it's going to be very spicy.
I think the gloves are off and it's going to be carnage.
The mail with its own history and the owners family should really avoid anything about Nazis and WW2. Going further it is well known that the non-dom owners of the mail predominantly reside in Surrey not France. The rules really don't apply to the elite.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:28 amHe joined Angela Rayner's team as a volunteer in 2013, helping her win the Ashton-under-Lyne seat at the 2015 General Election, before subsequently joining her staff.
As her SpAd, he was responsible for all media liaison, speech writing, op-eds and providing strategic communications advice. It's no coincidence that Mrs Rayner soon became a prominent Labour front-bencher.
They parted company in August 2017 - "the worst year of my life, but mainly for personal reasons", he now recalls.
Matt left the Labour Party in 2018 in disgust at the prevalent anti-semitism within Labour's ranks - his father served with British forces who had liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and the graphic accounts of what they witnessed have had an enduring impact on Matt's values and beliefs.
As for the police rather than the HMC. I would guess that is due to political pressure.
Ex-employee.........no axe to grind there then?Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:28 amHe joined Angela Rayner's team as a volunteer in 2013, helping her win the Ashton-under-Lyne seat at the 2015 General Election, before subsequently joining her staff.
As her SpAd, he was responsible for all media liaison, speech writing, op-eds and providing strategic communications advice. It's no coincidence that Mrs Rayner soon became a prominent Labour front-bencher.
They parted company in August 2017 - "the worst year of my life, but mainly for personal reasons", he now recalls.
Matt left the Labour Party in 2018 in disgust at the prevalent anti-semitism within Labour's ranks - his father served with British forces who had liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and the graphic accounts of what they witnessed have had an enduring impact on Matt's values and beliefs.
Daily Mail will have paid well for the quotes.
SaintK wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 11:13 amEx-employee.........no axe to grind there then?Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:28 amHe joined Angela Rayner's team as a volunteer in 2013, helping her win the Ashton-under-Lyne seat at the 2015 General Election, before subsequently joining her staff.
As her SpAd, he was responsible for all media liaison, speech writing, op-eds and providing strategic communications advice. It's no coincidence that Mrs Rayner soon became a prominent Labour front-bencher.
They parted company in August 2017 - "the worst year of my life, but mainly for personal reasons", he now recalls.
Matt left the Labour Party in 2018 in disgust at the prevalent anti-semitism within Labour's ranks - his father served with British forces who had liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and the graphic accounts of what they witnessed have had an enduring impact on Matt's values and beliefs.
Daily Mail will have paid well for the quotes.
Ex-employee who settled on an unfair dismissal claim
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6824
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
And if she is guilty it will still be very spicy, no reason for Labour to hold back on Tory/Reform suspects of alleged wrong-doing - only unluckily for them they don't have a tame media support base to put the boot in on their behalfC69 wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:30 amI think it's the electoral issue. I did hear that if this is to be pursued then it should be done within a year.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:24 am Why is it a police matter rather than HMRC ?
Is this because they are pursuing her for electoral register fraud, rather than tax evasion? Or do the HMRC sometimes use the police to investigate?
However let's get it done and dusted, if she is guilty then she is toast and her political career is over.
If not then it's going to be very spicy.
I think the gloves are off and it's going to be carnage.
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Imagine how much better UK society would be if the mail were so relentless in exposing every tax cheat, not just the labour ones.
-
- Posts: 9258
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Even saying she's a Labour tax cheat is giving the mail too much credit and playing into their narrative. The News Agents had some apparent expert on and he went through the whole thing pointing out, with a bunch of caveats around circumstances, that there's anything between no case to answer and £1500 owed.I like neeps wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:16 pm Imagine how much better UK society would be if the mail were so relentless in exposing every tax cheat, not just the labour ones.
I've no doubt Labour probably do have some egregious offenders in their ranks, though I'd imagine it's the likes of Mandelson rather than Creasy, but the Mail are going after Rayner because of her prominent position in the party and because, at heart, the right wing is still pretty mysoginistic.
As the motto goes 'Never shit on your own doorstep' yet the tories are happy to commit hari kari by shitting big style on their own doorstep! Mad. Why make tax evasion and electoral fraud as the issues given their own shitfest of both? They really are scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one.
Starmer is a pretty bright lawyer and will know exactly where he stands on all of this, he might also be not too unhappy if he has to replace Rayner as his Deputy. I imagine he sees this as a possible win:win situation plus the tories have opened the door to all sorts of dirt on Tory MPs, funders and supporters going public. However I suspect the Wragg honey trap situation with possibly Ministers implicated is the reason for this major dead cat/suicide wish.
Starmer is a pretty bright lawyer and will know exactly where he stands on all of this, he might also be not too unhappy if he has to replace Rayner as his Deputy. I imagine he sees this as a possible win:win situation plus the tories have opened the door to all sorts of dirt on Tory MPs, funders and supporters going public. However I suspect the Wragg honey trap situation with possibly Ministers implicated is the reason for this major dead cat/suicide wish.
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Ah fair, I assumed she'd done something because her defence from the leadership has been so erratic.sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:32 pmEven saying she's a Labour tax cheat is giving the mail too much credit and playing into their narrative. The News Agents had some apparent expert on and he went through the whole thing pointing out, with a bunch of caveats around circumstances, that there's anything between no case to answer and £1500 owed.I like neeps wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:16 pm Imagine how much better UK society would be if the mail were so relentless in exposing every tax cheat, not just the labour ones.
I've no doubt Labour probably do have some egregious offenders in their ranks, though I'd imagine it's the likes of Mandelson rather than Creasy, but the Mail are going after Rayner because of her prominent position in the party and because, at heart, the right wing is still pretty mysoginistic.
-
- Posts: 3800
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
To make a stink of tax evasion/fraud whatever you need to have a complaint press of attack dogs.dpedin wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 12:50 pm As the motto goes 'Never shit on your own doorstep' yet the tories are happy to commit hari kari by shitting big style on their own doorstep! Mad. Why make tax evasion and electoral fraud as the issues given their own shitfest of both? They really are scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one.
Starmer is a pretty bright lawyer and will know exactly where he stands on all of this, he might also be not too unhappy if he has to replace Rayner as his Deputy. I imagine he sees this as a possible win:win situation plus the tories have opened the door to all sorts of dirt on Tory MPs, funders and supporters going public. However I suspect the Wragg honey trap situation with possibly Ministers implicated is the reason for this major dead cat/suicide wish.
Starmer won't get cut through because the press won't publish it. Sadly.
That’s not from the mail - it’s from his own Biopetej wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:46 amThe mail with its own history and the owners family should really avoid anything about Nazis and WW2. Going further it is well known that the non-dom owners of the mail predominantly reside in Surrey not France. The rules really don't apply to the elite.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:28 amHe joined Angela Rayner's team as a volunteer in 2013, helping her win the Ashton-under-Lyne seat at the 2015 General Election, before subsequently joining her staff.
As her SpAd, he was responsible for all media liaison, speech writing, op-eds and providing strategic communications advice. It's no coincidence that Mrs Rayner soon became a prominent Labour front-bencher.
They parted company in August 2017 - "the worst year of my life, but mainly for personal reasons", he now recalls.
Matt left the Labour Party in 2018 in disgust at the prevalent anti-semitism within Labour's ranks - his father served with British forces who had liberated Bergen-Belsen in 1945 and the graphic accounts of what they witnessed have had an enduring impact on Matt's values and beliefs.
As for the police rather than the HMC. I would guess that is due to political pressure.
So the bit you put in a quote isn’t a quote.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 1:53 pmThat’s not from the mail - it’s from his own Biopetej wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:46 amThe mail with its own history and the owners family should really avoid anything about Nazis and WW2. Going further it is well known that the non-dom owners of the mail predominantly reside in Surrey not France. The rules really don't apply to the elite.
As for the police rather than the HMC. I would guess that is due to political pressure.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
It was an excerpt from the www, which we usually place in quotes.Biffer wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 2:12 pmSo the bit you put in a quote isn’t a quote.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 1:53 pmThat’s not from the mail - it’s from his own Biopetej wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 10:46 am
The mail with its own history and the owners family should really avoid anything about Nazis and WW2. Going further it is well known that the non-dom owners of the mail predominantly reside in Surrey not France. The rules really don't apply to the elite.
As for the police rather than the HMC. I would guess that is due to political pressure.
Got it ?!! Or are you struggling still.
Here is the link if this helps you struggle less
https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/author/B07RYYTL1P/about
So you point to a Mail story then put a quote in from a different, unlinked source.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:09 pmIt was an excerpt from the www, which we usually place in quotes.
Got it ?!! Or are you struggling still.
Here is the link if this helps you struggle less
https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/author/B07RYYTL1P/about
Pretty typical right wing loon misdirection.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yes, I appreciate it might have been confusing up until the bit where I clarified it was from his bio and not the mail.Biffer wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:26 pmSo you point to a Mail story then put a quote in from a different, unlinked source.Ymx wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2024 5:09 pmIt was an excerpt from the www, which we usually place in quotes.
Got it ?!! Or are you struggling still.
Here is the link if this helps you struggle less
https://www.amazon.co.uk/stores/author/B07RYYTL1P/about
Pretty typical right wing loon misdirection.
But why it still confused you after that is a mystery to me.
Serious question.C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
Since when do the police get involved in what is essentially a revenue matter ?
Certainly in Ireland the revenue have far more powerful investigative powers than the police do, and if they think you've been economical with the truth in your return, will go through you like a dose of salts to get their money plus usurious interest plus penalties, and hand you broken and broke to the police afterwards.
This is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.Camroc2 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:40 pmSerious question.C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
Since when do the police get involved in what is essentially a revenue matter ?
Certainly in Ireland the revenue have far more powerful investigative powers than the police do, and if they think you've been economical with the truth in your return, will go through you like a dose of salts to get their money plus usurious interest plus penalties, and hand you broken and broke to the police afterwards.
It's quite pathetic really.
C69 wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:08 amThis is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.Camroc2 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:40 pmSerious question.C69 wrote: Sat Apr 13, 2024 10:18 am Rayner to step down if found guilty of a crime.
Whilst I personally dislike Rayner, if she is found to have no case to answer then this may really bite the Tories in the arse.
Hopefully this distraction is sorted quickly.
It all seems quite vindictive and petty tbh but hey this is going to get very dirty.
Since when do the police get involved in what is essentially a revenue matter ?
Certainly in Ireland the revenue have far more powerful investigative powers than the police do, and if they think you've been economical with the truth in your return, will go through you like a dose of salts to get their money plus usurious interest plus penalties, and hand you broken and broke to the police afterwards.
It's quite pathetic really.
That’s the thing, they are about eight years too late in being able to bring about any prosecution, the police must know that, so why are they pursuing this?
Polis leant on by Tory politicians and take easiest route ie do what they are told and 'launch' an enquiry and then in a couple of weeks quietly drop it saying nothing to see here. Meanwhile news agenda will have moved on and damage will have been done by Mail, Express, etc and some folk will actually believe she had committed a crime. A few months down the road and the Chief Constable or whatever they are called get their gong in the next honours list. It is how it works folks.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:35 amC69 wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:08 amThis is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.Camroc2 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:40 pm
Serious question.
Since when do the police get involved in what is essentially a revenue matter ?
Certainly in Ireland the revenue have far more powerful investigative powers than the police do, and if they think you've been economical with the truth in your return, will go through you like a dose of salts to get their money plus usurious interest plus penalties, and hand you broken and broke to the police afterwards.
It's quite pathetic really.
That’s the thing, they are about eight years too late in being able to bring about any prosecution, the police must know that, so why are they pursuing this?
They're looking into it because the Deputy Chair of the Tory Party complained to them when they originally said there was nothing to investigate.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:35 amC69 wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:08 amThis is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.Camroc2 wrote: Mon Apr 15, 2024 10:40 pm
Serious question.
Since when do the police get involved in what is essentially a revenue matter ?
Certainly in Ireland the revenue have far more powerful investigative powers than the police do, and if they think you've been economical with the truth in your return, will go through you like a dose of salts to get their money plus usurious interest plus penalties, and hand you broken and broke to the police afterwards.
It's quite pathetic really.
That’s the thing, they are about eight years too late in being able to bring about any prosecution, the police must know that, so why are they pursuing this?
At the moment, as I understand it, they are examining the information he has said they have to look at (electoral rolls etc) to determine "whether any offences have been committed". The Tory press and their client journalists and commentators like Dan Hodges are presenting this as if Rayner is definitely guilty and is about to be arrested, but the likelihood is that the police will eventually say that no offences have been committed. Its like the orchestrated beer and pizza allegations about Starmer all over again.
And on TV he couldn't say what offence he thinks she has committed that he wanted the police to look intoLobby wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:20 amThey're looking into it because the Deputy Chair of the Tory Party complained to them when they originally said there was nothing to investigate.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:35 amC69 wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:08 am
This is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.
It's quite pathetic really.
That’s the thing, they are about eight years too late in being able to bring about any prosecution, the police must know that, so why are they pursuing this?
At the moment, as I understand it, they are examining the information he has said they have to look at (electoral rolls etc) to determine "whether any offences have been committed". The Tory press and their client journalists and commentators like Dan Hodges are presenting this as if Rayner is definitely guilty and is about to be arrested, but the likelihood is that the police will eventually say that no offences have been committed. Its like the orchestrated beer and pizza allegations about Starmer all over again.

I turned on the BBC news yesterday or the day before and this story was getting an inordinate amount of airtime for what must be a relatively minor issue in the grand scale of MP misbehaviour. Mission accomplished.Lobby wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 8:20 amThey're looking into it because the Deputy Chair of the Tory Party complained to them when they originally said there was nothing to investigate.Tichtheid wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:35 amC69 wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2024 6:08 am
This is slightly different, it's related to electoral issues not the tax. Did she register her correct address for electoral issues.
It's quite pathetic really.
That’s the thing, they are about eight years too late in being able to bring about any prosecution, the police must know that, so why are they pursuing this?
At the moment, as I understand it, they are examining the information he has said they have to look at (electoral rolls etc) to determine "whether any offences have been committed". The Tory press and their client journalists and commentators like Dan Hodges are presenting this as if Rayner is definitely guilty and is about to be arrested, but the likelihood is that the police will eventually say that no offences have been committed. Its like the orchestrated beer and pizza allegations about Starmer all over again.