Yeeb wrote: Sat Sep 14, 2024 5:56 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 7:04 pm
inactionman wrote: Tue Sep 10, 2024 6:08 pm
Boris, Liz, Rushi.
They're just not serious people. They're almost cartoon bad. Cameron was merely bad, not cartoonish.
(I'll ignore the pig fucking for now)
It's more the decison to hold a Referedum that I'd take issue with; that was the act of a conceited moron !
Let me guess, decision to have a Brexit referendum = bad, decision to have any other referendum like Scot’s indyref = good ?
Personally I’d say the method of persuading remain by saying anyone voting leave is racist and thick, was more of an act of a conceited moron. Weird how most of the ones busted now for riots and social media bants seem to be first and second generation irishers..
No, a, 'Yes', 'No' Referendum without any further clarification of the steps after any, 'Yes' vote would be just as moronic.
Let's be clear; Cameron didn't
need to call a Referendum to leave the EU, he could have just done it !, or better yet, had it as a policy in his GE manifesto, & then just followed thru on it, but he was too fucking gutless to commit one way or the other.
It is such a complex question that it can't be hammered into the form of a Ref Question, & pretending it can is irresponsible.
No one prior to the Ref said how the UK ended up was the where they should be, so wtf were the voters to understand what the consequences would be ?
Ironically the one MP who is recorded as suggesting a reasonable process was JRM, who said that,
perhaps the UK should have a 2nd Ref once the deal to leave was negotiated; but conveniently, once the blank check was written, the Bumblecunt added a few zero's onto the amount because there was no conditions to stop him !