President Trump and US politics catchall

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4599
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

I see the next step is the Insurrection Act, "Marshall Law" and "succession" from the USA to form the Red States of Rasciststan.

And Trump refused to attend his own Christmas party. What a fucking baby.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
If they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.

This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8752
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
If they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.

This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.

It was quashed in, "no uncertain terms".

If there was any shred of validity in the claims; they would have taken the cases in the States they claimed there was illegality; but there isn't so they couldn't. So instead they went to one of the most corrupt States there is & cobbled together with a mixture of lies & graft, a bullshit case that SCOTUS said didn't even warrant their consideration.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8752
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
It wasn't overturned because of a technicality. The court found that there was no case; because there was no injury. That's effectively what the court saying the States had no standing means.

It's like me making a complaint about a theft, when I wasn't either of the parties involved, & in fact, the both parties were happy with the exchange.

The thick fucks who support this farce will feel aggrieved regardless, so it's pointless to think otherwise.
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.
User avatar
Ata Rangi
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:54 am

Fish was close enough.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8752
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Image

There have to be consequences from all this shit; it can't just be a one way bet to pander to the orange arsehole, & try and keep sweet with his, "base"
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4940
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
If they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.

This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
It doesn't matter what they do. The dumb Fuchs who believe the conspiracy theory will believe that no matter what.
Slick
Posts: 13285
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:11 pm Image

There have to be consequences from all this shit; it can't just be a one way bet to pander to the orange arsehole, & try and keep sweet with his, "base"
I like this
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4940
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8752
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
No Government should ever, not enforce a Nations Laws because of a tiny number of nutters who threaten to break those Laws.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4940
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.

Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
User avatar
Ata Rangi
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:54 am

Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Yep. Threatening to use a narrow majority to attempt to deprive electors of the services of their duly elected Article 1 Representatives for supporting the resolution of a Constitutional issue relating to the election of the Article 2 by the relevant Article 3 body. Sounds grand.
Slick
Posts: 13285
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
Can you just read one trustworthy news source before posting in future?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 4030
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
I think that this is a con is closer to the mark.
I drink and I forget things.
User avatar
Ted.
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:54 pm
Location: Aotearoa

fishfoodie wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:28 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
If they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.

This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.

It was quashed in, "no uncertain terms".

If there was any shred of validity in the claims; they would have taken the cases in the States they claimed there was illegality; but there isn't so they couldn't. So instead they went to one of the most corrupt States there is & cobbled together with a mixture of lies & graft, a bullshit case that SCOTUS said didn't even warrant their consideration.
Precisely.

IMO, that SCOTUS will not get involved in a political bunfight is a good thing.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.
Anyone can fall off a horse.

If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
User avatar
Ted.
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:54 pm
Location: Aotearoa

Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.

Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
Lawlessness is you solution to lawlessness. That'll work.
User avatar
Ted.
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:54 pm
Location: Aotearoa

Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 am
GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.

This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.

The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.
Anyone can fall off a horse.

If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
You are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 am
Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Jimmy Smallsteps
Posts: 914
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
Location: Auckland

Gumboot wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 3:26 am
Flockwitt wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:57 am This one is good enough to be shared cross-boreds.

https://twitter.com/PaulLeeTeeks/status ... 5464263681
:lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 am
Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
I feel that to some extent but if there has to be a superpower in the world, I prefer the USA to some of the other candidates.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Ted. wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:36 am
Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 am
GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pm

If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.
Anyone can fall off a horse.

If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
You are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.
I'm saying that this was an attempted coup.
User avatar
Ted.
Posts: 653
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:54 pm
Location: Aotearoa

Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 9:55 am
Ted. wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:36 am
Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 am

Anyone can fall off a horse.

If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
You are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.
I'm saying that this was an attempted coup.
Yes. The courts loaded with shonky lawyers, trying to politicise those very same courts, being the weapon of choice.

If you want a political solution, look at Congress, not the courts - which IMO are politicised enough in the US without wishing to make them more so. That's a very greasy slope.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 am
Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.
Mehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:06 am
Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 am
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.
Mehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.
When the Western roman empire collapsed Europe entered the dark ages.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Glaston
Posts: 484
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:35 am

How is Biden/Harris Time magaxine "Person's of the Year"?
Seriously, win an election against a twat and you are person of the year, thats a low bar for winning,
User avatar
Kiwias
Posts: 7402
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 1:44 am

Glaston wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:49 am How is Biden/Harris Time magaxine "Person's of the Year"?
Seriously, win an election against a twat and you are person of the year, thats a low bar for winning,
How do you rate it in comparison with Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize?
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:17 am
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:06 am
Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 am

Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.
Mehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.
When the Western roman empire collapsed Europe entered the dark ages.
Irony being that amongst the causes oft cited for the commencing of the dark ages was the rejection of reason: at least partly driven by religious nuts :think:
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 10127
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11960
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

JM2K6 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:13 pm Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
That is a very long and contentious debate. I guess it depends on whether we are talking of absence of info or suggesting that "barbarians" really were any such thing culturally.
User avatar
MungoMan
Posts: 487
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:53 pm
Location: Coalfalls

JM2K6 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:13 pm Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
True. Pasty fucks filled all the starring roles.
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:13 pm Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
That’s not so much a new thread as a whole new board.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4940
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:13 pm Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
Exactly. Western Roman Empire was rotten to the core anyway.
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:01 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 12:13 pm Tbf the dark ages weren't what the name suggests
Exactly. Western Roman Empire was rotten to the core anyway.
Hang on, there might be a connection there. Give me a minute to think about it.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Fangle
Posts: 567
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.

Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
I really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Fangle wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:44 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.

Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
I really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.
I know it's a bit like this bloke on the pub told me but I heard/read of a poll a week or so ago that reckoned 70% of Republicans thought they'd been cheated.
Biffer
Posts: 10039
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

GogLais wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 2:04 pm
Fangle wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:44 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.

Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
I really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.
I know it's a bit like this bloke on the pub told me but I heard/read of a poll a week or so ago that reckoned 70% of Republicans thought they'd been cheated.
So given about 29% of registered voters are republican, and there’s something like 160 million registered voters, that’s about 32.5 million people. About 10% of the population.

Always have to watch how stats are presented.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Post Reply