Some embarrassing stuff in there. It’s a click bait article though. The herald has comments openHong Kong wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:46 am some interesting comments from Sam and by fans, who in reality, don’t know a thing about rugby

Some embarrassing stuff in there. It’s a click bait article though. The herald has comments openHong Kong wrote: Thu Nov 19, 2020 1:46 am some interesting comments from Sam and by fans, who in reality, don’t know a thing about rugby
Where in the backline will Foster shoe horn in Jordan? My bet is 2nd five.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:35 pm Will Jordan has almost single handedly saved Foster. He’s going to have to live with that responsibility for a long time.
Jordan out.
That’s just daft. Snecky will never start at 10. He’s got fullback all but nailed down. Jordon will start at blindside.Ymx wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:49 pmWhere in the backline will Foster shoe horn in Jordan? My bet is 2nd five.ScarfaceClaw wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 12:35 pm Will Jordan has almost single handedly saved Foster. He’s going to have to live with that responsibility for a long time.
Jordan out.
10. Aaron Smith (not having any luck with current playmaker configuration)
11. B Barrett (can't drop him and not good at 10 and 15)
12. Jordan (must put him in somewhere, but need to manage the Crusader backline quota)
13. R Ioane (He will get it right soon)
14. J Barrett (It's worked so well so far, on the verge on brilliance I can tell)
15. Clark (Needs a change)
Out of position and inconsistentlyJb1981 wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:54 pm Foster will be smiling like a Cheshire Cat this morning but I haven’t seen anything to change the opinion I had at the start of his tenure and am not clear on how he wants the team to play.
Yeah the All Blacks had a good win despite Foster being at the helm, not because of it.Monkey Magic wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:52 amOut of position and inconsistentlyJb1981 wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:54 pm Foster will be smiling like a Cheshire Cat this morning but I haven’t seen anything to change the opinion I had at the start of his tenure and am not clear on how he wants the team to play.
Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 1:36 amYeah the All Blacks had a good win despite Foster being at the helm, not because of it.Monkey Magic wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 12:52 amOut of position and inconsistentlyJb1981 wrote: Sat Nov 28, 2020 11:54 pm Foster will be smiling like a Cheshire Cat this morning but I haven’t seen anything to change the opinion I had at the start of his tenure and am not clear on how he wants the team to play.
If you and your Waikato mate are happy with a P6 W 3 L2 D1 record for the season then good luck to you, because that's not the All Blacks I know.Enzedder wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 3:22 am No, I am suggesting that you are an idiot.
"despite Foster, not because of him" - he's never going to be able to win if that is your thinking. In your case, Sam Cane is spot on I feel
Daft puerile comment? If I have misjudged Ian Foster on the strength of his side's performances to date then I humbly apologise.Enzedder wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:02 am I'm not happy with Foster - never have been. I was taking you to task for your daft puerile comment.
You sound like you glory in a loss so that you can say "I told you so" - true internet warrior. In turn, I want the team to do well, including Foster.
So John Kirwan doesn't know much about rugby either?Enzedder wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:17 am Yes, but that performance did not deserve your "in spite of him" comment as well. I will stick with my description which was about you, not Foster.
Sam Cane is correct.
p.s. I am not sure it was a great performance by the team - by the forwards yes but the backs were not that good.
Why do you believe John Kirwan? He was and is a doos all his life.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:25 amSo John Kirwan doesn't know much about rugby either?Enzedder wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:17 am Yes, but that performance did not deserve your "in spite of him" comment as well. I will stick with my description which was about you, not Foster.
Sam Cane is correct.
p.s. I am not sure it was a great performance by the team - by the forwards yes but the backs were not that good.
Because he basically said the same thing.
Cane might not like to admit it, but his team isn't up to normal AB standard.
Righto, you big sack of jaapie kak.OomStruisbaai wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:55 amWhy do you believe John Kirwan? He was and is a doos all his life.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:25 amSo John Kirwan doesn't know much about rugby either?Enzedder wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:17 am Yes, but that performance did not deserve your "in spite of him" comment as well. I will stick with my description which was about you, not Foster.
Sam Cane is correct.
p.s. I am not sure it was a great performance by the team - by the forwards yes but the backs were not that good.
Because he basically said the same thing.
Cane might not like to admit it, but his team isn't up to normal AB standard.
Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 9:13 amRighto, you big sack of jaapie kak.OomStruisbaai wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:55 amWhy do you believe John Kirwan? He was and is a doos all his life.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Sun Nov 29, 2020 4:25 am
So John Kirwan doesn't know much about rugby either?
Because he basically said the same thing.
Cane might not like to admit it, but his team isn't up to normal AB standard.
Ian Foster asked Mario Ledesma after the the loss to Argentina on Saturday —”Mario I thought I had the journey planned, how did you beat me?”
“Pretty simple,” replied Mario, “I picked my players for their intelligence and asked them just one question.” “That simple?” said Foster. “Yep,” replied Mario, “pick one of my squad and see how he does.”
Ian Foster thought for a while then nominated Nicholas Sanchez. Mario called him over and asked him, “Who is the child of your father and of your mother who is not your brother and is not your sister?” “Ah simple, Mario ,” said Nicholas, “it’s me.”
“Well done, Nicholas,” said Mario, and Foster was very impressed. He returned to the hotel and wondered about the intelligence of his team. He called in Sam Cane and asked him, “Who is the child of your father and of your mother who is not your brother and is not your sister?” Sam thought and thought, and couldn’t come up with the answer. “Can I think about it a bit more Coach?—I’ll give you an answer tomorrow.”
“Of course,” said Foster, “you’ve got 24 hours. But it is very important that you come up with the answer.”
Sam went away, thinking as hard as he could, and then he called in his team-mates. Aaron Smith thought it might be his grandpa, but wasn’t sure. TJ Perenara was certain that it couldn’t be anyone. Richie Mo'unga refused to answer, in case he would be dropped for not knowing.
Akira Ioane thought it would be an uncle in Samoa who had been adopted as a child. Jordie Barrett went into the foetal position. The rest of the team wouldn’t even hazard a guess. Twenty hours later, Sam was very worried that he still had no answer with only four hours to go. Eventually Sam thought, “I know, I’ll ring Beauden Barrett —he’s bloody smart, he’ll know the answer.”
He phoned Beauden Barrett. “Beauden, tell me—who is the child of your father and of your mother who is not your brother and is not your sister?” “Very simple,” said Beauden, “It’s me.” “Of course,” said Sam, and rang Ian Foster. “Coach, I’ve got the answer—it’s Beauden Barrett!”
“No, you idiot,” said Ian Foster, “It’s Nicholas Sanchez. ”
I competed at more breakdowns in that match than Akira.Ymx wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:11 pm What a shambles.
We were no better with our handling from last week.
Our forwards were glory seekers. Saveas leadership and that try dive was telling.
We need Sam Whitelock back in captain to change the energy of our team.
Again the only player who had a good game was Jordie Barrett.
BB wtaf
I was trying to see if I could identify the pattern Foster was wanting the team to play but couldn't for the fuck of me see anything even close to resembling a pattern of play.Ymx wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:11 pm What a shambles.
We were no better with our handling from last week.
Our forwards were glory seekers. Saveas leadership and that try dive was telling.
We need Sam Whitelock back in captain to change the energy of our team.
Again the only player who had a good game was Jordie Barrett.
BB wtaf
I guess we won more than 50% if you mean glass half full.Gumboot wrote: Sat Oct 02, 2021 12:53 pm Have to defend Fozzie here, the Boks were very smart and the officials were complete shit. It's a rite of passage for new All Blacks coaches to lose ugly to them, not the end of the road. This has been a much better sophomore year than I expected, so far. Glass half full, imho.