Sale v Worcester (Covid Bowl)
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Game on Sunday going ahead according to Sale, despite a reported 16 positive Covid tests being returned
https://www.salesharks.com/2020/10/02/c ... -round-22/
We're in the dark as to the details, but if the reported 16 players have tested positive the powers that be would seem to be taking a chance that there's no significant risk of transmission involved. Expect the whole squad would have been retested, but it still feels risky/reckless to the layman.
Hope they have taken appropriate advice.
https://www.salesharks.com/2020/10/02/c ... -round-22/
We're in the dark as to the details, but if the reported 16 players have tested positive the powers that be would seem to be taking a chance that there's no significant risk of transmission involved. Expect the whole squad would have been retested, but it still feels risky/reckless to the layman.
Hope they have taken appropriate advice.
Think players are getting tested twice a week at the moment (basically after/before every game). So there's a chance that anyone who tested negative recently isn't likely contagious by sunday, and may not have been against Saints.
However, 16 seems oddly high for there not to be some spread in a game.
I wonder what sort of squad they'll put out?
However, 16 seems oddly high for there not to be some spread in a game.
I wonder what sort of squad they'll put out?
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Colour me confused.
Sorry, but how the hell can Sale name players that were involved in the Saints match, yet Saints can't use those players???? Just because they tested negatively after that game, or even now, could just mean that it's not yet reached levels that are testable!
Sorry, but how the hell can Sale name players that were involved in the Saints match, yet Saints can't use those players???? Just because they tested negatively after that game, or even now, could just mean that it's not yet reached levels that are testable!
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Is it right that one of the Sale management team sent a WhatsApp message to other club managers that he had just got in at 6.30am from a party the night in question? I keep seeing it alluded to.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Mail have the game as being called off. Likely new positive results for Sale.
Good! Can't see how on earth it could be played with 19 Sale staff testing positive and Saints players having to self-isolate following their match against themMargin__Walker wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:49 am Mail have the game as being called off. Likely new positive results for Sale.
Sale forfeit as of just now! Further positive testsSaintK wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:01 amGood! Can't see how on earth it could be played with 19 Sale staff testing positive and Saints players having to self-isolate following their match against themMargin__Walker wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:49 am Mail have the game as being called off. Likely new positive results for Sale.
-
- Posts: 9348
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Right outcome, wrong route. Should've been forfeited at the weekend, this was the only way it was going to end. After such a spike in a cases, the idea that they wouldn't have incurred more for this delayed fixture was fanciful.SaintK wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:40 amSale forfeit as of just now! Further positive testsSaintK wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 8:01 amGood! Can't see how on earth it could be played with 19 Sale staff testing positive and Saints players having to self-isolate following their match against themMargin__Walker wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 6:49 am Mail have the game as being called off. Likely new positive results for Sale.
Yep, PRL dithering!!!sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 9:50 amRight outcome, wrong route. Should've been forfeited at the weekend, this was the only way it was going to end. After such a spike in a cases, the idea that they wouldn't have incurred more for this delayed fixture was fanciful.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Clearly should have been called off before now and glad the posturing from Sale didn't get the game played on Sunday.
Really shows how a significant outbreak can rip through a squad though.
Really shows how a significant outbreak can rip through a squad though.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2813
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
It wouldn't surprise me. Sure there has been all sorts going on behind the scenes.Kawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 11:14 am I'll be interested to know if Sale threatened PRL with a legal challenge unless they agreed to postpone.
It feels like that's the sort of thing Sale would have done.
Powers that be will be praying this season limps over the line without any more off field drama.
Joost wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 12:46 pm While it’s been a weird old season, I’ve actually quite enjoyed getting to see some of the bin juice players getting run-outs in the mid-week fixtures.
Not sure I’d be saying that if I were a Saints or Tigs fan, mind you...
The Leicester first XV is full of current and former test players;
George Ford
Ben Youngs
Ellis Genge
Tomas Lavanini
Tom Youngs
Dan Cole
Jordan Taufua
Matt Scott
Nemani Nadolo
Plus players like
Luke Wallace
Zack Henry
and Joe Heyes whoever he is.
Taufua's not an international. Luke Wallace was signed from Coventry. Zack Henry came from ProD2. Joe Heyes is a promising kid.
Every squad has internationals in it; the point is that COVID has forced heavy rotation. So the first XV has rarely played together. Leicester's first XV is not strong at all.
Every squad has internationals in it; the point is that COVID has forced heavy rotation. So the first XV has rarely played together. Leicester's first XV is not strong at all.
-
- Posts: 9348
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
A lot of Leicester's team sheets have read like Borthwick is deliberately avoiding putting too many of his best players together and running the rule over the rest of the squad, so he can get a sense of what he's working with going forward. Makes sense, with relegation handled and nothing else to play for, Tigers didn't actually need to win any games. Not pleasant for fans, but Scab-Nose will be banking on what he's done now being enough to result in progress next season.
Wasps 1st XV vs Tigers 1st XVKawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:40 pm Come on, Leicester's squad isnt as bad as it's been performing. Not sure why the test players get a free pass. Wasps are doing infinitely better with a comparable squad.
Harris vs Genge - Tigers
Taylor vs Youngs - Wasps
Brookes vs Cole - Wasps
Launchbury vs Lavanini - Wasps
Rowlands vs Wells - evens?
Shields vs Taufua - evens, maybe Tigers
Young vs no idea who first choice is for Tigers and it doesn't matter - Wasps
J Willis vs Liebenberg - ahaahah
Robson vs Youngs - Wasps
Umaga vs Ford - Tigers
Gopperth vs Taute/Potter - Wasps
Fekitoa vs Scott - Wasps
Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Kibirige vs van Wyk - Tigers
Minozzi vs Henry - Wasps
It's not close. Tigers' squad is proper shit-tier stuff.
Zach Henry has probably been Leicester best player. Launch and Lava are evens too.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:58 pmWasps 1st XV vs Tigers 1st XVKawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:40 pm Come on, Leicester's squad isnt as bad as it's been performing. Not sure why the test players get a free pass. Wasps are doing infinitely better with a comparable squad.
Harris vs Genge - Tigers
Taylor vs Youngs - Wasps
Brookes vs Cole - Wasps
Launchbury vs Lavanini - Wasps
Rowlands vs Wells - evens?
Shields vs Taufua - evens, maybe Tigers
Young vs no idea who first choice is for Tigers and it doesn't matter - Wasps
J Willis vs Liebenberg - ahaahah
Robson vs Youngs - Wasps
Umaga vs Ford - Tigers
Gopperth vs Taute/Potter - Wasps
Fekitoa vs Scott - Wasps
Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Kibirige vs van Wyk - Tigers
Minozzi vs Henry - Wasps
It's not close. Tigers' squad is proper shit-tier stuff.
And how can you dismiss the current England scrumhalf with 99 caps?

That makes it about even maybe even favouring Leicester. Point is they've massively underperformed regardless of rotation which every other club has had to do as well anyway.
Last edited by Kawazaki on Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Kawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:04 pmZach Henry has probably been Leicester best player. Launch and Lava are evens too.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:58 pmWasps 1st XV vs Tigers 1st XVKawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:40 pm Come on, Leicester's squad isnt as bad as it's been performing. Not sure why the test players get a free pass. Wasps are doing infinitely better with a comparable squad.
Harris vs Genge - Tigers
Taylor vs Youngs - Wasps
Brookes vs Cole - Wasps
Launchbury vs Lavanini - Wasps
Rowlands vs Wells - evens?
Shields vs Taufua - evens, maybe Tigers
Young vs no idea who first choice is for Tigers and it doesn't matter - Wasps
J Willis vs Liebenberg - ahaahah
Robson vs Youngs - Wasps
Umaga vs Ford - Tigers
Gopperth vs Taute/Potter - Wasps
Fekitoa vs Scott - Wasps
Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Kibirige vs van Wyk - Tigers
Minozzi vs Henry - Wasps
It's not close. Tigers' squad is proper shit-tier stuff.
And how can you dismiss the current England scrumhalf with 99 caps. Because he is utterly shit maybe?
That makes it about even maybe even Gaborone Leicester. Point is they've massively underperformed regardless of rotation which every other club has had to do as well anyway.
I like Zach Henry but he's been inconsistent and there's no way on this planet he's better than actually-good-international Minozzi. Lavanini is almost as talented as Launchbury but is an absolute liability with his ill-discipline, so Wasps get the nod. V amusing on Youngs. The gap in quality between some of the Wasps players and their Tigers counterparts is embarrassing in some cases, and the same is not true in reverse where Tigers have the better player.Kawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:04 pmZach Henry has probably been Leicester best player. Launch and Lava are evens too.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:58 pmWasps 1st XV vs Tigers 1st XVKawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:40 pm Come on, Leicester's squad isnt as bad as it's been performing. Not sure why the test players get a free pass. Wasps are doing infinitely better with a comparable squad.
Harris vs Genge - Tigers
Taylor vs Youngs - Wasps
Brookes vs Cole - Wasps
Launchbury vs Lavanini - Wasps
Rowlands vs Wells - evens?
Shields vs Taufua - evens, maybe Tigers
Young vs no idea who first choice is for Tigers and it doesn't matter - Wasps
J Willis vs Liebenberg - ahaahah
Robson vs Youngs - Wasps
Umaga vs Ford - Tigers
Gopperth vs Taute/Potter - Wasps
Fekitoa vs Scott - Wasps
Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Kibirige vs van Wyk - Tigers
Minozzi vs Henry - Wasps
It's not close. Tigers' squad is proper shit-tier stuff.
And how can you dismiss the current England scrumhalf with 99 caps?![]()
That makes it about even maybe even favouring Leicester. Point is they've massively underperformed regardless of rotation which every other club has had to do as well anyway.
Now look at the rest of the squads. Wasps can still call on some fine players. Tigers are proper no-marks.
-
- Posts: 9348
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Oh is that what the point was? Good to know, because Joost said maybe Saints and Tigers fans wouldn't have enjoyed seeing their bin juice and you started going on about the strength of their starting XV, which kind of has nothing to do with the players he was talking about.Kawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:04 pmZach Henry has probably been Leicester best player. Launch and Lava are evens too.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:58 pmWasps 1st XV vs Tigers 1st XVKawazaki wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:40 pm Come on, Leicester's squad isnt as bad as it's been performing. Not sure why the test players get a free pass. Wasps are doing infinitely better with a comparable squad.
Harris vs Genge - Tigers
Taylor vs Youngs - Wasps
Brookes vs Cole - Wasps
Launchbury vs Lavanini - Wasps
Rowlands vs Wells - evens?
Shields vs Taufua - evens, maybe Tigers
Young vs no idea who first choice is for Tigers and it doesn't matter - Wasps
J Willis vs Liebenberg - ahaahah
Robson vs Youngs - Wasps
Umaga vs Ford - Tigers
Gopperth vs Taute/Potter - Wasps
Fekitoa vs Scott - Wasps
Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Kibirige vs van Wyk - Tigers
Minozzi vs Henry - Wasps
It's not close. Tigers' squad is proper shit-tier stuff.
And how can you dismiss the current England scrumhalf with 99 caps.
That makes it about even maybe even Gaborone Leicester. Point is they've massively underperformed regardless of rotation which every other club has had to do as well anyway.
Like fuck is Lavanini on a par with Launchbury. If nothing else his being a penalty magnet takes him down.
Youngs' 99 caps don't mean he's currently a better player than Robson (or better over the last few years).
Henry's a nobody performing above non-existent expectations, but he's definitely not playing better than Minozzi. Isn't calling him Tigers' best player pretty much the definition of damning with faint praise?
Just noticed this, please tell me you were being sarcastic
Nadolo is probably the biggest lump of lard, lazy cunt waste of a contract i think i have seen for a long time. He is a talent Vacuum, in a team of talent Vacuum's and that is saying something.Bassett vs Nadolo - Tigers
Yeah, as much as I like Bassett, I'd take Nadolo.JM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:33 pm Are you confusing him with Naiyavoro? Nadolo isn't what he used to be but he's still ridiculously effective and a pretty talented rugby player.
Though I'd say Rowlands is better than Wells.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Naiyavoro is even worse, i think, one of the worst players in the PremJM2K6 wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 2:33 pm Are you confusing him with Naiyavoro? Nadolo isn't what he used to be but he's still ridiculously effective and a pretty talented rugby player.
OK well, having watched Nadolo rampage for >150m and 4 clean breaks at the weekend, and seen him be very effective as both a winger and a midfield battering ram for Tigers, and knowing how good he is at offloading, how good his boot is, and just how fucking massive he is... I'm happy to say he's a great option in club rugby, even if he does have some flaws.
As a serial Tigers sufferer I have to agree with that.sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Oct 07, 2020 1:45 pm A lot of Leicester's team sheets have read like Borthwick is deliberately avoiding putting too many of his best players together and running the rule over the rest of the squad, so he can get a sense of what he's working with going forward. Makes sense, with relegation handled and nothing else to play for, Tigers didn't actually need to win any games. Not pleasant for fans, but Scab-Nose will be banking on what he's done now being enough to result in progress next season.