President Trump and US politics catchall
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4599
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I see the next step is the Insurrection Act, "Marshall Law" and "succession" from the USA to form the Red States of Rasciststan.
And Trump refused to attend his own Christmas party. What a fucking baby.
And Trump refused to attend his own Christmas party. What a fucking baby.
If they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pmIf they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
It was quashed in, "no uncertain terms".
If there was any shred of validity in the claims; they would have taken the cases in the States they claimed there was illegality; but there isn't so they couldn't. So instead they went to one of the most corrupt States there is & cobbled together with a mixture of lies & graft, a bullshit case that SCOTUS said didn't even warrant their consideration.
Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It wasn't overturned because of a technicality. The court found that there was no case; because there was no injury. That's effectively what the court saying the States had no standing means.Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
It's like me making a complaint about a theft, when I wasn't either of the parties involved, & in fact, the both parties were happy with the exchange.
The thick fucks who support this farce will feel aggrieved regardless, so it's pointless to think otherwise.
If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
There have to be consequences from all this shit; it can't just be a one way bet to pander to the orange arsehole, & try and keep sweet with his, "base"
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
It doesn't matter what they do. The dumb Fuchs who believe the conspiracy theory will believe that no matter what.Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pmIf they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
I like thisfishfoodie wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:11 pm
There have to be consequences from all this shit; it can't just be a one way bet to pander to the orange arsehole, & try and keep sweet with his, "base"
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8752
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
No Government should ever, not enforce a Nations Laws because of a tiny number of nutters who threaten to break those Laws.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
Yep. Threatening to use a narrow majority to attempt to deprive electors of the services of their duly elected Article 1 Representatives for supporting the resolution of a Constitutional issue relating to the election of the Article 2 by the relevant Article 3 body. Sounds grand.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Can you just read one trustworthy news source before posting in future?Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Precisely.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:28 pmRinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:44 pmIf they were serious about defending their democracy, it would have been quashed in no uncertain terms.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 1:11 pm Not having standing to bring a case, and obviously not having having that, is more than a procedural misstep. There's a reason the only lawyer willing to sign it is a crazy old racist birther.
This way they allow those that backed this action justification for doing so.
It was quashed in, "no uncertain terms".
If there was any shred of validity in the claims; they would have taken the cases in the States they claimed there was illegality; but there isn't so they couldn't. So instead they went to one of the most corrupt States there is & cobbled together with a mixture of lies & graft, a bullshit case that SCOTUS said didn't even warrant their consideration.
IMO, that SCOTUS will not get involved in a political bunfight is a good thing.
Anyone can fall off a horse.GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pmIf it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
Lawlessness is you solution to lawlessness. That'll work.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
You are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 amAnyone can fall off a horse.GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pmIf it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.Rinkals wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 4:29 pm Well, it looks to me like it was overturned on a technicality.
This gives the backers who brought this to court justification and gives the impression that the case might have been upheld if the process had been followed properly.
The fact is that this was nothing less than an attempted coup and it should have been treated as such.
If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 amPart of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
- Jimmy Smallsteps
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
- Location: Auckland
Gumboot wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 3:26 amFlockwitt wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 2:57 am This one is good enough to be shared cross-boreds.
https://twitter.com/PaulLeeTeeks/status ... 5464263681![]()



I feel that to some extent but if there has to be a superpower in the world, I prefer the USA to some of the other candidates.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 amPart of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
I'm saying that this was an attempted coup.Ted. wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:36 amYou are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 amAnyone can fall off a horse.GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 5:27 pm
If it’s fallen at the first the SCOTUS doesn’t have to let the jockey remount. I hope that’s an appropriate analogy.
If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
Yes. The courts loaded with shonky lawyers, trying to politicise those very same courts, being the weapon of choice.Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 9:55 amI'm saying that this was an attempted coup.Ted. wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:36 amYou are missing the point, Rinkals. Miss it by a huge margin too.Rinkals wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:19 am
Anyone can fall off a horse.
If it was a hopeless nag with zero chance of winning and the reason it fell down dead is that you'd overdosed it with viagra, then that would surely be a crime and should be treated as such.
If you want a political solution, look at Congress, not the courts - which IMO are politicised enough in the US without wishing to make them more so. That's a very greasy slope.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Mehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 amShit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 amPart of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:39 pm Trouble is that the militia types will use stuff line that as "proof" of how they are being opposed and their casus belli for initiating armed conflict.
When the Western roman empire collapsed Europe entered the dark ages.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:06 amMehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 amShit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:08 am
Part of me thinks if yanks want to blow each other to hell, good luck.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
How do you rate it in comparison with Obama getting the Nobel Peace Prize?Glaston wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:49 am How is Biden/Harris Time magaxine "Person's of the Year"?
Seriously, win an election against a twat and you are person of the year, thats a low bar for winning,
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Irony being that amongst the causes oft cited for the commencing of the dark ages was the rejection of reason: at least partly driven by religious nutsBiffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:17 amWhen the Western roman empire collapsed Europe entered the dark ages.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:06 amMehh. Not convinced of that. Smells of usual pattern or decline and death of an empire. Just Rome with 1/100th of the culture and contribution to the world.Biffer wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:58 am
Shit take though. They'd take the rest of us with them one way or another.

- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11960
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
That is a very long and contentious debate. I guess it depends on whether we are talking of absence of info or suggesting that "barbarians" really were any such thing culturally.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Exactly. Western Roman Empire was rotten to the core anyway.
Hang on, there might be a connection there. Give me a minute to think about it.Uncle fester wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:01 pmExactly. Western Roman Empire was rotten to the core anyway.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
I know it's a bit like this bloke on the pub told me but I heard/read of a poll a week or so ago that reckoned 70% of Republicans thought they'd been cheated.Fangle wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:44 pmI really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
So given about 29% of registered voters are republican, and there’s something like 160 million registered voters, that’s about 32.5 million people. About 10% of the population.GogLais wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 2:04 pmI know it's a bit like this bloke on the pub told me but I heard/read of a poll a week or so ago that reckoned 70% of Republicans thought they'd been cheated.Fangle wrote: Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:44 pmI really doubt that it’s most Republicans. I would suggest a loud small minority. The rest want to get on with life, and maybe think of the midterm elections to take control of congress.Uncle fester wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 6:54 pm With most Republicans believing the election was dodgy and the armaments stocked by the general population, I'd be thinking realpolitik and try to defuse the situation.
Look at Spanish civil war and how it started to see how things can get out of hand very quickly.
Always have to watch how stats are presented.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?