GogLais wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 2:49 pm
Longshanks wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:47 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: Fri Dec 04, 2020 12:25 pm
You say the bit about an EU court ruling over the Uk in the future as if that’s totally reasonable.... it isn’t it’s not part of any trade agreement anywhere in the world. It cannot be signed as it would tie a future parliaments hands literally.
No leader could / should survive that.
It looks like the EU have dropped the demand that ECJ is involved in disputes. Redress through the UK courts for EU
I was going to say that bigger and better minds than mine will have thought about this but why couldn’t a new UK/EU court be set up to deal with trade issues?
Because both sides have great legal systems anyway. This was a bit about keeping control on the UK, the EU are nervous about its departure.
Boris still insisting that no ground will be given on UK taking control of its waters. But of more significance is the fact that the controversial clauses in the IMB removed by the Lords, are going back in.
Coveney said that EU will not sign off a deal if they are still there.
Markets think there will be a deal though