Kent born sprint cyclist Matt Richardsonhas decided to represent the country of his birth and where he lived for 9 years.
Bit of an odd one as the Aussie cycling programme is decent.
Official Paris Olympics 2024 thread
Strange timing as well, having just won 3 medals for Aus. If he'd done it a month earlier, that might have added 2 silvers to GB's tally.Big D wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2024 11:39 am Kent born sprint cyclist Matt Richardsonhas decided to represent the country of his birth and where he lived for 9 years.
Bit of an odd one as the Aussie cycling programme is decent.
Shit, not even the first time it's happened!
"Her death comes two years after the killings of fellow East African athletes Agnes Tirop and Damaris Mutua, with their partners identified as the main suspects in both cases by the authorities.
Tirop's husband is currently facing murder charges, which he denies, while a hunt for Mutua's boyfriend continues."
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4963
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Least surprising confirmation ever.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 7:47 pmShe looks like half the women who compete in combat or contact sports at a decent level.Calculon wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 12:45 pmcome on, she looks masculine by any standard.JM2K6 wrote: Fri Aug 02, 2024 9:01 am
The fact that she's a non white north African who looks masculine by certain western standards is clearly a big part of it, sadly.
I don't want to believe that Carini did this on purpose. Charitably you could say that maybe she was a mess before the fight and quit because she knew she wasn't in any position to compete against a serious opponent. However, the circumstances of the fight itself, the weird behaviour afterwards, the claims of a broken nose despite looking picture perfect after the fight, and her coach saying people were telling her before the fight not to do it because Khelif is a man and it's dangerous... I can't help but be deeply suspicious of all of this. I hope I'm wrong
I'm pretty sure most "non white" North Africans would think she looks masculine
anyways, fair enough about the IBA, they're clearly dodgy as fuck.
She will probably have to undertake some gender tests after this Olympics to coninue boxing and maybe she will turn out to be 100% legit.
Anyway, I found this reddit post to be a very clear summation of the facts as I understand them:
The sheer scale of the breathless accusations of her being a man, the stating of the existence of testes or her being XY / DSD, going through male puberty etc etc a as hard fact without any actual evidence is genuinely upsetting. I expect this sort of shit from JK Rowling, Logan Paul, and other poison brained idiots, but seeing the guardian's lead sports writer join in (and that prick Ewan McKenna) has actually gotten to me a little bit.In the interest of spreading… actual information, I’m copying my comment from another thread, because this is infuriating.
The short(ish) version is that she's a cis woman who been competing for years against other women, and there was no issue, including at the 2020 Olympics. Never any question of her gender or testosterone levels, no articles, no headlines, no commentary from her opponents, nothing. She doesn't even have a particularly stellar record, though she's been improving in recent years.
She was even tested at the 2022 World Championships and they didn't find any problems. She took the silver medal without incident.
Up until the 2023 World Championships - **when she beat a Russian boxer.**
Quick backstory on the IBA, the boxing organization that tested her and oversees the Boxing World Championships: it's been in contention with the IOC for years for issues of corruption and concerns over refereeing and judging, but things have gotten worse over the past few years. The IOC was concerned about the IBA's complete financial dependence on their sponsor: Russian-owned Gazprom. The IBA also elected a corrupt Russian president in 2020, and in 2022 they (wrongly) declared his re-election opponent ineligible, so he won an uncontested re-election. Multiple countries including the US and UK boycotted the 2023 World Championships because the IBA suspended Ukraine and un-suspended Russia and Belarus in 2022, against IOC guidelines. All of this ultimately resulted in the IOC severing ties with the IBA, which hasn't happened with any sport in decades. They fucked up so bad that the IOC may drop boxing altogether; another organization has risen up and is attempting to replace the IBA in order to save boxing at the Olympics.
Anyway. Imane Khelif competes in the World Championships in 2022, undergoes testing, no eligibility issues, takes the silver medal. She competes in 2023, no eligibility issues. Gets to the Round of 16, beats a Russian boxer...suddenly, she gets tested again and based on the results of that test AND her test from 2022, they declared her ineligible.
The IBA never said what kind of test it was, just that it wasn't a testosterone test, nor did they explain the results, citing privacy. In an interview with Russian state-owned media, the Russian president of the IBA said that they did a DNA test and found that Khelif had XY chromosomes, but again...look at the source, the audience, the track record of corruption, the timing...
Plus, they did this test in 2022 and didn't have any issue with the results? They used the 2022 test as part of their basis for disqualifying her - even though they allowed her to compete in 2023, up until she beat a Russian athlete.
So there's no evidence that she has higher testosterone. She competed in the 2020 Olympics without incident, even when other female athletes with high testosterone were withdrawn. And the IBA didn't administer a testosterone test.
There's also no other information, testing, questions, or anything that she has talked about that would allude to any sort of chromosomal or hormonal difference. She identifies as a woman and always has.
People are diagnosing her with all kinds of conditions but there’s actually no evidence for any of it aside from one vague test that an extremely corrupt organization associated with Russia subjected her to when she beat a Russian athlete, the results of which were only discussed by the Russian president of the corrupt organization when he talked to Russian media.
Khalif is a role UNICEF role model for young girls, a good boxer who has fought her entire life as a woman to be able to follow her dreams of being a boxer in a country that has some very regressive views on women.It is inevitable that successful women who look butch - of which there are so, so many in sports - would suffer as a result of the witch hunt whipped up against trans people. Now it doesn't matter if you're trans, you just need to look "wrong" and the right people can kick off an international shitstorm against you, aided and abetted by obsessive scumbags and helped by useful idiots.
The culture war fucking sucks, and there's no sign it's going to get better any time soon.
https://bsky.app/profile/kirstimiller30 ... nyzyhvt22e
Imane Khelif not allowed to participate in the female category at any World Boxing event until she/he undergoes sex testing.
https://worldboxing.org/news/
https://worldboxing.org/news/
This is actually quite a stepCalculon wrote: Mon Jun 02, 2025 12:48 pm Imane Khelif not allowed to participate in the female category at any World Boxing event until she/he undergoes sex testing.
https://worldboxing.org/news/
As it sounds like an XY chromosome without SRY gene presenting as female since birth will be eligible for female competition.Athletes that are deemed to be female at birth, as evidenced by the presence of XX chromosomes or the absence of Y chromosome genetic material (the SRY gene) or with a DSD where male androgenization does not occur, will be eligible to compete in the female category.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I think that's exactly the same as it was at the last Olympics they did sex tests before it was discontinued. They tested for the sry gene and a small number of female athletes that tested positive were found to be androgen insensitive so were still allowed to compete.
I wasn't aware of that - but it's an absolute recognition that sex is not binary and that there is a spectrum.Calculon wrote: Mon Jun 02, 2025 2:45 pm I think that's exactly the same as it was at the last Olympics they did sex tests before it was discontinued. They tested for the sry gene and a small number of female athletes that tested positive were found to be androgen insensitive so were still allowed to compete.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
It's not absolutely binary. That's the science. 1-2% of people are not straightforward XX or XY.Calculon wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:45 am Yeah… not sure it’s really a true spectrum. You have sex M, and sex F and then some conditions that affect sexual dimorphism but these are not actually a “sex”
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
If you define sex as being based on chromosomes like X and Y, which is not the best way to do it. Many animals don’t have sex chromosomes for a start, and might be phenotypically (almost) indistinguishable, so we classify their sex based on what gametes they produce, the “male” or the “female” one. There’s no spectrum there. I don’t see why humans should be different when it comes to a scientific based categorisation of sex, even if xx and xy can be used in 98% of cases
Not that this is relevant to athletics unless we want to exclude infertile people from competing.
Not that this is relevant to athletics unless we want to exclude infertile people from competing.
That's kind of my point. The definition used in the document goes further than the xx/xy categorisation, and as you say, sex is somewhat difficult to pin down across the broader animal kingdom. Some have sequential hermaphroditism, some have male and female reproductive organs at the same time, other change sex according to need or environment. It puts the lie to the 'you're either male or female and that's it!' nonsense that people scream. The definition being used in the boxing rules is drawing their line in what looks like a reasonable place for their sport, which is what is needed imo.Calculon wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 7:28 am If you define sex as being based on chromosomes like X and Y, which is not the best way to do it. Many animals don’t have sex chromosomes for a start, and might be phenotypically (almost) indistinguishable, so we classify their sex based on what gametes they produce, the “male” or the “female” one. There’s no spectrum there. I don’t see why humans should be different when it comes to a scientific based categorisation of sex, even if xx and xy can be used in 98% of cases
Not that this is relevant to athletics unless we want to exclude infertile people from competing.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I'm ok with the science on this. I'm also ok telling the 2% that it's NOT ok for one of the minority to batter a female competitor in the boxing ring and therefore you cannot compete in the Olympics.Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 6:11 amIt's not absolutely binary. That's the science. 1-2% of people are not straightforward XX or XY.Calculon wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:45 am Yeah… not sure it’s really a true spectrum. You have sex M, and sex F and then some conditions that affect sexual dimorphism but these are not actually a “sex”
Life isn't always fair.
Well, boxing has fortunately taken a little bit more care to work out what's a good route rather than following your knee jerk reaction to basing everything on chromosomal makeup.Sandstorm wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:56 amI'm ok with the science on this. I'm also ok telling the 2% that it's NOT ok for one of the minority to batter a female competitor in the boxing ring and therefore you cannot compete in the Olympics.Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 6:11 amIt's not absolutely binary. That's the science. 1-2% of people are not straightforward XX or XY.Calculon wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 2:45 am Yeah… not sure it’s really a true spectrum. You have sex M, and sex F and then some conditions that affect sexual dimorphism but these are not actually a “sex”
Life isn't always fair.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
What knee-jerk reaction? I'm agreeing with you that the science isn't 100% binary.Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:58 am
Well, boxing has fortunately taken a little bit more care to work out what's a good route rather than following your knee jerk reaction to basing everything on chromosomal makeup.

Ok, misunderstood. Thought you were saying that no one who is not standard XY should be allowed to competeSandstorm wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 10:10 amWhat knee-jerk reaction? I'm agreeing with you that the science isn't 100% binary.Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:58 am
Well, boxing has fortunately taken a little bit more care to work out what's a good route rather than following your knee jerk reaction to basing everything on chromosomal makeup.![]()
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 12:41 pmOk, misunderstood. Thought you were saying that no one who is not standard XY should be allowed to competeSandstorm wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 10:10 amWhat knee-jerk reaction? I'm agreeing with you that the science isn't 100% binary.Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 03, 2025 9:58 am
Well, boxing has fortunately taken a little bit more care to work out what's a good route rather than following your knee jerk reaction to basing everything on chromosomal makeup.![]()
